BANGOR, Maine — A new law geared to save taxpayers millions of dollars by placing a 24-month lifetime cap on state funding for MaineCare patients using methadone to treat their opiate addiction goes into effect Jan. 1.
The proposed policy rules to implement the law are under review by the Maine attorney general’s office, according to Department of Health and Human Services spokesman John Martins. They are expected to be signed by DHHS Commissioner Mary Mayhew this week, he said Wednesday.
The rules, which eliminate a controversial retroactive clause that was part of the law, will not be released until they are final, Martins said.
“There is still a two-year lifetime restriction, but it starts Jan. 1,” said Dr. Kevin Flanigan, medical director of MaineCare Services.
“It’s a soft cap,” Dr. Vijay Amarendran, a psychiatrist at The Acadia Hospital in Bangor, said last week. “There are exceptions, if it is medically prescribed.”
MaineCare recipients who are not approved for additional time after 2014 can continue to receive methadone maintenance treatment, but the state will no longer pay for it.
There are 4,760 drug-addicted Mainers receiving methadone maintenance treatment to fight opiate addiction, and 3,119 of those — more than 65 percent — are on public assistance under MaineCare, the Medicare program for the state, Martins said.
The state spent about $9 million for methadone treatment in 2010 and another $7 million to take patients to clinics, Martins said. Maine is expected to save $1.36 million over the next two years for the cost of providers, mental health services and the Office of Substance Abuse. Other costs, such as transportation, also might see reductions, Martins said.
“As we do not know how many patients will still be receiving methadone treatment in 2015, or what the final prior authorization rules will be, it is difficult to estimate savings at this point in time,” he said.
In recent years, more and more Maine residents have overdosed on diverted painkillers, most of the time mixed with alcohol or another drug, and the number of pharmacy robberies, which were nonexistent just a few years ago, has jumped to more than one a week in 2012.
The number of Maine residents seeking treatment for prescription drug abuse also tops the nation, according to a federal Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services report in 2011. The rate has risen steadily from 28 per 100,000 residents in 1998 to 386 admissions per 100,000 residents in 2008, the report said.
State lawmakers considered a controversial bill last spring to create a retroactive two-year cap on MaineCare payments for methadone treatment, but it eventually died in the Senate.
But the bill then was quietly slipped into the supplemental budget for the Department of Health and Human Services and became law when signed by Gov. Paul LePage in May.
Since then — and without any publicized debate — Flanigan, members of the Office of Substance Abuse, methadone and suboxone treatment providers, and others have been crafting rules that will govern implementation of the new law.
“There was a lot of anxiety out there” during the legislative debate, Flanigan said. “[The drug treatment legislation] was passed as part of the Department of Health and Human Services’ supplemental budget and it got lost in the mix.”
The fact that the draft statute was placed in the supplemental budget “gave us time” to work on the rules without public debate, he said of the working group tasked with writing the policy rules.
More than one methadone clinic operator said the legislative changes earlier this year were made for budgetary reasons without input from those who deal with drug addicts, many of whom have been on drug-replacement opioid therapy for years.
“We’re extremely nervous,” Kelly Kenney, director of outpatient services at The Acadia Hospital in Bangor, said last week in response to questions about the new drug treatment rules. “The state made the decision months ago and said, ‘Suck it up.’”
“It created a lot of anxiety,” Susan Sullivan, program director for Westbrook’s CAP Quality Care, the second largest opiate treatment program in Maine, said last week of the drug treatment legislation.
She said legislators made the changes because “Maine has a huge opiate problem and it costs a lot of money.”
“They are MaineCare rules promulgated by legislators against any evidence-based practices,” Dr. Joseph Py, corporate medical director for Discovery House, which has clinics in Bangor, South Portland, Calais and Waterville, said last week.
No one in favor of the changes testified before legislators about the drug treatment changes when the DHHS supplemental budget was passed, he said, adding, “We’re stuck with it, so we have to do it.”
That is one reason Py eagerly worked with Flanigan on the proposed rules.
“Kevin Flanigan has been very open-minded about what should be created,” Py said, adding that he was “encouraged by the process.”
The Discovery House clinics service about 1,500 addicted Mainers, and “85 percent of our folks in methadone treatment are on MaineCare,” he said.
CAP Quality Care serves 480 patients and about 70 percent are on MaineCare, Sullivan said. “A fair number” of patients have received treatment for more than two years, she said. Acadia serves between 650 to 700 patients every month, with about 60 percent on MaineCare. The number of patients at Acadia in methadone maintenance treatment for two years or more was not available Thursday.
Methadone patients also are worried about what the changes will mean.
“I think it’s a tragedy, quite frankly,” Joey Bonaddio, no address provided, said last week shortly after getting his daily dose of the cherry-flavored liquid painkiller at the Discovery House in Bangor, one of nine methadone clinics in the state. “The government, the state, needs to take a much bigger look into it. The people who come here need to be here.”
The changes would not affect him because he’s not on MaineCare, but they are a concern when weighing the consequences, he said.
“Would they like to see those people on the street buying meds or stealing from pharmacies — possibly hurting the public — or coming here for controlled treatment?” Bonaddio said. “I think it’s going to create a lot of problems.”
Breaking free of opiate addiction is the reason Millinocket resident Kyle Bellfleur, a MaineCare recipient, travels 134 miles every day for his methadone treatment. He said it has been a struggle but he is making progress and is trying to reduce the amount of methadone he takes.
“I’ve been at a high dose for so long my taper is about 5 milligrams every week or so,” he said, referring to the amount his dose is being reduced. “It’s going to be another six or seven months. I’ll be here till springtime.”
The methadone legislation mirrors prior restrictions placed on suboxone, another common opiate replacement drug for addicts in treatment. The suboxone rules and others covering opioid pain management also were strengthened as part of the DHHS supplemental budget, Flanigan said.
“In the Legislature, it’s safe to say, there was a three-prong approach to opioids,” he said, referring to methadone, suboxone and opioid pain management changes.
The new rules for suboxone, which is administered through a doctor’s office, place a 24-month retroactive cap for those on MaineCare, he said.
Suboxone patients on public assistance who want to continue to use the opioid replacement beyond the two years must get approval from DHHS “prior to the expiration of the 24th month of coverage” in order to continue, the new law states.
There are 2,875 people taking suboxone in Maine, Martins said. How many are MaineCare patients was not available Thursday because state offices were closed due to the snowstorm.
The new opioid pain management limits require a second opinion for many long-term patients — those taking painkillers such as oxycodone for more than six months — and require MaineCare patients to try other treatments, the proposed rules state.
In addition to the new drug treatment regulations, DHHS on April 1 reduced payments for MaineCare patients attending methadone clinics from $70 to $60 per week.
That was a tough pill to swallow, because some clinics operate in the red, Sullivan said.
“It does add an increased burden for clinics that are not adequately reimbursed for the services we offer,” she said. “I think all the clinics experienced staff reductions.”
With weekly costs averaging around $115 per patient, methadone clinics offer more services than state and federal funds pay for, according Py.
At the same time the payment reduction was put into place, the state also granted a number of waivers that reduce the number of federally required services methadone clinics must offer, Sullivan said.
Reducing the number of drug screens from one per month to eight a year, changing from one-on-one counseling to group therapy, and increasing a counselor’s caseload from 50 to 150 patients are among the waivers, she said.
“It’s not the same quality of services,” Sullivan said. “The quality of services provided to patients has been significantly reduced.”
Every $1 invested in treatment reduces drug-related crime and criminal justice costs by at least $4, according to a recent study by the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
“Recovery support is necessary to help recovery be successful,” Guy Cousins, director of the Office of Substance Abuse, said in a 2009 presentation titled “An Integrated Approach to Prescription Abuse in Maine.”
When Karen Simone, director of the Northern New England Poison Center, heard that services were being cut at methadone clinics, she was not impressed.
“That is the worst thing you can possible do,” said Simone, who tracks drug overdose deaths and other poisonings in Maine. “I understand you have a budget crisis, [but] there are expenses right now and expenses next week and next year. Just giving someone a drug is not going to work.”
Recovering drug addicts need services and support from a wide variety of sources — healthy friendships, counselors, family members, community-based groups and employers, for example — in order to be successful, according to Cousins.
While some patients have been on methadone maintenance treatment for years, the new law and two-year cap were created based on federal guidelines and established best practices, Flanigan said.
“The average length of time for all receiving methadone treatment is 508 days (1.4 years),” Martins said in an email. “The average length of stay for clients who were deemed successful in completing treatment was 852 days (2.3 years).”
What the new law will do is push addicts and providers to seek out alternative treatments to methadone and suboxone, according to Flanigan and Py.
“It’s really going to force that conversation,” Flanigan said.
“It kind of forces you, as a prescriber, to offer alternative forms of treatment for patients,” Py said. “We have to be more creative.”



Two years is more than enough time to get off of any substance. either it will work or it won’t for the person. quite frankly enough is enough.
Agree. We also pay them for transport to clinics and home. Way too much money for way too many years in the past.
Seniors can’t get free ride to and from home except to the doc they cut programbecause of short funds yet kids with 2 good legs get rides
i agree green, but, how about 2 month’s. it’s not my issue if you have a drug problem, it’s yours… (that’s not directed to you btw)
LOL, I gotcha. I did have a nasty cigarette habit that I quit last year though.
Good for you!
It will become your issue when someone who is addicted to drugs breaks into your home to steal in order to feed their habit. If you look at the big picture you will see that this is everyone’s problem.
When you can spend $1 on treatment and get $4 in return, that is a good way to prevent future problems. Instead of funding programs that actually work we are cutting these and providing funding to the endless money pits (grants, redundant govt jobs, etc). What most do not understand is that someone who is in a methadone maintenance program is not out getting drugs on the street and leading a life of crime to support their addiction.
Why are we cutting these programs when it is clear that Maine has a huge problem that is only getting worse? We have more people (per capita) addicted to opiates than any other state in the nation and we decide that cutting services to help these folks recover is a good idea??? I’m speechless and we wonder why our state is such a backwards f’d up mess.
If someone breaks into my home to steal anything, they are going to have a much bigger problem than drugs. In fact, they probably won’t need any drugs again.
i agree,, it then becomes the coroners issue,, not mine!
An you could end up in prison for life to ?
The problem is that the majority of these “addicts” embellish their habits. Show me the significant crime drop after these people are treated and no longer have to committ crimes to support their addictions. For there to be such a large percentage of opiate addicts in the Bangor area there would have been a precedent setting crime rate and there wasn’t. Bangor would have shoot outs and armed robberies on a daily basis. When will someone educate the public to understand that the majority of these patients are pathetic Axis 2 Personality Disorders who are dependent on society to meet their needs and we willingly oblige. Think about it. We provide housing, food allowances, disability checks, transportation to and from getting their drugs, childcare, welfare and a Diagnosis to make it all legit. Why not try helping out a Senior Citizen or a Military Vet, someone who has actually sacrificed for the good of our country. Methadone Clinics are paid for by the state which is the foundation of their existence. Do you honestly believe that if all clinics were shut down tomorrow that the State of Maine would suddenly be thrust into a society of murder and mayhem? By whom? Remember as I’ve previously stated these people have no money, transportation, or the intelligence to act on their own. Suddenly they would become an organized crime outfit? Methadone Clinics are a business that have identified a group of individuals that they are allowed to turn into slaves for profit with all our tax money. The legitimate reason for prescribing Methadone is for long term pain control. Wake Up People!
People say that the crime rate is cause by the CASINO not drugs ?
i have a family member who suffers with dual diagnosis. Bipolar with extreme addiction. After years of going to Alanon to learn how to cope, how to help, I have come to the conclusion that there are simply no facilities to help, at least none that are even remotely affordable for working people, What this family member needs is years of relearning, the ONLY facility available is jail.
and you want to know the truth, I began to make peace with that. to actually pray he would get arrested so he would: get sober. be sober.
addiction is horrible, i have no answers other than “if the addict doesn’t want to change there is nothing short of jail that we can do about it.”
therefore, I don’t support methadone. Let Go. Let God.
“someone who is in a methadone maintenance program is not out getting drugs on the street and leading a life of crime to support their addiction.” This is just not true.
Sounds like legal extortion to me. Do this for me or I will do this TO you. Got it, thanks for clearing this up for us.
no one needs to have opiates replaced for LIFE. the idea is to wean off. two years is a generous amount of time to do this. if they do not want to, they are free to PAY FOR IT themselves.
Show me a single piece of evidence from any source that shows that taking methadone away from opiate addicts after two years benefits society in any meaningful way. We’re going to see a jump in crime rates as we find untreated opiate addicts wandering around trying to score, and pay for, a fix.
Thats all right we have jail cells and that will cure their methadone habit if they stay their long enough.
It is easier to get drugs in a prison then outside of one.
And what did we do prior to the clinics opening in the first place? Crime rate was much lower then.
Statisitics to support please………
You libs just love to cling to statistics. Too bad most of them that you pay attention to are flawed.
Im not a lib. I do remain objective. So stop flapping your gums and provide some data to support your argument.
Where were the robberies of pharmacies every week that we have now?
It was called cold turkey..
Good lord almighty, That is so backwards it’s scary. This program was put in place to help get them off, not keep them on! OMG.
Its not being taken away. Its not longer going to be paid for by the state after two years. They can find a way to pay for it and have it illegally then why cant they pay for it out of the pockets legally?
Continuing to fund an individual’s methadone treatment is solving nothing, it’s putting a thumb in the dyke. And saying that by discontinuing methadone treatment will result in a jump in crime rates, while possibly true, is saying you condone legal blackmail. “We’ll give you drugs if you don’t commit any crimes.” It doesn’t work. Frankly I don’t understand why they are allowing two years and not one. People are going to quit or they are not going to quit. If I smoked cigarettes and had to quit, if asked if I wanted one year or two years for a deadline, I would likely choose two years. And after one year and eleven months, I would still be smoking as much as ever.
“Frankly I don’t understand why they are allowing two years and not one. People are going to quit or they are not going to quit.”
Do you think that they just arbitrarily picked 2 years because it was an even number? The reason they chose the 2 year limit is because medical research has shown that those who are in a methadone maintenance program for at least 2 years are the patients who had the highest rates of staying sober for good. Putting an arbitrary limit of one year would be, in your words, similar to putting a thumb in the dyke.
Methadone works by repairing the brain, over time it slowly reduces the number of opioid receptors. Numerous medical studies have shown that it takes upwards of 2 years for this process to take place. Once the opioid receptors are significantly reduced an individual can slowly get off from methadone.
Anyone who tries to go “cold turkey” is almost guaranteed to relapse within a month. Research shows that something like 95% of those who try to quit “cold turkey” relapse within a month or two. The research I am referring to is from the Harvard medical journal and other respected, peer reviewed medical publications.
Methadone does not repair the brain.
It works because it stays in the body longer, therefor easing the withdrawal symptoms.
It’s basicly the same as any other opiate except that the effects last longer.
The best thing oboma has done is sell guns. Let the druggies try to score.
Sounds like a Zombie Apocalypse. Maybe parents should start raising their kids instead of letting them raise themselves.
There is addiction in my family. It is very, very painful.
After years of going to Alanon, I have learned to “Let go, Let God”. I am not a Christian, so I read those words to mean: don’t enable. it’s okay to have compassion for an addict, but don’t enable them.
Taking the methadone away is going to be harder on the enablers than it is on the addicts. Trust me,
Good for you! My hat is off to you.
Show me evidence that crime has dropped since we became the drug pusher and supplier for these addicts. This is a waste of our money and the people making money off us never let the addict off the program.
Two weeks is more than enough.
No matter what, it makes no sense that existing clients get the whole 2 years more..
do you feel the same way about recipients of insulin? how about cholesterol medication? I mean, shouldn’t “those people” be able to get their act together in two years also? with diet, exercise, weight loss programs, etc? (if only life was truly as simple as you see it)
Apples to oranges. Get real. Show me one person who has died from not getting their fix.
There are thousands who have died from not getting their fix. They go to extreme measures such as robbing pharmacies or individuals and then get shot in the process. They also hurt others in the process because their mind is not working correctly, since the opiates have completely altered their brain chemistry. I would much rather pay for methadone treatment for those who are addicted than have to pay hundreds of times more to house them in prison when they ultimately commit a crime to feed their addiction.
Then the problem will be self limiting if they’re likely to die without their fixes or by getting shot while committing robberies.
You don’t see at all.
I agree. However I think an exception should be for a cancer patient that needs the methadone for pain management. If the primary treatment is for drug addiction then yes the two year cap should be implemented.
Give them $0, and put them in solitary confinement until the chemicals are out of their abused bodies.
That might kill them.
Good news for Maine budgets. About time this endless drug abuse program was cut to reasonable.
So it really won’t save money for another 2 years or more. I expect a dem will be in Augusta by then, bet he/she uses reduced expenses as a dem plan.
This is long overdue. I have sympathy for those with addictions who want to seek help, but we cannot hemorrhage money this way. Opponents to this believe we are providing safe drugs for people and then, after 2 years, they will be cast into the streets to find dirty needles, etc. They miss the point. The point is that in two years’ time, no one should need or want the drugs. If you can’t get clean in two years, you don’t want to be clean.
The mission of these programs needs to be to clean people up. Not provide them with free drugs forever and not to cast them into the streets as addicts.
I, for one, am glad to see this change take place. It is a step in the right direction for Maine.
Free room and board, free drugs, free food, free phones what a great place to live Maine is.
Lots of pros and cons here to consider for the short term, though long term, getting docs to stop over prescribing the highly addictive painkillers is a must.
“It kind of forces you, as a prescriber, to offer alternative forms of
treatment for patients,” Py said. “We have to be more creative.”
You got it doc.
Methodone is BIG business for the clinics and hospitals that offer it. The government gives them money to administer it. Therefore, since they have a profit incentive, their “opinions” about it should not be taken into account. In my opinion, Methodone is another narcotic that should be outlawed. It simply allows addict to trade one drug for another and, since most of those on Methodone are on welfare, clearly it’s not working!
Lets do the same thing for food stamps / welfare.
Right – because we all want to see more hungry/malnourished kids, right Bradford?
Never said anything about starving kids…just sick of stupid welfare cases selling food stamps for cash, buying crap that they don’t need….popping out 3-4-5 kids getting a grand a month in food stamps….that’s why they need to be put on a limit…way to many people are depending on free handouts, hence the governor doing what he is doing. Im going to go eat my cheese and crackers, maybe you should go sell your food stamps, and get some prescribed heroin….Bangorian.
Is it me? Or, do you guys always seem to describe the same woman every time you spew out a vile rant about welfare. She has 10 kids, she weighs 500 pounds, and she only buys lobster in front of you and no one else with her EBT card. She drives to her 10 different P.O. boxes in her Rolls Royce to pick up her checks from 10 different daddies. She spends $10,000 a month on fireworks and weed.
i lost my job years ago, started to collect unemployment, and food stamps! i did not need the money, i could have got by with what i had, but that was the easy, stress free way. when i went to fill out my food stamp paperwork, they advised me to go to the town office for renters assistance; which i did, and got money for rent. im not proud i did that and yes it did help, but my point is i was getting unemployment (around 200/week), food stamps (150/month), and rent money (700/month)! thats just crazy to me…i knew someone with one child getting around 300/month food stamps, 50/month for rent in cape hart, and collected unemployment for over 2 years! i dont associate with this person anymore but he could still be collecting?
Says something about you that just because someone has a compassionate bone in his body that you ascribe to him things that are not true….food stamps, heroin And so what if he was on food stamps for his family!
The point of my 2 statements I did make are this….Maine has a welfare fraud problem…if you are not aware of that, then you really need to open your eyes and not be so blind. I am all for helping people who need help…but not for 10 years…not for an endless amount of time. Unemployment has a cap…now prescribed heroin has a cap…why can’t food stamps / welfare / mainecare? I pay 20 dollars a week just in Medicare taxes…Money that goes to people who screw the system. I would be more than happy to pay that 20 dollars, hell I’d pay 40 a week…if I knew it actually went to good people…but it doesn’t, and it’s a shame because of the people that actually do need the help. Not these welfare cases that just want free handouts.
How many of these cases have you seen? Because most of what you are talking about is myth, you think you see something because of the grapevine stories out there.
Anecdotal at best. You think you see something you aren’t seeing.
TANF has a cap of five years and it does not start anew with each child. A person does not get ‘paid’ per child, there is a limit on that also, so you aren’t seeing the whole picture.
More payees and guardians needed if people want to spend their entitlements incorrectly.
You don’t really know much about food stamps, do you?
i’ve thought long and hard about this bradford, and for me, there is only one question, and only one answer.
THE question: Sure the adults are a bunch of losers, but what does a moral society do with the kids?
the ONLY answer: More good people, like you and your family, need to open their homes as adoptive and foster parents.
until more families do that, we will continue to have this problem.
I have thought of doing that…I honestly have, but the reason I can’t and won’t…is I can barely afford to feed myself and my cats and my dog…therefore, I know it’s not smart for me to have a child, so I won’t. You’re right though, a lot of adults are a bunch of losers…and the kids don’t deserve to suffer. I don’t know what the solution is….but if people weren’t so dependent on free handouts…I’m sure that they would find a way to live. I know I do, I know you do…whenever there is a problem, you have to find a solution….free handouts is not the solution.
i agree, handouts are not the solution.
we just need to realize what we’re doing; who is involved. children born to these people did not have a choice. are we ready to call poverty a crime? because rich addicts have access to treatment, it is the poor addicts we’re talking about.
alas. i honestly don’t know either. take care. off to work i go.
Foster care doesn’t work for the great majority of children. Adoption (at a young age) has a better record but is not perfect either.
almost 50% of all incarcerated individuals spent time in foster care. more than 65% of foster children will spend adult time in jail, a homeless shelter, or a mental health facility.
We have got to do better than that.
sadly, sadly. that is probably why the state works so hard to keep families together, even dysfunctional families.
we do have to do better, but we’re not going to. there’s a fiscal cliff, we’re not going to increase services any time soon. i honestly don’t have a problem with that. supporting addiction is what Alanon tells you NOT to do.
You’re starting to talk me into being a democrat elitist progressive eugenicist like those in the ’20’s !
…and you actually believe the funds go toward the feeding of children when the administrator of the funds is a junkie?
we can’t get more aggressive about removing children from the homes until there are foster families for every foster child. right now, there are far more children needing good homes than Mainers who open their homes.
none of this is going to stop until good people open their homes to Maine’s neediest children.
Better than “removing children” is to use funds to supply “home care workers’ who teach parenting, monitor nutrition. and assess jeopardy.
Costs less than foster care and is far more productive.
These young people need to learn how to run a home, all aspects of keeping a home.
Removing children from homes is not the answer.
what is the answer?
Here are some foodstamp facts from the Dept of Agriculture….
Who gets food stamps?
The most recent Department of Agriculture report on the general characteristics of the SNAP program’s beneficiaries says that in the fiscal year that ended Sept. 30, 2010:
••47% of beneficiaries were children under age 18.
••8% were age 60 or older.
••41% lived in a household with earnings from a job — the so-called “working poor.”
••The average household received a monthly benefit of $287.
••36% were white (non-Hispanic), 22% were African American (non-Hispanic) and 10% were Hispanic. [USA Today, 1/18/12, emphasis original]
You really should get the facts before you spew your hatred…..
God forbid if you lefties didn’t have your statistics to cling to.
So what you are saying is who needs facts??
Yes, Commie etc., stop making these logical fact-based arguments! I want to be able to cling to my irrational superstitions.
Statistics are manipulated facts. You put in a couple things here, leave out a couple things there, don’t mention this and only count that and you have Liberal statistics.
what are you clinging to? denial for the sake of denial?
apparently, now, “leftie” isn’t someone with a ideology, it is someone who uses information before forming an opinion.
what does that say about ‘righties’? that conservatives don’t read?
think about what you are saying…it’s ridiculous.
These stats mean nothing.
That comment means even less
because???
so provide some stats that do mean something, or are you just against people who form their opinions on information?
While I do not care about statistics, the Department of agriculture administers the food stamp program, and before severing it, you should know who truly benefits.
Lettuce would cost double what it does now, and dairy products would cost 25% more without the stability that the food stamp program brings to the farmer.
I am not one to support one drug to replace another, unless it is natural. Maybe they should hit weight rooms if they are so into their opiates?
Maybe that could be one of the services, but then again, who will pay for the weight room???
What amazes me is they can drive away after.I don’t get it, what if they have kids in the car or hit someone else.Are the clinics libel.A bar would be for alcohol.
If the dose is therapeutic the client won’t have any trouble driving or living a normal life.
Unfortunately, it will be a “wait-and-see” what happens to the crime rate in Maine. Taking away something these people have been prescribed for years, instead of making cutbacks…it’s gonna make a big mess. Instead of first eliminating paying transportation to clinics. Why is it the State’s job to pay for them to get there?
Because if we don’t pay for them to get to the clinics, we’re going to pay to incarcerate them for drug related offenses that they commit when they don’t get the methadone. The dirty secret is that prosecution and jail cost 10 times what we’re spending on methadone, and produces worse outcomes.
Dirty secret, or sad truth?
It is cheaper to give a car thief a brand new car than to incarcerate him for even one year.
It is cheaper to give the bank robber the $5,000 (average take in a bank heist) than to put him in jail for a month.
It is far cheaper to give the purse-snatcher $50.00 than to even pay the cost of his arrest.
The “dirty little secret” is actually it is cheaper to be sheep than to be lions.
Hopefully we will pay for the Loin’s life.
i am not an addict myself so i cannot speak from experience but i think unless you have been physically dependent on a chemical you cannot imagine the suffering one goes through to overcome that addiction. i think putting a time limit on it is a very danger situation and will only cause for set backs.
I am in no way proud to admit this but secure enough to say: I was a drug addict. I made a choice to stop. I did not replace illegal drugs and my drinking habit with a legal way to get high. I chose the day to quit and did it. I went cold turkey. I paced the floors, sweat, vomited, had the tremors, and still deal with minor anxiety 33 months later. Making the excuse that quitting cold turkey is “suffering” or “impossible” is complete crap. If you want to quit doing drugs, you don’t replace it with 2 or 3 more years of another substance until your insurance cuts you off
Congratulations keep up the great work.You took some responsibility and helped your self.You are an inspiration ,your story gives me a glimmer of hope for the future ,thank you.
You should be proud to say it. You have done what so many others choose not to, and you have done it without being a burden on the taxpayers.
Good for you–you are proof that true commitment to one’s own recovery can enable someone to kick the methadone habit. It can be done–those who say it can’t are either addicted to being addicted or profiting off addiction.
You are awesome.
You have done yourself and your family and friends proud…..your comments are filled with courage, determination and passion…..well done and I wish you all the best that life has to offer……
i agree with the cap of 2 years, as green says it is either going to work or it is not. Tobacco is one of the most addicting drugs there, yet for the most part with in a year if someone stays smoke free they can do it long term, because other then patches for a couple months, or pills to ease the cravings, its a short term drug treatment. Cold turkey worked for me after smoking for 25 yrs, i can say i have been tobacco free for 14. They are giving a high to replace a high….. and i have seen on pain killers and the high from that is less then what i have seen from the people on methadone :( and that’s legal…….Sad state of affairs especially for the people who do need long term treatment of pain, as they are now being cut from their pain meds. i hope this works, truly i do, but i do not think it will ….
This may turn out to be one of those things that will save cash in the short run but may have repercussions in human misery in the long run.
I would think that most addicts could effectively get off drugs after two years. But there may be some whose brain chemistry is so altered, they will need much longer maintenance. Cutting those may send them back to using illicit substances.
Rather than simply cutting a program, there should be a more cost effective alternative. Nothing like that is being proferred here. We cut mental health services years ago, closed hospitals, and many of those patients were discharged to and remain on the streets of our cities. We need to approve of therapies like ibogaine and others to effectively end addiction to opoids.
Cutting all those mental health services, closing hospitals and clinics…..look where it got us. It was not the answer.
I am not advocating endless payment for methadone treatments, however.
My point was that closing hospitals may have saved a few dollars but created a intricate web of human misery whose cost could not be determined. This will do the same for many long term addicts. There is abuse of this system, like any, but ending services for those who are not and cannot be prepared, will have repercussions in suffering, illegal drug use and sales, and crime.
I am not necessarily for unlimited treatment with methadone, but that will be the best solution for some, and those will be the ones who will suffer the most. There are other solutions which should be employed after the the two year cap.
The CHOICE to live in misery was there’s. I have no sympathy AT ALL!
I don’t anyone chooses that. Those on methadone have all made a choice to try and get well. Some may be more serious about it than others. Some may be more seriously messed up than others. But I can promise this cap will hit hard in terms of crime and homelessness in a couple of years. Just wait and see.
Thing is, is that methadone is a scam. It’s not part of a secession program. Let me repeat that. Methadone “treatment” is NOT part of a secession program. Methadone, is for life. They don’t call it “Liquid Handcuffs” for nothing.
And, ibogaine is nothing more than homeopathy. The addict believes it works, so it often does.
One last rant…
Methadone, is also widely used for pain management in the uninsured, poor. Let me repeat that. Methadone is widely used for pain management in the uninsured, poor. So, even if you aren’t a junkie already the methadone industry is happy to make you one.
Stay away from the opiates, kids.
I do know of people who have had success with Methadone. I agree it does not appear to work for most however. It does have the added benefit of giving some a legal high so they are not robbing our homes for a fix. There will be an increase in crime and other human misery when some of these people reach that cap/
Yes, and I wouldn’t go so far as to say that methadone isn’t useful in treatment for opiate addiction. However, the current system is a mess. From the lack of counselor initiated secession, to “to go” packages that get diverted and kill.
Then there’s the rampant over prescription of benzodiazepines, which when combined with methadone provide the addict with a high as intense as anything under the sun. To the awful practice of using methadone for pain management.
The whole system needs serious reforms and I see no sign of any pressure to do that.
I also agree, that when these people are cut off, we’re going to have a serious problem. But, we already have a serious problem so…
I highly reccomend everyone watch the documentary Methadonia http://movies.netflix.com/WiMovie/Methadonia/70043286?locale=en-US
This is a great start….now they need to test them for other drugs before they get their treatment.
They do test them. Where I work (a methadone clinic) it is a requirement they have clean blood test and urine drug screens before starting methadone. Also booze and methadone can kill them so they HAVE to stop drinking (not that they do).
Could you please explain the secession phase of the methadone treatment program?
Supposedly the client goes to individual counseling, group therapy, and daily dose of methadone. After the brain quits giving the body the withdrawal symptoms THAN the client starts getting a lower dose till they are done and graduate from the program. Of course, the client and counselor need to agree the client is ready to get off methadone and the addiction is beat. That is why some have been on it for 20 years. They are addicted to the methadone. I file the papers and charts. I’m not a counselor.
Fair enough. My point is just that there is no secession phase. Methadone “treatment” is for all intents and purposes a permanent “solution”, thus a scam.
I get that methadone employs you, so it’s hard to hate. But, I’m not a big fan, as you can see.
Massachusetts has huge meth treatment complexes with no time limit. Meth patients go to Mass.! POT smokers to Colorado. An excellent start to clean up the state.
I will personally fund greyhound tickets for ten people to go to either MA or CO. ONE WAY
i will drive the bus to Colorado for the pot smokers.
Im on board but only if we can stop at a few Phish shows
These clinics are the biggest drug dealers in the state. 2 years is waaaaaaaayyyyy to long.
Could that be Brenda!!
lol!
These clinics are the biggest drug dealers in the state. 2 years is way too long.
I totally agree why should addicts get their care paid for when people who can’t afford insurance go without.
If they need it to get off drugs thats fine,but they need to get in to a program,and get clean,so they can be free of the addiction in a reasonable amount of time. 2 yrs is plenty of time if they really want to get clean.
NALTREXONE
Sooner or later, private doctors and health centers might figure out that prescribing Naltrexone could be a good option for opiod replacement treatment, due to the restrictions on methdone and suboxone treatment.
Washington county is going to have come up with something else for medication treatment with the two year time limit on methadone treatment taking over Jan 1st.
Meanwhile, the ranks will continue thining in clinic dosing lines as the patient census continues to drop.The result will be, more addicts dieing, families suffering, increased burlaries and the ever faster revolving door at the county jail.
Are you all aware that 65% are on public assistance? Sad !! Maybe the law is changing for this but sadder is that an addict or alcoholic can apply for social security disability and most likely get it and then the system drops the ball and pays a lifetime for a disability of choice. To be disabled is not ones fault I know unless that disability is lifting the bottle (pipe, etc) to ones lips. So don’t think I am slamming the legitimately disabled individuals. Hence they find the loophole and continue on their free path in life. Time for citizens and lawmakers alike to address more of these situations and stop the ball rolling so easily downhill for the lazy buzz seeking low lives. I have worked very hard my entire life and it saddens me that like so many others I see what goes on around me and it is the government that usually turns the blind eye. Then the government says it is out of control and blames everyone but themselves when the solution seems simple enough to the majority of us. Most rehabilitation from drugs and alcohol is 90-360 days so 2 years is more than enough to those who really want to be clean. To the rest there will never be enough time because I would bet they are doing more than just these monitored doses anyway.
Actually, just fyi, per Social Sec regs, one cannot receive disability for alcoholism or drug addiction. If those factors are secondary to an underlying illness, then a person might receive disability. There has to be a medical condition or mental illness that prevents a person from gainful employment first – if an addiction occurs subsequently to the illness, the addiction will not disqualify a person from disability. (classic example is a severe back injury > pain meds > abuse of pain meds > addiction. The soc. sec. regs have been that way since the 1980’s.
Yeah, I remember when that law passed. Worked for the State back then heard the other DHS workers talking about how to get around it.
So, now-a-days to get drug-takers, and alcohol drinkers a disability check, they must also exhibit signs of P.T.S.D., or clinical depression. Add a couple of words to the report, and soon checks arrive. .
dual diagnosis is a real issue tho Tux. A lot of addicts are self-medicating their emotional disorders. It’s a very difficult catch 22, you have to be sober to get help, but you need help to get sober.
fyi: i support the 2 yr cap. let go. let god. no more enabling.
Dual diagnosis go hand in hand. If you were/are a social worker you should know that.
Did I say I was a “social worker?”
You’ve said a lot of things. You also said you worked for DHS. You present yourself as someone with a lot of knowledge in these areas; DHHS, foster care etc… among a few.
I’m a bit surprised at your lack of empathy, particularly where you know the foster care system as well as you do.
You believe all folks who work in the foster care system are empathic?
You think I lack empathy?
I agree I do not have “empathy” for everyone. Do you?
The story says 85% on Medicare (public supported medical care)
Should just dry them out in a detox.What is he talking about prescribing alternatives.Rolling pharmacy’s maybe.
Two years to get over addiction? Seems more like enabling. Some of the “patients” have been getting treatment for years. It ought to be cut off altogether.
I am pretty sure that the price the will have to pay for themselves,at the clinics,will not be as much as they were paying for street drugs
One thing I don’t see addressed is the fact that some are not taking their methadone but they are “cheeking” or having it go through a straw and into a bottle so they can sell it later, so we the tax payer paid for the medication, the trip to and from to get it and they sell it for 100% profit, agreed enough is enough, I am all for helping those that are using the program correctly but I have heard far to many stories of the ones that aren’t, kudos to passing this bill!
One little known fact is that the methadone clinics in Maine are mostly if not all for-profit. Discovery House and CAP Quality, the two clinics mentioned in this article, are both operated for-profit. The profit motive gives them an obvious incentive to keep their clients hooked on as high a dose as possible for as long as possible. They lose money if their clients actually pursue sobriety and kick the methadone habit, so it doesn’t happen very often. The State Office of Substance Abuse is in league with the methadone profiteers and is a major part of the problem. BDN–there is a big story here waiting to be told.
I work in the system and I know that people can and do wean themselves off methadone. Some taper, some do it suddenly when they are locked up. Two years is more than enough for someone to get off methadone. If they are serious about recovery. If they aren’t serious about recovery, then the methadone apologists are right–the addicts will need it forever.
I am a registered D and no fan of the LePage administration, but am very glad to see the State finally waking up to the big methadone ripoff.
Yes yes yes. Cutting down the urine samples and counseling will only let the clients who are on methadone use other drugs. The urine drug screens and counseling keep it kind of honest.
“I think it’s a tragedy, quite frankly,” Joey Bonaddio, no address provided.
“Would they like to see those people on the street buying meds or stealing from pharmacies — possibly hurting the public — or coming here for controlled treatment?” Bonaddio said. “I think it’s going to create a lot of problems.”
so if they don’t get what they want they’ll pollute our streets, steal from pharmacies and hurt the public? joey articulates the problem perfectly. there are natural consequences for crime, joey. how about trying or at least discussing abstinece. two years seems like a reasonable amount of time to get clean if you make a serious attempt. there’s always crime though.
Odd that there is no mention of actual numbers and percentages of addicts actually completeing a recovery program by becoming completely drug free.
Maybe it’s because the actual sucess rate is so laughably low.
Or is it possible that the clinic owners are actually making more money than they are letting on by keeping these poor folks hooked.
The people getting funding for providing these programs changed the names years ago. They no longer call it “treatment” they call it “drug replacement”
Clinics don’t make any money from cured addicts.
Not only did they change the names, they changed the entire dialogue.
The clinic’s version of success is keeping these poor addicts addicted for as long as the money keeps coming in.
Not long ago, Acadia stopped giving their clients free methadone treatment after getting them addicted to one of the most difficult opiates there is to kick.
Methadone, by it’s nature of staying in the body for much longer than other opiates, takes at least two weeks of hard withdrawal, while heroin addict’s symptoms start to subside within three to four days.
It’s a dirty little secret that the clinics “forget” to inform their potential clients on their initial consultation.
I was in the Methadone program and it took me just about 3 years for my complete treatment and I was not on MaineCare I had insurance. I’m for the clinics if people are actually using the program for the right reasons and you are right the success rate is low but it does work for some people, I’m over two years with no drugs.
Congrats for all your hard work. Keep it up.
Good for you!
As you know, the biggest reason that getting clean is so difficult is beause it’s woth it.
“There was a lot of anxiety out there” during the legislative debate,
Flanigan said. “[The drug treatment legislation] was passed as part of
the Department of Health and Human Services’ supplemental budget and it
got lost in the mix.”
The fact that the draft statute was placed in the supplemental budget
“gave us time” to work on the rules without public debate, he said of
the working group tasked with writing the policy rules.” pathetic comment form public servants .Public in put is what democarcy ( and public hearing) is all about >
“More than one methadone clinic operator said the legislative changes
earlier this year were made for budgetary reasons without input from
those who deal with drug addicts, many of whom have been on
drug-replacement opioid therapy for years.”
see pharmacy robbers go up 10 fold
“see pharmacy robbers go up 10 fold”
and if they’re caught they’ll go to jail.
or if they rob the wrong person… well, you know what happens there.
taxpayers should not be paying for other peoples drug addiction treatment.
Paying taxes and drug addiction are not mutually exclusive. People are not pegs in a board. There are plenty of functional drug addicts and alcoholics who work and pay taxes – one need look no further than the film and music industries for countless examples. Since they are taxpayers too, is it ok with you if taxpayers receive any treatment for their addictions?
One needs to look no further than Rush Limbaugh
Did Rush abuse the taxpayers and ask that they fund his drug habit?
No, but he did send his black maid out to get him drugs because he was afraid to walk in that neighborhood.
Sounds like he was still thinking rationally to me.
In other words, Rush did not expect Joe the taxpayer to fund his drug habits. Case closed !
You are pointing to Rush as a “functioning drug addict?”
85% are on Mainecare. Did you miss that? To be on Mainecare as a single person you must have a “mitigating circumstance” that can be drug addiction.
Incidentally while I am aware I do not speak for anyone but myself, I have no problem helping drug addicts get off drugs. I do have a problem buying them drugs.
Thank goodness no one was buying me alcohol when I was trying to kick that demon off my back. That was 35 years ago.
You need to tone it down. You’re the one who ‘missed it ‘- it’s 65%.
From the above Story:
“The Discovery House clinics service about 1,500 addicted Mainers, and “85 percent of our folks in methadone treatment are on MaineCare,” he said”.
” methadone maintenance treatment, but the state will no longer pay for it”… And who will pay for it? Will it be the inocent homeowner who, if didn’t get a hand gun, be one of the payees; or, the shopper who gets robbed at a downtown street; or maybe the child who just has a few dollars in his hand? Or, after the two years, are we going to put down the person in need…
So I have to pacify a junkie because I am araid. Forget that. i wont live in fear. I am a recovery drug addict/alcoholic. Been sober for 6 1/2 years. No methadone. Just me and a 12 step program. No one should make excuses for an addict. It only is hurting them. Make a spectacle of them, stop babying them and start holing them accountable for their actions.
You are also awesome on doing the hard work without more drugs.
Congratulations on being sober. You should be extremely proud of yourself, and I hope more of these bleeding hearts will read your story and wake up that the free handouts are not helping the situation, but it takes hard work, dedication and accountability.
Putting down the unrepentant addict is an idea with merit. the rest of your screed is junk. You think that just because someone is on methadone he stops his criminal activity? You have much to learn.
That was my point!
After 2 years, if the “person in need” hasn’t decided to get clean, then they never will.
and their decision to rob someone might be their last one.
Two years too long. I’m pretty sure that some methadone patient somewhere has been sentenced to jail. I haven’t heard of a death related to this and I’m quite sure that methadone is not administered in a correctional facility. Also, I have yet to see any evidence of crime dropping in Bangor as the result of methadone clinics. In fact, it was reprorted in this very paper, that officials pointed to services such as methadone clinics and other phenomena such as the high number of sex offenders and homeless people in Bangor as reasons for increased crime.
Good points..
“Millinocket resident Kyle Bellfleur, a MaineCare recipient, travels 134 miles every day for his methadone treatment.” shouldn’t he maybe try to move closer to the clinic? wouldn’t that make more sense then traveling that distance? i know that the price of gas is meaningless since we pay it for him, and it would be such a hardship to move, but come on. really? this is what we pay mileage for?
What about smoking related illnesses (don’t forget second hand smoke related illnesses), uncontrolled diabetes because someone wants to eat ring dings and twinkies, well lets not stop there……..how about illnesses related to obesity……….. why should my insurance rates go up and why should my tax dollars pay for their medical bills when they simply don’t give a rip? I certainly don’t my tax dollars to help someone who truly is serious and interested in getting of the narcotics.
I don’t want to help alcoholics or pay for their illnesses.(more difficult to treat than narcotic addiction)
Taxpayers are not buying smokers cigarettes, alcoholics liquor or fat folks , Ring-dings, and Twinkies.
Since you want to support these losers, I suggest you whip out your checkbook and write a big gift for the money-launderers over at Acadia.
If you think Methadone is an effective efficient way of curing drug abuse, you have been misinformed. .
Who do think pays for er visits for chest pain, strokes and MI.
Who pays for chronic disease management?ie
COPD
Emphysema
Diabetes management
Cancer treatment
hepatitis
liver failure
In an out of the hospital for alcohol withdrawal
Need I go on……
Our increased health insurance premiums pay for this including our tax dollars.
Are You stating that only private insurance patients have these diseases?
I don’t just think methadone is effective …..methadone is effective for opiate addiction– my sources are from Samsha, addiction journal ie research. So, how am I misinformed?…… Please show me your research to support your argument.
Meanwhile, your tax dollars can go to the people who are doing nothing for their disease management. My tax dollars will go for the individual who is treating their disease.
Furthermore, there are patients (that I mention) who are on mainecare, SSI and TANF who purchase cigarettes , alcohol and ding dongs….
Sounds like you have personal issues with Acadia….there is counseling available……..and you work in the mental health field?……you missed your calling.
Used to work in CHILDREN’S SERVICES.
You are ranting as your “reply” does not address my post at all.
I did respond to your scattered – meaningless post.
Nope.. You obviously didn’t have enough reading comprehension skills to even understand it.
Continue to hide behind your smoke screen.
I did address your scattered- meaningless post.
Long overdue. As broke as we are, Maine shouldn’t be catering to junkies. You can be freed from addiction- any addiction – but methadone clinics is not the cure to this horrible self abuse.
One of the real issues to be reckoned with is most of these “patients” are centralized in urban service centers, like Bangor. What follows the migration of opiate addicts are their friends and loved ones. Subsequently they all need services because typically they are also on the system. They get apartment subsidies and all the city gravy they can consume. It costs the taxpayers plenty. The crime rate is up in Bangor and it is not because of the Hollywood slots. This is a great idea and if they cant break away from the dope in two years it is time to look at other options.
Dear Joey Bonnadio:
Robbing pharmacies or buying street drugs? I’d like to know how many people caught robbing pharmacies and buying street drugs are in the program already. Suppose we’d ever be able to find that out? Nope.
To anyone who has successfully used the program to kick drugs once and for all a hearty congratulations and wishes for continued success.
I think we ought to be doing everything we can to get the ones who break the law and get their dose at the same time out, so that people who are serious about recovery have the option to do so.
I wonder how many people will leave the state seeking methadone? Or will pharmacy robberies just get worse? I’m always looking over my shoulder when I go to pick up my prescriptions.
Way to go LePage!! You are awesome! The people who complain about LePage have never met him. They are the low information voters who only listen to the biased media. Crime has increased in Bangor ever since these places have been here. Ask any police officer. We cannot continue all these free handouts to keep people on drugs. Give me a break! We pay for their transportation, many of them are on other drugs or sell their dosage. One recently had a car accident very close to a school shortly after 9a.m. she was under the influence of methadone.
2 months is more than enough..
Two years is WAY to long. Six months would have been more than enough.
You are right on point with your time schedule…..the intent of Methadone treatment for opioid addiction & detoxification is to determine a dose sufficient enough to prevent cravings and suppress symptoms of withdrawal which when achieved becomes the daily maintenance dose…..then the maintenance dose should be titrated DOWN by 10% every 10 to 14 days for outpatient treatment……in reducing the daily doses the goal is to keep withdrawal symptoms tolerable which even in higher dose should only take several weeks…..anyone taking Methadone for opiate addiction should not ever be treated for more than 6 to 10 months at high doses or they just become a Methadone addict……Crazy….
I know a woman who went through (and is still going through) the Methadone treatment. She will be on some dose of Methadone for the rest of her life.
“Would they like to see those people on the street buying meds or stealing from pharmacies — possibly hurting the public…”
What is this a threat? This addict should be prosecuted for criminal threatening and extortion.
The clinics “flavor” the doses with imitation cherry? Maybe if it tasted like excrement they would work harder to get off it.
I also see where this bill passed without public input. From what I’ve heard from friends and neighbors if the public had had a say the methadone programs would have been gone long ago.
There are times where Darwin’s theory of selective survival should be allowed to occur. This is one of those times.
The clinics have brought this on by not focusing enough on recovery.
They have created a pajama population that is never going to get dressed and face the day. The clients have become content getting a huge dose( Which is just like free recreational use) and sitting on their couches for the rest of the day.
They do not need to do any different because they have been coached into getting disability from social security. Like this, they will never become producing people again, which is a huge fail.
These clinics should be getting them out and walking, help them to get their dreams back and feel better about themselves.
Get dressed, get off the couch and try life……….
Before all the comments…I work in the field and see this daily, The dose must go down and the productivity up….
That was by far the most truthful post I have seen on here! Very well said.
Absolutely spot on comments….the only thing the treatment programs are creating is people addicted to methadone…..Crazy…..
I’d like to see them stop paying for travel. Let’s see, 134 miles a day at .50 a mile. $67 a day when the gas costs maybe $20. Plenty left over for beer and smokes. If they’re that serious, let them suck that up.
perhaps the only near decent thing lepage has done or ever will do as Gov of this “fine” state.
I understand we need tax cuts, but instead of taking medicine away from some people who really need it, we should be looking at all the people receiving welfare who most certainly can work but choose to live off the state.That right there would save millions and make those types of people get up and stop being lazy. And I believe every case should be based individualy, there are some people who really want help and use the help correctly and do not abuse it. It’s a real shame it takes a few bad apples to cast a dark shadow over treatment that can save lives.
MaineCare is NOT the Medicare program for the state of Maine. It is the Medicaid program for the state of Maine.
With all of the ignorance and misinformation regarding these programs continually being shared and repeated as fact, it certainly does not need to be reinforced by the local newspaper! Get it right, BDN!
One guy who used to work for me has been on the methadone maintenance since 2005 actually him and his wife with no end in sight,not only does maincare provide them with there drugs they were also kind enough to pay for 3 weeks in the nicu for both of there newborn babies while the infants went thru narcotics withdrawals , real awesome way to get started in life.The only reason a person from Millinocket would have to make the trip to Bangor everyday would be because he keeps burning his drug test and can not be trusted with take homes.We definitely need to raise taxes so the gov’mint can keep these programs going.