WESTBROOK, Maine — Elinore Dunton raised five children in the four-bedroom house she had owned for the past 36 years, but when her youngest son and two grandchildren moved out earlier this year, she was left alone with too much house and too little income to stay put.

“Without him being there, I couldn’t afford to live there,” Dunton, who recently turned 73, said Tuesday. “I hated to leave because it had been my home for 36 years.”

So Dunton, who retired three years ago after working in the cafeteria at the Sappi paper mill for 16 years, began looking for a smaller home in Westbrook. However, with only a monthly Social Security check of a little more than $1,000, the most she could qualify to borrow was $115,000.

The homes in that price range “were few and far between,” and the ones she did check out did not impress her. “A lot I walked in and wanted to turn around and walk right back out again,” she said. “They just were horrible.”

As it happens, her daughter, Benita Dunton, is a commercial real estate broker with Magnusson Balfour in Portland who had heard recently from a fellow broker about reverse mortgages, and their more recent siblings: reverse mortgages for purchase.

A reverse mortgage is a type of home equity loan that has been around since the late 1970s and is designed to allow anyone 62 or older to turn the equity in their home into cash to supplement their income, via a line of credit, monthly payments or a lump sum. But unlike a traditional, or “forward,” mortgage, a reverse mortgage doesn’t require monthly mortgage payments. Instead, the reverse mortgage is paid off, plus interest, when the senior moves, sells the home, or dies. Most reverse mortgages are guaranteed by the Federal Housing Authority and are part of its Home Equity Conversion Mortgage program.

Many people are familiar with reverse mortgages from television ads — that was the extent of Elinore Dunton’s knowledge of the product when her daughter brought it up as an option — but fewer people are aware of reverse mortgages for purchase, which were only created in 2009.

Reverse mortgages for purchase are essentially the same product, except that the loan proceeds can be used to purchase a new residence. In the past, seniors looking to buy a new home would be forced to close on a traditional mortgage, buy a house, and then close on a second, reverse mortgage. A reverse mortgage for purchase is designed to allow seniors who currently own a residence to purchase a new home and obtain a reverse mortgage within a single transaction.

Between 2009 and 2011, only 13 reverse mortgages for purchase closed in Maine, according to data from the FHA. In 2012, the FHA has only one on the books: Elinore Dunton’s.

Sharron Eastman, president of Big Horizon Mortgage in Kennebunk, closed on a reverse mortgage for purchase that allowed Dunton to buy a house in Westbrook that was on the market for $146,000, which was beyond her price range with a traditional mortgage.

“The reverse mortgage allowed her to buy 31 percent more house,” Eastman said.

Without a reverse mortgage, Eastman said many seniors who are “house rich, but cash poor” would be forced to “sell their house or rent or go to low income housing or go on the government dime.”

Dunton said the reverse mortgage for purchase helps her because she doesn’t have to make monthly mortgage payments, which leaves more money in her pocket and allows her to increase her quality of life.

“It helps a lot,” she said, sitting on a red recliner in the living room of her new two-bedroom, one-story home. “If I want or need to do something around the house, I have some money to do it.”

Dunton’s already added gutters, bought a new microwave, painted and added carpet to the two bedrooms.

However, reverse mortgages are complex financial tools, which even Dunton admits she doesn’t completely understand. As with most loans, there are risks associated with reverse mortgages. While there are no monthly mortgage payments, that doesn’t mean foreclosure isn’t a possibility.

Since the mortgage is secured by the borrower’s home, foreclosure could still happen if the borrower fails to pay the monthly insurance fees and property taxes, doesn’t live in the house for more than 12 months, or lets the house deteriorate beyond normal wear and tear, according to the federal Consumer Financial Protection Bureau.

In Maine, there are between 10 and 12 companies licensed to sell reverse mortgages, though none are headquartered in the state, according to William Lund, superintendent of Maine’s Bureau of Consumer Credit Protection. The names of these nonbank lenders reflect their specialty: Reverse Mortgage Solutions in Spring, Texas; One Reverse Mortgage LLC in San Diego being two examples. Dunton’s lender is Tulsa, Okla.-based Urban Financial Group.

While there was only one reverse mortgage for purchase in the federal 2012 fiscal year, there were 297 reverse mortgages in Maine this year, according to FHA data.

Reverse mortgages haven’t always garnered a good reputation. Lund tells a story of the early days, when the product was first being offered by lenders who would provide the reverse mortgage, then pitch the senior, now with a pocket full of cash, on sketchy investment opportunities.

“The white light of regulation shone on that practice and so it’s much less of a problem now than it was for a little while,” Lund said.

Today, there are protections in place to shield seniors from some of the risks, one of which is that the seniors or their heirs are not liable for loan balances that exceed the value of the home at repayment. In that case, the Federal Housing Authority would pick up the difference. Also, any senior considering a reverse mortgage is required to speak with an independent counselor to make sure they understand the risks and have considered all their options.

Reverse mortgages are not common at the moment — only 2 percent of eligible homeowners have reverse mortgages, according to the federal Consumer Financial Protection Bureau — but they are expected to increase as the baby boomer generation ages.

In a June 2012 report to Congress, the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau outlined some troubling trends when it comes to reverse mortgages. The bureau found that most borrowers are not using reverse mortgages to convert home equity into a steady supplemental income stream, instead opting to take the full amount they’re qualified for as a lump sum.

“By refinancing with a reverse mortgage, these borrowers eliminate their monthly mortgage or debt payments, but the interest on the loan will chip away at their remaining home equity over time,” the report states.

It concludes that most consumers struggle to comprehend “the rising balance, falling equity nature of the loan.”

Another trend the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau found was that seniors are choosing reverse mortgages at an earlier age. That means there are more years for the loan balance, insurance premiums which are added to the balance, and compounding interest to grow.

“There is a risk — especially in periods of low home price appreciation — that there will be little to no equity left when the home is sold,” the report found. “For borrowers who live in their homes for the rest of their lives, this may be an acceptable risk. But most borrowers ultimately sell their homes while they are still alive. These borrowers may face increased financial difficulties later in life if they use all their home equity while living in the home and have none left to help finance their next living arrangement.”

Before opting for a reverse mortgage, Lund encourages seniors to look at all their options, including traditional home equity loans or home equity lines of credit.

Whit Richardson is Business Editor at the Bangor Daily News. He blogs about Maine business, entrepreneurs and the economy.

Join the Conversation

51 Comments

  1. Be forewarned and pay special attention to the caveats wisely stated in the latter part of this article. Most financial products, like reverse mortgages, are designed to make the companies that sell them a very healthy profit and are highly inappropriate for most people to partake of. Make sure you investigate your options thoroughly and through an independent, objective source of advice before making a decision.

    1. The trouble is once this financial tool becomes popular and the inspections are not on the up & up we will find down the road that many will not upkeep this homes. Now that they are government guaranteed, guess what the tax payer bail out and we’re all on the hook! I can see now , mortgagee dies ,the bank tries to put the home on the market. They get an inspection . Hello ,the inspector says ,cracked foundation ,new wall, leaking windows, leaking roof, etc. Bank says no problem government guaranteed.

  2. Reverse mortgages, or even saying (reverse mortgage), is fully a scam, the people trying to get this criminal procedure mainstreamed, should be jailed, they are the lowest form of human we have, this reverse mortgage thing is just a continue attempt at robbery of the seniors citizens.

    1. When something sounds so good, Beware, most often it will come back to bite you. Reverse mtgs. should be banned.

      1. Why? What’s it to YOU? If don’t like it, don’t get one, but for Pete’s Sakes, stop trying to influence people who really can use them to a tremendous advantage in their old age. It has been a great benefit to us–enabled us to retire and not worry about future expenses. The family is totally on board with this–very useful. Good thing they aren’t banned, as you propose. Perhaps you should do more research before passing judgement on something you know nothing about.

        1. Glad to hear this has worked for you and your family, and fyi, I have done my homework on reverse mtgs. and it is Not a good way to go for most people. Read East of ChamberlainNorth in the next comment. That comment says it all.

          1. HUH? Who said anything about my family not having an inheritance?? The reverse mortgage is just a part of financial estate planning. When we are gone, the mortgage is paid off and the balance of the equity is distributed by the will. In addition there are other assets that are unaffected by the reverse mortgage. The family is not without an inheritance at all–they are pleased that we can use the equity of our home while we are alive! What’s so hard about this to understand?

      1. As an American, I do not need to explain my thinking to anyone, and If you do not agree with me, then, fine, go out and give the bank your assets for a little fiat money, do as you like.

        1. Patten, the sad thing is, some of these readers possibly don’t know what fiat money is. But we do, and you can bet the banks do!

        2. very inappropriate response to a honest question. It was years ago that I read about it, and I didn’t think at the time it was a scam, just not what I thought I’d do.. ..

      2. Frank. I will help you with this. Real estate is real. Fiat money is not real. It is paper with pretty colors on it that banks “order” from the Federal Reserve and is printed out of thin air. If given a choice, you should always pick the “real” thing, not the empty promise.

        1. I could google I know, but what I recall (probably inaccurate) was that the lender/buyer buys your house now about xx% less than market value but you effectively stay in and rent your house back until you die or decide to move. The lender / buyer is like an insurance policy, they want you to die, you want to live. If you die before you’ve used up your rent-asset, you get the balance and the lender is hoping that your house has appreciated in value.

          I’m sure there are other items of which I’m unaware.

          1. Reverse mortgages are quite misunderstood. NO, the bank doesn’t own the property. They simply receive a mortgage from the property owner to be paid back at the sale, the death or if the owner moves. A lot of older people buy homes and get a 30 year mortgage, which also would also have to be paid back in the same conditions….a reverse mortgage simply doesn’t require an immediate pay-back. How is this dishonest? It is the ONLY way that a lot of older people have been able to stay in their own homes for the rest of their lives,.

          2. Thanks – someone mentioned variable rates but if these instruments are limited to the value of the house.. The mortgagee (bank) should then verify that the house – their investment is kept up ! If there is real estate appreciation, then they might not be quite as concerned.

    2. Sorry, pattenpond, but you sure showed your ignorance on this one. Reverse mortgages are VERY legitimate, useful and safe. We got ours a few years ago and it was the best thing we ever did. We got the equity from our home and have no monthly payments. When we are gone, the proceeds are paid from the sale. It is sad that you would put such a doubt on a product that is an extremely useful tool for many seniors. Perhaps in the future you should do a little research before writing such dribble!

      1. If you got a reverse mortgage, then, surely we could never be on the same page of thinking, I am sorry for you, I will pass my stuff on to the next generation, not to a bank.

        1. WOW! You really ARE ignorant–why don’t you just stop now before letting even more people know? A bank NEVER gets the property in a reverse mortgage, or any other mortgage for that matter. If the terms are not met, they may foreclose, but when a person dies while a mortgage is still in force, the property is sold, the balance due the bank is taken and the rest goes to the heirs. Many, many seniors would have lost their homes without a reverse mortgage. Most have paid off the regular mortgage, but have trouble meeting expenses, so the reverse mortgage lets them access the equity of the home without any monthly payments. Good grief–WHY do find that so offensive?? It can only be because you don’t know anything about it or choose not to know. Hopefully no one reading this post will pay any attention to your ignorance. Just let it go.

  3. So the lady essentially gets to live rent free using a complex financial tool she admits she does not understand. Good for her. Is anyone still wondering why the real estate market cratered?

    1. indeed…and the Keynesian Granny Warren Progressives out there give the blessing to these corrupt banksters every time

      1. Looks like someone forgot which administration was championing the awesomeness of less oversight in the real estate market. Oops!

      2. Trickle down voodoo economics??? so just where are the jobs those jobs creators should have been creating with that lower tax rate for the last decade???Those jobs and job creators are a myth in tended to lift capitalistds while crushing everyone else. where are the jobs they would supposedly create?? anyone???. HELLO pretty foolish…

    2. nope the capitalist went too far with their creative “financiai instrumments” and congress passed laws to let them…. and now they are trying to obstruct common sense to keep it from happening all over again !!!

      1. All of the caveats and financial instruments you state….have come from progressive liberals in congress.

  4. Was her home in terrible shape? In 36 years it should have been fully paid off. Save any improvements necessary to make the sale, virtually 100% equity.

    A fat down payment from the sale of the home, decent credit and 1000k month income should qualify for far more than 115k. That just doesn’t seem right.

    1. As in my fathers house it was the cost of heating the house was to costly for him to stay where he was.

      1. I’m sure the heat and taxes were a doozy in a 4BR. Downsizing is certainly a wise move for a single occupant in such a home, though like others here, I don’t put much stock in these reverse mortgages.

    2. on $1K / per – Taxes $150-200, heat- $150-200 , utilities – $150, insurance $100 etc etc – food? medicine? Medicare? transportation

      1. Depends on what the original home sold for – and how much cash could be used on a down payment. I am not saying anyone should go to their max qualifying loan amount – especially on a fixed income, just that it seemed low.

        1. The article sorta indicate to me that she could afford a $100k mortgage on $1k .. Even with 5 or 10% down FHA or some other fed give-way (instead of 20%), I can’t see how she can afford to live there unless he’s not telling us she would get XXX from an investment paid for with cash from her house.

    1. Mortgage brokers, real estate salespeople, used car salesmen, I have just sometimes have to shake my head, at this bottom feeding lot, there was a real estate sales lady, who, got recorded and got caught destroying the sales of house, by telling the buyers she could build one better, but the lady was representing a client, who recorded the conversation, the sales lady paid a fine, for this, and she is back in the BDN selling real estate, I just shake my head, it is a jungle, there are times when I understand the homeless more and more, what in some cases is the use.

      1. I only have a superficial acquaintance, she definitely was wrong, but she is a hustler ! Don’t forget insurance salespersons. Even tho we tend not to like folks who work on commission, making business with incentives is capitalism and what makes us different from socialist and muslim countries.

  5. What is meant by “It’s only the 15th time the product has been used a since the federal government created it in 2009”? In Maine? Sounds like an accident waiting to happen, which seniors don’t need and usually can’t afford in their retirement years. I’d be super careful before signing on the dotted line. Read the fine print, as they say.

  6. I have an elderly relative who took a reverse mortgage but used the money to benefit her children instead of augmenting her soical security income. She made a poor decision.

  7. Another way to prey on old people that are having a hard time. Dirt-bags.Almost as bad as Peach-tree and J.G. Went-worth…double dirt =bags.

  8. But will she be able to sell the house and spend the proceeds on assisted living or a nursing home, if she eventually needs to? Hmmm. perhaps not with shrinking equity.

  9. Please talk to an accountant about any ideas you may have to try and help yourselves out of the predicament that unscrupulous bankers and financial fast-talkers have gotten people into.

  10. I think the interest one pays is variable. If that is the case then given the potential for hyper inflation these people could be wiped out in a heart beat.

  11. Sounds like a lot of smoke and mirrors here…lets be clear on one fact of this whole reverse mortgage scam…the only winners in all of this are the loan companies. This is very similar to the real estate securities scam that brought down the housing industry in the first place. The loan companies are betting on you not living very long, and never receiving the entire amount that you signed up for, and when you die they get the house in the end…….you will not be able to leave anything to your loved ones when you pass on. If it sounds too good to be true…..it is.

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *