WASHINGTON — Lawmakers pushed the country to the edge of the “fiscal cliff” on Sunday as they struggled to reach a last-minute deal that could protect the world’s largest economy from a politically induced recession.

Democratic and Republican leaders in the Senate had hoped to clear the way for swift action that would avert sweeping tax increases and spending cuts due to kick in on Tuesday.

But with the two sides still at loggerheads in talks, Senate Democratic leader Harry Reid postponed any possible votes and the Senate adjourned until Monday, leaving mere hours to pass any deal that may emerge through both chambers of a bitterly divided Congress.

“There are still significant differences between the two sides,” Reid said on the Senate floor.

Behind closed doors, the parties kept seeking a way to bridge deep divides over taxes and spending. But even if a deal emerges in the coming hours, under Senate rules any one of the 100 senators could prevent the chamber from acting quickly.

Prospects are also uncertain in the House of Representatives, where dozens of conservative Republicans could oppose any deal that includes a tax increase on the nation’s wealthiest households.

As the hours ticked away, it appeared increasingly likely that Washington’s failure to act would deliver a $600 billion hammer blow to the fragile U.S. economic recovery.

“Something has gone terribly wrong when the biggest threat to the American economy is the American Congress,” said Democratic Senator Joe Manchin of West Virginia.

Americans could see a bigger bite taken out of their paychecks starting on Tuesday as payroll and income tax cuts expire, while 2 million unemployed Americans could see their jobless benefits run out. Government contractors might be forced to lay off employees as $109 billion in automatic spending cuts kick in, and businesses could lose tax breaks for everything from wind power to research and development.

The uncertainty has weighed on financial markets and forced businesses to slow hiring and investment. Market participants braced for more turbulence on Monday.

“I believe investors will show their displeasure tomorrow by selling stocks if there is no deal,” said Mohannad Aama, managing director at Beam Capital Management in New York.

Though corporate chieftains have lobbied lawmakers to show flexibility, Congress also faces pressure from an array of interest groups urging them not to compromise core principles.

Conservative groups have warned Republicans that a vote to increase any taxes could be held against them, while liberal and labor groups have pressed Democrats to resist any benefit cuts to popular retirement and health programs.

Lawmakers may find it easier to act once the country goes over the “fiscal cliff” on January 1, as any new legislation can then be portrayed as a tax cut rather than a tax increase.

Points of disagreement

Republicans floated a proposal on Sunday to slow the growth of Social Security retirement benefits by changing the way they are measured against inflation, but they backed away after Democrats said they would not consider it.

Still, there were disagreements over all the major aspects of the negotiation.

Buoyed by his re-election in November, Obama has insisted that any deal must include a tax increase on the wealthiest Americans, who have seen their earnings rise steadily over the past decade at a time when income for the less affluent has stalled.

Many conservative Republicans in the House of Representatives oppose a tax hike on anyone, no matter how wealthy.

Obama has proposed raising income taxes on households that earn more than $250,000, but Republicans pushed to set the threshold between $400,000 and $500,000. Republicans also were resisting a Democratic proposal to raise inheritance taxes on the wealthiest estates.

Republicans were looking for new reductions to replace the looming spending cuts, which would fall equally on military and domestic social programs. Democrats say the increased taxes on the wealthy would generate enough revenue to offset those cuts.

Senate Republican leader Mitch McConnell talked several times to Vice President Joe Biden by phone in the hope of breaking the stalemate.

“I’m willing to get this done, but I need a dance partner,” McConnell said.

In a rare appearance on NBC’s “Meet the Press,” Obama accused Republicans of rejecting significant compromises several times already. He said he would try to reverse the tax hikes for most Americans if Congress fails to act.

“If people start seeing that on January 1st this problem still hasn’t been solved … then obviously that’s going to have an adverse reaction in the markets,” he said.

House Speaker John Boehner rejected Obama’s accusations that his fellow Republicans were not being amenable to compromise.

“The president’s comments today are ironic, as a recurring theme of our negotiations was his unwillingness to agree to anything that would require him to stand up to his own party,” he said in a statement.

(Additional reporting by David Gaffen, Thomas Ferraro, Rachelle Younglai, Jeff Mason and Emily Stephenson; Writing by Andy Sullivan; Editing by Alistair Bell and Christopher Wilson)

Join the Conversation

16 Comments

  1. The only reason there is a so called cliff, is because of the democrats, back in 2001 it was the dems that made this expiration date, however both sides and the president knew about the expiration date a long time ago, never let a crisis go to waste, and if you don’t have a crisis manufacturer one.

  2. Take it to them President Obama. Make Mitch Mcconnell wish he never uttered the words “one term president.”

    1. Seriously? Barry soetoro is too busy drone murdering little kids to be bothered with actual work.

      If the Obama zealots would get over themselves we could end this nonsense.
      But hey, why let reality cloud your fantasy?

      Obama is a bankster backed, corporate backed, hypocrite and liar. Far worse than W could ever have imagined.

      This is what two party politics gets you. Unimaginative drivel blindly supporting whomever is on “your” team….and constantly ignoring the fact that the two factions are one in the same and you’ve been played.

        1. Wow…no wonder….

          The founding fathers, some of them, warned against what they referred to as factions.
          For obvious reasons.

          Why do we need political factions/parties at all? The current “parties” are merely corporate puppets. They are bought and sold by special interests groups everyday.It is beyond an insult to the american people yet we sit back and play right along. Unbelievable.

          I don’t have any answers, never claimed I did, I’m just pointing out the obvious.
          What’s wrong with no party politics? And real popular elections? Not this fake electoral college farce.

          Time to think outside the box. Or revisit the federalist papers. This current system is not at all what was intended. Or was it?

  3. Let’s keep in mind that ‘the cliff’ is part of a debt ceiling deal that was agreed to by both parties in Congress and the President in 2011. They are all responsible for it.

    1. Thank goodness there are a few responsible Republicans down there who don’t want to continue this deficit spending trend!

    1. McConnell can’t play well with (most) classmates). He’s been able to get along with Biden all these years, makes one wonder how he got along with Obama in their senate days. Apparently not well, that’s probably when his vendetta started.

  4. Republicans want to end the gravy train, so of course the liberals and the media are going to blame them for everything. When some Republicans expressed a willingness to raise taxes to reduce the deficit, the Democrats wanted to use these new revenues for new spending initiatives instead. That is the primary reason for resistance from the “Tea Party” Republicans. Someone has to act responsibly, to stop the growing debt problem.

  5. The party of the gimmees and recipient class doesn’t care about the providers and workers. The party of “NO” are the marxists and socialists who will not cut a program as long as it benefits unions and their cronies. Raise taxes on the rich…what a joke. I guess Obama was going to use that to give the raises he enacted to all his buds in the house and senate. These thieves just want to rob taxpayers to give to the takers. When the sheep get over their lust for the rich and find out Obama and Biden will ask the middle class to then do their “patriotic duty” and pay more in taxes, the sheep who pay nothing will bleat YES…pay more. It is the mindless people of the country who allow themselves to be conned and really believe that big govt and a socialist govt is the answer. Now you sheep, hurry up and cash those welfare checks.

  6. So fellow wage slaves what are we gonna do? “Vote” in replacements next go round? Ha! I don’t think so. Time to end this charade folks! Thrown down your ego and get over it already—– two,party politics is a joke, doesn’t work, never has never will! Get rid of these corporate shills ASAP! Civil disobedience is what we got left ! Heck, protest! whatever you do do NOT think voting is going to to anything!

    The problem with occupy is that a majority of the tee vee head dumbed down Americans believed what the mainstam media told them!! It wasn’t merely a gang of jobless hippies getting high—– far from it. The establishment was scared and their coverage demonstrates that. All lies and propaganda..turn off that tee vee! Six corporations own all your “news” shows…

    Enough. Time to boot them out. Critical thinking folks!

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *