EASTPORT, Maine — As the easternmost port in the United States, Eastport is the closest deep water port to European markets.
That geographical reality has been driving operations at the Eastport Port Authority since it was established in 1977 and greatly expanded in 1998. That expansion facilitated significant growth in cargo operations, which now include shipments of wood pulp to destinations as far away as China and shipments of dairy cows and beef cattle to Turkey and Russia.
Executive Director Chris Gardner recently received approval from the Port Authority’s board of directors for a $1.55 million budget for 2013, a slight increase over the 2012 budget.
“That amount is what we are forecasting for revenues, and it’s a very conservative estimate,” Gardner said Sunday. “We are a revenue-funded operation. We are a quasi-municipal agency, but we must operate like a business. We make quarterly budget adjustments that reflect operational revenues.”
Gardner said the port handled shipments of 417,448 tons of wood pulp during 2012 and shipped 7,355 cows. Cattle shipments were significantly down from the more than 20,000 head shipped to eastern Europe from Eastport in 2011, which accounts for the port handling 50-plus ships in 2012 as compared to 70 in 2011, which was a record year.
“The company we work with on cattle had been using our port exclusively, but now uses both Eastport and a port in Eddystone, Pennsylvania,” he said. “We’re taking a look at what we can do to entice more cows back to our port.”
The 2013 budget projects payment of $17,483 in property taxes on top of the $20,000 the Port Authority contributes to Eastport as payment in lieu of taxes. While the main port facility is tax-exempt, other properties it owns within Eastport are not.
While Eastport was a port of call for seven cruise ship visits during 2012, no visits are on the books for 2013.
“There’s a good opportunity for Eastport there,” Gardner said. “The cruise ship visits we had this year were a great success, but were the result of enticing these cruise ship companies to assess the Eastport experience. These companies plan their itineraries years in advance, so we won’t see any results from the great experience we had this year until at least 2014.”
Unlike Bar Harbor, Gardner said, Eastport can offer cruise ships a deepwater pier located on a breakwater within walking distance of downtown shops, galleries and restaurants. Cruise ships that drop anchor in Bar Harbor need to ferry passengers and crew to and from the mainland with tenders.
“Eastport doesn’t try to be anything we’re not,” Gardner said. “These ships come here because people want to see a small town. And, given our proximity to Canada, we try to offer the entire bay as the experience.”



Good job being done by everyone at the port. It’s good to see that it can serve both the commercial and tourist interests in Eastport.
Lots of folks are waiting for the railroad to come back , also.
The increased tonnage will benefit the entire area.
Railway will be a long wait baby! are you kidding?
Now a little more import that the news didn’t seem to get. The Port pays $17,483 for property taxes. This is a very small portion of it’s value which is about $23,000,000 give or take a few dollar amongst friends. At a mill rate of 21 that would make it’s taxes $483,000. A little more food for thought the Port Directors bonus was $17,500 if I,m right.
They sold the Boat School pretty cheap , too.
Somebodies brother-in-law got a deal to go with all the grant money.
Port Director /County Commissioner ,Chris Gardener , keeps it all flowing smoothly.
….He’s worth every penny.
The Boat School fiasco, the boat school sale (gift to the good old boys). Now what will happen with the non profit Friends who “own” buildings and land? Will the city ever re-coup taxes on that? Or will the property go to Morrison? Oh, I forgot he donated it for his tax right off.
the value brought in by ships i would imagine drastically offset tax rate costs ships use pilots to head to the port the two tugs(not cheap) fuel LO or slop discharge and parts deliverys. and crew leave you talking 100,000’s of new revenue
The local people pay about 40% of the taxes. We don’t have any other businesses helping to take some of that burden off. That is why we need more from the Port. They have had a free ride long enough. It might help if the Port didn’t care of the Good Old Boys first. Any big money spent is from bonds. The new port $15,000,000 built by Canadians, $8,000,000 for a new conveyer. Now looking for a $1,500,000 for a new ware house. How much will Eastport get from a new ware house . Yes you guessed right nothing. Yes I think the Port owes the city and it’s tax payers a better pay back then filling the Port Director pocket. In my opion.
Sure would be nice to see an actual accounting of the Port Authority’s budget and revenues for the last few years. It would be nice if Tom Walsh asked a few questions about the 8 million dollars that the taxpayers paid for the conveyer belt, which apparently is just going to rust without ever getting used and ranks up there with the great government boondoggles, especially it the Director got a few hundred thousand as a bonus for getting the grant for it. 8 million is 5 times this years budget. How many more Eastporters are working at the port than were there 4 years ago? While the cattle shipments are down, the BS coming out of the Port authority
the conveyor belts will increase bulk carriers flow if energy cost go back up and it looks sparkling compared to the ones still in use all threw out the south
Yes!!!!!!!
My question is if the cattle and pulp only generate 1.5M, expected this year, what other revenues will be generated to pay for those two Tug Boats?
The ships pay for the tugs off a contract with the buyer
It’s a good news story, but I’d like to see them shipping less pulp overseas.