PERRY, Iowa — A funny thing happened recently in the presidential campaign in Iowa: The last Republican president’s name actually surfaced.

“We’ve had, in the past, a couple of presidents from Texas that said they weren’t interested in wars … like George W. Bush,” a voter said to Ron Paul, the Texas congressman who has been sharply critical of U.S. military entanglements overseas. “My question is: How can we trust another Texan?”

It was an odd, almost discordant moment in a GOP contest where Bush, a two-term president who left office just three years ago, has gone all but unmentioned. While the candidates routinely lionize Ronald Reagan and blame President Barack Obama for the nation’s economic woes, none has been eager to embrace the Bush legacy of gaping budget deficits, two wars and record low approval ratings — or blame him for the country’s troubles either.

“Republicans talk a lot about losing their way during the last decade, and when they do they’re talking about the Bush years,” said Jack Pitney, a political science professor at Claremont-McKenna College. “For Republicans, the Bush administration has become the ‘yadda yadda yadda’ period of American history.”

The eight-year Bush presidency has merited no more than a fleeting reference in televised debates and interviews. When it does surface it’s often a point of criticism, as when former Pennsylvania Sen. Rick Santorum told CNN on Sunday that he regretted voting for the No Child Left Behind education law Bush championed.

The former president himself has been all but invisible since leaving office in 2009 with a Gallup approval rating of just 34 percent. His predecessor, Democrat Bill Clinton, had a 66 percent approval rating in early 2001 when he stepped down after two terms marred by a sex scandal and impeachment.

In a presidential contest dominated by concerns over the weak economy, government spending and the $15 trillion federal debt, the Republican candidates have been loath to acknowledge the extent to which Bush administration policies contributed to those problems. Republicans also controlled Congress for six of the eight years Bush was in the White House, clearing the way for many of his policies to be enacted.

There is no question that Obama’s policies, including the federal stimulus program and the auto industry bailout, have swollen the deficit and deepened the debt. And three years into his presidency, Obama often falls back on complaints about the bad situation he inherited when seeking to defend his own economic performance.

But while Obama may be overly eager to blame the Bush years for the nation’s problems, GOP presidential contenders seem just as eager to pretend those years never happened.

Taking office in 2001 with a balanced federal budget and a surplus, Bush quickly pushed through sweeping tax cuts that were not offset by spending cuts. The tax cuts have cost about $1.8 trillion, according to estimates by the Congressional Budget Office and the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities.

The Bush tax cuts were set to expire after 10 years, but Obama allowed them to remain in place temporarily in exchange for an extension of unemployment benefits and a payroll tax cut.

The wars in Iraq and Afghanistan launched after the Sept. 11, 2001, terror attacks never were budgeted and have cost taxpayers about $1.4 trillion so far. Obama ordered the last troops out of Iraq in December, but the Afghanistan conflict will extend into 2014.

Bush signed legislation in 2003 enacting a prescription drug benefit as part of Medicare, the government health care plan for seniors — a huge entitlement program projected to cost as much as $1.2 trillion over 10 years.

The Troubled Asset Relief Program, the bank bailout program widely loathed by many conservatives, was another Bush-era program. Congress authorized nearly $700 billion for the program at the recommendation of Bush’s treasury secretary, former Goldman Sachs executive Henry Paulson, in response to the collapse of Lehman Brothers and the subsequent financial crisis in the fall of 2008. As a presidential candidate, Obama supported the TARP bailout, as did his GOP rival, Sen. John McCain.

To be sure, today’s GOP candidates occasionally acknowledge that not all was perfect pre-Obama.

“The reason we find ourselves in the problem today is because we had Republicans and Democrats — you couldn’t tell the difference in the way they were spending,” Rick Perry told a campaign audience in Cedar Rapids.

The Texas governor has been sharply critical of Congress, insisting he would bring an outsider’s perspective to tackling the nation’s economic woes as president.

Others have also tried to distance themselves from Washington and, by implication, the Bush years.

Mitt Romney stresses his experience as a businessman and as Massachusetts governor. Former Utah Gov. Jon Huntsman talks up his background as a chief executive. Newt Gingrich reminds voters that he presided over a balanced budget as speaker of the House during the Clinton years.

Santorum’s surge into top-tier contention has sparked complaints from rivals about his votes on spending. Among other things, he voted in favor of the Medicare prescription drug program.

Bush still has loyal supporters who believe his legacy will be vindicated by history. But even they say the GOP field won’t be embracing him anytime soon.

“Sad to say, they’re looking at polling data that indicates they’re better off not bringing him into the campaign,” former Bush press secretary Ari Fleischer said. “I think President Bush has made America a safer nation and better nation and I’m proud of it. But politics isn’t about what’s fair, it’s about winning.”

Associated Press writer Philip Elliott in Cedar Rapids contributed to this report.

Join the Conversation

25 Comments

  1. “Trust another Texan?” Who would have ever been foolish enough to do that in the first place? My question is: How can we even contemplate giving any trust to any Republican/Tea Party candidate? I say let the 1% have them. The other 99% should simply choose a Democrat (Knowing there are illogical people in all societies, I’ll even be willing to settle for 51%).

    1. we have an america hating dem now, you still aren’t satisfied with the destruction this reprobate has inflicted upon this country? say what u want about bush, he did not hate this place as does your aparent hero obama.ADMIT IT! 

  2. “Obama supported the TARP bailout, as did his GOP rival, Sen. John McCain.”
    “The Bush tax cuts were set to expire after 10 years, but Obama allowed them to remain in place”

    That’s the whole story

    Paul for President 2012

      1. “Temporarily”  Just like Bush enacted them as a “temporary measure.”

        You’re sold on the D company line… I get it.   

          1. Mike Dukakis in 88
            Ross Perot in 92
            Bob Dole in 96
            Ralph Nader in 2000
            John Kerry in 2004
            John McCain in 2008

            No “company line” here

          2. Which one of those you just mentioned was ever President?   If one of them was, I must’ve missed it.  One of them should have been,   talk about voter fraud…..

          3. My first presidential Bobby Kennedy on the New Hampshire ballot (where I lived at the time), my second was for George McGovern who won my State but no other, my third vote was Sargent Shriver (in the Mass primary) I voted for Ford in the general. My forth vote was for Ronald Reagan the only time I have been on the winning side,  My fifth vote was for Gary Hart, I voted for Mondale in the general which brings us to Mike Dukakis. see above. 

            I’ve only regretted one vote in my life, and that is the one where my candidate won.  BUT I still could never have voted for little Jimmy nobody.

    1. She’s an AP reporter, the article is in thousands if not hundred of thousand’s of newspapers in the US alone.   She also covered the Ca. governor Gray Davies recall in which Arnold won the special election.  Yea, I’m sure that the AP has a political agenda.   NOT

  3. Those two, Howdy Doody and Darth Vader, I mean Bush and Cheney, will go down as the worst in history. Unfortunately, my great-grandchildren will still be paying off the debt those two created.

    1. UR BUDDY OBAMA’S DEBT?    he nearly tripled the debt in less than 2 yrs. fact. but it’s ok for you so called grt. grand children to get stuck with this reprobates spending, huh?

  4. I think the only conclusion one can come to concerning the Republican primary is that the Republicans know they cannot and will not win in the general election or they wouldn’t be running such an extreme group. Few are able to make up their minds and are still undecided as of today in Iowa. I wish the media would stop paying so much attention to this out of control clown car called the Republican primary and instead focus on the House and Senate seats.

  5. A major feature of the Bush era relates to confronting terrorism and I’m glad he/we did. Many younger folks don’t remember the repetitive airline hijackings and they were poised to escalate up to the WTC and beyond if we didn’t do something. In fact, we are hearing new rumblings about Iran now. If Israel gets attacked will the U.S. stand by? I doubt it. In fact , I’d be surprised if we don’t have a non-published defense treaty with them (Israel). Maybe Iran’s nuclear program is only for peaceful purposes, but we’d be foolish not to contemplate other scenarios.

    1. The major feature of the Bush administration is that it fomented terrorism.  He brought gasoline to the fire.  While that is a confrontation of sorts, it destroyed our economy and our place in the world.  We lost every bit of moral standing we had earned after the World Wars.

      It is nice to see you approve of the significant costs of life and limb. 

      Now an internationally convicted war criminal along with Tony Blair, the president brought disgrace and dishonor to us. 

      Are you a war profiteer, a radical Muslim or just fond of despotism?  I can imagine little other reason to celebrate the Bush regime.

      We were attacked and that president failed to keep us safe and responded by attacking the wrong country.  Those are the facts, Nokomis.  We was warned and the blood of over 6,000 americans is on his hands.

        1. With no ultimate aim or goal to reach. Osama bin Ladden is dead. What other possible reason are we still in Afghanistan. A nation that obviously enjoys living several centuries behind the rest of the world. I am quite content to let them stay behind the rest of the world. If at some point in time they wish to join the 21st century, let them do it on their own.

    2. The hijackers themselves pretty much ended the era of succesful hijacking. If anyone even looks like their going to pull something stupid on an airliner they in all likelyhood will have themselves beaten to a pulp by their fellow passengers.

      What we should have done, upon learning that Osama bin Ladden was enjoying protection in Afghaninstan was to start a carpet bombing exercise like these people have never seen. Working from the exits inward. Not stopping until they handed us bin Ladden and all his merry men on a platter. That would send a message to the world that we will not play around when it comes to attacks on this country.

  6. Fleischer’s assertion   “I think President Bush has made America a safer nation” “I think” says it all.

    I wonder is that biased on the two unpaid for wars he lied us into, or that he declared victory prematurely, or he killed the master mind of 911, or that he drove the country economically into the worst recession in years, or that he handed Wall St, the US treasury, or he had enemy combatants tortured, maybe it was the fact that we were attacked on his watch, or was it the dumbing down of millions of children with no child left behind or is it safer because he used his policies to divided the nation? It’s easy to understand why Fleischer isn’t quite sure if Bush made it safer or not. One would have to do a lot of creative thinking to support such a claim. Fleischer might be right about one thing “politics isn’t about what’s fair, it’s about winning.” but who won?

  7. “In a presidential contest dominated by concerns over the weak economy, government spending and the $15 trillion federal debt, the Republican candidates have been loath to acknowledge the extent to which Bush administration policies contributed to those problems. Republicans also controlled Congress for six of the eight years Bush was in the White House, clearing the way for many of his policies to be enacted.”

    This above quote says it ALL! Why we are all in the current economic mess!

  8. Unless the candidates meaningfully address what they would do differently, we must assume they would make the same decisions as well.  In a party that sticks together like the republicans do, a failure to differentiate their views on this era means they will imperil us similarly, given the opportunity.

    We cannot afford the lack of responsibility and leadership this party demonstrates in their ignorance of the Bush era and failure to identify and run from the obvious pitfalls.  They do not speak of Bush because they would have to support him or lie about their position. 

    If we elect a republican president, we will be at war somewhere else in the world within two years.  You can quote me on that.  There is too much money to be made profiteering on war for this party to leave it one the table.  That much money is irresistible.

    I agree Ron Paul would not take s similar tack but I also contend he will not ultimately run as a republican, but as a Libertarian Party candidate, challenging the GOP and Obama. 

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *