Disgrace to democracy

I was deeply disturbed by the BDN lead article on Jan. 4 (“Loophole allowed state to pay millions to organization run by lawmakers…”), and bravo to you for revealing this little-known and shocking set of circumstances.

Millions of our dollars flowing (silently) into the coffers of businesses with clear ties to certain Maine state legislators, at a time when Gov. LePage is pushing to cut funding for Maine’s neediest people? It certainly underlines the egregious nature of crony politicians lining their own pockets at the public’s expense.

Mr. Nutting’s questionable Medicare dealings prior to taking office have been reported, and then we had Paul Violette. What next?

Mainers need to know just how corrupt the State House can be. I realize apologists will say, “They only followed the law.” The law needs immediate change. No one can miss the blatant conflicts of interest here, nor the self-serving instincts of certain named representatives. They are supposed to represent us, not defraud us through loopholes. It’s shocking and a disgrace to democracy.

Dennis Lopez

Rockport

Don’t forget adult ed

I was pleased to see the OpEd piece about early childhood education in the Jan. 7-8 Bangor Daily News, especially the fact that it was written by two businessmen who see, firsthand, the connection between education and economics.

Studies do show the beneficial effects of early childhood education, and the perils of reducing or cutting funding to these programs is real. Feedback to this article also mentioned the role of parents, who are their children’s first teachers.

One critical area of funding that should also be included in the discussion and supported is funding for adult education programming in Maine. The goal of our programs has always been to help our students become effective parents, workers and community members by providing academic and skill training close to home.

The foundation funding for adult education in Maine begins in the communities we serve in the form of taxes raised to support programs. With budget time here again, and town meetings approaching, I encourage all Maine residents to support their local adult education programs.

In the spirit of full disclosure, I work as the part-time director of the adult education programs in Machias and AOS 96.

Bonnie Fortini

Machias

The ‘gimmick’ saves lives

The BDN’s recent news report on the MaineCare budget discussions (Jan. 10) included a remark by House Speaker Nutting that requires a response. In his statement, the speaker referred to cigarette tax increases as “gimmicks.” We want to make it clear that the “gimmick” the speaker was referring to was using cigarette tax revenue to address budget shortfalls. He, like all of us, is entitled to his opinion on that matter.

But there is overwhelming evidence from Maine and throughout the nation that increasing the price of cigarettes by raising the excise tax is the most rapid and effective way to lower adult smoking rates and keep young people from starting to smoke. Every time the cigarette tax has been raised in Maine, per capita sales drop, as do smoking rates. People do not drive to New Hampshire; they quit smoking.

The American Lung Association strongly supports efforts to keep the price of cigarettes high by periodic increases in the excise tax as sound health and economic policy. One of the major drivers of Maine’s high health care costs is tobacco-caused disease and disability. If we want to address the “root causes” of this situation, then we can’t ignore tobacco use.

Edward Miller

American Lung Association in Maine

Front-lines offer

In October, I attended the Maine Attorney General’s summit on prescription drug abuse. I listened to the governor, high-ranking professionals and publicly elected leaders declare prescription drug abuse and addiction to be “epidemic” in Maine.

In December, Gov. LePage proposed cutting all noncategorical folks from MaineCare. This will systematically eliminate services to a very high percentage of folks seeking to overcome substance abuse and addiction in Maine. This plan will result in explosive increases in emergency room costs, corrections costs and deaths of Maine citizens.

There is an adage regarding the inevitabilities of continued drug and alcohol use known as the rule of threes. There are only three places an addict or alcoholic can end up if they continue to use: jail, institution or death. Cutting MaineCare prevents people from accessing professional rehabilitation systems (institutions). That leaves two options, governor, and the cost of jail outweighs the cost of treatment.

I understand that we cannot continue on our current fiscal path. I also understand that in the case of addictions, this plan will result in short-term savings and be outweighed in long-term costs in both tax dollars and in human life. To those in power in Maine — we in the trenches cordially invite you to seek solutions from the front lines of health care.

Jim LaPierre

Milford

No stinky news here

Aimee Thibodeau’s “skunked” story stimulated a few memories and prompts me to offer more advice.

When I lived in Jacksonville, in Washington County, more than 40 years ago, our house was a skunk hangout during the queasy months of my first pregnancy. The wild critters could have lived unnoticed in the crawl space were it not for neighbor cats who tried to steal skunk babies. Before we learned of better ways, a friend and my then-husband shot the skunks, who released spray with every bullet. Even our dishes held the odor for months.

Had we pinged in mothballs to repel skunks, we’d be stuck with toxic fumes unless we put them in mesh bags with long strings for later removal.

But I want Aimee to know that skunks are not so much “pesky” as helpful in controlling excess insects, including carpenter ants. And skunks do not “waddle” across roads — porcupines do that. A skunk’s white stripe ripples over pavement in a swift attempt to avoid our death-dealing vehicles.

But, best of all, Aimee: your employer is also your best friend when it comes to odors, including skunk spray. Newspaper is an awesome deodorizer that no website can ever replace. Crumple paper into smelly places from Tupperware to shoes and boots to eliminate unwanted perfume or sweaty residue. Layer newspapers across the floors and in closets to help with post-skunked clean-up. Pile a few in your car, too.

Thank you, Bangor Daily News, for your valiant effort to continue publication in a rough financial climate. You provide more than good reading. We stop to smell the ink, but it leaves no trace.

Sharon Bray

Orland

Join the Conversation

31 Comments

  1. Mr. Lopez, do not be shocked that our statehouse Republicans would choose Mr. Nutting as their speaker.  They didn’t choose him despite his having defrauded MaineCare.  They chose him because he had defrauded MaineCare and got away with it.   He is leading them by example as they try to defund MaineCare.  Government, in the eyes of the Republican Party, exists to serve the corporations and businesses who put these politicians into power.    

      1. John Maritin and who his boyfriend may or not be is one of the best kept not so much a secrets in Maine.

    1. It is funny all of you think this money getting thrown around just started happening  since Lepage took office, that same cash flow has been flowing for the past 20 plus years of democratic leadership in this state

      1. Undertaxed Under Obama – Nowhere in my post did I suggest that government corruption was a recent phenomenon.  The Credit Mobilier scandal under Grant, the Teapot Dome scandal under Harding, the Sherman Adams mink coat scandal under Ike, the ITT scandal under Nixon and the Halliburton scandal under Bush II show how old this trend is.  All of these occurred under Republican presidents; Democratic presidents have more typically been  involved in sex scandals, some of which were not uncovered until their terms expired.

        1. Sorry chard head,no one is undertaxed under Obama  unless you are living on the dole,Democrats just as scandalous as the republicans and it sounds like you agree with me the only difference is that the republicans keep their pant on  I guess you are ok  with tax dollars going to playboy clinton since his leaving office

          1. Your tax rate on earned income is lower under Obama than under Bush.  A prior post demonstrated that to you.  
              Thanks to Newt Gingrich, John Ensign, David Vitter, Larry Craig, et al. the modern Republican Party has found itself embroiled in sexual scandals at a more frequent rate than the Democratic Party.  
              I could care less what Clinton does or did sexually.  I miss the peace and prosperity he brought us. 

          2. Read my words carefully.  The “tax rate on earned income” would include all federal income taxes and all FICA taxes.  FICA tax rates were reduced by 2% last year and there was an indirect reduction of FICA taxes that came with the Making Work Pay tax credit in 2009 that has since expired.  
              Income tax rates are applied to earned as well as unearned income.  Income tax rates have not changed at all under Obama; indeed, the threshold for each marginal rate is now higher, given the automatic inflation adjustment.  
              Undertaxed Under Obama, who claims to be Overtaxedagain, has, indisputably, had his tax rates on earned income reduced under the President.  Spread the news, because Undertaxed Under Obama still doesn’t understand.

  2. Jim LaPierre–I agree with you that Governor LePage’s proposal for jettisoning our neediest citizens wholesale from their means of support will have serious negative repercussions within our state and also negative effects on the budget.  Addiction is only one of the diseases that LePage’s “cure” will worsen.  Many others including diabetics, heart patients, autism spectrum disorders etc will also be cut off from their chance at a more normal life.  I expect this type of action from Lepage, whose “people before politics” mantra apparently only applies to corporations and the 1%.  Hopefully wiser heads will prevail in our legislature.  Hopefully our representatives will understand that the cure is worse than the disease and look elsewhere for a cure.     

  3. does anyone actually believe that the small pay for being a legislature is it? that they go there to serve? they go for the power , influence and hidden “perks” . Corruption is vast 

  4. EDWARD,
    NOT! If you serious about tobacco and health then one would outlaw tobacco use altogether. The current” tax tobacco ” system only is used for a runaway government to get more revenue and for the freeloading crowd to take more of their welfare money away from their kids and direct it to their pleasures.

    JIM,
    Self inflicted addictions should be handled by ones self and not the taxpayers of Maine. You choose to make your life a mess then one must suffer the consequences. Get assistance from your family, friends or others who may want to help, but there is no place in society for the taxpayer to pay for self destruction!

    1. Re outlawing of tobacco, Prohibition really “worked”, right?  Not.
      You always revert to family support.  Does your extended family operate that way?  If one is not so lucky, what are they to do?

      1. Everyone has some family and friends, unfortunately some folks don’t take the advice of those who care about them, and then tough love has to be initiated. Next we see them become a burden on the taxpayers. Once you reach the point in life that your own family and friends don’t want anything to do with you then you need to be on the street and on your own, not living off taxpayer supported programs.

    2. I believe “self inflicted addictions” would include alcohol, would it not? Or is it still a disease?

      1. It includes alcohol. People choose to wallow in their problems and think alcohol and drugs, both legal and illegal will make it all go away. The social field will tell you it’s a disease in order to get more individuals on the government dole. Currently there is no law to get taxpayer money just because you destroy your own life, so we call it a disease and thus here comes the checks..

  5. Jim
    Many if not most of the people in drug rehabilitation are there because they got caught.  They were given a choice, jail or enter a drug rehab program.  Most are only interested in working the system and staying out of jail.  A majority will start using drugs again soon after being released from the system, often within days or even hours.   Stop wasting our tax money on these feel good programs.

  6. Jim, the reason Maine leads the nation in drug abuse is due to several decades of liberal policies that have “enabled” many to follow this path of self destruction, with the idea that the libs will “always help you out.”

    1. Bonny, that is just a dumb Limbaughish statement.  You seriously think people become addicts because ‘ libs will “always help you out.” ?   Let’s see:  I think I’ll start shooting up so I can get free methodone.  Plain stupid logic.

    2. Maybe they couldn’t cope with the events of September 11th and the endless wars that we have been involved in since then. Perhaps they began abusing drugs during the eight years of Bush policy.

  7. Looks like Mr. Lapierre has some skin in this game.
    Or should I say “scam”.

    http://www.linkedin.com/pub/jim-lapierre/10/29/9a7

    “I am a seasoned mental health therapist and substance abuse counselor. I am the clinical director of Higher Ground Services in Brewer, Maine.”

    “My current goals: – to expand our practice- to increase collaboration between my agency & yours- to network and offer myself and my staff as resources- to offer the highest quality therapy/counseling, clinical supervision & life coaching in Maine.
    SpecialtiesClinical Supervision (Mh & SA) Dual Diagnosis treatment, Trauma recovery, Substance Abuse & Addiction, Depression, Anxiety, Relational Issues, Skills Development.”

      1. “….looking at his list of specialties it looks like he is trying to do the job that parents didn’t…”

        And that is a good thing, because if it (Dual Diagnosis treatment, Trauma recovery, Substance Abuse & Addiction, Depression, Anxiety, Relational Issues, Skills Development) never gets done, we will always pay the price…jailing people for life, usually after they have robbed and assaulted you and your neighbors.

        So invest in cures, or at least stabilizations now, for a smarter and healthier future.

  8. Corruption in government is as old as government itself.  Transparency when doing business is  a good thing.  Any one involved with government that may do business with the government should have to compete for that privilege by being the best balance between cost and quality.  Most certainly any official that might have ties to a company that may be selected for something should remove themselves from selection committees, but I’m sure they all do that.

  9. Noparkforme,

    I believe in total transparency and that’s why my personal and professional views are easily accessed all over the internet – happy to provide other sites if you like. Do I have “skin in this game” well…the skin of my teeth maybe… I’m curious what the “scam” is. The Governor’s cuts won’t simply prevent people from entering rehabs – they will prevent a lot of Mainers from getting basic health care, reasonable detox services, all forms of professional counseling, medication monitoring, psychiatric help, and much more.
    I think we need a lot more meaningful dialogue and I am all about transparency. Here’s some transparency for you – in most every form of healthcare it’s vastly more profitable for practitioners to provide services to people with private insurance and there is no shortage of your fellow neighbors who struggle with addiction – they simply maintain good employment and therefore have private health insurance to rely on. The myth is that addicts and alcoholics are mostly on welfare – nothing could be further from the truth. So the “skin” I have in this game involves waiting up to six months for comparatively low reimbursement rates. Serving Maine Care clients isn’t done with money as a priority – in the case of addictions it is simply acknowledging that the disease of addiction doesn’t discriminate on socioeconomic status and so neither do those who provide services to those who seek recovery.  

    1. Would you say that with a national recidivism rate of 90% your use of the term “rehab” should be replaced with the term “maintenance”. Surely using the word “rehab” in this context is a misnomer.

  10. Dennis Lopez,

    Great letter on a very pertinent topic. Used to be that public officials always put up a good “front” even if a bit corrupt behind the scenes. Now they stand right up in front of everybody, ripping off the taxpayers, without any sense of shame whatsoever. They have totally lost their moral compass, if they ever had one. We deserve what is coming because we keep putting them in office and not holding them accountable for their slimy actions.

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *