WASHINGTON — Mitt Romney’s carefully plotted path to the Republican presidential nomination is now a long, unpredictable journey that could last months.
The next major tests are primaries in Arizona and Michigan on Feb. 28, where Romney has been heavily favored. A week later, 10 states vote on March 6, Super Tuesday, when the former Massachusetts governor was hoping to all but clinch the nomination.
Not any more.
With victories Tuesday in Colorado, Minnesota and Missouri, Rick Santorum became a threat. The sweep by the former U.S. senator from Pennsylvania exposed long-held voter qualms about Romney, and conservatives are likely to take a fresh look at Santorum.
“I don’t think this changes the title of front-runner [for Romney], but it underscores the fundamental problem he has with the party base,” said Larry Sabato, the director of the University of Virginia Center for Politics. “They just don’t trust him, and they don’t connect to him personally. He has serious, serious problems.”
Arizona and Michigan have strong conservative bases. Santorum’s faith-and-family message could appeal to them.
“After yesterday, I think everything’s in play,” said Jim Haynes, the president of the Phoenix-based Behavior Research Center, a nonpartisan market research and polling firm.
Even in Michigan, where Romney’s father was governor in the 1960s, the race could tighten. “There’s an opportunity for Santorum to give Romney a black eye,” said Douglas Koopman, a professor of government at Calvin College in Grand Rapids, Mich.
Super Tuesday’s most closely watched race is likely to be Ohio, the kind of diverse swing state that a general-election candidate historically has to win. Romney faces the same conservative suspicion there that he does elsewhere.
As a result, “It’s a volatile state,” said Paul Beck, a professor of political science at Ohio State University.
Super Tuesday also will provide opportunities for Santorum, Texas U.S. Rep. Ron Paul and Newt Gingrich, a former speaker of the House of Representatives. Paul is pushing hard in caucuses, while Gingrich is eyeing Oklahoma, Tennessee and Georgia.
Gingrich has Southern roots, having represented an Atlanta-area district for 20 years. His only victory so far came last month in neighboring South Carolina, where his angry-man, populist appeal propelled him to a big win.
But Gingrich is no Southern shoo-in, said Merle Black, a professor of politics and government at Emory University in Atlanta. Santorum has strong appeal to conservative Christians, who are influential in the Southern GOP.
“There are a lot of issues where Santorum would be seen as more consistent than Gingrich or Romney,” Black said. “And with Gingrich, you always have questions of judgment.”
A bigger question in the states ahead involves Romney’s political judgment, or, as Sabato put it, “his arrogance.” Early Tuesday, Romney’s political director, Rich Beeson, sent a memo to the news media, trying to downplay the day’s importance.
It was classic Romney, full of facts and well-reasoned arguments. No delegates were being selected Tuesday, Beeson argued, and besides, “there is no way for any nominee to win first place in every single contest.”
All true, and it’s also worth noting that the Colorado and Minnesota caucuses attracted about 65,000 and 50,000 voters, respectively, in states where general-election turnout reaches millions. In short, not many people voted Tuesday, and no convention delegates were chosen.
But Romney’s carefully calibrated logic ignored a maxim of modern political life: Psychology matters, and the media and the political world saw Tuesday as a big deal. Santorum’s sweep changed the conversation completely. Romney’s wins last week in Florida and Nevada are no longer Topic A.
Still, Romney retains important advantages: 1,144 delegates are needed to nominate, and his deep pockets and extensive organization are unmatched. He also has shown strong support among voters who are looking for the candidate who is most likely to beat President Barack Obama in November. If he fails to move voters passionately, he succeeds in moving many to make calculated decisions in his favor.
But what he’s indisputably lost is the opportunity to begin running now against Obama as the statesmanlike consensus GOP candidate.
Instead, he’s likely to savage Santorum, as he tore Gingrich apart in Florida with a barrage of negative attacks — which polls show alienated the centrist independents he’ll need in November.
If Romney is to win the nomination, he’ll do it by “winning ugly,” as Black put it, possibly alienating many voters and raising questions about his strength come fall.
He probably has no choice. As Sabato put it, “He’s going to have to keep his foot on the gas pedal.”



Our national debt is currently $15.3 Trillion; the chances of hitting $20 Trillion without a monetary collapse are slim. The budget deficit for this year alone is already projected to be $1.1 Trillion. Santorum’s overall plan will result in adding $900 Billion to that deficit in his first year. Gingrich’s overall plan will result in adding $850 Billion to that deficit in his first year. Romney’s overall plan will add $180 Billion to the deficit in his first year. These candidates have the sheer nerve to call themselves conservatives. Obama will not cut spending either and we will likely suffer collapse by the end of his next term; where will that leave all of the people who depend on entitlements and assistance to survive?
http://news.yahoo.com/study-santorum-tax-plan-swells-deficit-900b-080423488.html
Additionally, if we go to war with Iran, the added debt and money printing will cause the monetary collapse to happen much sooner. There is ZERO chance that we will be the first human civilization with a fiat currency to continue printing money and not suffer a collapse. Ron Paul is the only candidate who would actually reduce overall spending and try to fix our monetary system to avoid this. Nevertheless, you need to be prepared. Please make sure that you have enough supplies stocked up so that you and your family can survive the collapse; recovery from it could take several years!
The case for Ron Paul; please watch.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TGHJERqsu2c&feature=youtu.be
The government should not force catholic schools, charities.etc. to provide its employees with contraceptives, morning-after pills and sterilization. This is an infringement on religious
freedom and an attack on people of faith.
Let us take some common factors for all the candidates and evaluate them in order to hire one of them as POTUS:
1. Character and integrity -Santorum wins hands down; No flip-flops in cap & trade, climate change, bailouts, abortion etc; Compared to others he has no personal, professional and political issues. He could make Barack Obama and his policies an issue of the general campaign. We cannot afford a candidate who will be an issue in the general campaign.
2. Humble Beginnings – Santorum wins (lived in public housings – with a coal miner parents’; have less money than Obama and the remaining candidates..
3. Consistency in conservative leadership in sanctity of life, family, marriage, DOMA etc. : Santorum has a matchless record;
4. Sound national security and foreign policy – Santorum even won in CNN debates when asked about US foreign policy for Latin America etc. Santorum is again the winner.
5. Likability: It is widely believed that Santorum is the most likable;
6. Economic Policy: Santorum is the only candidate who has family friendly and manufacturing centered economic policy that helps US to grow our economy and jobs. Through this policy he can win back Reagan democrats, blue collar workers in the swing states.
Rupert Murdoch (Owner of the Fox News) said Santorum has a big idea when compared to others. Rush Limbaugh said he is the one who has not harmed the conservative cause (I am paraphrasing). He won the CNN debates on substance according to renowned conservative commentators. Even the liberal media was forced to say Santorum won. If so, what else conservatives are
looking for?
Ron Paul is a libertarian. He run on Libertarian ticket in 1988. He has not ruled out a possibility of running as a third party candidate in 2012. He has not adequately addressed about his racist newsletters published under his name and for which he was the editor. His isolationist foreign policy and his belief that America is responsible for all the attacks against it including
911 and his objection to America’s entry into WWII, which stopped Nazis and communists world domination won’t be acceptable to the majority of Americans.
Romney is unreliable and Newt is unpredictable, according to those who closely know them. Romney is not credible to stand against Obama on Obamacre, bailouts, government takeover of private properties. Newt married three times and changed church three times. Newt was for bailouts, TARP, the bogus man made climate change, cap & trade. Divorced twice due to infidelity. Santorum is from the blue collar background (lived in public housing, coal miner parents) and is not even rich enough like Obama or his republican opponents . BHO and DNC cannot
use class warfare against him.
The GOP has lost its mind! This guy is not going to be president and should never be returned to elected office.
No one should kid themselves – he wants to be in everyone’s bedroom and dictate social behavior. That’s about as scary as it gets.
Much as there is to dislike about Mitt (and I won’t vote for him), he will be the nominee. Regardless, President Obama will win.