PORTLAND, Maine — Former Maine Turnpike Authority executive director Paul Violette requested and received more than $316,000 for unused vacation and sick time from the agency he resigned from last year. That payout came despite the fact he was resigning over allegations he stole hundreds of thousands of dollars of the turnpike’s money for lavish international vacations, Assistant Attorney General Leanne Robbin said Thursday.

Violette pleaded guilty in Cumberland County Superior Court on Thursday to Class B theft charges, meaning he stole at least $10,000 from the authority that employed him for 23 years. Robbin said during Violette’s court hearing that the state can prove beyond a reasonable doubt that the former turnpike head used approximately $155,000 in authority money on personal expenses, including gift cards to hotels and resorts in Canada, France, Italy, Bermuda and Puerto Rico.

She said investigators speculate the amount Violette used for ritzy vacations, spa treatments and even a tuxedo rental ultimately may add up to more than $230,000, but she said the $316,000 paid out to the former executive director in unused vacation time is not being sought by the state because it can’t pinpoint with certainty when he was on vacation from work.

Robbin also said that despite the fact that Violette, who resigned last March, received checks of $185,000 and $131,000 for unused sick and vacation time, the state believes the $155,000 he offered in restitution to the turnpike now represents the entirety of his net worth. Bonding companies Travelers Casualty and CNA Surety reportedly will pay the authority back another $275,000.

Violette will continue to receive his state pension even if he goes to prison. Unlike many states, Maine does not have a pension forfeiture law to penalize public employees convicted of violating the public trust. The agency’s new head, Peter Mills, said last month that much of Violette’s more than $5,000-per-month pension will be used to settle debt he incurred paying $155,000 in restitution.

Violette did not answer questions outside of the courthouse in Portland on Thursday afternoon after his hearing, only silently lifting a hand to indicate he would not speak to the crowd of assembled reporters as he pushed past them and walked away. His attorney, Peter DeTroy, said in general terms that Violette paid much of his vacation payout in taxes and previous debt obligations likely consumed the remaining amount.

“There are no hidden bank accounts,” DeTroy said.

Violette was accompanied in the courtroom by his oldest brother and his brother’s wife.

“He has a sense of remorse and regret,” DeTroy told reporters after the hearing. “And he has a sense of anxiety. He’s 56 years old and he doesn’t know what’s going to happen to him.”

Violette agreed to plea guilty to the felony theft charges in exchange for a sentence not to exceed five years in prison.

DeTroy said he will argue for a shorter prison term for his client at the sentencing, which is scheduled to take place in approximately 60 days, but said he was not prepared Thursday to divulge how much shorter a term he will request. DeTroy said Violette likely will make public comments at his sentencing.

Robbin said “any jail time is a blow” to defendants in financial crimes.

“These are people who never imagined themselves in jail,” she said, calling the Violette case “the biggest public robbery case I’ve seen in my 28 years of public service.”

During the hearing, Robbin laid out the state’s case against Violette, which began with an Office of Program Evaluation and Government Accountability review of the Maine Turnpike Authority in 2010. The OPEGA researchers could not account for approximately $206,000 in authority spending, much of which was traced to hotel gift cards.

Robbin said Violette initially told state investigators the gift cards were to be donated to area nonprofit organizations as part of an “expanded civic involvement” campaign, aimed to better inform the public about the turnpike and its needs after a proposed widening of the highway was defeated at the polls.

The assistant attorney general said state researchers then reviewed hotel and resort records from all over North America and Europe to find out who redeemed the gift cards.

“In fact, Violette, his family and friends appeared to be the primary beneficiaries of the gift cards,” Robbin told the court.

Among the former executive director’s lavish vacations were a $40,000 trip to Paris in 2004, a nearly $20,000 trip to Italy in 2005 and visits to the historic Chateau Frontenac in 2005 and 2006 for Quebec’s Winter Carnival and meetings of the Winston Churchill Society, costing more than $25,000 combined.

“I think he fell into a pattern,” DeTroy told reporters. “A lot of it, he probably rationalized as OK after taking part in activities before and after conferences that had been board-approved.”

Robbin said Maine Turnpike Authority employees were “afraid to confront him,” and said Violette had a policy prohibiting turnpike workers from speaking to members of the authority’s board of directors. She said one employee who was scheduled to meet with a board member was brought in by Violette for “counseling,” a precursor to disciplinary action, and the meeting was canceled.

Robbin told reporters after the hearing Thursday that Violette exhibited a “significant abuse of power.”

The Maine Turnpike Authority is responsible for management of more than 100 miles of interstate highway from Kittery to Augusta. The agency employs 470, collects approximately $100 million in tolls every year and is overseen by a seven-member board whose members are appointed by the governor.

Violette had run the turnpike authority since 1988, but the allegations of financial wrongdoing date back only about eight years.

Seth has nearly a decade of professional journalism experience and writes about the greater Portland region.

Join the Conversation

142 Comments

        1. More than one post by you defending thieves. 
          Things that make you go Hmmmmm…

          If he worked for you, and he embezzled 100s of thousands of dollars from you you’d probably INSIST on paying his bloated bennies, right?  *cough*  Yeah, right.

          1. I called the railroad retirement board an im retired an they tolled me “if to jail or prison i would lose your pension for the time in in jail or prison ” So any one that goes to jail or prison should lose there pension for the time they are locked up

          1. An then they will go on welfare. Beside stealing is stealing weather it’s public money of not . What about a person that steals from a law office say 100,000b. They will never pass that they hould pass that they would lose there pension while they are in jail or prison that would have happen to me no matter what crime i commited

    1. He has paid back a portion, and the bonding companies have paid back the rest.  The amount Mr. Violette paid was the equivalent of his net worth.

      This is why public officials involved with large amounts of money are bonded.

      1. Since when has someone’s net worth been the basis for restitution? How many times have we seen criminals sentenced to jail and ordered to make restitution in six figure amounts when they have a zero net worth? The majority of the restitution in this case is being paid by the bonding companies and will ultimately be paid back in the form of higher premiums on the Maine Turnpike Authority.

        1. You can’t get what someone doesn’t have.  That is one reason public officials are bonded.  The bond is a form of insurance. 

          Please don’t respond with “They ought to confiscate his pension.”  They cannot, under the law.  This case might lead to a change in the law, but it isn’t an option in this case.

          1. He has it Buddy. He just hid it. Shoot, I don’t make half what he made, and for fewer years, and I have more than $155K saved up. He stashed it. Criminal.

          2. Not if it is not pursued, and I think that is the case here.  The state has a lot of egg on the face and it is hoped in Augusta that this mess fades away.  The longer it goes the louder the demands for accountability will become…I just hope he goes to prison and pays his dues there…

          3. I would like to see how they calculate his net worth as zero. The way I see it, he has a guaranteed pension of 5K a month and a life expectancy of at least 20 more years, so he has an imputed recievable of at least 1.2 million. That should be counted as an asset.

          4. It can’t be under current law.  Whether or not it should be is a different question.  I agree with you if you are saying it should be.  There is talk about changing the law, and this incident will probably be enough to trigger the change.

          5. His net worth was not calculated as zero.  It was calculated as $155K, and he paid that. The total was somewhere in the $400K range, and the bonding companies paid the difference.

            Think of it this way: some other person might be able to steal $5 million, with a net worth of only $1 million.  You can’t get $5 million from someone that only has $1 million.  That is why people who handle large amounts are required to be bonded.  It is how the public gets paid back in case the criminal simply could not make restitution.

          6. I have a degree in finance, I can do the math. My point is that the law is extremely flawed if the future value of an annuity cannot be counted as an asset.
            But of course it is flawed, it is a law written by the very crooks it was intended to protect.

          7. They could still make him responsible for the full amount.  He could pay it back on a monthly basis…when we send him his checks.

          8. With any luck the bonding company will sue him for every
            cent he has left. I am sure he still resides in a very nice house, drives nice
            vehicles and has other assets that should be liquidated to satisfy any other
            monies paid back on his behalf by others. I agree with “4mermainer”, since when
            has it been a consideration as to the net worth of a thief when it comes to
            restitution. He should have to liquidate everything he has that is worth
            anything. What about the assets of his spouse? She benefited from his theft and
            I am sure she knew what was going on, she should be liable as well.

      2. Good thing they are bonded, seeings how they steal and know they wont have to pay back the total amount they steal ! State of Maine is smart to make them get bonded by the looks of this case !

    2. In some foreign countries, a thief gets his hands removed for stealing! It works because they don’t steal again. I wonder how he is going to be received in prison? Paul Violette is an easy name to remember. I hope he has to move away after his prison stay. I believe the news report said he paid back 155,000 and it was all he has. What happen to the 316,000 he got in vacation pay? It also said the investigators couldn’t tell if he was on business time or vacation time, so they just gave him what he asked for! Who in hell is tracking our Maine employees vacation time?……Is Peter Mills a friend of Violette?……….I guess the people of Maine are the stupid ones. We let these people walk all over us and then put more crooks right back in their place………….The Great State of Maine….Vacationland…Come take our money, welfare benefits, free housing, free rent money, free health care and when we catch you stealing, We’ll pay you to got to jail……What great place to live………..We SHOULD BE A PART OF CANADA……..Socialized governemnt works better than this mess…………… 

    1. No, he would not be.  The investigation started months before the election.

      He was director under McKernan, King, and Baldacci.  That pretty much covers the bases.

      There is nothing partisan about the matter. 

        1. Mitchell was a spoiler, she never had a snowballs chance of winning. If she had any care for the well being of the state she would have pulled out of the election in the last month. Cutler would have had the election by a landslide, and we would not be dealing with this baboon currently squatted in the Governor’s chair.

      1. best photo ever!!!  the lawyer is smiling and paul looks like he’s puttin his hands up to be cuffed.

      2. Like to recreate history – this ugy was guilty only for his conduct during Baldacci and if it wasnt for the new administration pushing this the likelyness this outcome would have happened under a status quo dem like libby is highly doubtful

      3. The investigation by OPEGA would not necessarily have resulted in charges.   There is much less tolerance for misconduct at the moment.  

      4. Yes, there is.  We continue to see examples of how poor the oversight has been under 35 years of Democrat power in Augusta.  We have had outrageous spending, no business development, high taxes, and gimmicks to hide mountains of debt.  The party wa sin power too long and became corrupted.  Yes, I am a Democrat, but actually am beginning to like much of what LePage is doing.  Despite his tactics, the guy is telling the truth on Maine’s future without some pretty serious interventions. 

    2. Thats BS kind of sad to be bashing Libby know. Look at the money he stole and know pay him off. 314k Wow. Under the Lepage direction. But by cutting Welfare and School budgets there will plenty of money to pay him off.What a joke..

      1. if it wasnt for Lepage and the republicans he wouldnt have been prosecuted. Thats plain to see.  Mckormic and MSH is likely following the same path.

        1. One can only hope!  I would love to see her taken to jail…but so far it doesn’t seem that she embezzled monies for herself directly.  Totally misuses funding meant to help the needy, but only benefits organizations that she supports, not herself.  Sure want to know how money donated to Iowa helps Maine homeless.

        2. Lepage is the man a republican that got some grapefruit for awhile and then someone will take the air out of them. It always happens.

      2. He is not being paid off.  He is collecting the money that was not paid for vacation and sick time during his tenure.  Many government empolyees do that when they retire.  They either get paid for the time or they retire earlier depending on how many days they are ‘owed.’  Whether or not this is an appropriate payment, it is the way things are currently done.  Which could be changed.  LePage did not institute the policy.

    3. And ROBert Nutting who stole MUCH MUCH MORE would not be Speaker of the House…but thanks to the ROBthePUBLICans, he’s sitting in the fat chair.

    4. Libby Mitchell? You mean the one that Lepage paid off to be a spoiler in the election to siphon votes from Elliot Cutler…That Libby Mitchell??  

  1. Yes, he should lose his pension while he is in prison, that money should be auto paid onto what he stole from the citizens of Maine.

  2. On the bright side here, the only thing worse than a public official who steals from and lies to those he/she serves is one that refuses to admit he/she has done wrong in the first place.  Mr. Violette has taken the first step towards redemption for his crimes.  Sadly for us, many politicians will never even take that first step even when they and we all know they’ve been exposed as liars.

    Note the smile on his lawyer’s face. That can’t be a good sign for us.

      1. You’re right on the tolls, but it is still a violation of the public trust.  The Turnpike is a quasi-public agency.  And even if the Turnpike were a completely private entity, it would be embezzlement.

    1. He only took that first step because he was caught. Do you
      think he at some point would have obtained a conscious and stepped up and
      admitted that he was stealing money from the taxpayers?

  3. Since the cost of incarceration to the Maine taxpayer is about $2500.00 per month lets not lose sight of what the purpose of justice in this matter should be. The objective  for the justice systemin a property crime should be restitution not a long term of imprisonment.  At $2500.00 per month a term of 25 months will cost the taxpayer a minimun of $50,000.00. Prisons are for the violent, where you have someone who can work and repay what was taken that is what should happen.

    1. Yeah, great theory, except his “restitution” was only $155K. A fraction of what he stole. He claimed that was his entire net worth. I call BS. The guy made well over $100K a year for many years, apparently never paid for anything out of pocket. Wonder where he hid it all.

      1. No mention of his house . That has to be worth something. Or did the MTA own it and he lived there as a perk? 

  4. Will he receive jail time?  He has a number of factors in his favor: (1) blue collar crime; (2) no prior convictions; (3) represented by high paid lawyer with connections; (4) well educated with potential to find employment; (5) white male at retirement age; (6) made some payment (retribution) in agreement with prosecutors; (7) will give a nice speech asking forgiveness and showing guilt; and, (8) most likely receive letters of support from family and powerful friends.  I predict house arrest for six months and 200 hours of community services.  For someone without all these characteristics, I think that he might receive 10-15 years.  It is not fair but it is our system.  At least he has not claimed insanity.

    1. You may be telling the truth on what will happen but it is bull crap… no prior convictions!!! So if an employee has been stealing from you for 20 years and it totaled lets say 450,000 dollars, it will be concidered his/her  first offence and the Judge will concider that in the sentencing.. When actually that person commited hundreds perhaps thousands of crimminal acts.  I guess 3 strikes don’t count in blue collar crimes. hahaha!!!

  5. Here is a chance for the Judiciary to make an example of this donkey towards other corrupt politicians. Let’s see how it plays out.

  6. $5,000 per month in pension, and he will still be able to collect Social Security.  This story has made me nauseated.  All those who care so very much about “welfare fraud,” should take notice.  But those people who worked hard and got a pittance, or nothing for their long-time hard work, are to blame, right?  Isn’t that the rationale?  Blame them for not being in a job where you can be on the take?

    Here’s another ‘upstanding’, ‘hard-working’, ‘cultured’, man.  $5,000 per month – 23 years or not.   I don’t want to hear another word about the Maine State budget problems.  Not one.

    1. I doubt very much he will be able to collect any Social Security. Maine and a few other states look at the amount of one’s state pension and it usually reduces the amount of Social Security or eliminates it totally. With this much in a state pension he probably won’t be able to receive Social Security.

  7. This man was a carreer criminal, yet only being charged once.. If you steal money from you boss every day for 20 years, you have committed a different crime everyday for 20 years. So in my opinion this man is a Carreer Criminal and should be put away for life… You know Bill Clintone’s 3 strikes and your out law.. Life in prision…
     Run a toll booth and he was probably there with pepper spray and a tazer… These type of people hold themselves above others like they are Gods, yet they are just scum.

      1. But remember they are stating he is being held accoutnable only for what he stole during the Baldacci years- you could argue under Mckernan and King they had proper oversight and he didnt steal then – only the Dems empowered himenough to steal under thier noses.

        1. It is possible that he did not steal in the beginning.  Then discovered he could take trips on the public dime and continued and expanded the practice.

  8. This should disgust any Mainer and should be one more reason to throw BOTH parties out for allowing this kind of garbage!

  9. This guy is no good and a criminal…..any common person would have gone to jail for a long time and had to pay back more!  This guy will not suffer.

  10. Violette will continue to receive his state pension even if he goes to prison. Unlike many states, Maine does not have a pension forfeiture law to penalize public employees convicted of violating the public trust.  Where is Paul to stop this, this is not right?

  11. jail time is a blow.. what about the blow to all the taxpayers he ripped off if this guy does no prison time then there really is no justice in this state and crime does pay

    1. Ya, Jail time is a blow to anyone.  He did the crime and seemed to be having a blast living high on the hog. Give him the max.  Every time he cashed a seperate check, gift card etc. should be charged as another offense.  I say let him enjoy his $5,000 a month in jail for the next 15 to 20 years.

  12. best photo ever!!!  the lawyer is smiling and paul looks like he’s puttin his hands up to be cuffed.

  13. $100,000,000.00 collected annually!!! Employes 470. That is nothing. Thats a lot of freakin quarters, every year! Are you kidding me? What on Gods green earth could the turnpike authority be doing to spend $100,000,000.00 per year? That is a big number. Those roads should be gold plated. No wonder he didn’t think it would be missed. How much does the Turnpike do a year, ahh, about $100,000,000. No, I want it audited and I want the exact number. He probably figured it would be written off as a rounding error as it was for years. On $100,000,000.00 per year a few hundred grand over a long career is nothing.

    I get it the guy is a thief and should go to jail and lose his job blah, blah, blah but the bigger question is what is the money being spent on every year. Let’s get the BUDGET PLEASE!!!

    1. Well for starters, my best guess is 470 employess salaries with benefits incl pensions takes atleast $ 40,000,000 (40% of revenue); maybe more. How can we possibly need 470 employees to watch over a 100 mile stretch of road; this is absurd. There must be some national data out there that states what the average # of employees required / mile to operate interstate highways. I find it hard to believe we need 4.7 employees / mile to run this department.

  14. jeeze – that 316 thou would have help heat a lot of homes in maine!!!   And, he is going to get his pension of approx $157 thou per year???  What’s up with that?

  15. why is there no discussion of the other crooks in the organization.  This might include the Authority members who physically sign off on every nickel spent.  How about the finance director who had to know what was going on and had to facilitate these transactions.

  16. this is another example of a long term party having control .. no fear..-and resulting in corruption… vote them out ….and this time lets clean house and say goodbye to obama as well.

    1. Easier said then done my friend. I want to bring reality back to gvmt. as much as the next guy but I am afraid we are stuck with current admin for another 4 years. It pains me beyond words to write that…I still can’t actually say it.

      1. I hope you are wrong.  I think Obama intends to become a dictator and 2012 is the last time we can peacefully evict him from the White House.  He is overriding congress, he is appointing tsar after tsar to control everything without congressional approval or oversight.  He is destroying the Constitutional protections we have.  We have every reason to stand and fight this one out and not just hunker down and let him destroy everything.

        1. No Doubt. I am doing all I can with my resources to preach that same message, and then some My issue lies with the candidate we are going to be supporting after the RNC. If it’s Romney, we wont be doing much be.tter then what we have with BArack.

      2. Thank God after having to suffer through Bush for 8 years–talk about a clown with no competence–wow…

  17. This is typical of State and Federal officials, they line there pockets and when they get caught they get a slap on the wrist or walk away free and clear because they are protected by people higher up doing the same! What are you going to about this corruption Mr. LePage?
    (Ignore it of course!)

  18. what Department should be Investigated next, I think there is fraud going on not only in DHS, but all are a bunch of thieves.

    1. I think OPEGA is going to be busy for the next couple years!  They are currently at Maine Housing Authority, I believe.  

  19. Maine needs a law stating something like this.  “ANY public employee, who is convicted of a felony against the state, forfeits any and all benefits received from the state.”  This should become retroactive, ASAP.  I wonder if we are paying for his healthcare until he is on the other side of the grass.

    1. I already contacted my elected representatives to ask them to introduce that as emergency legislation, with the one change that I would have it include misdemeanor thefts.  I urge everyone reading this site to do the exact same thing.

    2. Uhhh–nice thought, but the employee pays 7.5% of their salary into their retirement.  It has been the state itself that failed to pay the other 5.5%.  Talk about criminal–the Maine retirement system IS criminal.  The sate has stolen the money from it for decades and now cannot pay it back…

  20. UNBELIEVEABLE…..AND HE KEEPS HIS $5,000 plus per month pension even while he is in prison ? Tell me that’s right. LaPage should be all over this one or someone at the capital.

  21. Can anyone spell or put together a simple sentence here? And, the article is about a man who violated a position of trust and commited a serious crime, but most of the writers attack other polititcans. For God’s sake, take a minute and represent yourself as Mainer’s with minimal intelligence. The guy’s going to jail and that’s a good thing, period.

  22. I’m certain Violette has been in touch with his accountant and arranged to have amended federal and state income tax returns filed for 2004, 2005, and other years he received those, um, “bonus” payments.  That amount of undeclared income will have accrued some pretty hefty interest and penalties by now.

  23. In simple terms, this man was entrusted with millions of dollars from which he most likely stole more than has been reported,  and he had the nerve to ask for over $300,000 –seems that he has gotten away with a lot more than any  average citizens could.  He “counseled” a turnpike worker?  Simply to be sure that he could still operate as he had been.
    When it is someone else’s money, the politicians and others think it is theirs to misuse and give away.
    He has a “sense of remorse and regret,” and a sense of anxiety.  He’s 56 years old and doesn’t know what is going to happen to him.” This lawyer is as out of reality as his client.  Maybe both need a major assessment.  Violette is not the victim–the people of Maine are, and they do not need to be cajoled into thinking that he is!  Perhaps the family and friends should be asked where they thought the “freebies” were coming from, as they enjoyed the handouts.  Thanks to Peter Mills for directing this agency in a professional manner.

  24. After 28 years of teaching with a masters degree, I barely broke $45000 in annual income. My retirement Cost of Living Adjustment has been suspended for several years. Thus with the inflation rate, I am going backwards every month. There’s something wrong here.

    1. Those summers off were nice though weren’t they. I mean really, in Maine we only have 90 great days of climate and you get them all off. C’mon,  you can’t tell me you didn’t enjoy that. C’mon, be honest.

      FYI, not many other businesses are giving out a “cost of Living adjustment” these days. Most organizations are forced to conserve because they aren’t making as much profit either, you know, in case you haven’t heard we just came out of a national recession. A recession is when to quarters of GDP, oh sorry, I am sure you know that. Anyway, do you know what that means? That means the owners of companies aren’t getting and “cost of living adjustment” raises or anything else you feel you are entitled to. 

      No sympathy here.

      1. “Summers off.”  That kind of statement is so tiresome.  You do not know what teachers do, do you.  Why not address the fact that after 28 years of teaching, the top salary was $45,000. 

  25. Former Maine Turnpike Authority executive director Paul Violette truly was wrong in what he did but I question the thinking of board members. The board of directors should have known this was going on. The monthly finance reports should have reflected Violette’s activities. It makes one wonder why the board was so relaxed abouth his activities. Something still isn’t right because board members either were kept in the dark or theydidn’t want to know. How could he  kept board members in the dark? Again, monthly finance reports are key to any organization. Something isn’t right and I’ll bet some board memebers knew about his activities. If I were the new executive director, I would seek all new board members and then have another certified audit of the books and change the bylaws requiring processes be put in place to prevent this from happening again in the future. The board must be more involved and should require board approval for trips etc. I feel violette is guilty but I also think members of the board are also guilty to some level. When you sit on a board you have duties and responsibilities and that appears to have been set aside in thei case.

    1. Boards are lazy and incompetent in many cases–a law should be made to hold them accountable.  The way it is now, people sit on boards for recognition and do little or nothing…

      1. Actually, by laws and State Laws do hold board members accountable. Take a nonprofit hospital, board members are legally responsible for expenditures and the conduct of the CEO and or the President along with other officers of the hospital. I was a board member and the lawyer representing the hospital usually makes that perfectly clear when you are asked to become a board member at your first meeting when taking the oath. Typically, board members are not lazy but they may be over there head if they become a board member without knowing the subject matter which is where most of the problems stem from. Not being familiar with the subject matter and being lead by the hand by an office of that organization can either open your eyes or keep you in the dark. When you begin asking questions to officers either they procrastinate trying to answer your question or they are upfront. One learns very quickly depending on your level of comfort.
        from what I understand

        Paul Violette, used intimidation techniques with employees to discourage them from speaking with board members thus, board members were not aware of employee concerns. This is why board members should have themselves available to employees.

        The new head of the Maine Turnpike Authority has already indicated he will work on changing the board members when their terms come up. If I were him I would request a full certified audit of the books and a full disclosure with employees as well as with board members. This would put everyone on notice that things will changes within the structure of the Maine Turnpike Authority.

  26. http://www.maine.gov/portal/government/edemocracy/lookup_voter_info
    This is the website to locate your elected state officials.   PLEASE contact them immediately to ask them to introduce emergency legislation which would require that any state or quasi-state employee convicted of fraud or theft involving taxpayer funds FORFEIT any benefits, including pensions, unused sick days or vacation time, bonuses, etc.  PLEASE do this immediately AND send the same request to Governor Lepage.

  27. Way to go LePage.  You let someone take $300K when they leave but force me to take a 42 % penalty in my pension to get out with my health insurance.  His administration is so corrupt.

  28. “He has a sense of remorse and regret,” DeTroy told reporters after the hearing. “And he has a sense of anxiety. He’s 56 years old and he doesn’t know what’s going to happen to him.”
    Oh waaah, waaah.  Too bad!  He didn’t have  remorse when he was on vacations, going places many will never go, staying in luxury hotels, eating better than many Maine poor &  acting like an important bigshot  compliments of the state of Maine taxpayers..   He doesn’t know what’s going to happen to him—I do, he’s going to jai but no worry,  taxpayers will continue to provide & I’m sure his stay will be short, afterall he is an important bigshot. 

  29. This is the most patently ridiculous thing I’ve ever heard of.  It’s like being raped twice for the state and John Q. Taxpayer.  There should be a law which states that an employee forfeits any pay or benefits in a case such as this.

  30. He was a “big man” on other people’s dime–now he looks like a scared rat. Pure scum who should be jailed until he pays back every cent from his retirement. The guy should be shunned by decent people for the rest of his life. Maine has children and retirees going to bed hungry and this thief is going on world travels with other people’s money. Lowlife…

  31. This guy also is not broke, I am sure.  The State wants the embarrassment of their lack of any form of oversight for decades to simply fade away.  The public comments lead us to believe all of his assets are gone including the payout for vacation and sick time.  I wager a year’s salary that is a lie.  Having worked for the state, I know how they dress up adverse information for public consumption.  Maine is simply a very poorly-run state, period.  We have so many people  in positions for which they are not qualified and the Peter Principle continues to be the norm. 

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *