Depending on how the current struggles and compromises over the Maine budget come out, one of the big losers can be the Fund for a Healthy Maine, which receives the state’s annual share of a 1998 multibillion-dollar lawsuit settlement with the four largest cigarette companies.
Maine gets about $50 million a year “in perpetuity” from the tobacco settlement as reimbursement for past tobacco-related health costs. The settlement allowed the states to use the payments for any purpose. Some have used the payments chiefly to balance their state budgets.
Maine has been a leader in restricting its use to health-related programs. In a 1999 law, Maine created the Fund for a Healthy Maine to receive the tobacco payments and specifies that “allocations are limited to the following health-related purposes.” It then lists eight programs starting with smoking prevention and winding up with school health and nutrition programs.
The drafters chose to use a statute rather than a constitutional amendment to safeguard the fund, since they wanted to impose it without delay. But that left open the possibility that future legislatures would modify the terms. One provision, which Gov. Paul LePage has ignored (and which the Legislature also can ignore) mandated that allocations from the fund “must be used to supplement, not supplant, appropriations from the General Fund.”
The raid on the Fund for a Healthy Maine, as proposed by the governor, involves scooping around $30 million from categories of the fund into the medical care account. That money would then be used for MaineCare, freeing up General Fund dollars to go to the MaineCare program, thus “supplanting” appropriations from the General Fund.
The Fund for a Healthy Maine accounts that thus would be wiped out in the next fiscal year include drugs for the elderly and disabled, community school grants including obesity prevention, home visitation, Head Start, support for child care and immunization. These programs serve mainly as disease prevention. That means the present economizing measures will result in costly future disease and disability — and not only in the distant future but also in the next years of Gov. LePage’s administration.
Tobacco use remains the top cause of preventable death in the United States and around the world. Yet Maine spends only a little over half of the $18.5 million a year needed for an effective, comprehensive tobacco prevention program, according to the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
Ed Miller, senior vice president of the American Lung Association of New England, notes that the attraction for lawmakers is that for every $1 of fund money they put into MaineCare they get $2 of federal matching money. He adds that “no one wants to talk about any kind of tax increase.” He points out that raising the tobacco tax from $2 to $3.50, as it is in Rhode Island, would both generate money and reduce smoking rates.
Becky Smith, a consultant to the Maine Public Health Association, says the governor’s proposal “rips the heart out of the fund.” She said, “These cuts will guarantee a future of fewer healthy families, higher health costs for all and an economic recovery that can only limp along because we continue to avoid dealing with the elephant in the room — the incredible cost of preventable chronic disease.”
It is up to the Legislature to save the Fund for a Healthy Maine and avoid short-sighted measures that would bring future trouble and expense.



You can forget Governor LePage raising the tax on cigarettes. He has signed a pledge to Grover Norquist to not ever raise taxes. I believe Norquist is a resident of Florida but has somehow managed to get a goodly number of our state legislators to sign his pledge along with Governor LePage.
I’m not quite sure what Grover Norquist holds as a lure or promise of reward to gain the fielty of all these Legislators, but it must be powerful.
There’s the answer from the LEFT=RAISE TAXES TO BUY MORE VOTES
This is real simple: ALEC (which controls LePage and dictates the policies he forces on Maine) is in favor of big business, including the tobacco industry. Public health is nowhere in the equation.
your Messiah Obama smokes. His actions influences young children to start.
LOL. Congratulations–the Irrelevant Comment of the Day Award is yours!
The Messiah’s wife is fat as well as one of the kids
C’mon Liz, that’s a stupid comment and you know it. The same could be said about the President and George Soros or the SEIU and it would be just as ridiculous. Suggest you add a bit extra to your Maine income tax to help with public health – I know I will.
“Please show proof of this claim”…JasonSimonds.
Yeah Liz, where’s your proof? This could be your most ‘stupid’ statement ever!
ALEC does its best to keep its membership list secret, but here are some clues (http://portland.thephoenix.com/news/126378-lepages-koch-brothers-connection-revealed/)
“Guess who is the new corporate chair of ALEC for the state of Maine? Confidential documents from ALEC’s annual meeting last month in New Orleans obtained by the Center for Media and Democracy reveal it is none other than Ann Robinson, a trusted advisor to Governor Paul LePage who simultaneously maintains her day job as a corporate lobbyist at Preti Flaherty Beliveau & Pachios. (Her legislative co-chair is Senator Richard Rosen, Republican of Bucksport.)…
“…a number of past and present Maine legislators have been active in ALEC, including senators Chris Rector (R-Thomaston), Debra Plowman (R-Hampden), Brian Langley (R-Ellsworth), and Michael Thibodeau (R-Winterport). Former senator Carol Weston (R-Waldo) — who now heads the local branch of the Koch-funded Americans for Prosperity — is a former state chair.”
I guess we’ll have to rely upon personal responsibility. Imagine that, people being responsible for their own actions.
While we’re at it, we can save a lot of money on police enforcement, since everyone will take personal responsibility to stop using drugs, drive the speed limit, stop beating their wives and kids, etc. Great idea!
I am referring to the editorial; from what planet are you commenting from? Although, you personally make a strong argument against cuts based upon your reply.
The planet Oorff. What planet did you think I was from dummy.
Another strong argument. And judging from your sentence structure would it be a stretch to state that English is not your primary language or perhaps you are the “dummy”? BTW, ever hear of a comma or question mark?
Sorry. Mis-spelled my planet – it’s Dorf.
Becky: Have you noticed that it is mostly the welfare recipients that smoke, use drugs and drink excessively? It is not my responsibility as a taxpayer of the State of Maine to force care on these people. I feel sorry for them but I feel no responsibility for them. I do not wish to spend any of my hard earned money on them, especially when they are unwilling to do anything at all to help themselves. Sorry, its cruel and mean but its much more cruel and mean to provide a service that cannot be sustained and then have to cancel the service. Maine has created thousands of dependents and it cannot afford to support them anymore. That’s cruel and mean and the fault of Maine democrats who never looked past the moment when it came time to creating new programs and new services.
Please show proof of this claim.
Come with me to downtown Bangor social services plaza where on a sunny day, nearly 100 welfare recipients & homeless are scattered about smoking. Sure it’s anecdotal; but it works for me as evidence.
“The downtown Bangor social services plaza” would be where? I’m in Bangor every day and I’ve never seen it!!
the legal are attacked. I’ve never seen any report in the news about smokers or people that want a drink breaking into homes or commiting crimes to feed their habits yet we give gas money to the drug addicts to daily drive to the clinic for their fix where is MADD. maybe they should redirect their anger towards the state sponsered DUI that happens every day. The state is making tons of money from people that smoke with their taxes if all money collected was put towards those people the problem would disappear !% of this money goes to this, they don’t want people to Quit smoking they would lose to much revenue.
“Have you noticed that it is mostly the welfare recipients that smoke, use drugs and drink excessively?”……wow. Clearly, you didn’t think this through before you posted it. Drugs? Perhaps. Cigarettes and alcohol? False.
Becky: Have you noticed that it is mostly the welfare recipients that smoke, use drugs and drink excessively?
What an idiotic statement!!! And where do you make-up these “facts” from. I know many people who do not get welfare who drink, smoke and drink excessively!!! Didn’t one of the Governor’s men from planning just get picked up for OUI!!!! LePage himself is a classic alcoholic.
Those people are not spending my money to buy their puffs and drink while lazy layabout liberals are spending my money when they smoke and drink
This smacks of cutting off your nose to spite your face. Investing the tobacco settlement money in the future health of Mainers should be a no brainer as it will pay dividends in lower health costs for ALL of us. For those who say it’s just welfare recipients who benefit, who do you think pays for their medical care when they can’t pay their emergency room visit? We do. Preventive care is much much less expensive … and benefits Maine’s employers by having a healthier work force. Stop advocating LePage’s machete approach and start cutting government wisely.
People make choices in their lives. One of those choices is whether or not to smoke. There are consequences to every decision, some of those consequences can involve death and disability.
At some point, we have to grow up and not rely on our parents to guide us and take care of our mistakes. Expecting the government to spend millions to be a surrogate parent is unrealistic, and in the long run too costly.
We need to care for people, but there is a limit to much of a person’s daily life we can manage in an attempt to keep them safe.
I guess I should be held responsible for my choice to begin smoking at age 10. Virtually every movie had people smoking, if someone was dieing from wounds in a war movie or western, someone would offer them a smoke. All the glamorous stars smoked. I guess I just wanted to be grown up too early. by the time I was 12 or 13, I was hooked hard. I smoked close to 2 packs a day for 42 years before I gathered the (still don’t know what) to quit cold turkey. It’s been over 16 years since I quit.
The BDN would advocate for a tax increase to keep the long list of low-to-moderately effective programs solvent. A tax increase in Maine is the LAST thing we need.
The LePage Administration is properly allocating limited resources to meet the most critical needs. We just simply cannot afford such utopian programs anymore.
Youth smoking is on the rise; smoking lifestyles are perpetuated with couples where both smoke and even Cigarette sales are rising in Maine for the first time in more than 20 years, … 5 percent over a year ago, according to Maine Revenue Services.(2011).
Program failure? Pushback? or endemic resistance to the constant anti-smoking propaganda?
At least with the Governor’s proposal, the money would go into direct care, not marketing and advertising campaigns; perhaps a far better use of it.
The BDN editor defends anther full employment program for party hacks – not dissimilar from the Maine Green Energy Alliance.
Notice the absence of any suggestion that the smoking cessation funds actually deliver any measurable results. Not even the usual BDN regurgitation of a liberal interest group press release (sans fact checking).
I think using Fund for a Healthy Maine money to pay for MaineCare benefits that include paying for health-related issues stemming from smoking, poor nutrition and drug use is a perfectly acceptable way to use the money. Paying for home visitors and educational programs is not saving the money people who run these programs claim it is. If that were the case, we would be seeing a significant decrease in smoking and drug use rates for youth, and an increase in nutritious food choices, and fewer child abuse and neglect cases. Are we? Not overall.
So, I say spend the money on MaineCare. At least the federal reimbursement is real money in the budget, not phantom “savings”.
The home visiting programs do impact the number of abuse cases. The population they serve also has a higher immunization rate. They only serve an average of about 3000 clients statewide, so just because you don’t see the benefit, does not mean it’s not there