When veteran print and TV journalist T.R. Reid visited Maine last fall, he claimed we could provide health care for everybody and do it for less money with better results. At 3:30 p.m. Sunday, MPBN will air his latest documentary, “U.S. Health Care: The Good News,” which shows how it can be done.
We spend almost $3 trillion nationwide on health care, about twice the average of all other wealthy nations. Our health care system has plenty of problems, but a shortage of money is not one of them. Historically, we in the U.S. have responded to problems in health care by throwing money at them. This mountain of money has led to a lot of wasteful spending.
High health care costs have raised taxes and insurance premiums, depressed wages and eroded public budgets. The more money we pump into our health care system, the worse it seems to get.
We spend so much because we have the highest prices for products and services in the world and often overuse them. Experts estimate that 30 percent of health care services provided in the U.S. offer little or no benefit to patients.
At the same time, we provide too few services to others. More than 50 million Americans, including 125,000 Mainers, lack coverage, and many more are inadequately insured. Underinsured people tend to put off medical care until they become very ill, often forcing them to go to the emergency room where the expense is far greater. Someone else usually pays the bill.
We learn in Reid’s documentary that costs often are driven more by a community’s supply of health care facilities and technology than by the amount of illness, contributing to large geographic differences in health care spending.
Our patchwork system of public and employment-based private insurance is inherently inefficient. There are literally thousands of insurance plans and tens of thousands of different policies in the U.S., all with different rules. Insurance companies spend megabucks trying to deny claims, and doctors, hospitals and patients spend more trying to get paid. This imposes hundreds of billions of dollars in administrative costs nationwide, with few or no medical benefits.
With so many private insurers, each one has little power to bargain down the prices charged by increasingly bottom-line-driven health care providers. Doctors and hospitals attempt to maximize their revenues by skewing their mix of services toward those that are most profitable, sometimes doing unnecessary procedures. Product manufacturers try to maximize their prices and generate demand, shamelessly peddling their goods to the public. While the insurance and health care industries game the system, patients pay the costs in more ways than one.
Each of these problems presents an opportunity to do more with less.
But tinkering with the status quo will not fix the problem. Reid suggests some promising solutions from several U.S. communities that have some important features in common.
First, they cover everybody in one communitywide insurance program. This facilitates preventive care, treats everyone by the same rules, cuts administrative costs and dramatically increases the public’s sense of fairness, community and confidence in the system. Recent changes in Maine law that will increase the number of companies in the state selling insurance go in the opposite direction.
Second, they put the whole array of services, from the ICU to home health care, within an organized system under a global budget — the only effective way to control overall costs. In Maine, Eastern Maine Healthcare Systems has been chosen to pilot a similar system for Medicare beneficiaries, a system that if proven cost effective could spread across the state.
Third, they reduce financial incentives that unduly influence clinical decisions. Fee-for-service payment to health caregivers is replaced by systems such as salaries and bonuses, eliminating the pressure on providers to chase dollars by doing expensive but unnecessary tests and procedures and giving them more time to spend with their patients.
Finally, they return the culture of health care to its healing mission and away from its excessive focus on the bottom line. As one doctor Reid interviews puts it, “Collaborate, do the right thing, don’t be greedy and work not out of self-interest but in the community interest.”
If these changes were easy, they would have been made already. But if they are made, we can provide health care for everybody at less cost. If they can do it in Washington state, Colorado and New Hampshire, we can do it in Maine. That really is good news.
Physician Philip Caper of Brooklin is a founding board member of Maine AllCare, a nonpartisan, nonprofit group committed to making health care in Maine universal, accessible and affordable for all. He can be reached at pcpcaper21@gmail.com.



Short version:
Universal Single Payer healthcare is the most logical solution to all our heath care problems.
http://lnk.co/IJAX3
Instead of single payer – which will only give providers incentive to RAISE prices – we need transparency of costs and to eliminate the fee for service program for drs. They provide many unnecessary tests, and send us to affiliated places for care at higher prices instead of letting us make an informed choice on where to go based on quality, experience and cost. Would you really take your car to the shop most convenient to you and say “fix everything”, not knowing how much it will cost or if what they’re doing is even necessary? Of course not. Getting a little information before making choices when possible and being good consumers is the best way to reign in costs. WE need to do more than just complain.
This just sounds like socialized medicine to me. Why do people peddle socialism when it fails time and time again? It must be, because socialism gives the people at the top immense power over others.
A couple of points:
1. insurance is not healthcare. Insurance is a financial instrument, risk management. It is there to save a person from financial ruin, in the event something that is unlikely to happen, happens.
2. Giving everyone insurance will not help bring healthcare costs down. It will increase healthcare costs.
3. The only way to decrease healthcare costs is to increase the supply of healthcare, through economic growth, and encourage competition.
4. The costs in Europe are far higher, they just use accounting tricks to make it seem like the prices are lower. When you factor in higher taxes, wait times, lower quality care, rationing, death panels, scarcity, and government subsidies, the costs balloon. There is a reason why europe is struggling, and why the UK is seriously considering privatizing the NHS.
5. We have high healthcare costs, because we have a doctor shortage, because we only have 133 M.D. medical schools in the united states. We need hundreds more medical schools. Medical schools should grow and compete with each other like regular businesses. No one should be turned away from a medical school, if they can pay tuition. They are customers. It makes no sense to turn away paying customers.
Good medical school corporations should have a college in every state. There should be a surplus of medical school seats, and medical schools should have to advertise to fill their enrollment each year.
With increased supply of medical education, and competition, the cost of tuition will go down. Doctors will be less in debt (if at all). And this will save patients money too.
So we have 700,000 doctors in the USA. We should aim to at least double that number as soon as possible. That will lower healthcare costs.
Also, doctors are gatekeepers to lots of products and services. They are, in a way, salesmen. When there is a bottleneck of this type, prices go up.
The access to universal financial support (insurance), indeed, becomes an element of socialism. OK. Whatever. Sort of like clean water, basic sewage and electrical supply.
Granted.
MORE primary is having access to capable, functional … “health” … “care” … which, beyond the medical industry … and the pharmaceutical chemical industry … is about addressing the CAUSE of dis-ease and working on THAT, as well as the (largely) symptom-suppressing techniques applied much of the time: because it makes PROFIT for the corporate hierarchy ,,, both national AND local.
Much disease and its “medical treatment” keeps people enslaved to the pharmaceutical merry-go-round, INSTEAD OF addressing the “cause-and-effect” of dis-ease, which can lead to HEALING, instead of so much of this -perpetual- “treatment”.
THIS is why some of us have come to call such approach: the “INSTEAD-OF-HEALING” industry.
Effective health care has been known and (sometimes) utilized for centuries ,,, and even millennia.
I have found (AND experienced GREAT ACCURACY regarding) that the “doctor” & “hospital” industry has been described as “following Sutton’s law”.
This refers to (a historically) notorious bank robber, Willy Sutton, who upon capture and trial was asked,
“Willy, why do you rob banks?”.
Willy responded,
“Because THAT’s where THE MONEY is.”
In contrast, if we are educated that maintaining a neutral to slightly alkaline body chemistry – BY the foods (and everything else) that WE put into our bodies – that ALONE – dispels a huge percentage of disease from even EXISTING in the human organism.
PLEASE take notice: Acid-VS-Alkaline. SIMPLE, BASIC, INEXPENSIVE. But learn to STOP DOing the things that make us acidic.
THAT is a very simple thing. I challenge ANYONE to accurately refute this, because they CANNOT do so — yet the Corporate Puppet-Monkeys (much medical “education” & much medical “treatment”) will do or say almost ANYTHING to prevent or distract from such learning.
When an industry can pull in a $200,000 to $300,000 cash flow in ONE given oncology case (cancer “treatment” program)… WHY would “they” want to educate people about a staggeringly simply and basic “health” … “CARE” … issue that’s as basic as paying “the rent” (or most other everyday utilities) ???
I’m talking about things as simple as molasses and baking soda in a glass of water – and learning to STOP living a destructive diet and lifestyle.
I’ve already used enough very pointed accusations, crude explanations – and plenty of capital letters – so why not go a step further?
This industry GETS RICH off the SUFFERING of humanity.
Let’s face it, they don’t make money from healing, they make money from DIS-EASE.
Please take notice.
Kind Regards
Best wishes.
PS. I mean absolutely NO offense to all the primarily well-intended and very dedicated health care workers. Alas that you/they are not better educated, beyond the (allopathic) “permitted”, ‘health’ knowledge … but then again, many of you are certainly quite aware (from direct experience) of this very basic, simple reality.
We can lead a horse (or a human) to water, but we can’t MAKE them drink.
They/WE have to WANT to.
Kick the false (programmed), (corporate) “belief systems”.