AUGUSTA, Maine — Maine’s congressional delegation wants Congress to act this year to reduce the federal budget deficit, but there is pessimism that it will occur in an increasingly partisan election year atmosphere.

“Whether something can happen this year remains to be seen,” said Republican U.S. Sen. Olympia Snowe in an interview. “But, when we are not going to even have a budget resolution, I don’t know what the foundation would be to build a deficit reduction package.”

She was sharply critical of Senate Democratic leadership for announcing earlier this month that the Senate will not consider the passage of a budget resolution that sets a spending limit for the next budget year. She said the extension of the payroll tax cuts and unemployment benefits last week was not fully paid for and added to the deficit.

“And the president’s proposed budget would increase the deficit,” Snowe said. She said despite her pessimism that a significant reduction plan can be worked out this year, the attempt should be made.

“We cannot continue to have the deficit continue to increase as it has been increasing,” she said, “we should tackle tax reform and regulatory reform and reduce the deficit.”

Republican U.S. Sen. Susan Collins agrees with Snowe that not having a budget resolution to use as a platform for spending reductions makes it very difficult to achieve significant deficit reduction. She said President Barack Obama’s budget is not helpful because it increases overall spending and adds to the more than $15 trillion deficit.

“It is very difficult to tackle serious deficit reduction without a budget resolution that puts a firm cap on the various categories of spending,” Collins said.

She is a member of the Senate Appropriations Committee and said without an overall budget plan, there will be spending decisions made without understanding the impact the individual votes will have on the overall deficit.

“It is exacerbated by the fact the president essentially punted on this issue in his budget,” she said, “His budget calls for increased spending, increased taxes and an increase in the deficit of $1.33 trillion.”

Even though what has happened so far this year is discouraging, Collins said Congress should not give up on efforts to address the deficit.

Democratic U.S. Rep. Chellie Pingree believes the threat of across-the-board cuts through the sequestration process will eventually move Congress to address the deficit. She said such cuts are a “meat axe approach” that simply will cut programs by a certain percentage with no assessment of whether the programs are doing the job they were designed to do.

“The challenge will be how do we figure out a way to agree on them without the sequestered cuts coming in all on their own,” she said. “That, in a Congress that does not have a very good track record of working very well together.”

Pingree said there will have to be defense cuts to achieve a significant reduction in the deficit. She said those need to be done carefully and not across the board. She serves on the House Armed Services Committee.

“There is going to have to be a lot of compromising,” she said. “That is going to be hard with everyone focused on the presidential election.”

Democratic U.S. Rep. Mike Michaud said it is unfortunate the supercommittee failed last year in their efforts to identify ways to reduce the deficit that were targeted. He said the across-the-board cuts that will kick in next fall as a result of that failure are unacceptable because they are not targeted.

“There will be some on the Republican side that will try to exempt defense,” he said. “There are areas in defense that we can target and should target for reductions. I think we should further look at overseas bases and reduce our footprint around the world.”

Michaud said while he hopes Congress will reach a compromise plan to reduce the deficit, he has seen little indication of that happening.

“There has been a lot of discussion about how we should lower our debt,” he said, “but I have not seen the efforts to actually come up with a plan to do it.”

It’s likely that if any debt reductions are made it will be done piecemeal as spending resolutions are considered later in the year. Collins said the closer to the fall election, the less likely significant action will be taken and that short-term spending measures will substitute for the usual spending bills.

Join the Conversation

34 Comments

  1. Just raise the debt limit to infinity, spend like there’s no tomorrow, and let the good times roll. It’s just money.

  2. Here is an idea to lower the deficit.
    1. Stop all foreign aid except for catastrophic circumstances like Haiti and then limit it to 5 years.   We have numerous countries that have been sucking off the U.S. for decades.  A few for over half a century.
    2. Stopping foreign aid will irk those countries and they will no longer be “business friendly” to the U.S.
    3. The loss of cheap foreign manufacturing (that really isn’t cheap because it is subsidized by foreign aid and U.S. military ops) will force American business to relocate manufacturing back to the United States.
    4. More Americans will find work in manufacturing and thus improve the income tax base while decreasing the need for social services.

    Of course none of this would sit well with the GOP and their idea of a “free market” that cost’s Americans money and lives while sending our jobs overseas.  Thank you GOP.

    1. Foreign aid makes up about 1% of the federal budget, a penny on the dollar.  And where it is spent, Israel, Egypt, and Russia, are the three biggest, doesn’t seem to do much to protect American businesses manufacturing abroad.  Gotta go after something bigger, and therein lies the rub.

      1. 1% is a start isn’t it.  In fact I don’t think anyone would mind that kind of reduction our budget.  Especially since that 1% really doesn’t buy Americans anything.  However I don’t agree with your point.  You see the American military keeps the world safe for what?  For business that’s what.  This cost’s American citizens much much more than 1%.  If we forced the United Nations to deal with world security, having all nations contributing equally, then the U.S. could save a bundle.  Military monies would be spent on actually protecting the United States rather than the world.  As it is now large corporations can lay off American workers (who pay the bill for the security these corporations enjoy) and go elsewhere for their labor.

    2. I have a much better idea Impeach Obama and here’s why. 
      According to the White House’s own figures , the actual or projected deficit tallies for the four years in which Obama has submitted budgets are as follows: $1.293 trillion in 2010, $1.300 trillion in 2011, $1.327 trillion in 2012, and $901 billion in 2013. In addition, Obama is responsible for the estimated $200 billion (the Congressional Budget Office’s figure) that his economic “stimulus” added to the deficit in 2009. In 2009, Obama pledged to cut the deficit in half by the end of his term. On Monday, he officially broke that promise, by unveiling a budget with the fourth consecutive deficit in excess of a trillion dollars. By the end of 2012, the national debt will exceed $16 trillion and by 2022, a whopping $25.9 trillion.

          1. Everything started going downhill before Obama got in office. You act like the second a policy is enacted its impacts are felt immediately. Get real.

          2. Your attack sure is a feeble one this time. Fact is I’m am a lot better off today because of a Bill signed into  Law in 2007 that had been fought against by Liberals for 45 years. Nice try though!

          3. It was three sentences, so I don’t think it can constitute a rant. We are better off than we were 4 years ago. These policies don’t work in an instant, they’re not magic bullets. You don’t plant a seed and then a day later screech that you have no crop.

          4. LOL, no, what you’ve said was the past 4 years were awful. Well the past 4 years have been the consequences of the previous administration and Obama’s attempts to remedy that.

          5. No no no, YOU said the past 4 years were awful, I said  “I’m am a lot better off today because of a Bill signed into Law in 2007 that had been fought against by Liberals for 45 years”. So you could say in a way Iwas agreeing with you in the fact it takes a long time to see the effects of policy change.  And by the way, the annointed one had nothing to do with it. Apology accepted!  Lol

          6. You said excellent idea to bringing back Bush, you said fighting against liberals has made you better off, you said impeach Obama, etc. Don’t put words in my mouth either, it just makes you sound childish. 

            He wasn’t anointed either. They’re called elections (this is America) and he won by a landslide.

          7. Chill out, bonhomme. If you don’t agree with somebodys opinion say so as I did.
             I didn’t put any words in your mouth either, you put them there yourself.  As far as my being better off since 2007, Obama STILL didn’t have a thing to do with it.

  3. “Delegation wants deficit reduction but pessimistic it will pass”…especially pessimistic if they have to offer up some bit of Maine pork that would complicate their reelections.

    1. Time to remove them from office.  With all the experience and power that comes from years in office you’d think that our representatives in Washington could come up with at least one good idea between them. Washington politics as we know it is broken, ineffective and corrupt. If our trusted representatives have no hope of fixing the problem then it may me time to remove them all !  As far as the current president is concerned , one term seems enough for me !

  4. Fix it fast by agreeing to no pay for representatives until the budget is balanced. If they don’t earn the pay, why pay them?

  5. Every survey etc. done has come up with the fact that the budget cannot be balanced without some addition in revenue.  So far the Republican’s have refused to discuss any addition in revenue, there is no question there needs to be cuts, the military is the biggest area to look for cuts, medicare needs something done, SS can be kicked down the road, although the fix on that should be easy, and many other areas such as tax reform needs to be done.   Until both parties set down and have a real discussion and put everything on the table and mean it,this crap will go on forever.  
    One of the major things,as far as I am concerned, that needs to be done is stop the rich people, corporations, unions and wall street from buying our government, until that is done nothing will get done.

  6. I find it odd that Snowe and Collins are so positive when it comes to getting other federal laws changed , but they all screetch the brakes on when they get asked about budgett cutting and get real negative. We dont see how that possibly could happen , maybe you and alot of the other fat cats dont want it to happen ! I can think of a few reasons why congress people might not want it to happen !

  7. Sorry, you don’t get to screech that the payroll tax cuts weren’t paid for when just a few years ago you were demonizing Democrats for making that same complaint over the Bush tax cuts. Every time you open your mouth, you lose more and more credibility. At the very least be consistent with your complaints.

    1. Correct.  The people who gave W everything he asked for can’t swing back the other way to placate the Tea Partiers and expect to get away with it.  Oh…they do expect to get away with it.

  8. We will not see a reduction in the deficit as long as Snowe and Collins along with the rest of the republicans are more interested in protecting the 1%s wealth over the best interest of the country. Revenues must be raised. We just can’t balance the budget on the backs of the middle and lower classes. We need to cut subsidies, close the tax loopholes, and cut bigtime the biggest boondoggle of all, the defense spending.

    1. Exactly. There needs to be a base tax minimum. The fact that the very wealthy can get down theirs 15% and below with all their loopholes, cuts and credits, while the middle and working class pays a higher rate is wrong.

  9. These four weasels are just like the preacher who sanctimoniously denounces adultery from the pulpit on Sunday and spends the other six days of the week shagging the church secretary in the vestry.  

    (BTW, anyone seen Buddy lately?) 

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *