AUGUSTA, Maine — Legislators were urged Wednesday to approve a bill submitted by Gov. Paul LePage to close an ethics law loophole that has allowed high-level state officials not to report millions in state payments to organizations run by themselves or their spouses.

The governor proposed the bill, L.D. 1806, shortly after publication of a Maine Center for Public Interest Reporting story that revealed that between 2003 and 2010 the state paid almost $235 million to such organizations.

“This legislation will help ensure that the citizens of Maine have a transparent and ethical government and I urge this committee to grant it a unanimous ‘ought to pass,’” said Sen. Nichi Farnham, R-Bangor, who delivered the public hearing testimony before the Veterans and Legal Affairs Committee on behalf of the bill’s sponsor, Senate President Kevin Raye, R-Perry.

“This legislation,” said Farnham, “attempts to close loopholes in the laws governing financial disclosure by legislators and certain executive employees that quite frankly most of us did not realize were there.”

Current law requires only that legislators or high-level state employees report state purchases of goods or services worth more than $1,000 directly from the individual legislator or family member, not from a corporation or entity for which the legislator or family member works.

The proposed bill requires legislators, executive branch officials and constitutional officers, like the attorney general and secretary of state, to disclose if organizations they or family members were affiliated with — as owners or management-level employees — were paid more than $1,000 annually by the state.

“If you’re the greeter at Walmart and Walmart is doing business with the state you wouldn’t have to disclose that,” said Dan Billings, legal counsel for LePage. “If you’re the manager of Walmart and Walmart is doing business with the state, you’d have to disclose that.”

But that was the one section of the proposed legislation that came under attack during the hearing.

Former House Minority Leader Joe Bruno, a Republican from Raymond and a professional pharmacist, served as a legislator and was CEO and president of Goold Health Systems as well as a board member of the controlling group of Community Pharmacies when each of those businesses got millions of dollars in state contracts. Bruno told lawmakers that the disclosure requirement shouldn’t be restricted to managerial-level employees or owners.

“I’m in favor of this bill,” said Bruno. “But make it equal for everyone. Employees of pharmacies don’t have to disclose. I’m an owner and I have to disclose? Why should any manager be different from any employee who’s doing the same thing? Think about what you’re asking here when you just single out professional, executive managers.”

LePage’s proposed legislation closes another loophole documented in the center’s story that has allowed departing legislators and officials to ignore the requirement to file financial disclosures each year if the filing deadline falls after they have left office or state employment.

In the past, lawmakers and high-level executive branch employees did not have to file a financial disclosure for their last year, or portion of a year, in state government. Bruno, for example, left office at the end of 2004. But when ethics commission staffer Cyndi Phillips was asked for a copy of Bruno’s 2004 financial disclosure, she gave this response:

“Unfortunately, we do not have a disclosure form for Senator Bruno for 2004 because he would not have had to report until February 2005, when he no longer was in office.”

The work session on the bill is not yet scheduled.

The Maine Center for Public Interest Reporting is a nonprofit, nonpartisan news service based in Hallowell. Web: pinetreewatchdog.org. Email: mainecenter@gmail.com.

Join the Conversation

19 Comments

  1. Maybe the state should be showing how bought what, right down the each individual paperclip, staple, sheet of paper, etc., and where it was used and who benefited from it!

  2. Maybe the Govenor would be willing to as transparent in his dealings instead of wanting to pursue his own veil of secrecy within the Executive Branch.

    1. Obama release his grades yet?  The transparent one who said we the public would have a chance to review every bill.  LMAO

      1. What does Obama releasing his grades have to do with our state’s ability to allow public scrutiny of state government’s inner workings?    And just for conversations sake,  Obama graduated from Columbia University and Harvard Law School (cum laud).  So if he graduates in the top 10%^ at Harvard Law, and was a law professor,  the safe bet is that his grades aren’t really a pertinent issue.  But since the birth certificate thing has passed, I suppose you need something to rant about.

        Has La Page released his grades from Husson? A school that he needed special accomodations to even enter?

  3. Ha Ha Ha……………has anyone been witnessing the repulican caucus?   OR how about the governor’s proposal to keep his and his administration’s papers protected..  ???   OMG!

    How transparent is THAT!? Out of 73 governors, only one has proposed to protect their administration’s papers……only one. And that man has been the governor for a little more than a year now???

    1. Though LePage is truly a reprobate of democracy this papers will undoubtedly revel
      only unintelligible doodles and scribblings of stick figures.

      1. By an administration that all the while proposing this, and also proposing that his administration’s paper’s are not to be subjugated to public scrutiny?  It leads one to wonder  just how earnest his intention is.   

        Read tsmdesign’s link. Apparently, I’m not the only one who feels that this is hypocritical.

  4. You can send the most honest man with the best intentions to Augusta or Washington and they will be crooked in 2 months because of the way our government is designed. Its designed to let companies and special interests groups influence bills and laws that get passed with the influence of the all mighty dollar and back scratching ! Let me say this one more time , OUR GOVERNMENT AS IT STANDS TODAY IS CORRUPT AND DOES NOT WORK FOR THE BLUE COLLAR AMERICAN !

    1. Sounds like your talking about ALEC  American Legislative Exchange Council.  It’s run by corporations who ‘suggest’ model legislation which is usually designed to favor corporate interests over people.  A lot of their funding come from the Koch brothers who also run or support a number of ‘independent’ think tanks like Americans For Prosperity, The Cato Institute, The Heritage Foundation, the list goes on and on and on.

      http://www.americanprogressaction.org/issues/2011/04/pdf/koch_brothers.pdf 

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *