NOVI, Mich. — With momentum shifting his way, presidential contender Mitt Romney pushed Thursday for critical primary wins using the formula that has kept him in the GOP hunt in good times and bad: an outsider’s posture enforced by unrelenting and overwhelming financial advantage.
Romney is blasting his chief rival, Rick Santorum, with a punishing ad drive in Michigan that mimics a similar, and successful, effort to demolish Newt Gingrich in last month’s Florida primary. The latest Romney attacks center around Santorum’s support for earmarked spending and portray the former Pennsylvania senator as a consummate Washington insider whose claim to be an unflinching, principled conservative doesn’t stand up to scrutiny.
Santorum inadvertently reinforced Romney’s strategy in Wednesday night’s debate when he failed to defend himself effectively on earmarks and admitted to having voted for programs he opposes, including federal funding for contraception.
Santorum said he had mistakenly done the expedient thing — siding with President George W. Bush, “the leader” of the Republican “team,” on the controversial No Child Left Behind law — instead of voting his conscience. Rep. Ron Paul of Texas seized on the confession in a critique aimed directly at the anti-Washington creed of many conservative Republicans and followers of the tea party movement, Santorum’s base in the primaries.
Romney charged Thursday that Santorum’s explanations for why he voted in opposition to his principles showed that he was a creature of Washington who sided with special interests rather than the American people. Romney was campaigning in Arizona, which votes Tuesday along with Michigan.
“I don’t think I’ve ever seen a politician explain in so many ways why he voted against his principles,” said the former Massachusetts governor, whose own shifts of position — on abortion and other issues — are among his main vulnerabilities as a candidate. “My team is the American people, not the insiders of Washington, and I’ll fight for the people of America, not special interests.”
The closing ad push by the Romney forces, overwhelmingly negative in tone, echoed his lines of argument in the debate: that Santorum was steeped in the distasteful habits of Washington, a defender of insider gamesmanship who veered from the conservative line to confirm Sonia Sotomayor to the federal appeals bench and voted in favor of Alaska’s notorious “Bridge To Nowhere” and against the E-Verify system designed to curb illegal immigration.
“Is Rick Santorum ready to be president?” a male narrator asks in one ad, adopting a sinister tone. “He’s never run a business. Never run a state.”
Santorum’s allies, meantime, were airing an ad critical of Romney’s electoral prospects, and a group backing President Barack Obama was attacking Romney’s opposition to the federal bailout of the auto industry.
Post-debate analysis portrayed Wednesday’s nationally televised encounter as a win for Romney and, perhaps more important, a missed opportunity for Santorum, who failed to generate a breakout performance at a key juncture in the GOP race.
With no more debates in sight and Romney able to rely on his superior financial resources and organization, Santorum may find it difficult to overtake Romney in either Michigan or Arizona. The winner will gain fresh momentum heading into delegate contests in 14 states over the following week.
A recent Arizona poll for NBC by the Marist Institute for Public Opinion showed Romney leading Santorum by a comfortable 16 percentage points, largely on the strength of early voting. More than 200,000 such ballots have already been cast, many of them after Romney’s Florida victory on Jan. 31 but before Santorum’s mid-February surge. The poll showed Romney with a 30-point advantage over Santorum among early or absentee voters, who could cast as many as half the total primary votes.
In Michigan, where Romney was born and reared, the latest round of polling shows a virtual dead heat, a shift from the previous week, when Santorum appeared to be leading Romney by as much as 10 points.
“All the polls show movement, and rather significant movement, toward Romney, and I don’t think Santorum did anything in the debate to change that and swing it back in his direction,” said Steve Mitchell, a Republican pollster in East Lansing, who is nonaligned in the presidential race.
I think it’s funny how Romney, the former Mass. governor states that he has hometown advantage in Michigan, and has to struggle to win.
I am starting to develop a severe dislike of Romney. He can’t connect with voters, even with the Republican establishment favoring him from the start. They have practically handed him the nomination and Romney has done his best to lose it anyway. The only way Romney wins is by using his money to outspend his opponent on incredibly negative advertising. What will Romney do for America? Nothing.
Romney, like McCain four years has daddy issues and that’s the problem. Mitt’s dad wanted to be president and failed. Now, the son is trying to right the wrong. Same thing with McCain. His father and grandfather were four-star Admirals and McCain got to Captain, failed to go further and saw the presidency as the way do as well as daddy.
Motivation matters and when its daddy or mommy issues that’s bad news. Mitt has already failed.
Unfortunately, I still think that Romney will buy his way to the nomination. Over the last several presidential elections, I’ve seen backmarker candidtates that had some good ideas and such, but can’t get anywhere because the media focuses on the big spenders. Romney will buy the nomination, and Obama will beat him. Like my father says, “We haven’t had a real president since Eisenhower.”
Much like after reading a lot of people’s comments on this site, every time I’m finished watching a GOP debate….I feel like they’ve made me dumber just by watching/reading.