ROCKY HILL, Conn. — Lottery officials in the six New England states have joined forces for the first time to offer a regional game, hoping to leverage the buying power and excitement of more than 14.4 million residents and provide a substantially larger prize to players and much-needed revenues for their states’ coffers.
Beginning Sunday, the Lucky for Life tickets will go on sale for $2 apiece in Connecticut, Rhode Island, Massachusetts, New Hampshire, Vermont and Maine. The top prize is $1,000 a day for a winner’s life.
The concept has been successful in Connecticut, which has had a state draw game and scratch tickets that offer a guaranteed payout for life since 2009. Anne Noble, president and CEO of the Connecticut Lottery Corporation, said the regional version comes at a time when the seasoned New England lotteries — most about 40 years old — are looking for something fresh and innovative to spur growth.
“Lotteries, as they age, look for more and more exciting ways to deliver new products to their players and this was a way to do that,” she said. “The smaller states can’t deliver a prize this big to their players, so it required a collaboration.”
Putting together a six-state game has been complicated, considering the state laws and approval processes governing the different lotteries. Officials from the six lotteries had to design a game based on the region’s population and estimated sales, and then design a prize structure that they believe can be supported by that population and sales.
They’ve collaborated over the past nine months on everything from the game’s logo to the rules.
New England lottery officials knew they had to come up with something different that would generate a lot of interest and a large amount of winnings, said Charlie McIntyre, executive director of the New Hampshire Lottery. With the advent of large multi-state lotteries such as Powerball, which has 44 participating states including the District of Columbia and massive jackpots that begin at $40 million, it would be difficult for the six new England states to come up with a large enough jackpot given the region’s population figures.
“You have to innovate. It has to be a little bit different every so often. You have to tweak it,” McIntyre said. “What used to work for a jackpot prize 20 years ago — you’d have lines at a convenience store for $20 million. Now $20 million doesn’t get noticed.”
The lottery industry grew substantially in the first part of this century as states expanded their instant ticket portfolios, offering higher and higher prices for tickets in the process, Noble said. Connecticut, for example, introduced a $30 ticket years ago.
“Massachusetts has topped out on its high payouts,” she said. “So lotteries are being forced to look for other means of growth, other than the instant portfolio. So we’re looking at what can we do to make the [draw tickets] more attractive to players.”
Besides the prospect of winning $1,000 a day — actually $7,000 a week before taxes — McIntyre said he expects New Englanders will want to play a regional game because they feel a kinship with their neighboring states. For example, in New Hampshire, he said, about 80 percent of residents are originally from New Hampshire or another New England state, which means they likely would be inspired upon hearing about someone winning somewhere else in New England.
He’s seen that already with the games New Hampshire currently shares with Vermont and Maine. In 1985, the three started the Tri-State Megabucks, the first multistate lottery game in the country.
“This [New England initiative] allows us to offer a much larger prize and really tie in the regional sympathies that the states have with one another,” McIntyre said.
The drawings will be held in Connecticut every Monday and Thursday, beginning March 15. While they will be televised in Connecticut, they will also be streamlined on the other state lotteries’ websites. Players will choose five numbers from a field of 40, plus a “Lucky Ball” number from a field of 21, and match them to the numbers drawn. Those players who don’t win the $1,000 a day top prize have nine other ways to win one-time prizes ranging from $2 to $25,000.
The top prize is guaranteed for a minimum of 20 years. That means that if a winner lives only long enough to receive the winnings for 10 years, his or her heirs will receive the remaining 10 years’ worth.
Paul Sternburg, executive director of the Massachusetts Lottery Commission, said he believes the Lucky for Life concept will resonate with players enticed by the idea of a guaranteed stream of winnings. His lottery began selling four instant tickets with guaranteed lifetime payouts in February, and he said “they’re flying off the shelves.”
Sternburg said he expects Massachusetts, like other states replacing an older game with the New England game, will gross nearly $62 million in sales from the new Lucky for Life tickets. After payouts to the winners, which are paid by the state lotteries based on their percentage of sales, about $18 million will be raised for the commonwealth’s general fund.
Sternburg said he also expects players will be drawn by odds. For the large, multistate jackpot games such as Powerball, the odds of winning the jackpot are about one in 175 million.
“This is one in just under 14 million and that’s a huge difference,” he said. “And there are 10 levels of prizes. Second prize is $25,000. So, it just has a natural appeal and ring to it — $1,000 a day for the rest of your life.”



Im headed to the store now to get a couple cases
of water to dump out and redeem for cash. $$
And be first in line to get this ticket.
I’m sure the novelty will wear off and then they will make changes trying to keep it alive.
Just another spin on an old gimmick , 87 percent of the total intake goes out to .000005 % of the players !
$2/ticket is too much. I recently stopped playing Powerball because of the price increase. There is only so much to go around and the constant influx of new games only waters down the existing ones. Wasn’t Megabucks supposed to be a New England game? Now the odds are so bad and the take so low that it just isn’t worth playing either.
I read that Megabucks has taken a huge hit due to increase of sales from Powerball, Mega Millions, and to the popularity of Hollywood Casino in Bangor and the Connecticut Casinos. If more Casinos and other forms of Gambling ever become reality look for lottery sales to decrease big time.
This is welfare for state governments.
Just curious if in the end and all the lottery’s don’t have enough money coming into them to make the payments on all these winnings if the general fund will have to be used to pay them off thus leaving the public responsible for the dept in the end ?
I think those payments are handled by an outside vendor or reinsurance co.Anything to keep Paul’s hands out of the cookie jar.
The Lottery expanded quite a lot under King and Baldacci it was ok for them to put their hands into that cookie jar ??.
We can’t agree in DC or anywhere else to help people.But let a new tax on the poor pop up and the agreements appear like magic.So much for solving real problems.Shameful.
Why should we help people. People should help themselves its not our responsibility to take care of people. Most of us struggling now why should we punish ourselves so other who are lazy continue to get handouts.
“Why should we help people”That more than anything describes what a rotten person you are.Thank God most aren’t like you.
No our economy is in the toilet because we have been not controlling our spending. The problem with the Liberals and the Warm and Fuzzy crowd they think we have all kinds of money to throw away on these Welfare Programs. Well we don’t want to pay for these people anymore its our money not the lazy folks.
It’s mine and everyone else’s money not yours, not lazy folks keep your hands out of the cookie jar. They should get off the couch away from the tv and start getting jobs like the rest of us. The majority of this country’s people’s who supports “god” as you put it would agree with me and not you. They support the conservative and independent points of view. Not the Liberal and Democrat Party’s Socialist point of view and certainally not anything that comes from The Joker’s in the White House (Obama and Biden).
I like how the Gov considers gambling illegal, yet they themselves are in the business.
I agree they are against having Casinos and other types of Gambling, because Gambling is bad for us. But yet they can join every multi-state lottery and national lottery game (Powerball, Mega Millions, Hot Lotto) because its popular and will bring in huge revenue to blow on stupid government programs.
Hope the younger folks realize that it won’t be long before the price of gas is $1000 per gallon. As well, these “gambling gimmicks” are the best form of taxation known to mankind.