PORTLAND, Maine — Teenagers arrive at Preble Street’s Teen Center or Lighthouse Shelter for a wide range of reasons. Abuse, sexual abuse, trouble with the law, family crises. But once they show up, none are turned away.

“Anybody under 21 who walks through our doors can get their basic needs met,” said Chris Bicknell, director of the teen center. “[We don’t put up] barriers to youth who have been rejected by other programs. Our kids have been kicked out of schools, they’ve been incarcerated, they’ve been kicked out of their homes, they’ve been kicked out of their foster homes and group homes — almost everywhere they’ve been, when they’ve been in a crisis, their behaviors weren’t tolerated.”

The “low-barrier” approach to providing services to the homeless and poverty-stricken — of any age — has always been central to Preble Street’s philosophy. But now, with the economic benefits of open arms becoming more statistically clear, the Portland organization is becoming highly sought after to explain their methods and best practices on a national stage.

“The cost to the city of [a homeless person] being here is far less,” said Caroline Partlow, coordinator of Preble Street’s Logan Place, an apartment building for the chronically homeless where operators embrace some of the most troubled tenants in the city. “They used to be in the shelter or the emergency room or the county jail.”

Preble Street leaders have been increasingly called on in recent months to conduct online seminars for the U.S. Interagency Council on Homelessness and the Runaway and Homeless Youth Training and Technical Assistance Center. The center is calling Bicknell down to another conference in Baltimore this summer.

Closely linked with the low barrier model in the industry vocabulary are “harm reduction” and “housing first” philosophies, in which service providers accept that small steps toward healthier lifestyles are better than none, and that providing stable housing for someone battling mental illnesses or abusing substances is a crucial first step toward recovery. None of these approaches were historically the industry standards, Preble Street officials say, as many service providers nationwide have long required tenants or clients to stay clean for long stretches before qualifying for help.

Mark Swann, executive director Preble Street, noted that The Shaw House and Bangor Area Homeless Shelter in Bangor use low-barrier approaches for some programs, as does New Beginnings in Lewiston.

“Folks running high-barrier programs — ‘You’ve got to stay sober to come here, you’ve got to take your medication to come here’ — they’re very afraid of a loss of control,” Bicknell said. “But if we turn that kid away, they’re more likely to use more drugs, more likely to sell their body for a bed for the night, and they’re less likely to survive adolescence. If we can eliminate the need to take those extra risks, that’s automatic harm reduction.”

Preble Street Associate Director Jon Bradley said the organization takes in all comers, regardless of their demons, because “if they’re here, we can work with them.”

“It’s like the old mission houses of hundreds of years ago,” added Swann, who last week was named a finalist for the prestigious Congressional Medal of Honor Foundation’s Service Before Self Honors. “They threw the doors open and that started the conversations.”

Thomas McLaughlin is an associate professor at the University of New England and the co-director of the Social Work Center for Research and Evaluation. His work over the last five years, in partnership with Preble Street and Shalom House Inc., is considered to be among the first analyses in the country to quantify the public savings generated by investing in low barrier and housing first programs.

“There actually is a cost to doing nothing, and mostly it’s emergency services,” McLaughlin said. “They’re pretty expensive.”

For his study, McLaughlin’s team followed nearly 100 greater Portland homeless individuals with disabilities — receipt by receipt — and compared their draw on public money before being provided stable housing and after. In 2009, he reported that, in their second year in stable housing, the subjects cost taxpayers a total of $622,386 less than in the year prior to entering the housing.

“Five years from now, these statistics might be well accepted,” McLaughlin said. “But for now, it’s new for social workers to be talking about things in terms of dollar figures.”

The cost avoidance came primarily in more efficient use of medical care and fewer run-ins with law enforcement, according to McLaughlin’s study, with year-to-year drops of roughly $264,000 and $188,000 in health care and mental health care costs, respectively. The greater Portland subjects also consumed nearly $85,000 less in police, ambulance and jail resources, saving the government more than two-thirds of what those same individuals cost in law enforcement and rescue resources the year before entering the stable housing program.

“It’s people jumping from detox to the shelter to jail to the hospital,” Swann said. “That’s not only expensive, it’s ineffective. One year we had 26 memorial services for people who died on the streets. We had to ask ourselves, ‘Is this the best we can do? Let these people bounce around from place to place and then die?’”

McLaughlin said his research doesn’t take into account the harder-to-quantify economic impact of turning a heavy public service user into a net positive contributor to the community.

Kevin Bowshier is a resident of Logan Place, one of a number of facilities and programs now run under Preble Street’s umbrella. He’s been at the seven-year-old Frederic Street apartment building now for about a year. He said he’s given up smoking and drinking, his long history of run-ins with police has come to a halt and, with the help of building staff and partner agencies in the city, is regularly taking medications to control his mental illness.

On one evening last month, he sat in the building’s community room downstairs listening through headphones to a new CD he purchased that day on a walk to a nearby shopping center. He bragged to a reporter about finding a great deal on a home exercise machine after paying a recent month’s rent. Preble Street officials note that, with a prohibitively high price of admission to their programs, individuals like Bowshier wouldn’t be circulating notes in the local economy, but rather knocking on the doors of public overnight shelters or hospitals.

Logan Place “helped me stand up on my own again,” he said.

Back at the Teen Center, 19-year-old Adym Verrill said she started coming to the center for stability nearly two years ago, just before becoming “fully homeless.” Since then, she’s acquired her GED through classes offered at the center in partnership with the Portland Public Schools, and she plans to enroll this month at the Empire Beauty School branch in the city.

Ashlee Richards, 20, is pregnant with her second child and said she’s eager to work with Teen Center counselors and their partners to find her own apartment, find a job and begin taking college classes to become a veterinary technician, something she said she never before thought was a possibility.

“I didn’t think college was really an option before coming here,” she said.

“It gets complicated when you start talking about money,” Bradley said of efforts to gauge the costs and benefits of low barrier and housing first models. “What’s the value of 30 kids each year getting their high school diplomas?”

Bicknell said he sees former Teen Center and Lighthouse Shelter attendees on the streets of Portland every day, but they’re almost never homeless any more.

“Only about 5 percent of our Teen Center kids move on to need adult homeless services,” he said. “When I see them out on the streets, they’ve grown up to get married, have families and jobs, and become productive members of society.”

Seth has nearly a decade of professional journalism experience and writes about the greater Portland region.

Join the Conversation

60 Comments

  1. Its nice to see kids wanting to turn their life around. We all need a chance, just some of us need a few extra – and thats ok as long as their is progress.

  2. I have been a long time supporter of the Unconditional Care model adopted from the Browndale Schools Model that came out of Canada. In one of my previous incarnations I worked for a 501 C 3 non profit called Communities For People. The philosophy is simple.
    You reject the behaviour not the person. You run with the person regardless of their
    behaviour. Of all the so called Mental Wealth treatment models I have seen this one seems
    to have the best results. Of course this model was the hardest one for me to learn.
    Have you ever practiced Unconditional Love, eh?

    see   http://junecdennis.multiply.com/?&show_interstitial=1&u=

    1. I hear you.  And yes, I have practiced unconditional love, having taken in a handful of homeless young folk.  It is amazing what a little kindness can do, for both the homeless and for me.

    2. I like to think of it as the Worcester Main South model.  I don’t know when Browndale advanced their idea, but Community Advancement Program was practicing this model from 1973, when Massachusetts closed the last of their reform schools to 1980 when Governor Ed King took over.

      Your point is good and the results of this program (in Massachusetts) was a lower crime rate in Worcester for a decade.

    1.  It’s disturbing that the State is leaving it to private agencies to address this problem, rather than the child welfare system taking a more active interest in cases in which kids are homeless.

      1. The “child welfare system” hasn’t worked for these particular children for a very long time.  To survive the child welfare system you must be docile, obedient, and very very patient.  These qualities are often not found in teenagers. 

        Through the year 2011 private vendors have done most of the “child welfare” in the State of Maine.   Machias a town of 5,000 has 22 private social service agencies selling services (exclusively) to the D.H.H.S.

  3. Have you even read this?  By accepting these teens, and allowing them to be who they are, this program is helping them better.  These teens needs to have a chance to become better citizens, and to be productive in their lives.  This seems to work, as the teems realizes that by being accepted and get the true help they need, they see a brighter future for themselves.  This program is saving the City and State money, by not placing a lot of barriers on them.  Which means your tax dollars are being use for something good.  We all gone through a rough upbringing, and most have made it and became better despite of it.  Some just don’t, as they rebel more.  By having a program that takes them in, and shows them they do matter, and allowing them to see what their lives is,  and show them the way to change it for the better, they are more likely to make a effort to get their lives in order.  Don’t be negative about a place where these kids can make a difference in their lives.  Whether they come from out of State or what, at least they have a place to live and get the needed help they deserve.  

    1. I don’t mind putting my taxes to something that is helping our teenagers with setting goals and achieving the goals of self sufficiency!  Social Services does have some waste however is why people are upset.  I have seen how it helps ,however!  What we really need to focus on is not spending any more money on war!  And bring jobs back to the USA so that parents who are struggling can raise productive children.  Ever issue surrounding crime, drugs, alcoholism etc..  is a byproduct of living an oppressed life.  The bigger issues need to be solved before others fall into place.  Continue using my tax dollars to shelter these teens, keep them safe, and education with job placement!  That will speak volumes.

    2. One of the two girls is being real productive….  

      And I’m willing to bet these were the best examples they could come up with.

      1. I’m always interested in new ideas, especially when dealing with teenage children.  Please tell us what you would do with these young people?? 

        ….and your answer below is you would do nothing…. Thought so!

        1. I would do nothing. 

          Let the bleeding hearts waste their time and resources trying to “help” kids who don’t want the help and who will manipulate and use them to continue their self destructive  behaviors.  

          Eventually they will get a clue and “fix” themselves or not.

  4. Interesting. I’m glad they’ve found a method that works for them and the community. Any improvements and innovations should be welcomed!

  5. Try reading the article before spouting off. Seems that they bring the teens in and work on improving their behavior and their lives. Most places don’t use that method, but Preble Street does and it appears to be very effective for them.

    It’s naive to claim that all these kids need is sheer force of will. That’s only part of the equation.

    1. It’s NOT “sheer force of will” that the kids need ,  it’s disicipline and clear boundries that they need and in most cases WANT..Allowing them to continue their destuctive behavior can’t help much…Having no income means they are still selling their body for booze and drugs even if they have a place to crash…I’m sure that makes the perverts in the area happy..They know where to get their fix as well…Just say’in…

      1. But that’s not what’s happening. You’re not “just say’in”, you’re just assuming.
         
        Their policy is that they don’t turn the teens away. So the alternative that you’re suggesting is worse, as the article states. Most places would turn them away — so what are the options for a homeless teen in that case? Accept the physical and sexual abuse, legal trouble, family crises and twiddle their thumbs in the mean time before being allowed the services and aid? You aren’t being realistic.

        1. Did I say turn them away or are YOU just “assuming” that ?? Once there they SHOULD NOT be allowed to to continue their destructive behavior…They don’t need more adults “letting them down”…

          1. I came back form some sever alcoholism as an adult.  AA didn’t judge, nor did they “force me to change” That would not have worked, because I (like these children) was not mandated to stay with AA. I could leave anytime I wished.  that freedom to leave made me stay. 

            This coming November I will celebrate 35 years of sobriety.  Thirty-five years of being a productive tax-paying citizen.  I do not begrudge these young people the same chance.  I’m even willing to support it.

          2. For others in the group.  Self disclosed identity to promote sobriety is permitted.

            35 years… read ALL the rules!

          3. That’s by choice. he isn’t talking about anyone else.

             AA should be proud and happy to have people come out as friends of Bill. We’re not 15 ducking the cops anymore.

             “Anonymity”?  Sheeeesh..

          4. AA is a great program for the few that it helps. Lot more credibility if they would lose ONE LITTLE WORD

             95%, recidivism.

             By all means dispute me. If so, I suggest you show me some pretty convincing evidence.

             I’ve been on both sides of the desk and dealt with my own addiction for 30 years.

      2. And my guess is those perverts who are availing themselves of these teens were once teens who were thrown away themselves.  Clear boundaries my aunt Betty.  These kids are where they are because adults in their life let them down.  Just sayin’….

      3. Either you dont have any children, or your children are grown and you havent had teenagers in the house in a long time, cause the world has changed.  Discipline and boundaries might have worked 20 years ago, but it doesnt any longer.  These kids are wiser to the system, which protects them greatly, and rebellious to any form of discipline that will infringe upon what THEY want to do at the moment.  It truly offends me when people comment when they have obviously never been through raising a teen in this day and age.

  6. (Mat 23:26) Thou blind Pharisee, cleanse first that which is within the cup and platter, that the outside of them may be clean also.  
    Meaning: clean up the internal problems that are causing the need for drinking as a way to eliminate the effect of external relief manifested in drunkeness and other outward signs (piercings, etc.) of revolution against the norms of civilized behavior. If it’s done the other way around it is truly only cosmetic.

    (Mat 23:27) Woe unto you, scribes and Pharisees, hypocrites! for ye are like unto whited sepulchres, which indeed appear beautiful outward, but are within full of dead men’s bones, and of all uncleanness.

  7. Are they really taking in kids running from the law?  If so that is just promoting crime by giving them a safe haven to hang out at while the fuzz is looking for them.  

  8. It is long past time that “teen shelters” took in teenagers “NO MATTER THEIR CONDITION” In the 1980’s the Portland Press Herald used to run pictures of teenagers sleeping on benches down at Deering Oaks. I remember one 13-year-old fugitive from a residential treatment center who used to eat out of the McDonald’s dumpster down on St. John Street. Another child lived in a burned out house on Cumberland Avenue.

    Sorry that it took so long to get here.  Happy that it finally has.

  9. Two kids at 20 years old? Take responsibility for your actions. Also put a cork in it so a third kid doesn’t come along for our sake! Taxpayers can’t pay for these services anymore!! 

    1. You can be forgiven for your statement.  Most folks don’t see or want to see these children.  Most “taxpayers” would rather not know that often these young girls were raped, sometimes by family members.  Most ‘good decent people” have no idea how dysfunctional a “home” can become.

      It takes time to get to know these young people.  they don’t talk easily many don’t trust adults / sometimes with good reason. If you finally break through all of that, you find that they are not much different than your own children… some of the same hopes, many of the same goals… Think (if you can) how would yout 12, 13, 14 year old do if suddenly, unexpectedly, they had no family, no support, and no friends. Maybe they would find their way to someplace like The Lighthouse shelter. I am guessing that you would prefer that to the pedophiles who prey on street children.

      I consider myself a conservative,  I don’t like paying for work-able adults, and I don’t like financing ever bigger government.  In fact Preble Street is one of the few social service organizations worth lots more than the meager tax money they get.

      So try to reconsider.  Think about young children down on their luck. Maybe you can see your way clear to send the place a sawbuck. 

    2. These kids or young adults are looking for help.Don’t slam the door on their face,it is easier  and less taxing when they are young,then trying to do this after a lifetime of dependency.

  10. To those making negative statements:  Do you realize you’re talking about children?  Children who probably have never been given a chance or had anyone protect them, love them, or believe them.  These are damaged children!  They need our love, our support and deserve a safe place to stay while they try and better themselves.  You’re adults, where’s your empathy?

    1. Perhaps they would understand it from this perspective…

      These children came from dysfunctional families and never learned how to be a functional adult. If we do not help them, they will not have a chance at becoming a functional adult and will thus depend on social services as adults. 

      In other words, helping them now will save money. 

      1. Some come from dysfunctional homes – others come from homes that set limits and put expectations on their children in order for them to be able to live in their world.  Some kids run away from home because there are places like this that will allow them to do just what they want whenever they want.  Not saying that this is the majority but certainly a place that lets kids drink do drugs have sex whenever and wherever they want, not go to school etc.  is very appealing to kids this age.

        My sisters daughter went to a shelter in Rockland much like this when she was 15 — she was rebelling terribly.  She refused to come home — she had a boyfriend at the shelter and was allowed to sleep with him — he was 19 and she was told that she couldn’t date him by her parents.  She found a way through the use of the shelter.  Now at 22 she has a child from this relationship (born when she was 17 years old) she has gotten her certification in the field she wished to work in with the help of her parents and is working, taking some college courses and living on her own (her mother takes care of her child while she is working and going to school) She says now that she can’t believe that she gave up all that time and her high school years to sit at a shelter because of a guy (that she is no longer with)

        Isn’t drinking illegal at 13? If they were at a high school party or picked up driving wouldn’t there be consequences? To condone this behavior as an accepted why of society is just wrong at this age. But, again its something that will draw kids that need a safe place to stay in — however probably many kids that have a safe place but want no restrictions on them will come too.

  11. Dealing with addictions and mental illness require support services that have been continually reduced in this country since the 1980s.  The result is that in a 2008-09 survey approximately 1 in 200 Americans was homeless for some period of time during the 12 month study.  And the incarceration rate in the United States remains the highest in the world.  What I want is a system that treats the causes and helps in recovery, not just institutionalization of anyone with a problem.  
    People living with homelessness live shorter lives and spend more on publicly funded services than people who can be helped back onto their feet.
    Shame on those who simply say “make them do it”, you just don’t understand the problem or the hurdles that need to be overcome to bring people back to being self supporting individuals.

  12. They missed discussing Hope House in Bangor as very low barrier. BAHS has much stricter policies-(its a great shelter, but not low barrier).  Hope house however takes those that no one else takes. Otherwise, excellent article

  13. When I lived at the LightHouse homeless shelter some 20 years ago, it was just a place to stay for the night. Not much help was offered. The Preble street Resource center on the other hand was a place to go to keep warm, get some coffee, and mabey if needed a warm jacket. It had many other features to, but to numerous to list. We had a teen center, but it at that time was on I think forest ave. There we ate lunch, and hung out for a while. but all in all, not much progress was ever made with teens. I am glad to hear that things have changed since then.

  14. I’m surprised at your comment.. Your screen-name describes perfectly the odds against street children.  They are David.

  15. Giving up on the kids will not help them, I believe we should give them all the help we can to achive their goals and become productive in their lives. I know from experince that without support from people it is easy to follow a wrong path in life. Luckly I had that support growing up from my family.

  16. Some folks might say that perfume, flowery hats and polyester pant-suits are gross.

    Adults used to get on my back about my motorcycle boots and black leather jackets…   Just made me a hardcore wearer of same. 

  17. I’m curious, does it appear to anyone else that some use the real name in order to perhaps gain some form of acclaim? 

     What i’m saying is giving your true name with an endorsement of a program doesn’t impress me. Anybody else? I don’t know who you are and I certainly wouldn’t bother to search for info.

     By the way, I hope we keep moving in this direction.Identifying the problem is the first step. The direction to take, follows.

      1. A few use first and last names, not just first  Comment as though they are THE authority on a subject.

  18. sounds like if they let them stay high, they are easier to deal with. this is just skirting the problem. these children need structure and someone to tell them that drugs are wrong.

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *