AUGUSTA, Maine — On the same day lawmakers authorized an investigation of the Department of Health and Human Services, the Maine House and Senate gave initial approval to a bill that would restructure the department.

Many Senate Democrats protested — one even called it “a terrible bill” — but it still passed after considerable debate on Tuesday. It then went to the House late Tuesday for more debate and passed in a 75-67 vote along party lines.

The bill still requires additional votes in both chambers but appears headed for passage, given Republican majorities in both houses of the Legislature.

Gov. Paul LePage and his administration introduced the bill last month as part of an effort to streamline state government’s largest agency. LD 1887 consolidates four DHHS offices into two and reorganizes another, resulting in a net loss of 15 positions, many of which are vacant at the moment.

The plan was crafted over a period of several months dating back to last year, but it was not designed to address budget woes, at least not directly. The initial savings are projected at only about $750,000 out of a more than $900 million total annual budget.

However, the shifting of resources from middle management to front-line services could make it easier to navigate DHHS’s web of various services. That could ultimately save money down the road.

The proposal seeks to merge the Offices of Substance Abuse and Adult Mental Health Services and combine the Offices of Elder Services and Cognitive and Physical Disabilities Services.

The Office of Child and Family Services would reorganize and link together its four major service areas, including child welfare and behavioral health.

The Office of MaineCare Services and the Office of Family Independence, which oversees food stamp and child support programs, were not targeted under the restructuring.

If finally approved by the Legislature, the bill would mark the first substantial overhaul of DHHS since it formed in 2004 through a merger of the Department of Human Services and the Department of Behavioral and Developmental Services.

But for a plan that took so long to craft, some lawmakers wondered why they haven’t had more time to go through the details of the 50-page bill.

“The work we have in front of us is incomplete; this is not ready for prime time,” Sen. Justin Alfond, D-Portland, said Tuesday.

Added Sen. Elizabeth Schneider, D-Orono: “It’s a rush job once again.”

Republicans disagreed.

Sen. Nichi Farnham, R-Bangor, said DHHS Commissioner Mary Mayhew spent months visiting communities across the state and listening to Mainers.

Sen. Richard Rosen, R-Bucksport, added that the plan seems to be a continuation of ongoing efforts to improve DHHS.

Some Democrats and advocacy groups, however, have been critical of LePage and Mayhew for getting rid of a number of high-level DHHS managers, which they say has contributed to problems within that department.

The restructuring plan passed late last month 9-3 in the Health and Human Services Committee.

One sticking point for some lawmakers was privatizing some services for the state’s most mentally ill residents.

The original bill called for the elimination of 33 “intensive case managers” who work with severely mentally ill and potentially dangerous residents and shifting those services to the private sector.

The committee voted to keep intensive case management services in-house for prison and county jail inmates and then contract out the rest.

DHHS has been in the spotlight for much of the 125th Legislature’s second session.

In February, the House and Senate voted on a much-debated supplemental budget package that addressed a $120 million shortfall within the department for the rest of the 2012 fiscal year.

Lawmakers still need to address a roughly $85 million shortfall at DHHS looming in the next fiscal year.

Follow BDN reporter Eric Russell on Twitter @BDNPolitics.

Join the Conversation

77 Comments

  1. Well, they’ve authorized an investigation,   LePage refuses an audit.   And the senate passes a reconstruction bill,   without an investigation or an audit complete.    That’s not very good governing,  I suspect that the Governor has had something to say to the leadership and, perhaps, their own proposal’s fates.  Especially given the recent setbacks he has had.  

    This is not leadership,   this is not even good representation,   and they were starting to stand up for themselves so well too.

      1. The Legislative Council was asked to authorize an audit early last month.  The most vocal opponent of this was the Senate President and the Speaker,  who both are in close with the Governor.  The Governor’s office expressed it’s support for the audit’s failure in the council calling it “unnecessary and politically motivated”.    It’s not very hard to put the two together.

        After all of the DHHS mess, and irregardless of who wants one and who don’t, an audit is completely and absolutely necessary prior to any restructuring, I maybe wrong, but the last administration during the 8 years had, I think, 14 of them done.

        Would you re-build a car without first knowing if all the parts are there ? where they are supposed to go, or even if that part works or not?

        1. Correct me if I’m wrong but aren’t many of the issues ongoing issues that their 14 audits still hadn’t corrected?

          1. The audit were conducted for many reasons.   These were audits done in the last 8 years, and t he audits also revealed the computer problem.   A problem that this governor knew about,   a problem that this governor decided to give information based upon.   You cannot blame the past administration for something that was revealed by that administration.   You can hold account that this administration,  knew of the problem,  and simply ignored it,   in order to create it’s necessary crisis.     Paul LePage is NOT the crisis manager he thinks he is……rather,   he is a crisis creator,  by his own volition.   

            Many of the audit’s reports that the previous administration encountered were dealt with,  the computer’s were something late. My point is : that he ordered audits , he listened to them, and he was not 220 million short after them. This governor wants to not have audits, despises an investigation, and still wants to restructure? Does that make any sense?

          2. Yes and no…here we are how many years later with a computer system that is still FUBAR.  A DHHS system that is out of control.  And dems & repubs pointing fingers at each other…

    1. With each tick of the clock we move closer to November 6th and an end to this tea party foolishness. There is no doubt that DHHS needs drastic changes, but to do so without finding out what the problems really are is insanity. Any person running a business will tell you that in order to solve a problem you first must identify what the problem is. A complete investigation and audit of DHHS by an independent firm would be the prudent thing to do and then when the results are known then make changes. Again the republicans are putting the proverbial cart before the horse.

      1. It’s starting too look more and more like LePage is hiding something, along with Mayhew.  His claims about balancing the budget, bragging about it, are going up in flames. 

    2. Pretty simple really rusjan, some are not as pleased with a 900 million dollar annual budget as you seem to be. Or maybe you just like to cry and moan over every issue that has anything to do with the Governor.

      1. 900 million dollar annual budget,  and he wants to restructure a department that has had so many problems in a single year,  and do that without independently identifying what the problems are, where they are,  and recommendations on how to fix them.    

        That’s not prudent,  it’s not responsible,  and it’s not fair to the taxpayer.  If the Governor would act in the transparent manner he campaigned on,  he would not be criticized so heavily.   I comment on the issues pertaining to the Governor because,    he sucks at it! And wants to run the state like a Marden’s,   and that offends me,  because you can’t run something that isn’t a business as a business. He wants to apply his standards to everyone but himself.     Does that answer your question?

        1. Um…maybe I’m a little slow on the uptake but I know I’ve been reading about DHHS “problems” since long before the current sitting Governor even thought about running for his position.  Many of those “problems” haven’t changed over the years either.  Can you tell me how these “problems” have only happened in the last year?  

          1. This restructuring will likely lead to more “problems” in the short term as most things do when you have two divisions moph into one. Also, the restructuring of DHHS does not include Office Of Family Independance, you know the TANF/Food Sup/Mainecare part. So this is 100% NOT about the kinds of “problems” we’ve all been hearing about.
            Therefore, the savings are said to be less that 3/4’s of a million dollars, not too much when you consider the whole think is $900,000,000. You won’t even feel the 1/10 of a penny go back into your pocket.

          2. You are not the only one who has been reading about DHHS problems over the years and past administrations. It seems that they have existed almost forever. The problem , as I see it, is that rather then to find the root cause of the problem and fixing that a band-aid approach has been taken which does not go to the root of the problem. Maine is one of 50 States and all have departments similar to Maine’s DHHS. I find it difficult to believe that all 50 States are having problems within their DHHS departments. Why not find a State that does not have the problems we have and model our DHHS after that State’s? This political “restructuring” can go on forever and never really fix the problem. The unfortunate part is that taxpayer money is being spent and based on what we have been told recently no one knows how or why. Until we fix the root cause of the problem we , as taxpayers, will spend the money and those who deserve the benefits will not receive them. LePage has been Governor for 15 months. If you and I were aware that DHHS had problems then I don’t think it would be unfair to feel that LePage should have known about them as well. By not taking steps to get to the bottom of the problem LePage has failed to do the job he was elected to do. We can point fingers all over the place, but the fact remains that Paul Richard LePage is the Governor of the State of Maine and it is his responsibility to fix DHHS. 

          3. I appreciate the rational and well thought out response.  While I agree that LePage as the current sitting Governor is responsible for finding and correcting the problems, what I do have is issues with some of the posters that blame all the problems on him.  These problems were existing during the last (at least) 2 administrations.  Point is instead of pointing fingers at each other…let’s move forward and just fix the darn thing!

          4. My point exactly!  Instead of laying complete blame at the feet of the current governor, why not just move forward with getting the darn thing fixed.   Where was the righteous indignation during the last 2 different administrations?  Pointing fingers hasn’t gotten anyone anywhere!

    3. Insanity to pass this bill before the investigation is finished (even if it turns out to be an invalid whitewash).

    4. I think the legis just want to get it doen now. Pass a law and worry about it later. A state should not be managed like retail. If mardens doesen’t sell enough junk, people are laid off. The admin is not honest about revenue ( just found some) and computer glitches.

  2. Just rearrangnig the deck chairs.  The Titanic that is the DHHS continues to sink of its own weight, dragging the taxpayers and its clients down with it.

  3. DHHS is such a screwed up department and has been for a long time.  Finally, we elected some people who recognize there is a problem and take the necessary steps to fix it.  Thank you from all taxpayers in Maine!

    1.  These aren’t the necessary steps, they don’t even have all the information to know what the necessary steps are let alone carry them out. This bill hurts Maine people, the mentally ill, elderly, and poor. I guess business comes before people in this state.

      1. Hopefully because if businesses thrive there will be more money for these programs. Where do you  think the money comes from. 

    2. Don’t say “All”  you don’t represent me.  Any bill that will leave Mainers out in the cold is barbaric!

      1. Whats barbaric is expecting the hard working people of Maine to continue to have our pockets picked to support an unsustainable level of support for those less fortunate and those who refuse to contribute to society.

        1. You know what is hilarious, is that you think this is going to save you money. Did you miss this part?

          “The Office of MaineCare Services and the Office of Family Independence, which oversees food stamp and child support programs, were not targeted under the restructuring.”

          That right there is your welfare division of DHHS. This restructuring affects Adult Mental Health and other programs along that line.

          1. Well I think we can both agree that there are those who receive assistance who do not require it. Thats the reason it is not a sustainable program. Am I against those who need it? absolutely not.

          2. We can absolutely agree on that point. However, it has nothing to do with this re-structuring, which is exactly what I was saying.

          3. Well im glad you got that point across. The ship is sinking under its own weight…whatever the reason may be. Its still sinking. Re-structuring is a must.

          4. Really? Even if it doesn’t fix the problem?
            Sorry, I disagree with that.
            This plan does nothing in terms of saving any real money.

        2.  Who are the largest consumers of DHHS again? Wait, I know this one, the elderly and mentally ill. How exactly are they refusing to contribute to society?

          1. Ah they would be the less fortunate I was referring to. Read thoroughly before lashing out. Its not a sustainable level of growth. If you think each and every person receiving assistance actually needs it, youre smoking something fairly strong.

          2.  It is only going to grow, and not by those you consider to refuse to contribute to society. Maine is the oldest state in the Union and it isn’t getting younger. Every year more and more elderly will join the roles. This bill will make not enough into much less than enough.  The rolls have swelled due to poor economy, job loss, and the start of the Baby Boomers reaching later stages of life. It has little to do with laziness or “refusing to contribute to society.” Words like “sustainable level of growth” are for businesses, and we aren’t talking about a business, we are talking about people.

          3. So what happens when theres more people needing assistance than there are people to pay for it? I guess we will just put on our blinders and drive right off the cliff. Ive got a parachute. Do you?

          4. Ok you think we have gone too far one way, why don’t we go the other. You know a nice mix of the Logan’s Run theory of society and Hitler’s perfect race. We can just cull the herd of the elderly and mentally ill… You either have to have a humane society that takes care of its people, or a barbaric one that eliminates the weak. I simply prefer a humane one.

          5. Streamline only applies to aircraft and automobiles. Making  one case manager cover more cases as Mentally ill and elderly together. The legis and Lepagee admin can strut around and anounce ” we streamlined something.  The health of elderly and mentally ill have chronic illness and they move slower This is not a proud moment in Maine.

          6. The truth of the matter is that the elderly and infirm are low hanging fruit. Baldacci, King and McKernan all (ALL), debased and devalued the help they needed. Closing AMHI, with no where for the people to go. Cutting much needed services, already cut, then cutting the services even deeper. We, as a country and a State, all give lip service to helping the elderly and the infirm and they are nearly all time, the hardest hit by budgetary changes.

          1. Again, They would be the “less fortunate” I was referring to. Wow. Talk about subjective reading….Its right there in black and  white. Iwas referring to two seperate groups of people…LESS FORTUNATE AND THOSE WHO REFUSE TO CONTRIBUTE. TWO SEPERATE GROUPS!

        3. They are the same ones who paid taxes and put you through school.  They paid for the roads you drive on and some of them even wiped your butt when you were too young to do it yourself.  Why would you want to run out on them? 

      2. Looks like “Terrible Bills” that do nothing but harm the neediest are about all we can expect until sometime following next November.  62% must be up to 68% and growing by now. Duck and cover GOP/Tea party!

    3.  They aren’t fixing anything.  They’re making changes driven by a political agenda and a limited understanding of the problem they’re trying solve.

    4. Wait till the class action suits begin…this isn’t really a change — just a trip back in time.  Won’t be long before everyone with a disability will be back hidden away at home or forced to live in an institution.  It hasn’t been but two years since the courtmaster released the State from under the class action suit for those that resided in Pineland.  Is Maine ready to face another suit — pay one way or the other…guess its gonna be when a group of activists in favor of protecting the lives of those with disabilities come together that attention will be paid to the neccessity for some of these services to remain in tact.  With those school kids aging up and sitting at home because no money is available for services for them coming into its third year — parents having to quit jobs because they have no help in caring for their disabled young adult.  I can certainly see that something is going to be a brewing and if Mr. LePage’s special “people” he has that surrounds him can’t see it perhaps he should send them down to the actual level of those that are caring for adult children at home.  Good luck state in the next class action suit –bet it won’t be released so soon next time as the state has proven there are no safety nets in place to make sure it won’t happen again to Maine’s most vulnerable individuals.

      1. You can’t live in the past, but at the same time, we, as taxpayers cannot bear the expense of keeping these people in private homes, with one on one people watching, sometimes two on one. Hundreds of thousands of dollars per person, and most of the money in our area goes right back into the pocket of a certain legislator that is actually on the committee that pays these homes. Conflict of interest? We are surrounded by these “homes”, and they are a complete waste of taxpayer money. There has to be a better way.

  4. Oh No!  We can’t cut the government!  We can never cut the government!  We are all going to die!

  5. Who said “it’s a terrible bill” ? If the BDN can narrow it down to one person, why not name the person? This is either lazy reporting or agenda-driven article writing. Regardless of which party said it, using straw men and unattributed quotes betrays the intention of transmitting information through an article. I think if there was some competition from another Bangor newspaper, that had something other than Sports and Movie Reviews (The Edge), the BDN would be in trouble.

    1. For many years there was another newspaper in Bangor, ” The Commercial”. It was not able to sustain itself and went out of business.

    2. So start one.  See how far you get.  With editorial opinions like yours, I sure wouldn’t buy it.

  6. Again the spineless in this legislature refuse to do what needed to correct this department.
    The Governor see’s the problem but the Demorats and the weak Rrepub’s only worry about reelection. DHHS has been broke for years and ignored for as many

    1. The  governor may “see the problem”   but,  in a year an a half, created a shortfall that equals nearly 2/3rds of the budget of the entire department.  (220 mill.  isn’t that far from 300 mill. and the budget was 900 mill.)   

      There is no explainations,    there are no pointing the fingers,   he knew the problems and he did not divulge them,   he knew that the numbers were not correct, and yet attempted to threaten a legislative committee to pass his bill or else he will cut education spending.   He also impeded upon legislative protocol and executive  honor by barging in on a committee work shop.

      He needs to do some explaining to the voter’s of Maine,   he also needs to understand that the legislative branch, together, are as nearly as poweful as he is, or thinks he is.   He also needs to know that there is an election next fall,  and if he ever wants to get anything done, then he needs to play by OUR rules,     not his.

      1. You need to understand that he was voted in by a majority of citizens. The only people I hear complaining are the Democrats that got us to this point.

          1. Gee let me re phrase my comment.

            For those who missed it, Lepage was voted in my the citizens of Maine to represent them as the Governor.

            Obviously had more votes than the others. No new math, he’s the governor. 

  7. The only way to fix the enormous waste of taxpayer money DHHS is would be to close there doors. 

    1. First they would have to close”their” doors.
      But that is never going to happen. There are still laws that the State needs to follow. Or are you one of those who only support laws you agree with?

  8. Rush job is in the lexicon of the Dem’s in the form of ObamaCare, where the voters were not even allowed to see the legislation. Oh my, now they complain when a little something rushed hits them so softly. Sounds like it is an act to unravel a mess. Good move.

  9. Thank you for fixing this…..  We know it must take a lot of courage went you are blasted continuely for doing something right. 

  10. It would be a great thing for the citizens of Maine to have a legislature that could work together rather than to always vote along party lines.  Ho Hum……………

  11. Don’t you love the comment from that Dem. Schneider. “It’s a rush job” .

    You’ve been looking at it for a year, and the Dems had what, 30 years to fix it?

    It’s a rush job? Hey Schneider, learn to either read quicker, or resign.

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *