On the evening of May 1, 2011, I was settled in for a quiet night. My cellphone was dead, nothing was on television, and I was half asleep on my couch ready to go to bed.
Suddenly, as I continued to slip in and out of consciousness, I started seeing pictures of the White House on my screen. I read the text below the pictures, which said that we were awaiting a major announcement from the president.
Presidential addresses are rather unusual that late at night so I knew something important had to have happened. Adrenaline began coursing through my body as I started to hear the pundits speculate what might be going on, a feeling that was only amplified when I logged into Twitter to see the words “Osama bin Laden” and “dead” being repeated ad nauseam.
The rest is history. The president announced what the country had been longing to hear for an entire decade. Spontaneous, celebratory rallies broke out at the gates of the White House and downtown Manhattan and a sense of relieved satisfaction captured our country.
Not wanting to miss the historic occasion, I got up, got dressed and drove to the White House to join the celebration. It was quite a surreal experience with the streets of Washington, D.C., alive with honking cars, screaming college students and more waving American flags than you are likely to ever see again.
One of my favorite images from that night was a group of Marines who had climbed a tree outside the gate to the White House and were proudly waving both a Marine Corps flag and the Stars and Stripes as a crowd gathered around them to applaud and scream out “thank you.” Hard not to be proud at that moment.
In the aftermath of the operation that killed bin Laden, I thought the president handled himself magnificently. He did not “spike the football” as is so customary in the politics of national security, but rather let the entire saga speak for itself. The focus was clearly SEAL Team Six and as a result the White House got some glowing coverage of its role as a bonus.
I was paying very close attention that night and the right was almost universally in praise of the president. The consensus seemed to be that Obama deserved credit for the mission being a priority and making a difficult, risky call that paid off. I saw virtually no criticism and I myself heaped copious praise on the commander in chief.
Sadly, that dignified, respectful behavior has come to an end, coinciding with the beginning of the 2012 general election.
In the past week, using the anniversary of the raid as cover, the White House has morphed into a nakedly political, inappropriate and opportunistic machine, attempting to extract as much electoral benefit for the president as possible. Campaign commercials, opportunistic interviews, offensive soundbites and unending political activity attempting to capitalize on the raid by framing it as a heroic presidential decision and barely mentioning the SEALS is now the norm.
As somebody who was so proud of a president of the opposite party for his adult, statesmanlike response to a major success, I find this all the more disappointing.
The president approved the plan and it was a gutsy call. But the SEALs are the ones that risked their lives and executed that plan, not the president, and any attempt to take a political victory lap on their backs is, in my opinion, disrespectful and wrong.
Strutting about the bin Laden raid is in horrendously bad taste. It is immature, it is grandstanding, political, phony and worst of all it is disrespectful to the anonymous soldiers who could have died in that raid but have to remain in the shadows. These men do not themselves get to take a victory lap in public in celebration of their deed.
As long as those SEALs remain unrecognized, it is inappropriate for their commander in chief to attempt to accumulate political points as a result of their sacrifice.
When heroes go unheralded and politicians claim credit, something is very wrong. Let your decisions speak for themselves, Mr. President, and honor the sacrifice of the men who actually risked their lives in that raid.
The irony is that you probably would gain more political benefit and earn more respect if you showed some class. This is not the new kind of politics that you promised us.
Matthew Gagnon, a Hampden native, is a Republican political strategist. He previously worked for Sen. Susan Collins and the National Republican Senatorial Committee. You can reach him at matthew.o.gagnon@gmail.com and read his blog at www.pinetreepolitics.com.



If he could just pose in front of a Mission Accomplished banner and use that for political ads it would be so much better.
I find this to be an undignified and disrespectful essay.
Was Matthew unconscious or in coma during the entire Bush administration?
Nope. I was uncomfortable with, and was very critical of the Bush administration’s jingoism as well, and we very public about it. Obviously you can’t fathom the concept that I have a principled problem with this no matter what party’s president is doing it, but I have, I do, and I will.
And really, if you are accusing me (based on no knowledge, obviously) of being a hypocrite… I wonder then why it is alright for Obama to do this kind of thing when the left had such a problem with Bush grandstanding on national security all that time. I mean, if it was wrong for him to do it, why be an apologist for Obama doing it. Show some consistency.
I had a problem with what Bush did. I have a problem with what Obama did. End of story.
BO show some class, hehee. He is more bush league.
Matthew, would you be happy if the President just stay in the White House, incomunicado during an election year and not speak of his accomplishments? Sort of stay mum while every Republican running of office condemns every move or decision the President makes?
His accomplishments? Wasn’t aware that he flew the helicopter, landed it in distress, stormed the compound, or shot bin Laden.
Yes, I do expect him to sit down and shut up about this. Talking humbly about the mission and approving the plan wouldn’t upset me in the least, but showboating like this is just entirely unacceptable when the people who actually risked their lives and deserve the ticker tape parade are in the shadows. Trying to take their credit is beneath contempt.
“Yes, I do expect him to sit down and shut up about this.”
He made a presidential decision. He made a gutsy call as the commander in chief. He has every right to remind voters of this, especially when the Republicans claim he and the rest of the Democratic Part are “soft” when it comes to military action.
No, Obama may not have risked his life. But he had to wrestle with the intelligence and advice given to him by his advisers. He had to live with knowing that his decision could end up killing American soldiers and civilians, and end up placing the United States in the uncomfortable position of defending a military action on sovereign land if the mission failed.
Despite the lies you spew, the President has constantly given credit where its due on this matter.
http://www.whitehouse.gov/the-press-office/2011/05/02/remarks-president-osama-bin-laden
http://www.whitehouse.gov/the-press-office/2011/05/06/remarks-president-and-vice-president-troops-fort-campbell-ky
http://www.whitehouse.gov/the-press-office/2012/05/01/remarks-president-obama-troops-afghanistan
Contempt? The stuff you write is not only disgusting, it’s untrue. Why don’t you show some class?
After tolerating 8 years of Bush not getting his man but strutting as if he was well endowed enough to have done the deed I’m only mildly annoyed at President Obama for reminding us that he did get Bush’s man.
Do take a few minutes and watch Jon Stewart’s reaction to the Republican complainers who fail to remember how their own party and President acted just within the past decade.
Ah, yeah, Bush was a d-bag and so is Obama….what’s your point?
This whole D vs. R thing is becoming very much irrelevant….they are one in the same, both in it to profit off of the military-welfare industrial compex
ding ding ding… we have a winner.
Mr. Gagnon certainly got his knickers in a knot over this! Guess it hurts to accept the fact we got bin Laden on Obama’s watch so give credit where credit is due.
You have made some good points in some of your other columns Mr. Gagnon. Not this time. This entire premise is totally off base. If you want to attack the President for campaigning on the taxpayer dime–that would have some truth. If you want to attack him for promising to get out of Afghanistan and then making an arrangement that plans on keeping us there in an aggressive role for an indefinite time–ok. If you want to cast aspersions on his signature of the NDAA bill that allows any of us to be arrested and detained indefinitely–I will agree. But he is our commander in chief and he was on the night you claim to have been proud–he has earned the right to make that a talking point, no matter how much it irks his detractors who would apparently prefer if bin Laden was still around rather than admit Obama did something right.
I seem to recall President Obama’s predecessor proudly standing under a banner that said “Mission Accomplished” before anything had been accomplished.
How odd it must be for the Republicans to find themselves unable to thump their chest for waging a successful military mission, after all of these years of accusing Democrats of being soft on military might.
Let’s be serious, Mr. Gagnon: If the roles were reversed, the Republicans would be touting the bin Laden mission.
Why shouldn’t the president tout an actual accomplishment?
Why did he wait a year to do it?
“Class” is not in the Obama dictionary. He could learn from George W. Bush, who never blamed anyone for the issues he dealt with and still refuses to criticize Obama. But what else would you expect Obama to do – celebrate his great economic accomplishments?
That’s because when he took office the country was in pretty good shape and well on its way to having a balanced budget.
The issues Bush had to deal with were all self-inflected, Bush needs to be thankful that Obama didn’t have him and Shooter convicted for war crimes, there are still many places outside of you US where neither of these criminals dare set foot.
Typical Washington hypocrisy… It’s OK if our guy does it, but if the other side does it, its BAD!
You saw me say it was okay for “my guy” (whoever the heck that is) to do it… where?
I’m sorry, but I’ve built myself up a rather substantial history of taking a baseball bat to my own side of the aisle, and I did that to make sure I had more credibility when I had a principled objection to my political adversaries. I try to be fair, and if you honestly want to make the “its okay to do it, but we hated it when Bush did it” argument, than you are just as hypocritical as you accuse me of being.
I’m happy to wax on endlessly about Bush’s grandstanding if you want, but I did that plenty when it was happening – I’m one of those obnoxious libertarians in the Republican party that loudly smacks my own side when they do stupid things like that – and we are talking about the current occupant of the White House now… so… really…
Matthew you say.
“I’m happy to wax on endlessly about Bush’s grandstanding if you want, but I did that plenty when it was happening -“………
Please point me in the direction of where you “did that aplenty when it was happening”??????? I did a google and other searches for Matthew Gagnon writes, blogs, talks about being upset with GW Bush showboating or grandstanding about attack on 911. I could not find anything. I will be happy to read whatever you post going back to when you were in college if you like. I promise you I will read it. I await your links.
You’re full of it.
It’s hard for me to believe that you are complaining about him ‘strutting’ for having taken out Bin Laden. The last guy in the White House landed a fighter plane on a carrier deck to strut about the ending (not even close) of his war in Iraq. Where was your outrage then? Give me a break. This essay is garbage.
Bush flew the plane but he didn’t land it. Landing was above his pay grade.
Good piece of repubspkeake or hog wash.
Please Mr. Gagnon, show some class, and, moreover, some maturity. What absurd and ridiculous mountains of whining. The President over and again has praised that Seal Team and the military in general. Give us a break. Your buddy Bush ran entirely on his chest-thumping bravado over 9/11 in 2004, not to mention his silly “Mission Accomplished” stunt, flying onto a carrier in a flight suit. Talk about PHONY. And then his team, headed by Rove and with Bush’s full blessing, had the disgusting gall to attack John Kerry with their unending paid-for LIES about a guy who risked his life in combat. All you are doing here is memeing the FAKE-News right wing talking points and, as usual, like most right wingers, acting like a complete and utter pathetic hypocrite.
Oh come on Matthew you must live in an alternate universe. Should I share some of the posts from Fox Nation or even on Freepers Republic for you to peruse.
“I was paying very close attention that night and the right was almost universally in praise of the president.”
Okay I will keep it local, from AMG it only took 9 posts for it to get classless.
Sun, 05/01/2011 – 10:49pm post #9
Joined: 01/08/2003
“Obama’s Speech: He said “I” so often, it looked like he might unbutton his
suit and reveal the camo fatigues he was wearing when HE killed Osama!”
Then bright and early the next day…….
Mon, 05/02/2011 – 6:38am post #24
Joined: 06/03/2008
I find myself speculating this morning on the probable headlines if this had happened …
5 years ago
BUSH INVADES PAKISTAN
Women and children suffer.
UN outraged
OBL dead: Were civil rights violated?
3 years ago
Did GOP reveal death to manipulate election?Mon, 05/02/2011 – 8:55am post#31
Joined: 04/12/2000
I got the same impression as Martin from the speech. Obama used “I” prominently.
Mon, 05/02/2011 – 9:01am post#32
Joined: 11/03/2003
Although I’m glad he’s no longer with us, I find it
distasteful to revel in anyone’s death. (That attitude kind of reminds
me of the videos of the Arabs partying in the street on 9/11, and I
think we’re better than that.)
I’m sure Osama’s not a happy camper, and it’s sad for him that that unhappiness will be eternal.
I was sort of expecting Obama to tell us last night that he had
inherited Bush’s intelligence and the SEALs. Must’ve missed that part.
Mon, 05/02/2011 – 9:45am post#36
Joined: 10/06/2004
I’m glad he’s dead, and I’m damned proud it was our
Navy Seals who took him out. OUR Navy Seals — not the President, who
appeared to be using this as a dandy campaign opportunity..
Like some others, I hope Bin Laden saw it coming, and I hope it hurt. I hope he was terrified. I hope he wet himself.
Note the times on these posts and tell us all again how the right was “almost universally in praise.”
Mon, 05/02/2011 – 9:06pm post#72
Joined: 03/27/2005
The AP has filed a story that is pretty informative
but appears to include some dated fantasy. It says bin Laden used a
woman for a shield. He didn’t according to the latest report. The story
also says bin Laden died in a fire fight. True to an extent but bin
Laden is now reported to be unarmed when he was shot so it is more like
he was executed, but that’s ok with me.
The story also gushingly describes Obama’s ordering the ground strike
as the “gutsiest call by any American president,” but I can’t imagine
that Reagan or the Bushes (especially that “cowboy” George W.) would not
have made the same call. The media suddenly is back in its pro-Obama
campaign mode, it appears.
Imagine that all in LESS than one day, and there were others I just chose a few choice picks.A little research goes a long way, Matt if you would really like some of
the really distasteful comments from FR or Fox Nation I am sure I can find
them for you, but then I would have to join and I don’t have the stomach for that.
As for bad taste nothing can beat the strutting little chickenhawk GWB standing on the aircraft carrier with that stupid Mission Accomplished sign behind him while he was wearing, what appeared to be……. Ted Nugents Diapers.
Good boy, spot on with the RNC talking points!
Mr.
Gagnon, your concern for the SEALS involved comes off as phony. Try again.
Interesting!
The author is expecting way too much from obama!
Real outrage about Obama’s handling of the bin Laden anniversary? http://pollways.bangordailynews.com/2012/05/03/national/real-outrage-about-obamas-handling-of-the-bin-laden-anniversary/
Let me see if I understand your message, Bush did it so therefore its okay for Obama to do it. Is that about it?
Another great article from Matt…….
This is the flipside of the David Farmer’s columns. Both all heat but no light, meant for the faithful.
Prisident Obama got Bush’s man for him. Deal with it.
And here we all were led to believe the SEALS go him! That obama, he sure is a superhero!
You got to give Republicans credit for their messaging. Sounding like a constant beat of a dismal wet drum signals their complete disgust with a President who continually up stages them at every turn of the road. If they had watched the special last night on the Bin Laden raid it was as plain as the blueberry pie all over the their face that the President gives all the credit to SEAL Team Six and their commanders.
What the Republican’s should truly be worried about is their very close ties to Jason Todd Ready, the Arizona White Supremacist. The plot thickens.
Oh please get a life. Sorry your boy didn’t kill him, our did, get over it!
actually a BAMF SEAL operator did. More specifically a 77 grain match grade 6.8spc round between the eyes.
And the operator did that all on his own accord? No orders from anyone? No intelligence from elsewhere?
*****
And here we all were led to believe the SEALS go him! That obama, he sure is a superhero!
Excellent piece.
Last week this author wrote a piece denouncing manufactured outrage. How ironic can you get without puking?
Respect.. .something the GOP rails on but does not seem to be able to use themselves.
Just watch the Daily Show clip on this subject for clarity… here is a link… it demonstrates better than any words I can use, just how wrong and off base this criticism is…
http://www.thedailyshow.com/watch/tue-may-1-2012/victory-lapse—the-anniversary-of-osama-bin-laden-s-death
The beginning of this same episode show also how warped their viewpoint is on this issue.
Really, trying to make a mountain out of this just got very hard when the real truth is shown.
and here is the clip of the beginning of the Victory Lapse episode..
http://www.thedailyshow.com/watch/tue-may-1-2012/victory-lapse
The point is… the GOP refuses to actually look at what they have said and done in the past and fabricates issues to make a stink over that .. well.. they don’t stand up to scrutiny…
as Stewart says, maybe the Obama ad was a bit over the line, but this completely warped sense of being insulted is really a bit much….
Somewhere there is alternative reality where Mr. Gagnon cheers from a tree as President Guliani, Bush, or Vice President Palin conduct themselves in a more dignified manner on the accomplishment of killing OBL. This consoles the Mr. Gagnon of our universe, who must daily retire to his fainting couch when confronted with the shameful use of this act as a proud accomplishment of the Obama administration. My thoughts and prayers go out to him and those like him.
Articles like this prove how pathetic the Republicans have become. The fact of the matter is that Bush stood in front of the world and proclaimed he didn’t think much about getting Bin Laden. Bush and those he put in charge were able to get only three of the leaders of al-Qaeda, Obama over thirty.
As Republicans whine about Obama’s success, Romney is gathering around him the same people who have already failed their country serving under Bush. Look, see and understand the insanity of the Republicans who insist on doing the same things and expecting different results. I’m already tired of the next Republican War.
More or less pathetic than the left excusing Obama’s behavior when they kicked and screamed and complained endlessly about similar behavior from Bush.
That’s the worst thing about true partisans, such as yourself. You really do think you occupy some kind of moral high ground. That the other side is hypocritical but you aren’t.
Well, it doesn’t work that way. Both sides are unbelievably inconsistent, hypocritical and without redeeming virtue. We have Senator Obama raking the Bush administration over the coals for raising the debt limit and mortgaging our children’s future with high debt… Harry Reid and Nancy Pelosi saying it was a matter of principle to oppose more debt… Republicans arguing we have to for the good of the country…
…and then the Democrats take over, and suddenly they are the ones telling us that insanely high levels of new debt is necessary for the good of the country, and the Republicans are the ones raking the Democrats over the coals for doing so.
You can point and laugh at the Republicans for flipping based on politics if you want, and you’d be right. But, you should also be laughing at the Democrats for doing the exact same thing. Why do you think the rest of us are so sick of this crap.
So, feel free to pretend Democrats occupy the moral high ground… but everyone else notices how ridiculous that sounds. Nobody has the high ground, they’re both hypocritical and they’re both in the gutter.
But, since that is the case, all any of us who care about the actual truth in these situations can do is call it as we see it as things happen. In this situation, the president is acting terribly, and no amount of moronic excuse making or false moral equivalency will change that.
I notice you use the all inclusive “everyone” and “All of us”…Please don’t lump me in with your ilk. There are reasons the Dems did what they did…They had to. I’d rather they save GM and prop up the financial market than try to live through the aftermath of THAT Republican fiasco.
First off you make a fatal error in assuming this has anything to do with moral high ground, it’s a war, down and dirty and in the trenches. There isn’t any moral high left its all been carpet bombed by a bunch of war hawk sissys’. That’s right, people like Bush, Cheney, Limbaugh and Romney all thumping their chests, all too eager to send our children into harms way but have never fought for their country, and all of them have avoided serving one way or another. So before you compare Obama to the likes and the arrogant incompetence of Bush, all Obama is doing is trying to clean up the mess that was so conveniently left behind.
You must have forgotten what a mess this country was when the Bush Imperium came to its bitter end? What Bush handed Obama looked worse then what a toddler leaves in a badly soiled diaper, if you want to discuss crap.
I’m not laughing at anything my friend, I’m totally P.O. after waiting for more than 30+ years for the Republican fantasy to actually trickle down something substantive. It didn’t work and we have the current mess today that proves it didn’t work yet the R’s insist that by being more extreme it will succeed? Give more money to the job creators and the corporations they own so they can create more jobs ….where the hell are the jobs, oh that’s right the job creators sent them to China.
Do you realize how ridiculously obvious and Pavlovian like the Republican talking points are? I’ll agree there is a sense with these two parties of having to pick the lesser of two evils. But given what the Republican Party has become since 2001-2012 it’s a no-brainer. They are so desperately far right a paint scraper will be necessary to get between them and the wall they have plastered themselves against.
Democrats may occupy a lot of space, but the moral high ground ‘it ain’t’!
And you think you occupy the moral high ground because you say both sides do it, but you still engage in the behavior you complain about. That’s just pathetic.
When this author regurgitates fringe right talking points and tells you the President hasn’t thanked others for their part in this, he’s lying.
“Tonight, we give thanks to the countless intelligence and
counterterrorism professionals who’ve worked tirelessly to achieve this
outcome. The American people do not see their work, nor know their
names. But tonight, they feel the satisfaction of their work and the
result of their pursuit of justice.
We give thanks for the men who carried out this operation, for they
exemplify the professionalism, patriotism, and unparalleled courage of
those who serve our country. And they are part of a generation that has
borne the heaviest share of the burden since that September day. ”
http://www.whitehouse.gov/the-press-office/2011/05/02/remarks-president-osama-bin-laden
“And today, here at Fort Campbell, I had the privilege of meeting the
extraordinary Special Ops folks who honored that promise. It was a
chance for me to say — on behalf of all Americans and people around
the world — “Job well done.” Job well done. (Applause.)
They’re America’s “quiet professionals” — because success demands
secrecy. But I will say this. Like all of you, they could have chosen a
life of ease. But like you, they volunteered. They chose to serve in a
time of war, knowing they could be sent into harm’s way. They trained
for years. They’re battle-hardened. They practiced tirelessly for this
mission. And when I gave the order, they were ready.
Now, in recent days, the whole world has learned just how ready they
were. These Americans deserve credit for one of the greatest
intelligence military operations in our nation’s history. But so does
every person who wears America’s uniform, the finest military the world
has ever known. (Applause.) And that includes all of you men and women
of 101st. (Applause.)”
http://www.whitehouse.gov/the-press-office/2011/05/06/remarks-president-and-vice-president-troops-fort-campbell-ky
The author of this essay has absolutely zero integrity.