ST. STEPHEN, New Brunswick — A Massachusetts attorney has been at odds with the Canadian government since last August, when she claims she was “bullied” by a New Brunswick border patrol agent who she wants reprimanded. She also wants her record cleared of any border crossing violation that could affect her career and prevent her from revisiting Canada.

The incident at issue occurred July 27, 2011, when Deborah Butler of Framingham, Mass., was en route with her 79-year-old mother to a family reunion in Bridgetown, Nova Scotia. At the newest “Third Bridge” Canadian border crossing located southwest of downtown Calais off Route 9, Butler declared two “oversized” bottles of Jim Beam bourbon she was bringing to the reunion. She was told she would be required to pay $1.74 in duty. She was given some paperwork and was directed to park her car and wait for a Canadian Border Authority duty collector.

“I was under the impression that the whiskey was duty-free, but we waited,” Butler told The Bangor Daily News in a telephone interview. “We were heading to the car ferry in St. John to do the crossing to Digby, and I was nervous we’d be late. There would have been a $100 fine if we missed our ferry reservation.”

Butler was in a hurry and grew weary of waiting, she said. She drove off, deciding she would pay the $1.74 when she returned through St. Stephen in two weeks.

When Butler returned on Aug. 10, she left her mother in the car and went inside the St. Stephen border crossing headquarters with the duty paperwork and $1.74. She explained she hadn’t paid the duty two weeks ago and wanted to pay it now. That’s when she came nose to nose with Border Agent 20712, a young man whose name she doesn’t know. She refers to him casually as “the bully at the border.”

The Canada Border Services Agency declined Friday to name the agent involved. A transcript of his version of events has been censored to remove his name.

In that transcript the agent claims surveillance video from July 27, when Butler and her mother entered Canada, shows that they did not wait in their car for 10-15 minutes, as they had claimed, but only 59 seconds. When informed of the video footage, Agent 20712 said Butler “drops her head and states that she knew it really wasn’t very long that she waited, and she just (sic) in too much of a hurry.” The agent never touches on his demeanor, which Butler claims was “aggressive.”

“This kid was a bully and a hothead, who I guess wanted to prove himself in front of an older agent who was there,” Butler said. “When I told him I was concerned about the $100 fine if we missed the ferry, he started screaming and said, ‘You’re going to pay a lot more than that when I get through with you.’”

Butler was asked to surrender her passport and her car keys and was told the Mitsubishi Galant would be searched. She later was read her rights but was never subsequently arrested.

“My mother is a cancer survivor and had no idea why two border agents were coming toward the car,” Butler said. “She had no idea what was going on, and this kid was screaming at her, saying things like ‘We’ve been looking for you for two weeks.’ When my mother came inside, she was shaking, and I thought: I’m going to kill my mother. She told them: ‘Call my minister; he’ll tell you I’m a good person.’ It was a nightmare.”

The vehicle search turned up nothing unusual, Bishop said, and she was told that her passport would be returned. She also was told that her car would be seized and that getting it back would cost her $1,000.

“I didn’t have $1,000,” she said. “I finally got the car back with my brother’s credit card, after I called him. My car had nothing to do with this incident, which was about failing to pay $1.74 in duty. The whole thing was very nerve-wracking.”

Upon returning to the United States, Butler submitted a nine-page brief on the incident to Canadian officials and requested that the $1,000 she paid be refunded. She was told it would take a year to make a decision. It almost did.

Butler, 54, received a registered letter last week from the Appeals Division of the Canadian Border Authority, informing her that the $1,000 would be refunded, even though she had violated border crossing regulations.

“Notwithstanding your explanation for the situation, it is clear you left the customs office, and the [car] in question was lawfully subject to seizure and forfeiture,” a letter signed by Senior Program Advisor M. Sears reads in part. The letter also indicates that Butler has 90 days from May 8, 2012, to appeal the ruling to a Canadian federal court.

Butler said Friday she plans to do just that. She now is searching for a Canadian civil rights attorney to take her case. She would also like to find a Canadian or American law school willing to use the incident as a case study that, among other issues, would determine if her civil rights under the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms were violated when her car was searched without a warrant.

“I want the charge of running the border removed from my record,” she said. “I am seeking to practice law in [Washington] D.C. and cannot have this on my record. I am African-American and was wearing a ‘MADE IN THE US’ Obama T-shirt when I entered the station. Agent 20712 is Caucasian. Whether he was motivated by racial animus is yet to be determined, but I will argue this in federal court.

“This whole incident could jeopardize my career in public interest law, so I won’t go down without a fight. The incident could also land me in jail if CBSA [Canada Border Services Agency] charges me with the infraction.”

Butler also was told by a friend that the “border running” incident may preclude her from entering Canada for a family vacation in July.

Butler has sought help from the office of U.S. Sen. John Kerry of Massachusetts in determining how the border incident might affect her ability to enter Canada in the future. Kerry’s office also has requested that the videotape of what transpired at St. Stephen on Aug. 10, 2011, not be destroyed by Canadian officials.

“While I’m glad they are refunding the $1,000, I think they just want to get rid of me,” Butler said.

Join the Conversation

71 Comments

  1. Hmm, a lawyer that thinks she is above the law.  Did I detect a “race card” threat also?  I do not see where the border agents did anything wrong.  Seems to me you are only worried about your own hide.  YOU ARE NOT ABOVE THE LAW!!

    1. Question:  What’s the difference between sperm and a lawyer?  Answer:  Both have a one-in-a-million chance of becoming a human being.  

      Ms Butler…there is only one Bully in this story…and It’s You.  Grow up.  You are embarrassing yourself!

    2.  It is not confirmed, but I understand a bystander at the crossing heard Ms Massachusetts say:
      “Do you know who I voted for?”

  2. “I want the charge of running the border removed from my record,” she said. “I am seeking to practice law in [Washington] D.C. and cannot have this on my record. I am African-American and was wearing a ‘MADE IN THE US’ Obama T-shirt when I entered the station. Agent 20712 is Caucasian. Whether he was motivated by racial animus is yet to be determined, but I will argue this in federal court.
    _____________________________________________________________

    “I broke your law, and if you don’t do what I want, I will call you a racist”………nice.  At least Jesse Jackson and Al Sharpton would be proud of her.

  3. Um, you can’t just take off at the border like that.  You violated any basic country law.  You’re lucky you got away with it and there wasn’t a high speed chase.  Someone thinks very highly of themselves and that they can do whatever she wants.  

  4. She can’t be too smart either as duty free only applies to the place you’re buying it in, not the country you’re taking it into.  

    1. Actually, you buy duty free in the country of purchase ONLY if you are traveling to the county of visitation.  Be careful of phrases such as “can’t be too smart”.  

      Yours might be showing!

      1. I don’t remember saying anything to the contrary.  I stated that you may buy something duty free in one country, but once you bring it to another country it is still subject to duty.  

        1. OK. Let’s try again.  You buy duty free in Houlton ONLY if you are going to Woodstock.  You can’t buy duty free alcohol in US and stay in US . You MUST go to Canada after you buy it.  Then, it’s duty free.  If she bought it in a Maine/Mass liquor store, it’s not duty free, and additional taxes must be paid if it’s oversized

  5. You don’t need a search warrant when you cross the border.  This lady will not do well if she gets into law school.  Why is the BDN giving this person who obviously was wrong a platform?

    1. When I was a law enforcement officer I was threatened by a “lawyer” as well.  In court, the judge had a field day with her, she was not a “lawyer”.

  6. It was not agents fault for charging her duty, it was not his fault she didn’t want to wait, it was also not his fault that there was 100.00 fine for the ferry and she was obvously in a hurry. She made the decision to drive off into a foreign country without doing what was told of her then shows up two weeks later and is upset with them because they were not pleasant? This isn’t Walmart; satisfaction is not guaranteed…. Now lets blame it on them and use the race card. How about take responsibility for your actions and show some respect instead of the BS about your color, your clothes, your minister and whatever other stupid excuse you could come up with. Your gonna exhaust all your legal defenses in one case…………. Either way you lose.

    1. I don’t think your right on this one….and as for the agents they need to learn better manners.

      1. Manners be damned. What about her manners? If she had done that on the US side she probably would have had guns drawn on her when she left and probably a few hours of questions. Many of themvery direct and pointed. I have crossed the border several times and never had any officials on either side that showed bad manners, even when they searched my vehicle.  Be nice and you will get little favors and be done quicker. Be snotty and it may take a while. You reap what you sow when dealing with others.

      2. What do you think would have happened if she had done this while trying to enter the USA? 

        I am thinking that there would have been a high speed chase with many vehicles and possible some violence would have followed because she may have been a “terrorist”.  She was lucky she was entering Canada instead of the US.

        And if she had returned 2 weeks later, there would have been arrests and cavity searches (thanks to the recent Supreme Court ruling) if this had happened in the US instead of a “rude” Border Agent.

    2. I agree! With her attitude I hope she doesn’t become a member of the bar. What she did is no different than shopping in Wal-Mart, seeing that the check out line is too long and leaving with the merchandise and coming back next week to pay for it. Once you leave the frame of the building you are guilty of shoplifting. What is the difference with a fee owed to customs?  TS if she was late for the ferry. She should have allowed more time to catch it.

    3. She obviously crosses the boarder more then many of us do, so it sounds like she didn’t leave early enough and planned for any delays. If I was going to cross the border I would plan time alone just to be questioned for my reason to enter. 
      Secondly, if she was so familiar with coming back 2 weeks later and pay, why the heck didn’t she just walk in with her paperwork and $1.74 to begin with instead of 2 weeks later?

      I am not saying border patrol was perfect either. She could have never come back, never paid the $1.74, but if what she says was true, to go as far as taking her passport, yelling, “lawfully” searching and seizing her car for a grand even over $1.74 is a bit absurd by the Canadian Authorities.

      I am sure there has been worse people who tried crossing the border for worst crimes that were well beyond $1.74

      At the end she looses, but how the second trip was handled by the Authorities was a bit much.

    4.  Is anyone else happy that there is a good chance this person will never practice law?

  7. She is very lucky that she didn’t do that on the US side of the border. You can bet that there would have been a chase and a lot more excitement when apprehended.

    That being said, there were a lot of new faces on both sides of the new bridge last year. A lot of local people still don’t like taking that bridge because of all the nitpicking from some of the officers. I waited 1/2 hour while one officer spent overly long and only cleared 4 vehicles at the new bridge. All those lanes and most of the time there is only one open.

  8. Living on the border and having traveled to Canada many times , I can understand the frustration with what may seem a long wait.
    However , in this case the woman clearly violated every common sense approach to entering a Foreign Country.
    Not to mention numerous laws.

    She should consider herself lucky they didnt track her down and give her a good going over
    while she was a guest in Their Country.

    The fact that our neighbors, the Canadians, returned the $1000 to her underscores the fact that
    we can all get along.
    She should take a deep breath and let it go be fore she makes a bigger hash of things than she already has.
    I wish her the best of luck in Law School.

    ps: Im going to lovely St.Andrews ,N.B. tomorrow.
    And I wont be running any checkpoints.

  9. 1st ambulance chaser I ever heard of that needed to borrow $1000.00. Note to self, do not utilize this lady for any matter related to the law.

  10. I have to wonder, why would she have had such a tight schedule, knowing she had to cross the border?  Anyone traveling from the US to Canada or Canada to the US should always add an hour to their trip time, just in case.  Cutting it so short that what would have been literally a five minute affair to pay the duty, was not good time management on her part.  Usually an appeal of a fine with Customs will result in a mitigated amount being applied.  That she got the entire $1000 back was a decent gesture on the Canadian Gov’t. 

    She questions why her car would be seized, as it had nothing to do with the incident???  Ah, she was in the car when she left the border, and that is common procedure.  When Customs seize a load for an overage, they don’t just seize the additional merchandise, they seize the whole load!
    Here’s a person who should have learned a lesson, and instead is blaming everyone other than herself.  I don’t believe she would have been barred from crossing the border unless arrested.  For what it’s worth, they could have arrested her for her prior actions, as they did not have the opportunity to inspect her vehicle as a secondary.  And they absolutely have the option to inspect her vehicle on return!  US Customs can inspect your vehicle as part of export control as well as import.  Obviously someone who doesn’t understand international law…  Must of missed that class in law school!

  11. And this woman presumably went to law school, passed various tests and calls herself a lawyer and finally expects to work in Washington, D.C. Perfect. It’s exactly where ‘lawyers’ of her calibre belong. Good luck to her and all those who take counsel from her.

    1. Sorry, NBaker, Washington is already overloaded to the gills with lawyers of her caliber (.22 short?) We definitely don’t need her there. Next thing we know, she’ll be running for office!!!

  12. What will happen is the next time she crosses, she most definately be pulled in for a secondary inspection, no doubt…  She will of course claim she is being profiled, pulled in because of her race, etc…  Sorry, it’s just the way it is!  You violated the law the last time you came through, they will be all over you the next time regardless of who you are.  Same situation for commercial importations.  You get caught with undeclared merchandise, or a violation of marking, etc…, you can bet your next few loads are going to be backing up to the warehouse for an inspection.

  13. Ok a lawyer went to another country broke there laws got caught and is mad she will have consequences for her actions? Well maybe that 100 dollar late fee for the ferry was not such a bad idea after all.

  14. Not content with getting her $1,000 back, instead of putting her bad behavior behind her and cutting her loses, she’s pulling the race, Obama, and John Kerry cards; is looking for a law school to use this as a “case study” in civil rights law; thinking about appealing; and looking for a Canadian lawyer to take her case.  And if all that isn’t bad enough, she’s actually telling newspaper reporters about it, so the whole world will know how foolish she is. 

    It’s hard to believe – except for those who hate lawyers – that this silly and impulsive hot-head is a lawyer and presumably represent clients.  In fact, it’s hard to believe that anyone would go to her for representation given how she handles her own affairs. Now everyone knows that Massachusetts attorney Deborah Butler is the kind of lawyer who makes an international incident out of a $1.74 custom duty.

    1. She should get 48-hours in the slammer for not paying the duty, 15 years for being a lawyer and another 5 years for being from Massachusetts.

      1. And no chance for parole for being a Lawyer from (M)assachusetts! Seems like God has already punished her,lol!

      2. PLUS another 5 yrs just because she is an Obama supporter !!!  I guess she was thinking she was crossing the border in Mexico and not Canada… Seriously, just the fact they caught her in a lie (saying she waited 15 or 20 minutes and the video shows 59 seconds) is reason enough to convict and make the charge stick   ; )  Also, she probably fled because they had “missed something else she had in her car”..

  15. “My mother is a cancer survivor”.  Good for her now pay the duty.  BTW I have found Canadian  border agents much nicer and relaxed than the American agents.

  16. Some attorneys — notably strident feminists with an agenda — are under the impression that the law doesn’t apply to them.

    1. Some people are still quite threatened by an intelligent woman who’s willing to stand up for her rights. 

      1. An intelligent woman would have understood she was in a foreign nation and her “rights” aren’t the same there as here.

  17. Her ignorance is only superseded by her arrogance.  She broke the law!  In some countries, her car would be filled with bullets if you run from the border agents.

  18. It was the Osham-ah T Shirt that did it.  Typical supporter dem that cannot be wasting time waiting for law enforcement.

  19. She clearly doesn’t have a good understanding and needs more “practice” in law. 

  20. I hope she wins her case.  Someone has to stand up to the “bullies at the border,” which I would argue exist on both sides of the border.  Since 9/11, there has been much more suspicion on both sides, and this has resulted in some oppression, and people feeling like they’re criminals.  

    1. Some oppression? And how would you feel when you drove over and IED on you way to work because USCBP  were forced to just wave you through? You’d feel either dead or maimed!!!!!!

  21. Geez, lady, get a life. Cowboy up to the fact you violated Canadian law! You should have been aware of your responsibilities when you “crossed the line”! Quit acting like an ignorant (M)assachusetts attorney–oops,maybe it’s not an act-sorry!

  22.  This is how brand X operates and gets by with it here in the states. Maybe she will get a dose of her own medicine.

  23. Seems fairly simple to me… if you don’t like the way you are treated entering a foreign country, don’t enter! The law was broken, plain and simple. 

  24. Hmmmmm. A masshole crossed the border to Canada with some booze. She was told she owed $ 1.74 in duty tax. She didn’t wait to fill out the paper work and pay the tax. She is now blaming the agent on duty for her foolishness? Get a clue woman and quit while you are ahead.

  25. Mom is sick, I’m a lawyer, I’m black, he’s white, Obama, I’m poor. Law school taught her well.

  26. 59 seconds…She “Ran the Port”…Try that with USCBP and see what happens…You’ll be looking down the small end of of a 9mm H&K…
    And of course when your in the wrong throw down the “Race Card”…But hey maybe Obama will comment or even intervene. 
    This woman broke the law and now is looking to deflect her error in anyway possible…
    People like her give me a body rash  

  27. Funny, she is president of a non-profit… Will Will Win Inc.  Wonder what they do?

  28. I hope this lady never is allowed to practice law because she is clearly not qualified to have such a serious career that relies on facts if she can not comprehend how her own actions are the reason this situation escalated to where it is now.  And despite her behavior, she caught a break from the Canadian government but still wants more….shame on her.  

  29. One thing is certain… she is looking to work in Washington DC where this mentality is rampant, she will fit right in. I wish they would have locked her up and kept her for a week or two. I am sick to death of political priorities. Why should she get any different treatment than anyone else just because she wants to work in DC? That is the most absurd statement she made. This lady should NEVER practice law, or hairdressing or anything else that requires a brain! Play the race card all you want, when Obama is out in November you will have yourself to blame you egotistical bigot!

  30. I have found the Canadian agents hospitable and helpful. I wait my turn and do what I am asked. In a different capacity some years ago upon entering Canada I surrendered my firearm, which they held until my return, no issue, no problem. This ladies problem started when her ears disengaged, and she drove off into another country after being told to stop, fill out declaration forms, and pay. This an attorney that does not know how to follow directions or comply?

  31. The thing is if she just let the ferry people know what happened their would have been NO 100.00 fee – it happens all the time.

    She took off – she should NEVER be alowed into Canada- she is a disgrace to americans everywhere who think they own the world!

  32. Everyone has already covered this over and over … I can’t help myself.

    “she had violated border crossing regulations”

    I wonder, what is it about “law” (at an International border crossing) that his Massachusetts (alleged) “lawyer” seems to have such difficulty comprehending?

    If they charge her for all of the investigative and court costs, that won’t in any way be excessive, that will be -very- lenient, along with a punitive judgement. She violated the law, – their- law, – their- country, -their- border crossing, -their- agent, who is employed to do -this- job … enforcing the “law” – and then she put up a great huge -stink- about how they responded to -her- illegal, unlawful, outlandish, distrespectful behavior.

    I would not blame Canada at all for “trespassing” her from -their- country.

    I wonder if she is familiar with the phrase, “cause and effect”.

    Perhaps she could request assistance from Twit Brains International.

  33. How long will it take Obozo to say that the Canadian officer acted “stupidly” like he did with the Massachusetts officer? She’s as arrogant as the other guy involved in that instance.

  34. BDN: Saint John, New Brunswick, is always spelled out, never abbreviated (as in St. John).  However, St. John’s, Newfoundland, is always abbreviated.

  35. ok, you’re black, you’re wearing an obama t-shirt,  you’re planning on being a lawyer in DC and you have john “live shot” kerry on your side. that should do it honey..but you have to remember, you’re in another COUNTRY, unlike the US you HAVE to follow THEIR laws. after reading this, you should be banned from ever practicing law ANYWHERE. it’s ppl like you that have screwed this country into the ground. where do you get off thinking YOU can break laws? oh wait, that’s right, you were wearing an obama t-shirt..my mistake..geeesh..i get so sick of ppl like you

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *