It hardly took another study for people to know that political polarization in this country is deeply embedded. Still, a report issued Monday by the Pew Research Center paints a particularly stark portrait of a nation in which the most significant divisions are no longer based on race, class or sex but on political identity.

For 25 years, Pew has been conducting regular surveys assessing American values. They provide a series of historical benchmarks by which to examine the changes in what binds people and what divides them. The latest report finds considerable continuity over that quarter-century in the way different groups view society — and one very large change.

“Overall, there has been much more stability than change across the 48 political values measures that the Pew Research Center has tracked since 1987,” the report states. “But the average partisan gap has nearly doubled over this 25-year period — from 10 percent in 1987 to 18 percent in the new study.”

Republicans and Democrats have long seen the world through different lenses. On some issues, the gaps between them are relatively small (the importance of political engagement, for example). On others they are wider. What Pew found is that in almost every measure, those gaps have increased over the past 25 years, and in some cases now seem to represent almost unbridgeable divisions.

The Pew report found that the changes began to accelerate during George W. Bush’s presidency. Barack Obama’s presidency, the report says, has received “the most extreme partisan reaction to government in the past 25 years. Republicans are far more negative toward government than at any previous point, while Democrats feel far more positive.”

Andrew Kohut, who directed the study, said two things are notable. One is that, “by and large, values haven’t changed. The other is that political identity has eclipsed these other factors” such as race and class as the biggest sources of division. “The only thing that’s changed is the extent to which Republicans and Democrats go to opposite sides of the room on most issues.”

Some of the most significant differences — and the areas where the divisions have increased the most — were on core issues of the 2012 campaign: the role and scope of government and the social safety net.

Twenty-five years ago, the gap between Republicans and Democrats on how they assessed the scope and performance of government was six percentage points. Today it is 33 points. On support for the social safety net, what once was a 21-point gap is now 41 points. On environmental issues, the gap has ballooned from five points to 39 points.

On some of these issues, the biggest changes in attitudes have been among Republicans. Twenty-five years ago, 62 percent of Republicans and 79 percent of Democrats said the government should take care of people who can’t take care of themselves. Today, 75 percent of Democrats agree with that statement, but the percentage of Republicans who agree has plummeted to 40 percent.

The shift on environmental issues among Republicans has been even greater. In 1987, 93 percent of Democrats and 86 percent of Republicans said there should be stricter laws and regulations to protect the environment. In the latest survey, Democratic support is unchanged, but among Republicans it has plunged to 47 percent.

But Republicans aren’t the only ones responsible for the partisan polarization. In other areas, changes in attitudes among Democrats have widened the gap between the parties.

Although majorities of Democrats and Republicans express strong faith in religion, Democrats are less likely to say that today than in 1987. What once was a three-point gap between Republicans and Democrats on doubting the existence of God is now 15 points. The report found that among liberals, the shift away from religious values has been particularly pronounced.

Democrats are more supportive of immigration rights than they once were, while Republican support has declined somewhat. The percentage of Democrats who say government should do more to ensure equal opportunity for blacks and other minorities has risen, more so than the decline among Republicans.

The most profound change may be on the issue that has roiled American politics since early in Obama’s administration: the role of government.

“Since 2007, Republicans increasingly feel that regulation does more harm than good, while Democrats increasingly disagree,” the report states. “Republicans see more waste and inefficiency, Democrats see less. And the share of Republicans who say the government is too involved in our daily lives has grown, while the number of Democrats who say this has decreased.”

Americans long have been divided along partisan as well as demographic lines. The report states that 25 years ago, the cleavages between Republicans and Democrats were “on a par with the differences of opinion between blacks and whites, wealthy and poor or college grads and those without a college degree. This is no longer the case. Since 1987 — and particularly over the past decade — the country has experienced a stark increase in partisan polarization.”

Part of this is related to the growing homogenization of the major political parties, a sorting out that has been going on for some time. More Republicans now call themselves conservatives (over the past 12 years, that percentage has risen from 60 to 68) and more Democrats now consider themselves liberal (increasing from 28 percent to 38 percent since 2000).

Over this period, the Democratic Party has become more diverse, with minorities now accounting for 45 percent of those who call themselves Democrats, up from 36 percent 12 years ago. During that same period, Republicans have remained overwhelmingly white in their makeup, at about 87 percent.

Join the Conversation

55 Comments

  1. When the mass rioting in the streets happens and the media calls it the American spring we will know it is almost over.  The lie that is green energy and global warming as well as cradle to grave entitlement will keep us seperated.

    1. Oil is what causes wars not green energy.

      If sunbeams were weapons of war, we would have had solar energy centuries ago. 

  2. I will be your president also. Right! Thank you Mr. Obama
    for the deep division your admin has left our country with. The Obama library
    when built only needs a door on the far left. Pictures of his minions that
    sacrificed for him will hang in the halls. Like Miss Couric getting awards
    for destroying a candidate that only wanted to serve. Also making it
    known what will happen to good people and their families if they attempt to serve.
    Proudly Bill Maher’s picture will be front and center for being the finisher
    for Miss Courics work. Also in the room on the left will be liberal sermons
    loudly playing of MSNBC with Miss Maddow, Kieth Fall on his sword Olberman and
    tingle Mathews all bloviating praise for the great divider. Hopefully Mr.
    Romney can put us back on a course to put the ugly jack in the box called
    Liberalism back in its box where it belongs.

    1. What a joke. You’re literally blaming Obama for the fact that you and people like you hate him. That’s ridiculous.

  3. The
    growing polarization between ideologies during the current administration is a
    result of the drift toward a socialist state. This drift has caused the right to
    change their views on “entitlements”. History has shown that the socialism
    experiment cannot survive without producers of wealth; when their money runs
    out the government fails. The “Union of Soviet Socialist Republics” has
    crumbled into a rabble of rogue states. 
    The U.S.S.R. was still on the minds of many Americans a decade ago;
    evidently some folk’s memories are short or the memory is inconvenient.

    1. So if I, for example, hate black people, it’s not my fault for having that attitude, but their fault for being who they are? Whatever happened to personal responsibility? Seems like you want to shift the blame for your hatred.

      1. “Seems like you want to shift the blame for your hatred.”
        ****************************************************

        Consider the possibility that your observation is an illegitimate leap of judgement.

        To my knowledge this is the very first time I have seen a post under the name of “personal_responsibilty” unless I have simply missed any others. It is quite likely that the two of you have never met in person and therefore have not seen the color of each other’s skin. Therefore, the only basis you may have to make the above selected quote is his/her five sentence post.

        Your insinuation that  “personal_responsibility” ‘s lack of personal responsibility and blame shifting, based upon your pre-conceived personal notions of left/right definitions just might very well be an unfortunate mis-characterization. Perhaps the two of you have met and know each other…but none of us third-party readers would necessarily know that.  

        Can we re-visit personal responsibility? 

        1. You’re babbling. It’s annoying and what you’ve wrote is mostly meaningless. I won’t blame you for my own impatience though. That’s exactly my point. The previous poster wants to blame Obama for political divisiveness despite the fact that Obama has made huge attempts to be bi-partisan and include multiple perspectives in crafting proposals. For the poster to blame Obama for his/her own internal hatred demonstrates a lack of personal responsibility and it is certainly blame shifting.

          1. I have read the original post at least five times and although there is reference to opposing ideologies I cannot find Obama’s name in it anywhere. Similarly, I do not interpret the poster’s divergent opinion as evidence of hatred.

          2. THANKS anewvoice.
            difference of opinion is not hate.
            please people, stop swallowing the kool-aid that says that it is

          3. I didn’t say otherwise. My comment speaks to the fact that posters are blaming Obama for divisiveness. The truth is that he’s constantly seeking a consensus even at the cost of his own ideas. Difference of opinion is not hate, but irrational disdain and complaints that aren’t fact-based ARE hateful. 

          4. you mean bipartisan like Obie-care.Nice try but Mr Obie and Mr harry bottled up the government.2012 it will end.

          5. Girl, please. Obama bent over backwards trying to get Republicans on board. He used Romneys idea and ditched his own. Notice how we don’t have a public option? Obamacare IS bi-partisan. It is full of Republican proposals and ideas.

          6.  “It is full of Republican proposals and ideas.”  – name some – be specific please.  Heck even the dems don’t have a clue what was in it except for their “hopes”

          7. Individual mandate. Insurance market place. Increased risk pools. More options in plan/tiered plans.

            You partisan hacks are the ones without a clue. Merely regurgitating talking points without any regard to reality.

          8.  LOL I was going to call you that !!

            You partisan hacks are the ones without a clue. Merely regurgitating talking points without any regard to reality. 

            Second  one wins !!

            I admit I gave up on the details when Obama / Pelosi changed their rhetoric from Health Care Reform to Health Insurance Reform – I do recall that NO one in Obama’s administration  even talked to ANY republican about health for over a year (maybe more)

            The republicans had a large bill but then tried to introduce this:
            Small-Bill Proposal for Sensible Health-Care Reform
            http://smallbill.org/Small-bill_proposal_2010.pdf

            Yes this was the Republicans take on Obamacare :

            Four months after U.S. House Speaker Nancy Pelosi famously declared “We have to pass the bill so you can find out what’s in it,”a congressional panel has released the first chart illustrating the 2,801 page health care law President Obama signed into law in March.
            Developed by the Joint Economic Committee minority, led by U.S Senator Sam Brownback of Kansas and Rep. Kevin Brady of Texas, the detailed organization chart displays a bewildering array of new government agencies, regulations and mandates. 

            “For Americans, as well as Congressional Democrats who didn’t bother to read the bill, this first look at the final health care law confirms what many fear, that reform morphed into a monstrosity of new bureaucracies, mandates, taxes and rationing that will drive up health care costs, hurt seniors and force our most intimate health care choices into the hands of Washington bureaucrats,”said Brady, the committee’s senior House Republican. “If this is what passes for health care reform in America, then God help us all.”

            Brownback, the committee’s ranking member, added, “This updated chart illustrates the overwhelming expansion of government control over health choices and the bewildering complexity facing everyone affected by this law.  It doesn’t take long to see how the recently signed health care bill causes a hugely expensive and explosive expansion of federal control over health care. Personal choices that should be between a doctor and a patient will quickly be strangled in a never ending web of bureaucracy.”

            Senate Steering Committee Chairman Jim DeMint (R-South Carolina) called Obamacare “a bureaucratic nightmare. The Democrats’ takeover of health care creates a byzantine network of 159 new federal programs and bureaucracies to make decisions that should be between just the patient and their doctor. It should concern everyone that at the center of this regulatory web is the new CMS chief, Donald Berwick, who has championed rationing and European socialized medicine. Americans were rightly outraged that this big government bill was rushed through Congress before anyone read or fully understood the bill’s consequences. Republicans will fight to repeal this reckless takeover and to ensure health care freedom to American families.”
             
            In addition to capturing the massive expansion of government and the overwhelming complexity of new regulations and taxes, the chart portrays:

            * $569 billion in higher taxes;

             * $529 billion in cuts to Medicare;

             * swelling of the ranks of Medicaid by 16 million;

              *  17 major insurance mandates; and

              *  the creation of two new bureaucracies with powers to impose future rationing: the Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute and the Independent Payments Advisory Board.

            Brady admits committee analysts could not fit the entire health care bill on one chart. “This portrays only about one-third of the complexity of the final bill. It’s actually worse than this.”

            See chart here: http://www.house.gov/apps/list/press/tx08_brady/pr_100728_hc_chart.html

          9. Pumpkin, you’re changing the subject because you’re wrong. Obamacare includes many Republican ideas and proposals. That’s fact, period. 

          10. That chart looks like something out of the old Mad Magazine.  “Byzantine” doesn’t even begin to describe it. 

            Here’s hoping the Supreme Court dumps this abomination.

    2. Explain the drift towards a socialist state.  Maybe you have been listening to someone else.  I was under the opinion that the war against entitlements was based on the fact that American buying power was dwindling and everyone was working more for less.  That can’t be blamed on Liberals.  Blame the ones who stole American jobs and sent them to those nice Communists in Asia.  I don’t those businessmen are Liberal.  As for the downfall of Communism, the biggest economic power in the world today is Communist.  I don’t recall anything in the Constitution about Socialism, Communism, or Capitalism.

      1. The Constitution promotes individual liberty.

        Socialism and communism are inimical to that ideal; capitalism is a natural vehicle for its realization.

        1. Explain “personal liberties.  Does that mean that a person can own land and not have it confiscated by the government if they don’t pay taxes?  Unfortunately, democracy, like justice, is for the ones who can afford it. Socialism and capitalism are economic idiologies and have nothing to do with government

    3. The Partinsanship comes from  Fox and friends, Hannity and Rush Limbaugh’s Hypnotic impact on mushbrains!

      They used to be complacently occupied with senseless sports statistics now they just absorb and repeat senseless Limbaugh Statistics!

      The other side is mearely forced to fight off the “insHannity” that has taken hold.

      LOL

      1. the division is well planned by those in power.
        if we ever stopped pointing fingers at each other, then we would all be pointing fingers at the government.
        those in power are giving us an enemy… all of the foolish sheep fall for the divide and conquer garbage…
        have you notices that there is nothing that Bush did that OBama did not keep doing?

  4. It is a sad place to be in this world when disagreement, divisions and negativity evolve into hate…..hate is nothing more than a cancer in one’s soul…..very sad……

    1. is there a tiny chance that you are misusing the word hate?
      disagreement is not hate…. but the left wants us to believe it is… only so that nobody DARES voice disagreement.
      Orwell was right

  5. Barack Obama’s presidency, the report says, has received “the most extreme partisan reaction to government in the past 25 years. Republicans are far more negative toward government than at any previous point, while Democrats feel far more positive.”

    Um, duh.

    1. That’s just because more closet bigotry has been exposed.  There are a lot of Rebels without a clue Teapublicans who can’t stand the idea of Obama being president.  Much of it, I think, is subconscious, though.

  6. Blame Bush theology once again by the Washington Post–no surprise here that the PEW center would be noted–leftist all–
    Seems that the BDN upholds these articles completely, since we have been seeing more and more leftist columns from the AP, WP, NYTimes, etc.
    The fact that “hate” is used in the headline speaks volumes. Obama and his cohorts have been playing the race card from day one, and that can not be denied.

    1. I have to say that I have plenty of issues with Obama…his use of the race card isn’t one of them.  I think he’s been very careful about it.  Just look at the heat he takes from the Black Community, especially when *they* try to play it. 

      He’s not a Uniter, but the people who scream that he’s splitting an otherwise united country need to adjust their tinfoil hats.

  7. Just take a moment to look at the comments on this website alone. The attacks become personal like “dirty liberal,” or “crazy conservative.” The attackers often accuse the other side of the exact same irrational behavior “liberals/conservatives never think!” We have lost the ability to consider the other sides policy and focus  on treating people with differing opinions like some group of “others” that must be crushed at all cost. How many times do you hear people screaming “your ideas about how we should run this nation are un-american!” 
    We are all American we just have different opinions about our priorities and logistics of this nation we all share.  

  8. As quantum leaps in the growth of government have occurred in the past 25 years, it’s natural that the parties would become more polarized.   

    Democrats have always been in favor of bigger government, while Republicans have, in theory anyway, historically been in favor of limited government.  I will grant that country-club Republicans for many years drifted leftward and often abandoned the smaller government philosophy to the detriment of the party. 

    But the Democrat Party today is stampeding as far left as fast as it can, a far cry from the day when JFK advocated for tax cuts and was staunchly anti-Communist.

    There’s a growing awareness that we have abandoned our Constitutional principles, which produced the greatest country on earth, a country to which people flocked to enjoy freedom and the right to direct their own lives as free of government interference as possible. 

    As those freedoms have been chipped away, people have suddenly come to realize that freedom, once lost, is seldom regained.  The rise in conservative identification is a reaction to this realization and an effort to revitalize the patient before it flatlines. 

    It’s a battle worth waging, as history has shown that as government increases, freedom recedes.  We have too much to lose.   

  9. ” the biggest changes in attitudes have been among Republicans. Twenty-five years ago, 62 percent of Republicans and 79 percent of Democrats said the government should take care of people who can’t take care of themselves.”
    The key being taking care of people who CAN”T TAKE CARE OF THEMSELVES.
    The change is and it is NOT just repubs who feel this way, take care of the
    people who TRULY need taking care of…not everyone who wants to sit on
    their duff and reap what many of us worked hard to earn.
    Also some regulation can be agreed to by most people but when a govt
    stifles free enterprise and openly states it will put businesses like the coal
    industry out of business and destroy communities, then if someone agrees
    with that, they must be whacked and I could care less which party you are.
    When a mayor will dictate how much you can drink we may as well let him
    tell you what you can eat next. And the sheep who have taken over the democrat
    party love this stuff. Just a few examples as to why the differences now and
    for those who want to be given free diapers by the govt, well it isn’t the govt
    giving you those diapers, I AM and anyone else who is paying taxes is GIVING
    it to you.

    1. Good Lord, I’m speechless (for once).  Those poor kids.

      Why did the mean, rotten conservatives make her have so many?

  10. it IS bizzarre that someone chose to use the term “Hate” in the title.
    do we really hate each other over politics?  who are we? and who really hates over politics or beliefs?
    wow.  the disinformation campaigning is alive and well and as strong as it is in the middle east and the Congo where the CIA drop pamphlets about this leader and that.

      1. I’ve noticed that the online headlines sometimes are different  than in the printed newspaper.  Will this article be in tomorrows paper?  Is Kevin Miller doing the online political stories?  

        I used to say that I knew when the “letters to the editor”  took a day off based on the inclusion of non-liberal letters ! Usually a Monday – sometimes a Tuesday.

  11. So basically, Democrats have become more thoughtful towards their fellow man while Teapublicans have become more greedy, intolerant, selfish and care very little about their fellow man.

  12. Governor Walker just demolished the democratic party in a state that use to be nearly as liberal as Maine.  The dems decided to split that state in two by conducting a recall election that failed miserably.  Now they will be even further apart.  There is no money, liberals have bankrupt the economy and it’s time to fix it.
    Still waiting on the BDN to report on Wisconsin.

    1.  Don’t hold ur breath!  The media will be all over that its the money that Walker spent, when recalling a governor for doing nothing illegal, immoral or anything but his duty to the citizens of WI .  

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *