A new Maine Maritime Academy report looks at the feasibility of developing a Searsport-to-Bangor logistics corridor, networking rail, boat, road and air to move goods into and out of Maine.

Past studies have looked at one piece of the region, or only certain aspects of transportation — say rail over air, said Bill DeWitt, dean of MMA’s Loeb-Sullivan Business School. DeWitt’s masters-level global logistics and maritime management class undertook the study for Eastern Maine Development Corp., which has been looking at the concept of such a corridor for several years and moved the idea forward after last fall’s Action Committee of 50 Trade Logistics Forum.

“The study came back with a rousing affirmation that, in fact, there is a viability for logistics-based movement of goods in this corridor,” said DeWitt.

The basic question the study sought to answer was whether the logistics assets of the Searsport-Bangor corridor would be developed to support a “prosperous, competitive” Eastern and Northern Maine economy.

The researchers interviewed people from a number of Maine companies that ship product out of state and globally now, talked with transportation officials, shipping experts and visited other areas, including the port of Los Angeles. In Maine, they concentrated on companies which worked with perishable and time-sensitive products (which would benefit from efficient shipping), industrial and consumer products, logistics providers (shippers, etc.) and forest products.

Assets they looked at included the rail lines in the region, the port of Searsport, Bangor International Airport, the roads infrastructure and more.

“We are sitting on these assets. If strategically addressed and appropriately invested in, I think we can bring manufacturing back to Maine; we can really look at value-added production activities that will result in some of the rural communities being able to retain and grow some of that manufacturing base,” said Michael Aube, president of EMDC.

The MMA class laid out key potential developments that the region could capitalize on to boost the use of the infrastructure in the corridor. The first was the likely future use of the seaport for export of forestry biomass, particularly given the plans to develop a torrefied wood plant in the Millinocket region.

It also saw an upside from the expansion of the Panama Canal, allowing larger ships to more easily access the East Coast ports. Congestion may clog some of the seaboard’s bigger ports, the report suggested, allowing Searsport to capture more European-U.S. cargo ship traffic. And more big ships coming through the canal may mean more offloading onto smaller ships for East Coast ports, which may boost traffic to Searsport.

And more offloading at Searsport means more cargo making its way across Maine by rail and road. That could boost regular shipping service, which would benefit Maine companies, suggested DeWitt.

Another finding was that greater collaboration and communication among shippers and companies with product to ship was needed.

“Maine has valuable products with demand from both domestic and international markets. The state also has an established logistics network that is not being utilized to its full capacity,” researchers wrote in the report. “A majority of Maine’s products are being shipped using out-of-state infrastructure. Yet conversely, the local logistics partners are struggling to find sufficient volume to compete with other logistics hubs, and the in-state infrastructure is unable to grow and improve.”

A lot of companies in Maine essentially go it alone, seeking their own shipping solutions instead of working together to fill containers, trucks and other transport vessels and more efficiently pool resources — saving money, potentially.

“Sometimes the world gets unnecessarily complex and fragmented. Pulling it back to a simple framework has some merit,” said DeWitt.

The report makes a number of suggestions, but primary is identifying a person who can act as a leader and advocate for the corridor concept and lead a team of people from different parts of the equation to make it happen.

“That’s the key — leadership. What’s the vision, and how do we move these things forward — and truly be market driven?” said Aube. “How do we make the economic argument that this does, in fact, make sense.”

Investment also must be made in various parts of the infrastructure, the report noted.

“The current rail network connecting Searsport to Bangor and the rest of Maine with the United States is in unexceptional condition,” the researchers noted.

Overall investment in rail and, possibly, development of an intermodal facility near arterial roadways is needed, they wrote. Additionally, the current road conditions in the area are “not well suited to a large increase in truck traffic,” the report found.

The port of Searsport is in a position to be more heavily used, they wrote, but could use additional cargo handling equipment, including a conveyer loading system.

And on the air front, the report noted that BIA has runways that can handle any plane today, as well as the personnel and systems in place to handle needs. However, it lacks a significant route network to other cities.

“If [BIA] established more regular flights to major global hubs, it would attract more companies,” the report noted. “It is also vital that warehouses be built at the airport and that they be temperature- controlled.”

Cargo at BIA is limited now, said Tony Caruso, interim airport director, though the airport does have the infrastructure, personnel and training to be available for freight handling. Even before this study came out, he said, airport officials were talking about getting everyone in the shipping/transportation network together to discuss who ships what, where it goes, how often it goes out — in hopes of fostering more coordination and building more business.

The MMA report, said Caruso, provided a strong, comprehensive view of what assets exist and where potential lies.

“If we can get companies, shippers, freight-forwards to work together in a collective effort, there [are] ways to improve the economics in that corridor,” he said. “Really, it’s just optimizing volumes in and out of that region.”

Join the Conversation

10 Comments

  1. Like anyone from the looney left would go for anything to advance the economy of this area.

  2. DeWitt has the right idea when he says simplify it by bringing it together. Rail from the Bangor area down to the Searsport and Belfast area’s is a natural. And the connection of the Millinocket biomass plant from Millinocket using the existing railine’s is only 1 short step from practicality when looked at from the ‘Big Picture’ perspective. This is an idea that everyone, even Paulie, can get behind since everyone stands to benefit from better transportation of Maine good’s and product’s at a better and cheaper rate (fooled ya, didn’t I Governor ?) than the current roadway’s. And the best part is that it’s gonna create huge number’s of job’s in the construction and rail sector’s (is anyone at Cianbro awake ?), both in building it but also in maintaining it also. It might even help with the DECD’s Bombardier Project, one would think ………..

  3. Better not make any structures higher than the new Propane Tank in Searsport. You’ll drive the tourists away from the whole midcoast region if you do such a thing.

    I wonder why MMA didn’t do a study of the deepest water port on the east coast of the US? You know Eastport? Oh that’s right, it’s not in Maine, it’s in Washington County. Now there is a place that is curious. They vote Republican yet seem to be anti business.

    1. Millinocket’s product has to be shipped to Europe from somewhere. If not Eastport then where else ? This stuff is not going to sprout wings and fly there by itself and to get the shipping issue resolved is going to take time. A study, regardless of who did it, at the very least shows the options and the problems related to a solution. If you got an option, please, don’t keep it a secret.

      Maine needs all the options it can get. But the most important part of any solution proposed is to actually get out there, put it into effect and do it, not sit in Augusta, throwing temper tantrum’s and sulk in some corner of the Statehouse, chanting ‘No’ on the orders of whatever special iuterest group opposes it. Maine needs more innovative thinking, not ‘scaredey-cat, gott’a keep-looking-back’ cookie-cutter thinking that leads no where. Given the options here, one would think, why not use the rail system’s of both with the Millinocket bio-coal going to Eastport and the Bombardier rail potential at Brunswick going to Searsport for their railcars and transit cars to be shipped oversea’s. Both win and it increases business, and the job’s picture, all over Maine because of the ripple effect. Anyone else got in idea, please, join in and add to it all ‘ cause Maine needs everyone’s idea’s to move forward.

  4. And MMA has no interest in promoting the objectives in this maritime management class”study”?  An impartial study could come to some very different conclusions concerning moving goods around Maine. Make no mistake the big construction jobs will employ men from out of state, and the $$$ will flow out of state too. 
    Torrified wood? I’ll wait until the plant is producing. Perishable goods? who did they talk to? Saying that larger ships coming through the Panama canal”may” mean some more traffic for searsport, but every seaport on the eastern shore is crying for more business, so don’t count on lots of new ships unloading at mid maine.

    Sounds like a senior class project to me.

  5. Fine.  Just don’t foul the upper Penobscot Bay’s brackish  estuary that powers New England’s most productive lobster fishery while you’re doing it. 

  6. What an amazingly novel idea. I believe the owners of the Bangor and Aroostook Railroad actually thought of it (and acted on it) starting circa 1904. When people devoid of imagination are called upon as part of a class assignment to come up with something imaginative, this is what you get, the recycling of a tired old idea.

    Perhaps Maine Maritime Academy should stick to maritime matters and not run a so-called business school on the side complete with its own well paid dean. The best these jokers seem to be able to do is go to their pals in the revolving-door world of state government and industry and channel on behalf of them whatever their hearts desire. 

    David Cole spent years heading up that corporate welfare clearing house Eastern Maine Development Corp., whose last claim to fame was the failed sponsorship of a for-profit private prison in Milo. Later, Cole was Baldacci’s choice for Transportation commissioner in which position he tried to put the taxpayers of Maine on the hook for $200 million to build a totally unneeded, unwanted and out of place container port on Sears Island. Despite absurdly generous terms, not one port developer in the world even sniffed at the bait. Could someone have been out of touch about basic economic realities?

    Of course this is all too bad for the speculators at RailWorld of Chicago, owners of the bankrupt B&A’s decrepit assets and ever hopeful of recouping their questionable investment through heavy industrialization of the midcoast area. Such soulless creatures are unmindful that this would come at the expense of an existing way of life based upon tourism, retirement and second home living, and the expanding creative economy. For those who might be unaware, RailWorld (aka Montreal, Maine and Atlantic Railway) last year received a $22 million gift from the taxpayers of Maine so they wouldn’t have to provide upkeep on the least profitable half of their trackage, something that already establishes its owners as world class corporate welfare queens.

    Now, like many a government bureaucrat sitting out a change of administrations, Cole is in the private sector, essentially working for the same people. As David Cole Consulting, the state’s former transportation chief is busy promoting the rape of Sears Island, construction in Searsport of what would be the largest refrigerated propane tank in North America and — who knew — a Bangor-to-Searsport “logistics corridor”!     

    1. Eternal vigilance is the price of liberty, as Ida Wells wrote so long ago.  Thank you Peter, for keeping an eye through the years on the machinations of Cole and  other Sears Island port wannabees as they scuttle about.

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *