Protecting children

For the past two years I have been the voice of a toddler and infant, brother and sister. Both children were removed from the care of their parents and placed in foster care because someone accepted the responsibility of reporting severe neglect. Today, I go to court again as the voice of two children who can go forward in life and be cared for by loving parents in a safe environment.

Professionally, I work with families who constantly struggle to care for their children. In most instances, they succeed.

In the spring of 2011, Victor Vieth, executive director of the National Child Protection Training Center and National Center for the Prosecution of Child Abuse, was the guest speaker at the Child Welfare Conference in Orono. Vieth’s passion for the protection of children has resulted in a system that gives children of neglect and abuse a voice based on clear research and science.

Regardless of the lack of legal precedence and the weakness of Maine laws mandating the report of child abuse and neglect, there is no excuse for those who fail to protect children at risk. It is time for all of us to look beyond the “fears” of doing the right thing.

Ultimately, many of these unprotected children grow up to be adults. The time to recognize and report child abuse and neglect is when it occurs. Society needs to stop looking away and pretend the problem will somehow disappear or care for itself.

Margaret Capehart

Bangor

Heads of the Hydra

Republicans and their pseudo-libertarian cohorts howl with outrage at Obamacare. No doubt a sizable portion of these right-wingers have government-funded health care, whether by state, federal or local tax-based employment, Medicare, taxpayer-funded retirement programs or Medicaid. While President Barack Obama’s reform reins in the most egregious private insurance practices, it falls far short of universal coverage and further institutionalizes the for-profit health insurance and pharmaceutical industries, allowing them to feed at the public trough.

For our small business, existing reform translates into a 44 percent premium increase for 2012. To add insult to injury, Anthem Blue Cross Blue Shield demands, and our Gov. Paul LePage-backed state insurance bureau agrees, we must join the Chamber of Commerce at $250 per year or face cancellation of our policy. This week the Chamber featured a television attack ad against independent Angus King and supporting the Republican candidate for the U.S. Senate this November. For years the Chamber has funded Republican-based initiatives. Anthem not only squeezes us dry for health insurance but also insists we fund the Republican Party and Willard (Mitt) Romney. We have no other option. Aetna, Cigna, MEGA Life, United Healthcare are, like Anthem, heads of the Hydra.

James McDonald, Ph.D.

Reesa Greenberg

Bangor

‘Johnny Baseball’ had something for everyone

I am writing to let BDN readers know that stepping into Hauck Auditorium was like walking into Fenway Park. The replica of the Green Monster greeted the audience and got them in the mood for baseball, “Johnny Baseball,” that is. The overture contained enough strains of the national anthem to begin the game, and an American chorus filled the bleachers to sing “86 Years,” and the show was underway.

Non-baseball fans should keep reading, however, because, in spite of the title, “Johnny Baseball” has something for everyone. The music is by turns catchy, edgy and bluesy. The themes range from the perseverance of entrenched racism through the endurance of love and the bond between fathers and sons. The lighting, costumes and sets take history fans to 1919 and 1948. Fans of acting and vocal performance will appreciate the efforts of the local and imported talent. To borrow a phrase from another baseball musical at the expense of the Yankees, “you gotta have heart,” and “Johnny Baseball” has more than enough heart to engage theater fans of all stripes and revive the flagging spirits of Red Sox fans during this otherwise mediocre season.

Overall, the show was every bit as good as last summer’s student production of “Sweeney Todd.”

Scott Peterson

Orono

Resounding yes

I would like to reply to the question posted by Leverett Merrill of Orrington (BDN, Aug. 9) with a resounding yes. Many of us who are upset with the recent decision by the Boy Scouts to ban gays are also upset with Penn State and the Catholic Church.

This is because we understand the difference between homosexuals who are harmless and pedophiles who are not.

Jay Hall

Brewer

Health care costs

A study by the department of economics of the University of Chicago is pertinent to present discussions about health care costs. They demonstrated that improvements in health care have been worth approximately 73 trillion dollars to society between 1970 and 2002 (life expectancy in 1970: 70.8 years; in 2002: 78 years). The average 50-year-old man gained additional life-years worth $350,000; the average 50-year-old woman gained $180,000. Also, they noted that a 10-percent reduction in heart disease mortality would save society $4 trillion.

Thus, while society has invested very large additional sums in health care during this period (approximately $25 trillion, of which approximately $7.5 trillion went to administrative costs, a percentage much greater than noted in any other major country), the return on this investment has been substantial, greater than the average return on most investments during this period.

Another disturbing study by the Commonwealth Fund demonstrated that the United States ranks last among high-income nations on deaths that could have been prevented by timely access to effective health care.

The preventable death rate in the U.S., 95 per 100,000, was almost twice that of France, at 55 per 100,000. The authors attributed these findings to the lack of universal coverage and high cost of care.

Arthur J. Weiss, M.D.

Little Deer Isle

Far from the truth

The lady who quoted scripture in a letter Aug. 3 should study the Bible before remarking on it. Just as homosexuality is a sin, so is rape and incest. None of those things are accepted by God.

If she thinks that Christians hate people who commit such acts, she is far from the truth. We love them and pray that they will repent and accept the truth of God’s word. It is the sin we hate, not the person.

God does not make mistakes. People do, and we will all be accountable to Him one day.

Gloria Boynton

Prospect

Join the Conversation

42 Comments

  1. Thank you to Dr. Weiss for his well written and informed letter. We keep forgetting that while improvements cost us something in the short-term, they gain us in the long-term. This is the type of investment I’m willing to make.

    I do wonder why increasing the lifespan extends the value of a man’s earnings by more than $300K but a woman’s by only $180K. Is this because of the cost of caring for men vs women when they are old? Or because of discrepancies in what men and women earn?

  2. Drs. McDonald and Weiss and Ms.  Greenberg, I agree with each of you.  We need Medicare for all, both to reduce the costs we face as small business employers and to keep more of our citizens alive.  The plans of Romney and Ryan to repeal the Affordable Care Act will unquestionably lead to more deaths than would otherwise occur if the Act continued to be implemented.

  3. Gloria Boynton–I respect your right to believe in your god and will defend that right to the end.  I do not believe in your right, in the name of your god, to deny civil rights to my brethren and children.  That is no different than saying we should be able to own people as slaves because the bible says it is OK.  It is NOT OK–neither is discriminating against same gender couples by disallowing them the same civil rights that you and your fellow “Christians” enjoy.  

    1. Her judgement of homosexuality as a sin is highly suspect.  It’s a sin to be born a homosexual?  Hardly.  It’s not a choice as she implies.

      1. Highly suspect by whom….the SSM crowd? Gee, what a surprise.
        Gloria, hold on, you’re about to be viciously attacked for your beliefs.

        1. OK, controversial even within theological circles.  Besides, her statements are even broader than SSM issues and imply that people are not born homosexual.

  4. Margaret, maybe if the FOBs had gone to the Child Welfare Conference in Orono last spring, and took it seriously, do you think it would have changed the outcome of the former Rev issue in November 2011?  Maybe if these FOBs were mandated to go to this said conference years ago, they would have done the right thing and stopped the atrocities performed by the former Rev?  Who knows how many children would have been saved?

  5.  No doubt a sizable portion of these right-wingers have
    government-funded health care, whether by state, federal or local
    tax-based employment, Medicare, taxpayer-funded retirement programs or
    Medicaid.  ~~~~
    James McDonald, Ph.D.
    Reesa Greenberg

    Just a point of fact, most government federal employees are Left Wing Democrats out to protect their own.

    1. I assume you have statistics  to back up your statement, I would like to see them.
      Thanking you for your non answer.

      1.  I made the statement that most state federal government workers are Democrats… It is up to you to disprove it.

        1. dont you remember, all of us republicans are guilty until proven innocent  thats why the democrats sling so much crap around just hoping a little may stick

          1. Good show me the data, or are you like your vice president who got caught in a lie about the stimulus?   He is guilty you are still in play at this time.

          1. Don’t need to. You are free to accept it, dispute it with your own facts or ignore it.. that’s up to you.

          2. That’s ridiculous. Then anybody could say anything and there would have to be good and decent people running around correcting everything. I could say you’re a greedy racist with no basis and you’re the one that has to prove me wrong? Come on, you KNOW that’s not how things work.

          3. Knowing that cheesecake wouldn’t back up his “facts” I went ahead and tried to google the party demographics of federal employees … I couldn’t find anything other than the Hatch Act which governs the political activities of governmental employees.  My opinion is that cheesie has no facts, just opinion, and thus his reluctance (inability?) to support his claims.

          4.  You are telling me now that there are fewer Republicans in Government than Democrats. Prove it.

          5. We’ll lets just use the Cheesecake method. You’re saying that I said something, so now you have to disprove what a said. We could go round and round in circles. I know you know that’s stupid. When you make a claim, it’s you that has to back it up.

    2. Don’t know about your circle of friends but in my circle, the most vehement anti-ACA people all have health insurance through their employment. Quite a few have what could be called a Cadilac plan. Until I retired I had a Cadilac plan where I worked and if it weren’t for that and a few other benefits, I doubt that they would be able to hire enough qualified people to function. Most of these people that I worked with were die hard Republicans.

        1. Hmm, dept. of defense, the military, Tea Party representatives, Grover Norquist representatives, adds up to a sizable number who have federal benefits.

          1. The numbers of law enforcement that lean to the right is huge. Just about all PD’s in this state are union. Most of the other states except the South are union. Most corrections officers are right leaning. Large numbers of these people are anti-ACA and have their benefits tied to their job. All at the same time that those they are negotiating with for new contracts are trying their best to take benefits away. Go figure.

      1. Writers made statement that those with Federal Government benefits were right-wingers.
        Sweeping generalizations that…. don’t you think? Why don’t you ask them for data?

    3.  Hardly. My sister and her husband are staunch Republicans as were my parents. All federal employees.

      1.  There are far more Democrats than Republicans in government service. My point being is there is more of a likelyhood of radical left-wingers than the right wingers in government the kind Doctor spoke of in his post.

  6. James McDonald, Ph.D. & 
    Reesa Greenberg– You can thank our wonderful governor for allowing the large increases and if he does not get going on the exchanges you will not enjoy any decreases for a while. I agree the healthcare should have been single payer and maybe sometime this will change but for now we are stuck with the ACA which is better than anything we had before.

    1.  That kind of made me wonder also. I am not in favor of that. If it is true it sounds a lot like a worker being forced to join a union in order to get the benefits… I am not in favor of that.

      As an aside I think they have real poor insurance representation or are real inexperienced.

  7. Ms. Boynton:  “…we will all be accountable to Him one day.”  Yes we will…I’m not sure you should be looking forward to that.

  8. James, of course, the US Chamber is buddy-buddy with the nastiest of the nastiest as an ALEC member. 30+ companies have left ALEC which means those remaining are more sinister in their intent. And, yes Arthur, we are among the undeveloped in the area of health care. This article in The Atlantic tells the story quite nicely: http://www.theatlantic.com/international/archive/2012/06/heres-a-map-of-the-countries-that-provide-universal-health-care-americas-still-not-on-it/259153/#.UC5hda_U9ix.facebook

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *