AUGUSTA, Maine — The League of Conservation Voters on Tuesday named a Scarborough lawmaker to its nationwide “Dirty Dozen” list of state-level candidates with voting records the league called some of the “most anti-environmental” in the United States.

Rep. Heather Sirocki, a Republican, is the first Maine lawmaker to make the list, a result of her 0 percent score on the recently released legislator scorecard of Maine Conservation Voters, the League of Conservation Voters’ Maine affiliate. This is the second time the League of Conservation Voters has assembled a state-level “Dirty Dozen” list; the group last put one together in 2010.

Sirocki and one other House colleague, Republican Rep. Beth O’Connor of Berwick, voted against Maine Conservation Voters positions on all 10 of the bills the group used to develop its scorecard rankings. It’s the first time since 2006 that any legislator has scored zero on the rating for a full two-year term, said Maureen Drouin, executive director of Maine Conservation Voters.

“It’s pretty remarkable that this legislator didn’t vote for the environment one time,” Drouin said. “As they were looking across the country, Heather Sirocki really stood out because of Maine, but also because of her district, which really values its natural resources.”

The conservation group based its legislator ratings on how they voted on 10 bills taken up by lawmakers over the past two years, including:

• A ban of the chemical bisphenol-A in certain children’s products, which the league supported and lawmakers passed;

• A bond issue to fund Land for Maine’s Future — a state program that purchases land parcels to set aside for conservation, forestry and recreation — that passed the Legislature and will go to voters this fall;

• A law, opposed by Maine Conservation Voters and passed by the Legislature, that loosened restrictions on open-pit mining; and

• Legislation, supported by Maine Conservation Voters and passed by lawmakers, approving new rules that keep protections in place for wetlands that are crucial habitats for certain species of birds and waterfowl.

“It’s really hard to get a zero on our scorecard,” Drouin said.

Sirocki, in an email, called the “Dirty Dozen” list a “publicity stunt” that discounted legislative efforts she made to implement environmental protections. She cited her co-sponsorship of unsuccessful measures to regulate the use of magnesium chloride in road salt and to prohibit the Department of Environmental Protection from licensing combined sewer overflow systems.

“Using a list of cherry-picked bills to suit their political purposes, [Maine Conservation Voters] attempted to paint me as an anti-environment legislator who does not listen to her constituents,” Sirocki said. “This sort of overblown rhetoric and selective scoring is not what the people of Scarborough, or Maine, deserve. Facts, research and genuine conversation with constituents are what is needed.”

A dental hygienist, Sirocki is serving her first term representing House District 128, which covers part of Scarborough. She’s facing a challenge from Democrat Jean-Marie Caterina in November.

Sirocki beat Scarborough school board chairman Brian Dell’Olio in 2010 to claim the District 128 seat for Republicans. The seat had long been held by Democrat Peggy Pendleton.

In developing its legislator ratings, Maine Conservation Voters also considered lawmakers’ votes on two measures the group opposed: an unsuccessful bill pushed by Gov. Paul LePage that would have lifted a 100-megawatt cap on renewable power sources, allowing more hydropower to be classified as renewable, and the “takings” bill, which would have allowed property owners to sue the state if new regulations diminished their property value by 50 percent.

Maine Conservation Voters opposed both of those measures.

Join the Conversation

27 Comments

  1. Sirocki is a darn good legislator. Her voting record is right on track.

    The radical leftist Sierra Club threw its support behind Angus “Double the State Budget” King this week. Enough said about such whack-job environmentalists.

    Please ignore the liberal media. It wants you to vote the way it votes. We are better off voting EXACTLY OPPPOSITE!

    1. The Sierra Club is not radical. The Sierra Club is not leftist. What it is is a hiking club for yuppies who want to feel they’re sensitive and special folks but don’t want to face the fact that their group has no moral inhibitions against getting into bed with all manner of big developers and large corporations.

       They sold out Sears Island, agreeing it is appropriate to build a $200 million container port on the nation’s largest publicly held wild island. They greenwashed Chlorox for a share of the profits. Now, most obscenely, they’re kissing Angus King on his nasty toothbrush mustache-accented mouth, this a man who has made an art form out of selling out the environment while professing himself to be an environmentalist. Only one step ahead of the law, King has reaped millions of taxpayer dollars raping the mountaintops of Maine for bogus windpower. When are those same taxpayers who made him rich going to wake up to what a fraud he is?

      Please don’t confuse the Sierra Club and its many sleazy bedfellows with real environmental activism. Real environmentalists despise the Sierra Club (and Angus) every bit as much as the Tea Party types you, Dannyboy7, obviously hang out with.

  2. Jean Marie will do a far better job representing that district.

    Ms. Sirocki is not a very good candidate it seems.

    1. Look at her score of 0 %.

      That  is perfect.
      It is refreshing to be able say something that positive about any Maine Republican, lately. 

  3. Environmental groups aren’t interested in the actual environment.  They want power.  (Which brings them MONEY).

    1. Of course they want power. Is there any such thing as a pressure group of any type that doesn’t realize power is necessary before anything gets done in government? For example, does the NRA and its members not seek (and achieve) power by targeting officeholders they see as obstacles to their agenda? No matter what their objectives, isn’t that why people run for office and why other people support them? For that matter, whenever we choose to vote we seek and exercise a measure of power. To think any individual or group wading into election campaigns seeks no power is to have missed the whole point.

  4. Good for her…Means she is representing her voters and not special interest groups…We have ENOUGH laws protecting wetlands and don’t have the money to keep buying more land for the moon  bats to protect..They should spend their millions BUYING the land they claim to love so much…

  5. News flash all Republicans are “DIRTY” LOL. Someone said good for her she is representing her constituents……………Well not sure what heavy industry takes place in Scarborough, but it matters not because Republicans now don’t live on planet earth they have all moved to the planet Kolob where the Mormon Gawd lives and there is no pollution and everything is wonderful. OK cue the looney tune music here come the Republicans. LMFAO!

  6. So the rich enviros have a dirty dozen list?  Taking time off from reading their trust fund portfolios?
    I’m shocked that Biff and Buffy would take their Prius down that road! 
    Nobody gives 2 cents for this outfit and their list! Where’s the jobs Barack?????

    1. Don’t you mean to ask “Where are the jobs, Gov. LePage?”
      Seems like we don’t very often hear about how well he’s doing on that count.

      1. Hey Jefflord,
        You can’t be serious right? After 30 years of being run into the ground by the left in Maine you expect that in two years its going to be all changed? I mean, you guys are still blaming Bush and want us to give the “Messiah” another 4 years!

  7. Anguish leveled mountains in Maine and the whack-jobs vote for him.He did not make the list.Guess it does not mean much.

    1. It seems that before he left Record Hill Wind, King helped apply for a Department of Energy grant worth some $33 million. Which means one of two things: either the company was thriving, in which case King was helping bilk taxpayers for an additional $33 million; or the company was having financial difficulties, in which case the $33 million grant was designed to help cover the cost of the loans, $23 million of which was coming due with a maturity date of April 27, 2012.

      The reason he did this?

      A $407000 “success fee” he was personally awarded for nuturing this government loan through the crony capitalist Obama (puke) green loan process.

      http://tinyurl.com/8ppkajq

  8. Thank you, Heather, for trying to  regulate the use of magnesium chloride in road salt. This is an actual enrivonmental issue. And why would the conservation group oppose lifting the ceiling on hydropower? It is the only form of alternative energy that is even mildly feasible – the others all take more oil to construct than they replace.

    1. The “conservation” groups are not at all interested in cheap, clean , reliable energy for Maine.  They are interested in depopulating the state.  Anything that furthers that agenda meets with their approval.  Anything that lowers the cost of living in Maine is a huge negative in their eyes.  Don’t believe what they tell you, look at what they support.

  9. Environmentalism has killed the economy in Maine and is well on it’s way to killing the national economy.

    But, all the liberals that donate money to these causes DO feel better about themselves, though, so I guess it must be alright.

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *