WASHINGTON — Republican presidential candidate Mitt Romney fought back on Friday against Democratic charges he paid no taxes in some years, releasing a letter from his accountants saying he paid an effective federal tax rate of at least 13.6 percent annually over 20 years.

Despite heavy political pressure, Romney stood firm in refusing to make those returns public, but followed through on an earlier promise to release his 2011 return. It showed he paid $1.9 million in taxes on more than $13 million in income — an effective tax rate of 14.1 percent.

Senate Democratic leader Harry Reid and others have questioned whether Romney paid taxes in at least some of those earlier years. President Barack Obama has used Romney’s refusal to release more returns as support for his argument that his challenger is out of touch with the lives of everyday Americans.

Romney, who faces Obama in the November 6 election, earns the majority of his income from investment profits, dividends and interest that is taxed at a lower rate than wage income, which is taxed at a top rate of 35 percent.

The tax release on Friday afternoon, traditionally a time when politicians make public information they hope will not attract heavy news coverage, came after a brutal week for Romney’s presidential campaign.

A secretly recorded video was released earlier in the week showing Romney denigrating the 47 percent of Americans who would back Obama “no matter what” as government-dependent victims who pay no taxes. That followed last week’s fumbled response to attacks on U.S. compounds in Libya and Egypt.

Romney, a former governor of Massachusetts, has fallen slightly behind Obama in polls in the White House race, with a series of three high-stakes debates between the two scheduled in October.

Even many of Romney’s Republican allies have suggested he release his earlier returns to end the controversy. Romney released his 2010 return in January, which showed he paid an effective tax rate of 13.9 percent, and had promised to release his 2011 return before the election.

The 2011 return made public on Friday showed Romney donated about $4 million to charity in 2011, amounting to nearly 30 percent of his income.

Romney has refused to release returns from his years as head of Bain Capital, a private equity fund that Democratic critics have charged plundered companies and cut jobs in a quest for profits. Romney has an estimated net worth between $190 million and $250 million.

He has said that issuing full returns from earlier years would just give Democrats “hundreds or thousands of more pages to pick through, distort and lie about.”

The Obama campaign has repeatedly criticized Romney for his refusal, and released an ad earlier in the year questioning the decision and noting Romney’s accounting techniques and tax havens to minimize his tax burden.

The Romney campaign published a statement on Friday from former Internal Revenue Service Commissioner Fred Goldberg, who declared the returns “reflect the complexity of our laws and the types of investment activity that I would anticipate for persons in their circumstances.”

Goldberg said, “In my judgment, they have fully satisfied their responsibilities as taxpayers.”

The letter from accountants PricewaterhouseCoopers said the average of Romney’s annual effective federal personal income tax rate during the 20-year period up to 2009 was 20.2 percent, and he and his wife, Ann, had a charitable deduction rate of 13.45 percent.

The campaign also released a letter from Romney’s doctor noting he was in excellent health, but occasionally needed to use an inhaler to ease an obstruction in his airways.

Additional reporting by Deborah Charles, Kim Dixon and Alistair Bell.

Join the Conversation

34 Comments

  1. Romney could have deducted $4.0 million from his gross income and only took $2.8, which means he paid more taxes than he needed too. Recently he said that if he paid a penny more in taxes than he needed, he did not deserve to be president. So, exactly why should anyone vote for him?

  2. I suspect Romney’s terrified that voters will discover HE is one of the 47% of non taxpaying Americans he reviles…

      1. Can YOU read Romney’s tax returns for the past 10 years? I didn’t think so… He doesn’t dare release them.

      2. How about in 2009, 2008, 2007 or earlier? 

        He is hiding his tax returns because there is something in them he does not want the American People to know about? 

        I am not saying he has done anything illegal, just that he knows that something in his taxes would hurt him more than not releasig them has.

    1. Leave it to a liberal to chastise someone who donated 30% of his income while obama donated 7%. And talk about evil, what does it say about a president who in ’08 ran his campaign on change but this week admitted he can’t? This is an admission that he cannot lead – something we already knew & now is confirmed by obama himself. obama = fail.

      1. A clear distinction needs to be understood; candidate Obama isn’t TOTUS Obama.  He even promised not to run again if he couldn’t deliver on his hope and change!  However, if candidate Romney is caught on hidden camera saying liar-liar pants on fire, he’d probably be hauled off by the secret service for threatening the president.

  3. so far, the only three reasons romney has given for his refusal to release more tax returns are: i don’t have to, the democrats will use them to pick on me and just trust me. did i leave anything out?

  4. Just curious.   Why is the media so in bed with Obama?  The fact that the “tough questions” he faced from Spanish language media outlet Univision became a big mainstream media story shows how shocked they were that anyone would actually question “The One.”  This non-story about Romney’s taxes from Reuters (they pretend to be unbiased) is a perfect example.   The writer’s anger and hatred for Romney is transparently smeared through each paragraph. 

      1. Romney once said that if he paid more in taxes than he was legally required then he should not be President.  Why did he flip-flop on paying too much tax?

          1. An accountant does not decide not to take a major deduction, $1.75 million, without first asking his client. 

            Why would Romney decide not to take his full amount of deductions in order to reduce his tax burden?  Was he feeling generous?

          2. So he adjusted this year’s tax return to pay more in taxes.  Again, he said that if he ever pais more in taxes then he legally had too he should not be President and accordign to your link he paid more to “keep” within his stated tax rate of 14%.

          3. That appears to be pretty much what happened.

            A few years back Mass had a temporary (10 year?) state income tax rate increase.
            Many people raised a stink when it wasn’t dropped back on expiration, so it went to the people. Amongst all the ‘sky will fall’ screams, it was passed with the twist that anyone who wanted to pay at the higher rate could. The tax forms had the provision.
            Only about 1700 taxpayers file under the higher rate per year! So, the ones who cried to keep the old rate have decided that they aren’t going to pay anymore than they have to. Hypocrites!

  5. He fights the release but has the nerve to require Ryan, who’s not all the bright to begin with, to release 10 YEARS OF RECORD’S for the ‘vetting process. Nice to see that the double standard is alive and well and is trying to make a come back in DC. I wonder what’s next, Charles Koch as Secretary of the Treasury ? The pony show is in full swing !

    1. Wouldn’t that be for Romney’s eyes as part of the vetting process and not for public consumption?  Apples and oranges.

        1. Uhh, the reply I gave to Mike was about Ryan….
          Plus, legally, no candidate has to show a full ten years. We’ve just become used to it since Romney’s father started the tradition. I’m not arguing about whether they should, only what is technically required.

          1. I stand by my post.  Romney needs to see 10 years of data to vet Ryan, the voters need to see 10 years of data to vet Romney.

          2. I stand by my post of it being about Ryan. You added Romney to the mix, so I will say that in a perfect world, they all should. Remember that Pelosi and Reid, his loudest critics on the subject, haven’t shown a single one (like the vast majority of Congress haven’t).
            Here are a couple of interesting links I ran across.

            http://www.taxhistory.org/www/website.nsf/web/presidentialtaxreturns

            http://rt.com/usa/news/congress-tax-disclosure-publicize-

            http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/politics/2012/08/romney-campaign-requested-several-years-of-tax-returns-of-vp-contenders/

  6. So now that he has released these, when should we expect Obummers college and financial aid records to be released ? Oh that’s right, those are sealed away for nobody to see. I know, it’s different. 

    1. I wonder how you equate college and financial aid records with tax returns. You are comparing apples and blue. What does one have to do with the other?

  7. Romney once said that if he paid more than he legally had to in taxes than he should not be president. 

    In 2011, Romney took a $1.75 milion tax deferral to pay more taxes than he legally had to.  Why?  Because if he took his full deduction he would have paid only a 9%, instead of 14%, tax rate on his income.

    Is it legal, yes.  Does it pass the smell test, no.  Romney is trying to make it look like he pays more in taxes then he does while trying to cut his taxes even more

  8. The biggest thing people have against Romney is that he is rich.  Too bad people don’t think the same about the millionaire Obama.  If being rich were not an issue, Obama would be an afterthought in this election.

  9. Wait, wasn’t it George Romney, Mitt’s own father, who released 12 years worth of his tax returns when he ran for President?  Suffice to say that Mitt is not the man his father was.

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *