ROCKLAND, Maine — Maine’s Coast Guard fleet hasn’t been stuck in port when rescue calls, law enforcement, oil spills and ice-breaking duties summon them to sea. But given the age of the fleet, that record could be in jeopardy.
“We’re still able to get the missions done,” said Lt. Nick Barrow of the Coast Guard’s Portland office.
But the Tackle, the 65-foot icebreaker tug based in Rockland, marked its 50th year in service this year. And next year, the 65-foot icebreakers Bridle, based in Southwest Harbor, and Shackle, based in South Portland, also will hit the half-century mark.
“They’re beyond their intended service life,” Barrow said.
The small icebreaker vessels — the Coast Guard also operates the 140-foot Thunder Bay, based in Rockland — are critical to Maine in late winter and early spring, he said. The 65-foot vessels are the only ones able to navigate upriver from the Richmond bridge on the Kennebec River.
Recent years haven’t seen heavy icing in the rivers, but if Maine has an especially cold winter, ice jams could cause serious flooding, Barrow said.
Though it is in the 20- to 25-year-old range, the 110-foot patrol vessel Jefferson Island, based in South Portland, is currently in drydock in Rockland for repairs.
“There’s some pretty significant pitting and hull intrusion,” Barrow said.
The Maine fleet also includes the 87-foot patrol vessel Moray, based in Jonesport. And each of the Coast Guard’s six rescue stations in Maine — Eastport, Jonesport, Southwest Harbor, Rockland, Boothbay Harbor and South Portland — have at least two smaller boats, 25-foot and 47-foot vessels, all newer.
Sector Northern New England has been able move vessels around to handle rescue calls and other duties, but the aging resources take their toll, Barrow said.
The 50-year-old ice-breakers have crews of 7-8, “and those crews spend a great amount of time and effort to maintain the ships,” he said.
And when vessels are out of service due to unscheduled maintenance or repair issues, the Coast Guard is missing opportunities to do random inspections and other, nonemergency work.
Sector Northern New England’s aging fleet is part of a national problem. In the years after the 9/11 terrorist attacks, the U.S. Coast Guard became part of the Department of Homeland Security, and so is on the front lines of national security. But the fleet is one of the world’s oldest and a multibillion dollar replacement program is years behind schedule.
In addition to ships staying in service beyond their intended years of use and frequent breakdowns, many of the vessels are equipped with obsolete electronic and other gear, further hampering their ability to complete their missions.
More funding from Congress to bring the $29 billion replacement program up to date is unlikely, given the belt-tightening U.S. budgetary environment.
The Coast Guard’s 11 missions range from busting drug smugglers to icebreaking. In the last fiscal year, it carried out 20,000 search-and-rescue missions, seized 75 tons of cocaine, detained almost 200 smugglers and conducted more than 10,000 vessel inspections.
The burden falls mostly on the fleet of 378-foot high-endurance cutters, 270- and 210-foot medium-endurance cutters and 110-foot patrol boats. Some may be twice the age of the sailors on board. The service also operates about 1,400 boats under 65 feet long.
At average ages of about 43 and 23 years, respectively, the high-endurance cutters and patrol boats are three years past the ends of their estimated service lives, according a report by the General Accountability Office, the investigative arm of Congress, released this summer.
The midsize cutters also are fast nearing the ends of their estimated service lives.
In fiscal year 2011, the fleet fell about 40,000 hours, or 23 percent, short of its benchmark for operating without major equipment problems, the GAO said.
The number of hours the biggest cutters spent on drug interdiction fell by almost two-thirds from fiscal years 2007 to 2010, mostly because of equipment breakdowns.
The fleet “is in overall poor condition and is generally declining,” the GAO said.
The shortfall in operating hours would “likely result in more cocaine and illegal migrants reaching U.S. shores and a decreased capability to protect U.S. waters and fish stocks from the encroachment of foreign fishing vessels,” it said.
The Department of Homeland Security rejected a GAO recommendation this summer that the Coast Guard reduce its overall benchmark for operating hours without major breakdowns. The target has remained unchanged for at least eight years despite the maintenance headaches.
To deal with equipment problems, the Coast Guard has streamlined maintenance operations and is nearing the end of a 10-year, $453 million program to refurbish some patrol boats and upgrade midsize cutters until new ships come on duty.
Reuters news service contributed to this story.



The United States has a crippled economy, they allowd Wall Street to ship our industrial might oversees, forgetting we needed the revenue to operate our own government operations, now China will have to build our Coast Guard vessels, or lend us the money, I do not think anyone really understands how crippled this Country is.
“………………..I do not think anyone really understands how crippled this Country is.”
I “DO” believe, most everyday AMERICANS understand, the problem is those that WE elect “DO NOT” and add to that the $BILLIONS that OUR Government gives away to foreign countries even those that just as soon slit our throats, is the real problem.
It is time that this Country takes care of OUR OWN “FIRST”………………………
I agree to hope you are right, I mean I hope all understand how crippled we are, and if the time comes when the VOTE cannot seem to bring this country back to it’s senses and to common sense, the people will need to have the knowledge to find the unknown ace in the deck that has not been used to reach a common re-shuffling to bring the deck, back to 52, and the extra aces and jokers removed from the game.
Ross Perot would have saved our Country and wouldn’t have signed the one way free trade bill. We really blew it that time.
Oh I agree one hundred percent.
The Coast Guard will have to help you for going overboard with that comment. China will not build our Coast Guard cutters. Thats a republican political ploy. We have borrowed money to fight two needless wars. The rest we pay for, and we will pay for it all, in time.
I agree with you on the two needless wars and that is some of the reason we are in such a debt situation, however, if you think, this government, has learned it’s lesson, I am sure there are many on here that has a bridge to sell you. It can be debated, argued, talked to death, however one might want to minimize this, with an individual, a household or a nation, heavy debt is crippling,
and often the beginning of the end of true independence.
Perhaps if we stopped sending the American Coast Guard around the world to protect the coast of other countries they would have the money to maintain these vessels. Frankly I feel the same way about our National Guard. What the heck is the American National Guard doing on foreign soil? Outrageous!
Excellent, informative article. At least it keeps the Rockland Marine crew busy.
The coast guard has had the “deep water” program to replace aging vessels for at least 15 years. The new vessels will be built by US manufacturers. It takes time to negotiate the contracts and build the vessels. Don’t lose hope!
Good article but lacks in a few spot’s. With the transfer of 2 of the CG’s cutter’s, the HAMILTON and the about to go DALLAS both going to the Philippines, the CG is beginning to see the end of the HAMILTON-class cutter’s service life. What is really sad is that until the CG can get it’s newer ship’s built and into service, the CG is going to be in a constant ‘catch up’ mode. Until recently the majority of the CG’s ship’s were built in Louisiana and in the Todd Yard’s. Avondale in LA is now shutdown since they have no more Navy contract’s. Who knows what the Todd Yard’s are doing.
What is a bit more than curious also is the Navy’s sending off what the Navy calls ‘surplus to need’s’ ship to foreign Navy’s when these same ship’s more than meet CG requirement’s. The CG for years had the same problem as the Marine Corps as far as aircraft was concerned. The Marine Corps has managed to shed that. The Coast Guard has not. It’s about time that the Maine Delegation got up and started to get in someone’s face about the need for these ship’s to be kept here, where there needed, instead of either being given away or put in some riverside Naval Maritime Reserve Fleet anchorage, waiting to rust or be sunk as a live fire target like some of the recent LST’s. And with the coming push for the Mack Point tank project, regardless of what anyone thinks, the need for these cutter’s, patrol boats and ‘breaker’s is only gonna increase. The same can be pointed out for the Millinocket bio-coal shipment’s, either Eastport or Searsport. And if, and it is a very big IF, the Maine / NS ferry service ever starts up again the need for these vessel’s becomes immediate. Better we keep what we have now than have to pay for it all over again, after the ship sink’s…………
The old hand-me-down systems does not work. You would not want a want a vessel or aircraft at the end of its service life no matter who owned it first. The other reason is the Navy vessel is not equipped to meet the Coast Guard missions and often have much higher operating cost because of those design differences.
The Coast Guard let itself get sucked into the latest procurement fad back in the late 1990s with the Deepwater program. Much money wasted there. I was still in at the time and you could see where it was all going. Kinda like hiring racoons to watch your chickens!
There has been a very old saying, especially relevant when budget’s are either tight or someone’s flag in a game of King of the Hill, that if you don’t have what you need then you make do with whatever you have on hand. Regretably the Coast Guard has been doing this for far too long. What’s really tragic, and should be a national embarassment, is that the Coast Guard has been doing this since the 1930’s ! Now if the Maine Delegation want’s to get behind a piece of legislation that ALL of Maine benefit’s from then maybe they could try getting the Coast Guard something to work with instead of them having to lasso a local porpose to get their ship back in to port for lack of adequate fuel.
this touches on something I have heard about over the years that I always found curious. This is the deployment of US Coast Guard vessels in overseas locations apparently for military patrols. There are US Coast Guard vessels in the medeteranian sea at the same time we are lamenting a shortage of them here on our own coastline. I know there are numerous different types of vessels in the USCG fleet and they are not all interchangeable on a given task but still, why are USCG vessels in use overseas?
As tender as the old boats may be , they will last alot longer
if you keep them away from the landlubbers at Portland Fire Dept.
The DHS (Department of Homeland Security) has been spending “stimulus” money like drunken sailors since its inception(sorry for dig sailors). Now the CG has issues with their older boat? Maybe it is time to trade in some of the go-fast orange boats for some real boats. There sure is a lot of those little orange go-fast boats. Time for a new direction, or better yet, time to end the DHS boondoggle.
I was on the CCCutter Cook Inlet, a 311. We gave it to South Vietnam in the early 70’s. Wonder if she is still sailing?
Sad answer to your question
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/USCGC_Cook_Inlet_(WAVP-384)
” the belt-tightening U.S. budgetary environment”… That’s just funny. When did that happen?
“The Department of Homeland Security rejected a GAO recommendation this summer that the Coast Guard reduce its overall benchmark for operating hours without major breakdowns. The target has remained unchanged for at least eight years despite the maintenance headaches.”
And that is the biggest issue..we keep getting slammed with more and more operational requirements, yet our equipment is constantly being put into corrective maintenance mode rather than preventative maintenance…I have been on three ships since 2004, the first one was in drydock for over 2 years…TWO YEARS!! – the next one remained pierside and drydocked for almost the same amount of time…and when it came time for trying to get the time necessary to fix major hull degredation issues and mechanical problems, things were prioritized in such a way so as to make sure the cutters were back out on the water doing the mission, meanwhile, the things that werent’ getting fixed were only getting worse…..the CG is it’s own worst enemy when it comes to fixing and operating…too many entities competing for their own interests while forgetting that it is the CREWS of these ships that have to live with these decisions. It’s time to start farming out some of our missions to other goverment agencies and stop burdening the CG fleet with too much.
USCG Motto: “We have done so much, for so long, with so little, we are now qualified to do anything with nothing”. That’s what it was when I was in, I doubt it has changed much. This country needs to step up and support those that are doing the job!
This is nothing new for the Coast Guard. All six of the cutters I served on between 1979 and 1993 were older than I was. One was built in 1942 and was not decommisioned until 1994. I vidly remember trying to find replacment vacuum tubes to repair a generator in 1989.
It might have been nice to be on a boat that was only 25 years old.
The USCG has a long term problem of being tasked with new missions and responsibilities without additional funding – “mission creep”.