If we’re going to improve student achievement, we have to embrace innovation and sometimes-radical techniques and outside-the-box approaches to teaching.

As we approach the November elections, I’m surprised to see that most of the problems facing our K-12 education system have taken a back seat to the economy and the turbulence of the global arena. It’s these very economic concerns and America’s ability to compete in an international marketplace that should be spurring us to find the most exciting and jarring changes for our public schools.

That’s why we need to elect former Gov. Angus King to the United States Senate. He’s a leader who understands the importance of innovation in education and will bring that leadership to Washington.

Innovation requires support in multiple ways during its incubation and growth phases. First, educators need support to convert ideas into prototypes from which they can seek feedback from fellow teachers and students. New ideas need time to grow and access to programs that provide financial and technical support.

Under the ex-governor’s leadership, the Maine laptop initiative was initially tested by coastal teachers and then effectively implemented across the state in the launch phase of the project (second phase).

The third phase is scale. The success of the laptop initiative has been documented and researched and has affected 72,000 teachers and students in grades 7-12. The research has shown students using the laptops have higher writing test scores, teachers and students are more engaged, and math scores have improved.

The laptop initiative, as conceived and implemented by King, has empowered teachers, leveled the playing field of digital equity and has made all students technology literate.

King recently said about the program, “We did the right thing at the right time. It has been tremendously successful.”

In education, history shows us the most promising innovations address the individual student. Efforts addressing the child stem from the concept of “disrupting class.”

Clayton Christensen and Michael Horn have coined the term disruptive innovation, which refers to new ideas that change the fundamental assumptions about how learning occurs, when it occurs and where it occurs. Maine has been a leader in taking risks to make a difference in education.

After leaving office, King continued promoting innovation in education, not just in Maine, but globally. He created and built the Maine International Center for Digital Learning, a nonprofit organization helping educators use digital technologies to promote student learning.

With its connections to most of Maine’s middle and high schools, and national and international organizations and learning institutions, the center has become a strong force in America’s debate around digital programs and individualized learning.

Education is a local endeavor, but to make innovative change, we need leaders who understand the national and global importance of new ideas. King understands how to balance costs with change, knowing that innovative ideas are often driven by emotional energy and not just dollars.

We need leaders who are not afraid to take risks in education and who want to disrupt the status quo. Our students and our country can no longer wait for change. As senator, King will provide the tools, experience and passion needed to create education policy that embraces change, promotes innovation and instills Maine’s entrepreneurial spirit in the classrooms of America.

Dr. Barbara Kurshan is executive director of academic innovation at the Graduate School of Education at the University of Pennsylvania.

Join the Conversation

24 Comments

  1. With all due respect and appreciation of Angus King’s leadership in pushing for laptops for K-12 public education in Maine, the author presumably doesn’t know of his utter lack of leadership in funding public higher ed in Maine. A proud Dartmouth grad–like his predecessor, Jock McKernan–King had little commitment to the Univ. of Maine System save as a “job creator.” He could have done so much more but was, at best, indifferent. Let voters remember this if they care about public higher ed. Laptops are great, but, contrary to Angus King, they aren’t gods. 

    1. Nobody said laptops are “gods” but the figures speak for themselves.  Computer moxie is will absolutely essential to living in this world for no onward.  Thanks heavens my grandsons are getting keyboarding instruction in elementary and middle school.

      1. Angus King, with good intentions, is a true believer–like MIT’s Nicholas Negroponte–that laptops suffice for basic education everywhere. I recall King’s argument as Governor that a laptop alone would teach Maine students about the Civil War. Like most such high-tech visionaries, he is seduced by the technology and can’t appreciate much beyond it. Studies by genuine educators have demonstrated that K-12 Maine students at least need more, however helpful laptops surely are. 

        1. In case no one has noticed “laptops” are a quaint memory of the past.  When was the last time you saw a businessman, politician, or news reporter using a laptop.

          School children need to keep up.  That was King’s argument.  How much technology can property-taxpayers  provide?  Wouldn’t it be better to require parents (who can afford it) to provide the extras?

          1. I see a lot of use of laptops, although the trend toward hand-helds is increasing (although with the disadvantage of terseness).  Local Fox/ABC newscasters use them.  I recently attended (and presented at) a professional society meeting where the visuals were all from a laptop feeding a video projector.  Most (except me) were taking notes on a laptop.  Collegiate seminars are universally done by laptop feed to a projector (plus a lot of HS teaching).

          2. I disagree.  In business laptops are essential tools, even outside of little old Maine.  They are not the laptops of even a year ago but they are still laptops designed to dock at your desk & travel with your where ever you go. 

        2. I wasn’t around so I’m not aware of King’s alleged argument that laptops alone would suffice (did he really?).  I still maintain that availability of laptops are at least a start.

      2. As ONE of my jobs is working in Sporting Goods at Walmart I see the results of the laptop crap daily…The number of kids age 10 on up who PRINT their name on a hunting license like a kindergartner is shocking…

  2.     It’s To Bad King never got educated in the Constitution that barred Government from illegal search and seisure!

         Maybe HE should have had a Laptop Computer access as a young child so as Maine Teachers would not have been subjected to the invasive Fingerprinting by a Fascist Maine Government   for doing nothing more than wanting to educate!

    1. Other professions are subject to fingerprinting you know.  Stock brokers, for instance.  What’s more important, our kids or our money?  Fingerprinting helps keep creeps/criminals away from our kids and out of the teaching profession & related services (bus drivers, etc.).  Get over it already!

      1. Actually fingerprinting does absolutely NOTHING to “protect children”  Most teachers start teaching directly out of college, and have no “criminal records”  Most pedophiles are not apprehended or fingerprinted, so the program only serves to make people THINK their children are safe, when they are not. 

        Other professions are “at will employers” they are free to make policies about your employment which might not pass Constitutional muster, for an instance, you can not work at the cashregister at Hannafords with a button on your lapal which says “Better cheaper milk available at Rite Aid.”

        Government jobs need to be bound by Constitutional principles.  The fourth ammendment says No searches without a warrant.

  3. King innovative? Sure. Just look at  how “outside the box” he was in opposing the Maine School of Science and Mathematics – MSSM in Limestone! Unquestionably, the most successful experiment in Maine education, MSSM graduates are eagerly recruited by America’s best colleges.
    If Angus had his way, it never would have happened.

  4. King may or may not be an effective voice for education, but the essential point is – or ought to be – that education is a state and local issue, not a federal one. Even if a massive federal presence were the key to good education, there’s nothing in the Constitution that authorizes one.

    This, of course, is the merest formality, which I’m sure would not trouble a Senator King or those education professionals who profit through federal involvement.

  5. Excellent Op Ed.  The MLTI (laptop initiative) WAS visionary both with respect to education AND workforce development.  This program just had it’s 10th anniversary.  All of our high school graduates are computer literate/savvy and take those skills directly to higher education or the workplace, where nearly every job now requires some computer knowledge.  Providing 1-to-1 access to laptop computers for every 7th & 8th grader in the state was incredibly innovative.  It took real leadership & guts to propose it and implement it, and that program is paying off big time for Maine students and young workers.

    1. How do support the statement  “and that program is paying off big time for Maine students and young workers.” As a teacher (now retired)  that isn’t what I observed; they can’t spell, they plagiarize and game constantly ; oh I forgot, they instant message each other constantly…..I’d like to see statistics to back up your claims as there is much more to educating a student then technology.

  6. “That’s why we need to elect former Gov. Angus King to the United States Senate. He’s a leader…”

    Actually I don’t want people who have no concept as to how our government works.  I surely don’t want a “leader’ or I would move to some banana republic in South America. 

    Our politicians are our employees.  We send them to Washington (and Augusta) to carry out OUR wishes.  The people lead in the U.S.A.   Senators, Governors, Represenatives, even the president are servants.  Time they were told who is boss.

  7. The mere fact you argue for education innovation at the federal level shows your bankrupt ideology. The true laboratories are in the individual states, not to mention that no where in the Constitution does it say anything about the federal government involving itself in education…

  8. http://www.curriki.org/xwiki/bin/view/Coll_Bobbi/FundraisingVideo

    Mmm..is Mr King still on board of directors or at least when Ms Kurshan was
     Curriki? 

    ” In  Maine, Governor  Angus King has 
    proposed  taking advantage of the state’s 
    overflowing coffcrs, at a time when many 
    1 16  lAPTOP  November 2000 THEINTERNET 
    states are running surpluses. He suggested 
    creating a $50-million endowment (the 
    legislature cut this back to  $30 million) 
    that would begin  paying for laptops and 
    lnternet access for seventh graders in 2002, 
    and  keep doing so each year. By  2007, 
    every student in Maine, from seventh grade 
    up. would have a computer”

    http://donunger.com/WebLearning.pdf

  9. Title:  ‘Angus King will help make educators into innovators’

    Reality:  Angus King will help Angus King.

  10. I would much rather see Mr. King assure us that students will actually LEARN rather than just receive laptops. We gave students calculators and they still can’t add. We gave them video and laptops and they still can’t read.

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *