PEMBROKE, Maine — The Federal Energy Regulatory Commission will stage three public meetings this week to collect input on a proposed $70 million tidal energy project on the Pennamaquan River south of the Washington County community of Pembroke.

As conceptualized by Utah-based Halcyon Marine Hydroelectric, the Pennamaquan Tidal Power Plant would be the technological centerpiece of a 1,616-foot tidal “barrage,” or low dam, that would stretch between Leighton Neck and Hersey Neck at the point where the Pennamaquan River flows into Cobscook Bay.

The facility would utilize proprietary “tidal wing” technology that combines power generation during both the flood and ebb tides with a pumping system so that the tidal levels within the cove rise and fall to their natural 18.5-foot levels, an approach engineered to minimize shoreline environmental impact.

The technologies involved were developed by Halcyon Marine’s founder, physicist Ramez Atiya of Salt Lake City, and are patented in the U.S., China, Mexico and the Russian Federation. In its filings with FERC, the company estimates the facility would generate 80,000 megawatt hours of electricity annually. That would represent about eight-tenths of one percent of Maine’s annual energy requirements.

The project was first proposed to FERC in November 2010 and is similar to a barrage proposed for Half Moon Cove that would extend from the terminus of Toll Bridge Road in Eastport to the terminus of Old Eastport Road in Perry. The Half Moon Cove project would tap into a 950-acre water surface area, as compared to a 692-acre Pennamaquan River tidal area.

“This is an exciting, first-of-its-kind project that would be applying new approaches to tidal energy production,” said Andrew Landry, a Portland-based attorney who represents the Halcyon Marine project. “If successful, it will have potential in playing a large role in providing renewable energy in the future. It’s a new approach that has significant potential around the world.”

FERC staffers will meet with the public, project advocates and state environmental and energy regulators at three scoping sessions, beginning with a 1 p.m. site review in Pembroke on Thursday, Oct. 25, at the boat ramp parking lot on Boat Ramp Road, located off Garnet Head Road. That meeting will be followed by a 6 p.m. scoping session at Pembroke Elementary School gymnasium. A third session will follow at 1 p.m. Friday, Oct. 26, at the Maine Department of Environmental Protection’s regional office at 106 Hogan Road in Bangor.

FERC staffers and representatives of various state regulatory agencies also will be meeting on Wednesday, Oct. 24, with Passamaquoddy tribal officials at the Pleasant Point reservation. That afternoon meeting was described Tuesday by tribal Gov. Clayton Cleaves as a “workshop” organized to discuss the tribe’s environmental concerns about the Pennamaquan tidal project and other fisheries management issues affecting the waters that surround the reservation.

Cleaves requested the meeting in a Sept. 14, 2012, letter to FERC’s Division of Hydroelectric Licensing. In that letter, he said “a cursory review of the [preapplication document] indicates the project might have an impact on migratory species, which should be addressed in relation to tribal aboriginal rights to tidal waters.”

He also said in his letter that the meeting “will take the place of any consultation which should have been taken before the FERC filing by Pennamaquan Tidal Power.”

Cleaves said Tuesday in a telephone interview that the Passamaquoddy nation has been “screaming for consultation for a number of years” on state and federal fisheries management policies.

“We want to make certain that consultation is on the table before they write up whatever laws they will put together,” Cleaves said. “At the moment, we have really good cooperation from a number of agencies, but at times our own laws and conservation rules surpass, and are more superior to, those generated by the state.”

Cleaves said the Passamaquoddy people are particularly concerned about how such projects affect the migratory spawning behavior of alewives, which have been an important food source for centuries within Cobscook Bay and along the St. Croix River watershed.

Landry said the project’s developers have made an effort to keep the Passamaquoddy nation informed throughout the FERC application process.

“We’ve kept the tribe in the loop from the very first document we filed,” Landry said Tuesday. “FERC has carved out this meeting with them.”

Join the Conversation

25 Comments

  1. If anyone thinks, the yachters, the rich yachters, the summer sailors, the not in my back yarders, the interested, dis-interested, the other ideas for the coast bunch, are going to allow this, well, I would not be holden’ ya breath.

  2. Here we go, the tribe doesn’t want it.   Where it is proposed to go doesn’t even touch the reservation.  Maybe they should worry about their own land, and let Pembroke worry about theirs.

    1.  Sounds to me like the Nation (tribe) is concern about the impact of this economic endeavor to there  traditional  fishing rights quarantined by there treaties!

    2. The Tribe doesn’t say they are against it.  But of course they want to bookmark their concerns. Funny how they want to get into wind power, with all its subsidies and tax breaks.  Remember the three litmus tests:  Necessary, Useful, Affordable.  

      Nobody has said it is necessary or affordable, but at least this tidal power can be useful to the grid, unlike wind power. Remember, Maine is one of the cleanest states in the nation for electricity generation, with 99.6% of our present generation coming from clean sources OTHER than oil and coal. No need to jump off a cliff if the technology is not affordable or necessary. 

  3. The meetings are just to pacify the public.. They never say no. They just want you to think they care.. Waste of time, They are all bought and paid for.. most of the time the commission falls asleep anyway.

  4. more crap to power 5 houses.  Without debt funding from our government this would never happen. Not only does this project require taxpayer money, the taxpayer has to borrow the money to fund it.. a double wammy

  5. Two words caught my attention right away : migratory species.
    And one other word brought it all into focus : impact.
        I know that the alewife ,among other fishes, like salmon and glass eels
    utilize this waterway for important parts of their life cycle.
       This is a vibrant healthy balanced ecosystem that is
     being eyed for drastic change.
         I’m not sure how some of those affected will do if the plan goes through.
      As well ,some of the local fisherman , myself included, may not feel a dam at this location is a good fit for many reasons.
       I look forward to the presentations on this issue.

    Could someone please translate , in plain english, how many homes this may power.
     

    1. I’ll take a shot at the math–don’t quote me on this one, I’m a few years away from algebra. 

      This installation is projected to provide 80,000 megawatt hours per year.
      1 year is 365 days or 8,760 hours. 

      80,000 megawatt hours/8760 hours=9.13 megawatt hours produced per hour. 

      The internets say the average home requires 1 kilowatt hour of energy each hour, or 0.001 megawatt hours per hour.

      9.13*1,000=9,132 homes. 

      What the BDN really needs, besides someone better at math than I am, is a scientific piece on the projected impacts of this installation with regards to fish, eels, and potentially tragic water spills. Not that their prose is that bad, but a few diagrams would be nice. 

      1.  Thanks for shedding some light on the proposed project in
        regards to what it will really do for powering homes.
            9,132 homes is a number I can better understand.
        Why hasnt BDN done the quick math for us?
           It sure would help.

        I wish I knew how much power some of the hydrodams that
        have been torn down so salmon can swim about had produced.
           

  6. why no mention of how many jobs would be created. I would also like to know news about the water bottling plant that was proposed a while ago by the tribe. tidal power can play a big role in growing that areas economy but it needs to be done the right way

    1. When Halcyon was in Eastport looking he said the place would pretty much run itself.  Only need two people during the day once it’s on line.  Not a big jobs boon.

  7. Well then use nuclear energy or coal as means of energy.  Seems to be okay with Romney.   andddddd a  few doses of Radiation and carcinogens didn’t hurt anyone.

  8. More importantly has this project been approved by the Eastport Council of Non Development?

    I’m surprised that Robert Godfrey hasn’t been consulted before this went to press.

  9. Because the proposed Tidal Power project is on such a grandiose scale,  I would just interject a word of caution.  Many smaller investments attempted by the tribes have fallen by the wayside. I only name a few by the Passamaquoddy tribe: 

    2 radio stations in Rockland;  a parking garage in Portland; a housing manufacturing enterprise in Eastport (PHI); a saw mill enterprise at Indian Township; a High Stakes Bingo at Indian Township; a convenience store in Perry; a supermarket  at Indian Township; a supermarket at Pleasant Point; an Appliance Enterprise at Pleasant Point, and a Carpet Surging Enterprise at Indian Township.  Additionally, there are three projects proposed that have not even gotten off the ground: A Bottled Water Enterprise, a Wood Pellet Enterprise and a Maple Syrup Enterprise. 

    If the smaller projects can not be sustained, what can one reasonably expect from the grand ones?  One final comment: Any potential law suite against the “tribe” with respect to the Tidal Project is not confined to Pleasant Point Res.  If the Passamaquoddy tribe is named, it will put at risk any financial resources Indian Township has as well.  Speak to your council members.

  10. Forget the tribe, the new age environmentalists will attack this project the the courts, with their typical religious  zeal.  But hey, this is “green energy” so the environmentalists will love this!  Wrong my friends.  No matter how small the effect tidal generators  will have on the creatures of the sea, the environmentalists will sue to stop it.  Their mother earth religion allows for no sins, no matter how small.

  11. Have no fear the job stopping enviro-whacko’s will stop this project. No jobs in Maine.Not in their backyard.

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *