Finding workers

A topic referred to frequently in the Senate debate was employment, but I never heard an adequate response. As someone who has been recently unemployed, I have some insight into this problem. There are a few reasons companies can’t find workers other than a lack of qualified people. Here are a few.

Job titles: Advertising positions with titles rather than skills needed may be the easy way to advertise, but it causes problems. For one, this is Maine, a rural state. Many people have learned their skills because the work had to be done, and they did it, never realizing there was a title associated with it.

Applications: Some forms make it difficult to describe one’s skills, as when an answer has to be chosen from a list that has no accurate answer in it. Human resources managers must scrutinize their search parameters to make sure the company is getting an accurate picture on each applicant.

Employment parameters: Many employment notices leave prospective employees with few clues as to what the company is looking for or the hours and compensation. Does it require tools, travel? Where is it? Companies need to let workers know the particulars.

There are difficulties: But we do have talented people in Maine, and I think it is likely that people can be found who, with maybe only a little help from these companies, could do a great job for them.

Vincent H Ghelli

Bar Harbor

Plagiarism

As a former staff reporter for a daily newspaper, I would have expected to be fired from my job if I lifted a story someone else had written and put my own byline on it. This can’t happen by accident. It’s deliberate, and there’s a word for it: plagiarism.

School Administrative District 40 superintendent Susan Pratt is claiming her word-for-word copying of a another superintendent’s strategic plan — she even copied the cover letter — was just an oversight. Pratt objected to anyone making a fuss about her apparent plagiarism.

The school board considered her actions, but despite obvious evidence that she was putting forth work she falsely claimed as her own, the board did nothing.

The “somebody else” turns out to be a superintendent in southern Maine, Andrew Dolloff, the son of former SAD 40 Medomak Valley High School Principal Ronald Dolloff. Andrew Dolloff was, shall we say, less than delighted by Pratt’s copying his work and claiming it as her own.

Pratt, to my knowledge, has not apologized for her transgressions, nor has she acknowledged that she has done anything wrong. Perhaps her lawyer told her not to admit to anything. What have we come to when the head of our school system can cheat with impunity? This is a terrible role model for students.

The Medomak Valley student handbook says, “Plagiarism is representing the works or writings of another as one’s own. Reference to the work of others in some assignments is acceptable, but sources must be cited. Students may receive a zero for plagiarized work.”

It seems to me superintendent Pratt just scored zero.

Steve Cartwright

Waldoboro

Certificate of need

I am writing with respect to the pending certificate of need, or CON, application for Parkview Adventist Medical Center to join Central Maine Healthcare. I am troubled that one hospital can file an opposing certificate of need, oppose another’s certificate of need, and participate as a “party” at the other’s hearing in an effort to eliminate its competition. That is un-American and anti-competitive.

I am not saying that what the Department of Health and Human Services is doing is negative but that Mid-Coast Hospital’s hijacking of the certificate of need system absolutely is.

The standard is whether Parkview’s joining the CMHC system will improve the quality of patient care and the cost of that care.

Without addressing that standard directly, Mid-Coast has posed its opposition to this certificate of need as allowing a distant hospital to take over the locals. It failed to disclose at the recent hearing that it has been in discussions with Maine Health, a health conglomerate, that is even farther from Brunswick than CMHC. It failed to make clear that it seeks to shut down Parkview and eliminate its competition as opposed to work cooperatively with Parkview to together serve the community

better by sharing efforts, not shutting them down.

It failed to disclose the multiple efforts at communication that Parkview has made, instead telling the public that Parkview wasn’t talking.

It is bad enough that its position is not in fact relevant to the certificate of need standard that DHHS must apply; it is worse that it is deceptive. Parkview should be allowed to join the CMHC system as it has requested to do.

Rebecca Webber

Auburn

Made in China

Our country is being sold out for the profit of a few.

First, our business leaders closed factories in the U.S. as they outsourced manufacturing to China to increase profits. Second, Chinese leaders used the money we shipped to their country to buy U.S. government debt and improve their military capability.

Now I read in The Wall Street Journal that U.S. business leaders are courting the Chinese to invest in our businesses.

So, in order to increase profits and the personal wealth of a few, our business leaders have provided the means to China to be the the single largest holder of U.S. government debt, develop a military to challenge the U.S. in the Pacific and now own U.S. businesses.

This is not only the worst example of egregious greed, it is a serious threat to our national security. I call on our federal elected officials to take immediate action to stop this Chinese threat.

Michael Drake

Monson

Campaign thanks

Over the past several elections I have increased my participation, placing signs, calling, letter-writing. This year I also drove a candidate to visit voters.

Every man or woman who runs for office must learn campaign laws, issues, public relations and myriad other things. Each candidate risks voters’ disrespect and dismissal just to understand a job that most of us want someone else to do while we wait to criticize.

State candidates give up family time, preparing for winter, gardens, vacations and sometimes friends. Some represent parties such as the Greens who, from the start, are unlikely to win, but value ideas.

To every candidate from whatever party, whether you won or not, whether I would have voted for you or not, my sincere thanks for participating in the stressful, demanding job of running for office.

John Bednarik

Montville

Join the Conversation

41 Comments

  1. Michael Drake – You’re going to call on the elected officials to fix the China problem? The elected officials are the cause of the problem. Many of the worst elected officials were just voted back into office. And the worst just got 4 more years in the White House. After all, he is the one that said that he admired how well the Chinese have developed over the past few years. And his head adviser, VJ, is a Mao lover.

    1. If Obama is the worst President and if Republicans have the answer, there shouldn’t have been such a massive win for Democrats last Tuesday. What you have to say (Mao lover? Really?) is so far detached from reality — you guys are going to keep losing if you don’t get a grip and start acting like adults. Government can work, but it involves everyone working together — not point fingers and screaming bloody murder over the tiniest things.

      1. You read comments of that poster EJ Parsons and it becomes even more crystal clear why the election went the way it did. There are still plenty of sane people left in this country.

        1. Neat how the +/- ratings show true colors. Note that EJP and other conservatives aren’t doing so well.

          1. Seems that people got disgusted with the judgmental and arrogant tone. The “we” are going to do this and that. It comes off pompous and not credible.

      2. Massive? 2% is hardly massive. And that 2% came from the people that Obama has enslaved to the government.

        1. 332 to 206 is massive. Quit spinning, it’s pathetic. The loss was because of your weak candidates and weak positions — take responsibility for yourselves and quit trying to blame others.

          1. 51% to 49%. The popular vote. Electoral votes don’t constitute a landslide. And 2% is nowhere close to a mandate. Of course, your side will run with it for as long as possible.

          2. Yes, 332 to 206 is a landslide. We have an electoral college system. Suddenly a conservative wants to move away from states’ rights? More hypocrisy from you, how surprising. Only have principles and positions when it’s convenient. You lost seats in the Senate and the House. It was a landslide and you know it. That’s why you’re desperate to make excuses for it.

          3. I notice you can’t address my concerns. You’re so transparent. It WAS a landslide. And of course it was a mandate. What kind of margins do you need? The Democrats picked up seats EVERYWHERE.

          4. That’s funny… all the republican pundits focused on NOTHING BUT a “electoral vote landslide”… until they lost by one.

          5. Actually the only “electorial vote landeslides” recognized by the Encyclopedia Britannica in the last fifty years are LBJ in 1964, Richard Nixon in 1972, and Ronald Reagan in both 1980, and 1984. With the new hyper partisanship of the US electorate, a “landslide” is unlikely in the near future.

    2. Well, not What is going on is the Free enterprise system at work. You know the thing that Republicans want.

    3. Actually E.J. it is worse than Democrat v Republican. Bush, Clinton Bush & Obama have all sold out our country to some degree. Richard Nixon moved us into trade with China origionally, Jerry Ford, Jimmy Carter, Ron Reagan did NOTHING to stop this slide and in some cases helped the Chinese move our factories and production capabilities over seas. Both Clinton and Reagan, after they left office, made millions of dollars telling Chinese businessmen how to beat our export/import laws.
      The communists have long claimed that “capitalists will sell us the rope with which we will hang them, and they will sell us the shovel with which we will bury them.” Well E.J. most of the shovel companies and just about all the rope companies now use chinese labor in chinese factories. My father used to say that if we ever go to war against China, our soldiers will have to fight barefooted.

      I’m no big fan of Obama’s, but I voted for him because our guy had absolutely no core values. He was a liberal as Massachusetts governor, and a reactionary as presidentrial candidate. I couldn’t stand either of his incarnations, and many of my fellow Republicans agreed. Romney lost this election. Obama did not win it.

      Ron Paul is a passe issue, BUT the Party would do well to take on some of his issues as their own.

  2. Vincent H. Ghelli – It’s not the applications, parameters, or titles; it’s the overreaching government intrusion, taxes, penalties, and fees that businesses have to bear. You might want to get used to the unemployment line and hone your application skills.

      1. It sure does! I’d say we should invite EJ to the wedding, but he doesn’t live in Maine so probably wouldn’t show up.

    1. You don’t acknowledge the problems encountered where the rubber meets the road. VG is commenting on want ads for companies that ARE hiring.

  3. I wish more people were concerned about the threat from Red China.

    It disgusts me to see so many goods manufactured in China instead of either here or at least our allies. Kohl’s, Target, Walmart, Macy’s-so many of those great bargains are there for us, but at what cost? The more Chinese-made stuff we buy, the more our dollars go to Red China. I, for one, do what I can to spend my dollars in a way that keeps as much of it here to benefit us than to benefit them.

    1. Funny thing is that Chinas citizens are already suffering from outsoucing. Their workers are starting to demand more and the companies are moving their produciton to Vietnam, Cambodia, Indonesia, as soon as Myanmar is stabilized they will move there. Once Asia is stabilized and their workers start to ask for more the manufacturing jobs will migrate to other 3rd or evern 4th world countries to set up shop. Our tax payer supported military will protect them.

      1. Not only that, but China’s land is of terrible quality in agricultural terms. They are always going to rely on us and other countries for food.

  4. I like this new and improved Disqus. I’m glad that the BDN decided to continue with Disqus and not go with the stupid Facebook option!

    1. Agreed. Didn’t realize until today that it was a N&I Disqus. The Facebook option, unfortunately the only game in town for Blogs, is atrocious, especially since I don’t have nor will not have a Facebook account.

  5. Michael Drake- You hit it out of the park!!! We are being sold out by people who are consumed by money. Our founding fathers would have hung them for treason. Buy American, or learn to speak Chinese. Those are our options.

    1. I don’t know what happened to the FTAA. When I was in Costa Rica, I saw tons of shoes and clothing made elsewhere in Central and South America. If we must import such goods, why not from our allies in our own trade zone? I admit I don’t understand most of this stuff, but it would seem logical to import shoes from Brazil than from China.

      1. There is no need to import clothing and footwear, other than greed. I buy my clothing and footwear off the internet. allusaclothing.com. All certified union made right here in America and their prices are competitive with what L.L. Bean is getting for their Chinese made crap.

  6. I call on our federal elected officials to take immediate action to stop this Chinese threat.

    Michael, you’d better talk with your peers as well. Consumers are as much to blame as our representatives.

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *