AUGUSTA, Maine — Gov. Paul LePage’s finance commissioner is recommending that state agencies start cutting spending by $35.5 million in the coming weeks to keep the current year’s budget in balance as the state deals with tax collections falling short of projections.

Administrative and Financial Services Commissioner Sawin Millett on Monday sent a letter to LePage and legislative leaders recommending a curtailment “as soon as possible.”

A spokeswoman for LePage said a curtailment is likely, but that the governor planned to review Millett’s recommendations and consider other options to contain spending before issuing an executive order demanding that agencies scale back spending. If LePage decides to order a curtailment, he’s likely to do it this week, said his spokeswoman, Adrienne Bennett.

“I feel steps need to be taken soon to assure that we not get further and further into the fiscal year and find ourselves in the difficult position of not having as much latitude or opportunity to lower and slow down spending,” Millett told reporters. “If we get into the fiscal year, January, February and March, then our options for gaining $35 million in reductions continue to decline.”

Millett’s call for a spending curtailment followed revised tax revenue projections last week that predicted revenues for the current fiscal year — which ends June 30, 2013 — will fall $35.5 million short of earlier revenue estimates. The December report of the state’s Revenue Forecasting Committee attributes much of the depressed revenue picture to uncertainty at the federal level over the resolution of the impending fiscal cliff. Mike Allen, associate commissioner for tax policy, told lawmakers last week that anxiety over the fiscal cliff has helped to slow economic output in the state, especially among businesses that have held off making big investments.

State law requires that the finance commissioner notify the governor and legislative leaders when it appears spending will exceed available revenues. After receiving that notification, the governor can order a spending curtailment.

Millett said it’s too early to know which areas of the budget a curtailment would target. A few areas, including debt service and retirement system payments, are off limits, he said. Bennett said LePage has indicated in the past he’s not keen on recommending furlough days for state employees, a budget-balancing tactic used during the administration of former Gov. John Baldacci.

“We would be asking agencies to make some prioritized decisions on what they could do without,” Millett said.

Any cuts made through a curtailment would be temporary. The Legislature could make them permanent or approve alternative cuts.

The Revenue Forecasting Committee’s report shows that sagging revenues in the sales, corporate and individual income tax categories account for most of the overall revenue decline. The committee also revised its revenue projections downward in the sales, tobacco, fines and investment income categories.

To complicate the diminished revenue picture, the state’s Medicaid program is facing a $100 million shortfall for the current budget year, which the LePage administration plans to address with a supplemental budget package aimed at keeping the budget in balance through June 30, 2013.

And as the administration looks ahead to the upcoming two-year budget cycle, it’s facing the prospect of revenues falling $125.2 million short of previous projections. That grows the structural budget gap — the amount by which expenditures would exceed revenues if state spending continues essentially at the same level, if the state meets all its spending commitments and if actual revenues don’t stray from projections — to $880 million for the two-year budget that takes effect July 1, 2013.

If LePage decides against a curtailment, Millett said the administration likely would address both the Medicaid shortfall and the diminished revenues through that supplemental budget package.

LePage met Friday with Republican legislative leaders and will meet the Legislature’s incoming Democratic leaders, presumptive Senate President Justin Alfond and presumptive House Speaker Mark Eves, for 15 minutes on Tuesday. The meeting will last 15 minutes because the Democrats are scheduled to attend mandatory legislative training sessions.

Last week, Alfond and Eves — who will lead majorities in both legislative chambers — expressed concern at the prospect of an across-the-board spending curtailment.

Democratic leaders on Tuesday said they were most concerned by the limited information available about a potential curtailment.

“Our immediate concern is the lack of details,” said Sen. Seth Goodall, D-Richmond, the incoming Senate majority leader. “Here we are, three weeks after the election and we’re still working to find out what the details are.”

The Republicans’ incoming legislative leaders last week called for quick action to address the budget situation. Rep. Kenneth Fredette of Newport, the incoming House Republican leader, and Sen. Roger Katz of Augusta, the incoming assistant Senate Republican leader, said they supported using a curtailment as a temporary measure to immediately contain spending.

They also urged legislative leadership to seat a new Appropriations Committee, which handles budgets, in the coming weeks before other committees so the panel can get to work on the upcoming budget proposals and so members of the public can offer their input at public hearings.

“For every day that we lose right now before June 30, it’s a shorter period of time in which to deal with those revenue shortfalls and the exceeding expenditures within the current budget,” Fredette said.

Join the Conversation

100 Comments

  1. We have surplus. No we’re a little in the hole. Oops just talked to Mary Mayhew and now weez oozing life and are just about dead. If the way this crew presents us different numbers every month weren’t so sad it would be laughable.

      1. Can’t help but note here that you are comparing your beloved leader LePage to John Baldacci and Angus King. By extension then can we all now presume that you also believe that Mr. LePage is doing just as bad as those you’ve consistently said were horrible leaders? It would all make sense if you admit that you are just as aware of the poor job LePage is doing as the rest of us. If not, well I don’t know how you come to say the things you do. Are they based on moon phases, number of empties in your returnables or just something you heard someone else say on a radio?

        1. “Are they based on moon phases, number of empties in your returnables or just something you heard someone else say on a radio”

          One of the more apparent CP posts….

      2. Oh here we go again with the TeaPublican HYPOCRISY. You badmouth away on King, Baldacci, etc. but then when YOUR boy falls short of revenue, then it is EXCUSES EXCUSES EXCUSES. Under King we had massive job growth and ended many budget gimmicks that McKernan used. Baldacci balanced the budgets even in the toughest of economic times when the Bush Great Recession hit and did it with tough choices, a balanced approach, and cooperation. Now your boy gets in, says he is going to create “jobs jobs jobs” and “balance budgets” and so he gives us middle class and working class folks a tax increase with his corporate anti rural healthcare law, and he cuts taxes for the richest, and now look where we are: precious few new jobs jobs jobs and at lesat $35 million in the hole. Moral of the story: NEVER TRUST THE CORPORATE TOADIE TEAPUBLICANS WITH OUR MONEY !

  2. Instead of just meeting with republicans why not the whole legislature? Not a good sign. More of the same.

    1. well the good news is…. the R’s don’t “have the votes” any more . But they are acting like they do…

      1. Yes you’re right so that means when things get worse we can blame you now! It’s about time we take a page out of the Demorats playbook!

    2. “LePage met Friday with Republican legislative leaders and will meet the Legislature’s incoming Democratic leaders”

  3. Hey the liberals coming in soon and want to borrow our way out of debt.. Coming soon to a wallet near you.

        1. For the family earning $50,000 per year, the LePage tax cut nets about $5.00 per week. In other words, it’s too small to be noticeable. Wealthier folks might notice it a bit more, however.

          For the vast majority of us, the LePage tax cut is an absolute farce.

        2. Capital gains and interest are not “earned”. That’s why they are called “unearned income”.

      1. Assuming that we would be in the “black” if those tax reductions had not been made is “pretty foolish”. My experience is that state and federal government spend far more than it takes in.

        Maine has a terrible history of “bonding” for projects that they do not have the money for.

        1. What terrible history?
          Maine has a double A bond rating, and has never defaulted on a repayment.
          Bonding is the smart way to invest in our communities.
          Did you pay for your house in cash upfront?

          1. It’s really pretty simple….when you don’t have the money to pay for everyday services you don’t bond and spend money you don’t have.

            The state has a money problem…it’s spending money faster than it is taking it in. Remember Governor Baldacci’s furlough days to help balance the budget? Has anything changed? Doesn’t seem that it has and it doesn’t seem that we have learned anything from past experiences.

    1. well if the GOP would pay their fair share in taxes, the middle class wouldn’t have to borrow their way out of debt!

  4. i am sick to death of R ( Grover Norquist like) policies that reduces revenue thru tax cuts( lepage and BUSH) then whines there is a “budget gap” to “‘justify” more spending cuts . Do they think we don’t understand their “game” by now??

    STOP giving away revenue .The first thing to go needs to be the R’s unwise and unpaid for tax cuts, especially the capital gains changes .

    If you are struggling to pay your bills., you don’t voluntarily quit your job and REDUCE revenues .(THAT is in essence what the R’s are doing when they “give away” tax cuts) Instead, you get a second job to increase revenues..Lepage,Grover and ALL the R ‘s have “the math ” back wards. And then they wonder why we have endless “funding gaps ” aka deficits , under R’s

      1. No problem. Eliminating or reducing the $9,000,000+ subsidy to the Maine Maritime Academy and he closes 1/4 of his estimate without any downside. Well, some downside.. the $40,000 per student of 1/2 of the student body of 900 that are from out of state that graduate and never look back will no longer be draining the taxpayers of Maine. It’s time to privatize the MMA.

    1. I thought deficits didn’t matter? Didn’t Uncle Dick Cheney teach us that as he funneled billions to his pals in the “war for hire” department at Halliburton?

    2. To make your struggling to pay your bills analogy a little more accurate. The D’s would have someone else get a second job, and then take their money to increase revenue. The balance between expenses and revenue will always be in the flux, but our best times are when the R’s and D’s compromise rather than one side ramming their majority down the others throat. The division in this country is so depressing for all of us. Our best leaders have been those that united our citizenship. There is a responsibility to spend wisely when you are spending someone else’s money. Just imagine how many of our unfortunate could have been helped with government wasted dollars. There is no accountability for a job poorly done in Congress. They, the R’s and D’s, just retire with a large pension and Cadillac healthcare benefits. Until there is election reform and reined in benefits for the elected R’s and D’s, we are just F’d.

    3. Most of these so called “tax cuts” have not even been put into effect yet. These shortfalls have nothing to do with Lepages budget. Maine is still a massive welfare state, and until it isnt anymore,this will continue. It will be funny almost to watch the dems try to wrestle with these shortfalls, as if they ever could. Dems know only one thing,….more taxes,bigger government. Well, the people of Maine said they wanted this, so they will now get it. So be it.

    4. Oh but its their plan to bury our country and make it look like the D’s are totally to blame. This has been in the works for the past 20 of so years. But they did not plan on the one thing that would put a nail in their tire. The second term of President Obama. They are so befuddled by this that they are actually sounding like children in a sandbox arguing and bickering amongst themselves.
      The Repubs could care less what happens, as long as their agenda goes as planned.

  5. It wasn’t that long ago that Tea Party Paulie was bragging about how he and his tea party parrots in the Maine Legislature had just enacted the largest tax cut in our State’s history. Heck the tea party parrot Republican controlled legislature even passed a law making sure that any budget surplus Maine might have any time in the future would go to cutting taxes even further. LePage himself said his goal was to eliminate Maine’s income tax. Cut taxes and make sure you put up a bunch of “Open For Business” signs and prosperity will come charging across Maine’s borders and life will be wonderful. Well that’s what the tea party claims. I guess we didn’t cut taxes enough so I guess there is only one logical thing to do. Maine needs to reduce taxes…. sales, income, business, gas, cigarette, property and every other tax you can think of to zero so that we will become instantly rich as a State and all our fiscal problems will be solved. Yeah right. We also need to cut services…. anything that benefits any of Maine’s citizens needs to be done away with. Lets sell all the snowplows, get rid of the State Police and the Warden Service close the schools and lock the doors at DHHS.

    1. You need to stop whining about this. Elections will be here soon enough. If people really think the democrats could do better, they are sadly mistaken. They are the ones that got us in this mess.

      1. Gosh maybe you didn’t notice we just had an election and the Tea Party Republicans took a blood bath.

          1. Heading to Florida soon, or already there?
            Not me….I am a New England person . Boston, Maine,etc. A friend of a friend of mine was playing golf where she lives in CT today….in December!
            I am one of those who was very happy with the recent election….in so many ways! Now, our next job will be to do something with this Governor of Maine. Will LePage run again? (for re-election I meant, of course.) Most likely.

          2. Already back in the Sunshine State. Left the day after Thanksgiving. I think just about everyone with the exception of the die-extremely hard tea party parrots was satisfied with the outcome of the election. I think that Tea Party Paulie’s days are numbered. I’m wondering if he will actually serve out this term. If we are lucky he will follow that other darling of the Tea Party, “Quitter” Palin. We already know he does not play well with others and Maine voters certainly sent him and the rest of his ilk a strong message on November 6th. He is going to lose his lapdog AG in January. I was hoping that Cindy Dill would be the new AG, but that doesn’t look like it will happen.

          3. No, I don’t think it will happen with Cynthia Dill either. I think I recall your saying you were a Republican (at least in the past….and voted for LePage. Yes, I realize you would not vote for him now!!!) For someone who was a Republican, Dill is quite a leap. She never wavered from her positions which I found admirable. It was a rough election for her. Angus King will be an effective Senator , though, I predict.
            As for LePage. No I don’t believe he will pull “a Palin” and quit. No way. I don’t see that happening. He is too arrogant . We may be stuck with him for a while more.

          4. I’ve been a Republican since ’67 and yes I voted for LePage. As far as Dill is concerned in my opinion she took one for the team in the last election and I thought that the Dems would reward her for it. They still might. Imagine if she is the candidate for Governor on the Dem side in two years. As far as Tea Party Paulie is concerned I still have questions if he will make it the next two years. He is liable to have a total melt down if he doesn’t get his own way. But time will tell.

          5. LePage would be lucky to get 10% of the vote. Everyone hates him… There is no Dem that can compete with Cutler this time around. EC wins, in a landslide.

          6. The very petulant LePage , you are right, gets very upset and often angry when things don’t go his way. So, would he step down out of disgust and being fed up? Not sure. I don’t see that happening for some reason, but could be wrong. It depends, I guess, on what develops in coming months. He is going to have even more opposition. Paul and the Heritage Foundation are not going to call all the shots.
            Best to you in Florida, and when you return to Maine. I will continue to appreciate your comments here (and often respond….ha ha ha)

          7. I f all goes according to plan, i may be able to buy a property on CapeC and do the winter-summer travel thing.

      1. Not making any sense at all. You guys complain when they spend and complain when they cut. Get a clue people.

  6. Paulto…you are not at Mardens anymore…the voters have taken your power; so if you want any voice in Maine, you had better learn how to compromise!

    1. Don’t give him any encouragement. Maybe he just won’t run again if he realizes there are more voters he’s already alienated than ones who like him.

  7. The Penguin administration should not be allowed to play with any of the breakables without some level of adult supervision. The child that heads it is known to tantrum and break things when he doesn’t get his way.

    1. Are you ever going to stop acting like your two years old and stop the name calling. It is what it is, deal with it. If you are so sure the tables will turn, you really have no reason to be talking like that.

  8. I suspect Paul is enjoying this. He went to Augusta to cut the state government. Shortfalls play into his core strategy.

  9. Sounds like he’s going to backstab the voters and have his puppets vote through what they can before they get the bum’s rush.

  10. Why should TAXPAYERS be expected to pay more taxes so at least 30 percent of Maines population doesnt have to work- they can stay home and just collect all the bennies they can get their hands on– It is time to truly help those that need it and let the rest fend for themselves. For pete sake people we are now paying for THEIR pot (aka medical marijuana)- A report out today shows that the nationwide average dollar amount for a person receiving various goverment benefits(Disability,food stamps, rent,phone, healthcare etc) is around 65 thousand dollars a year.not to shabby

      1. People like that poster seem to spend a lot of their time worrying about what other people do, or do not do.

    1. I totally agree with you. I would however, rather pay for pot than methadone or soboxon. Close the meth clinics and save money.

  11. Why do all Liberals vote with everything that is put out there by their party.. Not one of them has a thought of their own with the marbles to disagree with their party when a bad idea arises

  12. just wait… the 35.5 million is going to turn into 100 million soon… just like the DHHS scandalous shortfalls.. that went from 60, to 100, too 160 million… crazy!!! i money should be cut anywhere, I think it’s legislature paychecks, & gubenorial paychecks/retirement funds.. those asses need to see some cuts, and see how the other half lives..

  13. We are indeed blessed to have an administration that is not intimated by the seminal issues that have — for far too long! — eroded the character and integrity of Maine’s work ethic. The parasites and their enablers should be exposed and allowed to fend for themselves at their own peril. And, of course, the fatal grip of union Thugees on pensions and overpaid state positions that frequently provide less than average service must be severed. Only then will a climate emerge where entrepreneurs are willing to give Maine a go by investing capital and hard work.

  14. Lepage and his corrupt masters hate Maine.
    I will never forgive the mucky mucks for letting these villains have the keys to the Blaine house..

  15. The December report of the state’s Revenue Forecasting Committee attributes much of the depressed revenue picture to uncertainty at the federal level over the resolution of the impending fiscal cliff. The House Republicans have responded to the president’s offer with essentially the “grand bargain” proposed in the summer of 2011.

    House Republican Counter

    Revenue through Tax Reform: $800B

    Health Savings: $600B

    Other Mandatory Savings: $300B

    Revision to CPI: $200B

    Further Discretionary Savings: $300B

    NET SAVINGS: $2.2T

    No business or family for that matter is not spending any money on “non essentials” when obama’s next four year reign will be so expensive to pay for democrats socialism! We are not spending but saving, buying precious metals (gold, silver, and a few others) as a hedge against this democrat economic enslavement!
    Cutting now is a smart move! Thank You Governor LePage!

    1. You have zero credibility to complain about state spending when your hero Paul Lepage gave 17 million to bail out Brookfield investment bankers from Canada,

          1. Funny it was the democrat union that forced them to shut down! You need to go back to democrat lies 101 for remedial training! Your lies need to be framed like this…”If you got a business…you didnt build that!”

          2. Classic Twinkie politics, You blame the least powerful for every problem, while exempting the 1% who actually run everything.

          3. The reason given by Hostess Foods for shutting down, was that sales of Twinkies had dropped by 36 million packages, or, 2 % from the year -2012- prior to filing for protection under Chapter 11 of US Bankruptcy law.

            The reason for the calamitous sales drop was not the Union. Hostess stated it was simply because people had opted for healthier foods.

            The BDN and other news sources reported that dozens of companies are anxious to take over the Hostess businesses. Meanwhile, Twinkies are still being produced in Canada.

    2. LOL 800B through tax reform? That’s obviously a lie.

      “other mandatory savings”? What does that mean? “further discretionary savings”? What does that mean? Seems like they were competing to see how vague they could be!

        1. You’re being a partisan hack. You know if Obama put forth a plan that was so vague, you’d be attacking it. So why is it fine when Republicans skimp on details? I looked it up and the details aren’t there.

  16. Here is how i would come up with the budget money.

    I would take 50-100 Maine State troopers. I would send them out to the roads throughout the state to aggressively stop ‘every known traffic violation” from driving too close to turn signals to speeding to dark tinted windows to loud exhaust to everything.
    Everyone gets tickets.
    To motivate the staties to be very aggressive, every statie that stops 75 vehicles earns a paid day off

    Criticize my plan, but i dont see anyone else coming up with a good and or painless ways to come with the money.

    1. That’s ridiculous. Glad you aren’t in charge.
      It’s simple raise the taxes on the wealthy. You don’t live here so don’t worry.

  17. I’m sure his cuts will be fair and balanced, no way Paulie would ever use his position to further a petty grudge.

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *