WASHINGTON — Roger Ailes, the longtime Republican media guru, founder of Fox News and its current chairman, had some advice last year for then-Gen. David Petraeus.
So in spring 2011, Ailes asked a Fox News analyst headed to Afghanistan to pass on his thoughts to Petraeus, who was then the commander of U.S. and coalition forces there. Petraeus, Ailes advised, should turn down an expected offer from President Barack Obama to become CIA director and accept nothing less than the chairmanship of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, the top military post. If Obama did not offer the Joint Chiefs post, Petraeus should resign from the military and run for president, Ailes suggested.
The Fox News chairman’s message was delivered to Petraeus by Kathleen McFarland, a Fox News national security analyst and former national security and Pentagon aide in three Republican administrations. She did so at the end of a 90-minute, unfiltered conversation with Petraeus that touched on the general’s future, his relationship with the media and his political aspirations — or lack thereof. The Washington Post has obtained a digital recording from the meeting, which took place in Petraeus’s office in Kabul.
McFarland also said that Ailes — who had a decades-long career as a Republican political consultant, advising Richard M. Nixon, Ronald Reagan and George H.W. Bush — might resign as head of Fox to run a Petraeus presidential campaign. At one point, McFarland and Petraeus spoke about the possibility that Rupert Murdoch, the head of News Corp., which owns Fox News, would “bankroll” the campaign.
“Rupert’s after me as well,” Petraeus told McFarland.
McFarland said she had spoken “directly” to the Fox News chairman and the “advice to you from Roger Ailes is. … He says that if you’re offered [JCS] chairman, take it. If you’re offered anything else, don’t take it; resign in six months and run for president.”
Petraeus demurred, saying he would consider the CIA directorship if Obama offered it, as the president did several weeks later. Petraeus was confirmed and sworn in as director on Sept. 6, 2011. He resigned a year later, on Nov. 9, after the disclosure of an extramarital affair with his biographer.
In a telephone interview Monday, the wily and sharp-tongued Ailes said he did indeed ask McFarland to make the pitch to Petraeus. “It was more of a joke, a wiseass way I have,” he said. “I thought the Republican field [in the primaries] needed to be shaken up and Petraeus might be a good candidate.”
Ailes added, “It sounds like she thought she was on a secret mission in the Reagan administration. … She was way out of line. … It’s someone’s fantasy to make me a kingmaker. It’s not my job.” He said that McFarland was not an employee of Fox but a contributor paid less than $75,000 a year.
Petraeus, Murdoch and McFarland did not respond to calls and messages requesting comment.
When McFarland first said she had a message directly from Ailes, Petraeus said, “With no one else in the room, I hope?”
Later she said, “I’m only reporting this back to Roger. And that’s our deal.”
Petraeus said it was OK to relay his response to Ailes, adding “that has to be off the record.”
“His deal with me was that I was only supposed to talk to you,” McFarland said. “And he is a little paranoid, so believe me, he doesn’t have anybody in that room.”
At the meeting, some 18 months ago, Petraeus told McFarland that he thought the CIA was “a treasure. … I think that organization is full of just heroes. Unsung heroes.” He went on to say, “We’re going to be retrenching militarily.” In contrast, the CIA and the intelligence agencies, “I think, are going to be a growth industry,” Petraeus said.
While rejecting Ailes’ advice, Petraeus said, “I love Roger. … He’s a brilliant guy.”
Petraeus said he “would love to see” Ailes on his next trip to New York, where Ailes has his office.
“Tell him if I ever ran,” Petraeus said, and then laughed, “but I won’t … but if I ever ran, I’d take him up on his offer. … He said he would quit Fox … and bankroll it.”
“Bankroll it?” asked McFarland, who served as a senior aide to Henry Kissinger and later as a Pentagon spokeswoman in the Reagan administration.
“Or maybe I’m confusing that with Rupert,” Petraeus said.
“I know Roger, he’s done OK,” McFarland replied, “but … no, I think the one who’s bankrolling it is the big boss.”
“That might be it,” Petraeus said.
“OK,” McFarland said, “the big boss is bankrolling it. Roger’s going to run it. And the rest of us are going to be your in-house.”
“Yeah, right, OK,” Petraeus said.
“We’re all set.”
“It’s never going to happen,” Petraeus said. “You know it’s never going to happen. It really isn’t.
“My wife would divorce me,” he added. “And I love my wife. … We have a beautiful house.” Both Petraeus and McFarland laughed. “With his-and-hers bathrooms, believe it or not. I just want to live in it. I’ve never spent a night in it.”
The digital recording also provides a glimpse into the close relationship Petraeus had with the news media, especially Fox News. At one point, McFarland declared that “everybody at Fox loves you,” adding that Ailes had directed her to ask Petraeus whether “there [is] anything Fox is doing, right or wrong, that you want to tell us to do differently?”
Petraeus didn’t hesitate. “The editorial policy of Fox had shifted,” he said. “It was almost as if, because they’re going after Obama, they had to go after Obama’s war as well.” He said he had discussed this with Bret Baier, a key Fox anchor.
“Papers and news outlets have editorial policies,” Petraeus said. “They know sort of how their bosses feel about things … and it causes a certain shading,” Petraeus continued.
One example, according to Petraeus: “Off the record, the New York Times was never going to give Bush or Iraq a break. I don’t care what happened.
“In fact, one time Thom Shanker [a Times military correspondent], who I think very highly of, wrote a piece. And it was on me, before I was going to testify one time, and they had — a pretty good piece, I mean, factual, in other words. Again, all we want is the truth. We’re not out to spin. But then it had this sort of really odd thing inserted in it. And it was something that had been proven unfounded, but it sort of bounced around on the MoveOn.org kind of Webs. And I said, ‘Thom, where did that come from?’ He said, ‘Oh, that was added by the editors.’”
Both journalists had different recollections. Baier said he recalled no such conversation with Petraeus. “That’s B.S.,” he said. “We cover the war the same way no matter what administration is in power.”
Shanker also said he did not remember saying anything resembling what Petraeus asserted. “I don’t blame the editors for what appears under my byline,” he said. “It undermines your own credibility.”
In the meeting with McFarland, Petraeus gave his standard line about the Afghanistan war, saying there had been significant progress, but “that progress remains fragile and reversible.”
McFarland mentioned her conversation with Petraeus in a FoxNews.com piece on April 27, 2011. “Our discussion was off the record, and to respect that I will not quote the general,” she wrote. By that time, it was clear that Petraeus would be nominated as CIA director. “I can’t help thinking that the Obama administration has done something a bit underhanded but politically shrewd by tapping Petraeus for the CIA,” she added, because it would remove him as a “potential rival” in the presidential contest.
On Monday, Ailes, 72, said there was “zero chance” he would leave Fox to re-enter politics for Petraeus or anyone else. “The money is too good,” he said, declining to say how much he earned, although reliable reports have pegged the amount at roughly $20 million per year under a new four-year contract.
“I left politics in 1988 because I hated it,” Ailes said. “My main interest is seeing my 12-year-old’s basketball games.”
Evelyn M. Duffy contributed to this report.



Ah yes, the “impartial,” “fair and balanced” “we report, you decide,” NEWS network is again exposed for what it really is – a conservative political organization committed to putting conservatives in power.
With the CEO enthusiastically offering to “bankroll” a conservatives candidacy.
The fact that people think this ridiculous excuse for a “news” network is anything but a right wing PAC is pathetic.
The worshipping of anything and everything military, right or wrong, is also definitive of Fox. Now I’m not anti-military by any means, though I don’t want an ex-general as president (D or R) and blur the lines between military and civilian.
I agree with you about Fox and the military.
That’s because Fox represents their “constituents,” which before Fox came on the air we would have referred to as “viewers.”
btw – I think General Eisenhower was a great president!
just my opinion.
He’s not on my favorites list. His foreign policy decisions were quite poor and devastating when put into long term context.
The overthrow of the (Democratically elected) Iranian PM Mosaddegh is one of the most important turning points to consider when looking at our modern day relationship with the middle east. Iran might very well be an ally today if not for this intervention. Many wars could have possibly been avoided. Ike talked about the domino theory, while he was setting his own negative dominoes in motion.
And about the domino theory (and the actions taken to prevent it) – what did it bring us? Ike put an end to the Korean war (backing his words with the threat of nuclear annihilation), though the ideology he promoted helped deliver Vietnam and countless other smaller scale conflicts.
He was a reasonable domestic policy president, though quite destructive in a foreign policy sense.
Did I say General Eisenhower? I meant Washington! (grin).
You always make a good argument.
But just to be “fair and balanced” to Ike, the mistakes made in the middle east far pre-dated him, and there have been many mistakes made since. Indeed it was British colonialism and the way the Brits divided the region that laid the foundations for the terrible situation we have today.
Sometimes I think that every western leader over the past 100 years took his/her turn doing EXACTLY the wrong thing concerning the mideast. I’m not sure that I attribute the situation today in Iran to Eisenhower quite as much as you do, but I do agree that the Eisenhower Doctrine would have to be included in the “damage done” category.
I’ve always felt though, that during his second term Ike started to change his views, and openly spoke about the risk of an uncontrollable military – his prophetic “military industrial speech” being the most famous. And he changed his mind too about nuclear weapons, seeing them more as a destabilizing force than a useful deterrent.
And I could be wrong, but I believe that Ike is the only post WWII president that did not send American combat troops to fight in some war somewhere. I often think that the Generals are more reluctant to go to war than the civilians.
In any case, your points are well made. Perhaps I see those days through rose colored glasses.
btw, if Feingold has presidential aspirations, I think he has to now wait to see what Hilary’s plans are.
Be well.
Heh. Yeah, I think I can give George a pass – a reluctant, humble president – not at all a modern politician. My type of guy.
To be sure, there were far more factors than just the coup to consider in the middle east, though the whole US pre-emptive intervention model was solidified as precedent in his time period and hasn’t been seriously challenged since (by either party.)
I think some of his quotes are great, they were just overshadowed by what his decisions brought us in a long term sense. He didn’t commit us to any wars directly – though indirectly, certainly.
I really hope Hillary refrains from running in 2016. The rumor mill has Jeb Bush talking about possibly running as well. Another Clinton vs Bush matchup? I don’t think I could stomach it. :P
Take care. :D
If you think YOU don’t want Clinton, you should see how I feel!
After all, I’m a liberal!
Given his career, it’s amazing that Petraeus ended up being such a dumb guy.
Perhaps “pride comes before the fall” would be relevant in describing the General’s situation.
The people at Fox News are nuts.
worse then that they are dangerous !!
Look how “fair and balanced”!
Roger Ailes is a lying creep.
WOW….just WOW … so who ended up being FOX NEWS cadidate?? And I guess that explains all the losers getting high paid fox jobs as ( expert) “consultant”.Palin Newt ,Huckabe etc…
Dont really see the big deal here. How many presidents have we had? And of them, how many of them have had affairs? Most would be the answer to that, whether they were found out by the public or not.
I wonder who it was that DID convince Bill Clinton to run for the presidency???
Ah yes, now come all the naysayers from under their rocks, from out of their caves to slam FoxNews.
And for all the negative comments, I wonder how many have ever watched FoxNews, but rather get their rants from third parties, like CNN, MSNBC, ABC, CBS, NBC, Huffpost, moveon and the rest of the bleeding heart, left wingnut, loon outfits……all of which FoxNews blows out of the water in ratings. Not one left wing media outlet even comes close to Fox.
That’s a fact. Read it and weep.
AMEN!!!!!!!!!!!
Equating popularity with quality is a bad idea. You jamming to Justin Bieber dude? Ok then. ;D
Who is Justin Bieber?
One of the latest manufactured pop stars teenybopper girls love. According to his bio, he has “46 million” facebook friends – a very popular “artist”.
McDonalds and Walmart are America’s most popular “restaurant” and retail store.
Popularity does not equal quality. Catch my drift? ;)
Right. He’s the smart mouth, punk Canadian bubble gummer.
And the reason I watch FoxNews is for just that…the quality.
Which none of the other so called “news stations” cable or broadcast have. Nope, not a single one. And if you want, I will be glad to run through the litany of idiots.
It took the bias of all of the other networks to give Obama a little over 50% of the vote. I wonder what would happen if all the networks reported the truth.
He’d be on his way back to the sh17hole he came from.
Chicago.
Imagine if CNN announced that it’s CEO was having negotiations with a liberal candidate about bankrolling their candidacy, and then using the network to promote that liberals campaign.
It would be unthinkable that a legitimate news organization would do that.
But we’ve come to expect this kind of corruption from Fox.
Was anyone actually SURPRISED when they read this?
Fox News Corp. is a morally bankrupt organization, that keeps finding new ways to exhibit their obvious bias.
Brian Williams now we can safely talk about the economy now that the election is over.Obama to candy show mitt the transcript.Need i say anymore.
Exactly. They already scream bloody murder that they’re victims of liberal media bias and then this is how they act? They’re projecting — trying to divert attention away from their own terrible behavior.
Hate to burst your bubble all news is bias, both sides….
The Chicago mob shut Petreaus up .
Right on………..