NEWTOWN, Conn. — Investigators on Saturday worked to understand what led a bright but painfully awkward 20-year-old to slaughter 26 children and adults at a Connecticut elementary school, while townspeople took down Christmas decorations and struggled with how to get through a holiday season that has suddenly become a time of mourning.

The tragedy brought forth soul-searching and grief around the globe. Families as far away as Puerto Rico began to plan funerals for victims who still had their baby teeth, world leaders extended condolences, and vigils were held around the U.S.

Amid the sorrow, stories of heroism emerged, including an account of the Sandy Hook Elementary School principal who lost her life lunging at the gunman, Adam Lanza, in an attempt to overpower him.

Police shed no light on the motive for the second-deadliest school shooting in U.S. history, though state police Lt. Paul Vance said investigators had found “very good evidence … that our investigators will be able to use in painting the complete picture, the how and, more importantly, the why.” He would not elaborate.

However, another law enforcement official, speaking on condition of anonymity, said investigators have found no note or manifesto of the sort they have come to expect after murderous rampages such as the Virginia Tech bloodbath in 2007 that left 33 people dead.

The mystery deepened as Newtown education officials said they had found no link between Lanza’s mother and the school, contrary to news reports that said she was a teacher there. Investigators said they believe Adam Lanza attended Sandy Hook Elementary many years ago, but they had no explanation for why he went there on Friday.

Lanza shot and killed his mother, Nancy Lanza, at the home they shared, then drove to the school in her car with at least three of her guns, forced his way inside and opened fire in two classrooms, authorities said. Within minutes, he killed 20 children, six adults and himself.

On Saturday, Chief Medical Examiner Dr. H. Wayne Carver said all the victims at the school were killed up close with a rifle and were shot more than once. All six adults killed at the school were women. Of the 20 children, eight were boys and 12 were girls. All the children were 6 or 7 years old.

The tragedy plunged Newtown into mourning and added the picturesque New England community of handsome colonial homes, red-brick sidewalks and 27,000 people to the grim map of towns where mass shootings in recent years have periodically reignited the national debate over gun control but led to little change.

Signs around town read, “Hug a teacher today,” ”Please pray for Newtown” and “Love will get us through.”

“People in my neighborhood are feeling guilty about it being Christmas. They are taking down decorations,” said Jeannie Pasacreta, a psychologist who was advising parents struggling with how to talk to their children.

In the tightly knit town, nearly everyone seemed to know someone who died. Among them: well-liked Principal Dawn Hochsprung, who town officials say tried to stop the rampage and paid with her life; the school psychologist who probably would have helped survivors grapple with the tragedy; a teacher thrilled to have been hired this year; and a 6-year-old girl who had just moved to Newtown from Canada.

Authorities said Lanza had no criminal history; it was not clear whether he had a job. Lanza was believed to have suffered from a personality disorder, said a law enforcement official who spoke on condition of anonymity.

Another law enforcement official, also speaking on condition of anonymity, said Lanza had been diagnosed with Asperger’s, a mild form of autism often characterized by social awkwardness. People with the disorder are often highly intelligent. While they can become frustrated more easily, there is no evidence of a link between Asperger’s and violent behavior, experts say.

The law enforcement officials insisted on anonymity because they were not authorized to discuss the unfolding investigation.

Acquaintances describe the former honor student as smart but odd and remote.

Olivia DeVivo, now a student at the University of Connecticut, recalled that Lanza always came to school toting a briefcase and wearing his shirt buttoned all the way up. “He was very different and very shy and didn’t make an effort to interact with anybody” in his 10th-grade English class, she said.

“You had yourself a very scared young boy who was very nervous around people,” said Richard Novia, who was district’s head of security and adviser to the school’s Tech Club, of which Lanza was a member. He added: “He was a loner.”

Novia said Lanza had extreme difficulties relating to fellow students and teachers, as well as a strange bodily condition: “If that boy would’ve burned himself, he would not have known it or felt it physically.”

Lanza would also go through crises that would require his mother to come to school to deal with. Such episodes might involve “total withdrawal from whatever he was supposed to be doing, be it a class, be it sitting and read a book,” Novia said.

When people approached Lanza in the hallways, he would press himself against the wall or walk in a different direction, clutching his black case “like an 8-year-old who refuses to give up his teddy bear,” said Novia, who now lives in Tennessee.

Even so, Novia said his main concern about Lanza was that he might become a target for teasing or abuse by other students, not that he might become a threat.

“Somewhere along in the last four years there were significant changes that led to what has happened Friday morning,” Novia said. “I could never have foreseen him doing that.”

Sandy Hook Elementary will be closed next week — some parents can’t even conceive of sending their children back, Board of Education chairwoman Debbie Leidlein said — and officials are deciding what to do about the town’s other schools.

“Next week is going to be horrible,” said the town’s legislative council chairman, Jeff Capeci, thinking about the string of funerals the town will face. “Horrible, and the week leading into Christmas.”

Asked whether the town would recover, Maryann Jacob, a clerk in the school library who took cover in a storage room with 18 fourth-graders during the shooting rampage, said: “We have to. We have a lot of children left.”

Contributing to this report were Associated Press writers Jim Fitzgerald, Bridget Murphy, Pat Eaton-Robb and Michael Melia in Newtown; Adam Geller in Southbury, Conn.; and Stephen Singer in Hartford, Conn.

Join the Conversation

99 Comments

  1. Today as the nation once again mourns for mass casualties I listen and read about carnage and destruction and like everyone ask myself why. Unfortunately the answer lies solely with the perpetrator and there is no rational answer. Then the talk turns to gun control which it always does and I listen and agree the laws need to be challenged but without losing our right to carry or own a firearm legally. No matter what thought the truth of the matter is …. there unfortunately will always be out there someone who is either mentally ill or just plain evil that will always commit these kinds of crimes and no matter what the gun laws are at the time it will not stop. The majority of these end up being committed by those with underlying mental illness and that is not changed by tighter regulations. I also believe more guns are sold illegally than legally in this country so tightening regulations does nothing to stop someone with a mind set of mass killing. Just about everyone of these killers ends up knowing they will die this day either by their own hand or LE and many say why not kill yourself and leave the innocent here? Well the mentally ill lack this reasoning and your left with once again mass murder only this time just babies were the majority of victims and to the logic of our balanced minds this is just truly the most heartbreaking because these angels were just so innocent. I am licensed to carry and I am a law abiding concerned citizen and I think there are many loop holes that need closing when it comes to gun control but I also am informed enough to know if you take away legal gun owner rights for the majority that will only leave guns in the hands of the minority of those who harm or kill innocent people and devastate the lives of those relatives and friends left behind to say Why.

    1. I agree with what you say, but know something has to be done to stop these nut cases from killing our kids. I have several guns myself. I have guns that have been in my family for over 150 years and I have a shotgun which my father checkered meticulously and flawlessly with a jack knife. I would gladly give them all up to save just 1 of those dead kids. I am not advocating abolition of all gun ownership, but we can’t go on as a society with this happening with the frequency it is. No one needs a rifle with a 30 round clip or a handgun with a 17 round clip. Both sides of the argument have to work together to find answers.

      1. Here’s the thing, giving up your guns WON’T save any kids lives (assuming you’re responsible with them). Also, they’re magazines, not or or clips. At least know what you want to ban. If no one needs a round magazine, then why do police and security guards charged with protecting government officials and property need them?

        1. If you read my whole post, you would have noticed that I didn’t advocate a ban on guns. Maybe in your world you prefer to call them magazines instead of clips. I don’t care. I have a close friend who is in the Secret Service, She carries a handgun with standard size clips. The only reasons I can think of that someone would need a 30 round capacity is they are in a war zone or aren’t a very good shot! Which are you?

          1. I think standard magazine capacity varies depending on the firearm. Again, police carry Glocks and AR-15’s.

          2. So what’s your point? You think that since the cops have heavy firepower, the citizens need it too? Police should have the best equipment they can get. If you as a citizen feel you need a 30 round clip in your gun, I would say maybe you need some instruction. Every deer I have shot was killed with 1 or 2 shots.

          3. If your one or two shots fail to kill that deer, it won’t continue to rape or murder you or anyone else (in many cases, the deer keeps going for a time even with a fatal shot). Here’s my point, if certain firearms are useful for enforcing the law, protecting government workers and government property, why can’t I have them to protect myself and my family? In the case of mass riots or multiple attackers, that semiautomatic rifle is going to start looking pretty good. When a bad guy is so jacked up on PCP that he can’t feel pain, I’ll take 30 rounds, thanks you very much. I’d rather have something I don’t need than need something I don’t have.

          4. Then get a shotgun and eliminate the possibility of killing someone else in your neighborhood. Guaranteed that if someone is raping your family, they will stop when you shoot. There is no need for someone to be in that much fear in their life,

        2. The guns he shot them with were obtained legally. Most guns used in these mass shootings have been. There should be a ban on these weapons. The drug dealers who get guns illegally do not shoot up babies in a classroom.

          1. 1997 North Hollywood shooting. Two convicted felons illegally bought armor and automatic weapons. This was during the “assault weapons” ban and in California, of all places. Granted, those two weren’t targeting a school, but my point being that the bad guys will be able to get them no matter what the laws are.

      1. This is not really a personal response to prettyfoolish. It just seemed like a good spot to add my own opinion.

        It’s not fear of gun control. It’s just that many of us can understand that guns are not the issue. It’s like trying to mop up the floor without realizing you need to fix the leak. The problem has been the gradual devaluation of human life in recent years by allowing things into our society like abortion, doctor assisted suicides, methadone clinics, ect. Attempts to rewrite the United States Constitution and infringe on the rights of good citizens is barking up the wrong tree. Even now the news media will not call the murderer by what he was. They’re trying to desensitize it by calling him an ‘autistic’ or a ‘social misfit’, as if he were the victim. He was an evil murderer that was deranged in his mind.
        When I was young almost every family owned a gun. And almost every teenage boy tried his hand at hunting. But you never saw things like this. Furthermore you never see things like this happening at a rifle range or in a gun store. It’s not guns. It’s predators seeking to destroy the lives of innocents because they have no sense or no regard for the value of a human life.

        Anyway, that’s my humble opinion.

    2. I hope your smart enough to understand it’s a marketing ploy by the NRA to have you believe the government is coming for your guns.

      They are not coming today, tomorrow or yesterday ! It’s been a very slick campaign by the NRA to keep the pubic in fear of that.

      Do you remember in 2009 when that kid killed those six Pittsburgh cops because he said he had heard President Obama was coming for his guns ? Based on a rumor. He kills 6 cops.

      So, the President invites the NRA leadership to the White House to discuss what can be done, and they never even bother to reply. Speaks volumes.

      I don’t fear my government, I fear the George Zimmerman’s of America.

    3. A personality disorrder, and Asperger’s are not mental illnesses. They are mental conditions/disorders, as news reporters clearly state disorder rather than illness. Mental illnesses are chemical imbalances and usually developed closer to one’s sexual peak, or as depression and bi polar becomes evident or more evident after a mother gives birth. These are conditions he has had to deal with his entire life, though he may still have issues with reasoning.

      As a school official said in the story mentioned, he was always different, he would withdraw, and they were concerned he would be mocked by other students, and effected by abuse. Enough abuse, or trap someone in a corner, they may feel threatened and come out fighting.

      It also sounds like rather than alleviating or easing his anxiety, it was made worse by daily activities, further enhancing an act or potential reaction.

      Age 20 is between ages and is also an awkward stage. Too old for somethings, but not old enough for others, full rights and respect. The only more awkward age I can think of is 23.

      Though I agree with you fully, if you take guns out of people’s hands the only one’s left with firearms are criminals.

    4. Countries with strict gum control laws have someviolence. However it is confined to the use of weapons which do not cause the mass death that semi auto and aut0matic weapons can cause. The second amendment says we have the right to bear arms in an organized militia. It doesn’t say you get to keep one in you living room nor does it say you can keep one that can shoot over and over without reloading. There is and will always be evil. However, we do not need to put a means of mass destruction in their hands. Other countries have been able to curb this behavior. Instead the United States plasters this mans pictures and talks about how sad he was. This just makes others want to do the same. He should not have his 15 min of fame.

  2. most likely he was given mental health drugs that depressed him and gave him thoughts of suscide.. Hear it on the advertizments all the time

    1. Too bad he didnt take his life only…..Suicide is for the weak, people who cant stand up for themselves…..

      1. Ah, it’s not so much they can’t stand up for themselves. It’s really as simple as being selfish. But this punk really did not want to kill himself, he gave himself the excuse in the end, cause he lacked the courage to go off and do it.

        He wanted like most of the mass shooters to make a statement.
        He did.

          1. Any sicker then you or I ? Don’t fall for the hype. Spoil little selfish kid, and mommy started being a parent. Too late.

          2. We all all have a good side and a bad side. ALL OF US.
            But if you lack emotional maturity, you got problems.

    2. Actually not. All it took was an enabling parent who failed to put restraints on his behavior growing up.

      There are correlations in every one of these mass shooting since Columbine and very little to do with any ‘traditional mental illness’. That is only hyped to the public to try and make some reasoning , some understanding to it all.

      1. yeah, blame the dead mother – was there a sperm donor involved? or did these two brothers appear magically? gotta love it when an absentee father gets a complete pass on child rearing.

        1. Plenty of blame to go around. But let’s not try to neatly wrap it up under some mental illness.

          And the reason some are trying to do it is because they cannot accept that the problem has more to do with a ‘cultural’ influence then anything else.

          And it’s too simple. But what it does is show their logic was flawed, and has always been flawed as to how children should be raised.

          1. I am in complete agreement with you. I think cultural influence is the biggest factor involved, including with the devaluation of fellow human beings – far more so than mental illnesses.

          2. I don’t agree. I think it is both. I am not a Republican but I thought David Brook’s (Repub) remarks today made sense. He believes it is more of a psychological problem than a sociological one. I think both.
            That mother seemed to be troubled…..stockpiling provisions for the end of the world, etc. I don’t think she was particularly mentally healthy. Not placing blame on her however.

          1. Or cultural revolution if you will. And of course blame everyone else and try to pawn your responsibilities off.

          2. You have no proof of that. It seems there was a lot more wrong here than a single parent. Many single parents do a good job.
            She (mother) seems to have been abnormally fearful. That was considered a safe town. People spoke of leaving their doors unlocked. That may have changed now. Why was that mother so abnormally fearful with that arsenal? Most people in such a town would not have those feelings.

          3. very true. Having worked with victims of domestic violence, I cannot help but wonder if the mother was unusually fearful of her ex husband. I’ve known several woman who have armed themselves out of fear of their ex’s. I think there’s a lot more to this family’s story that we will never know, but I doubt the father is an innocent.

          4. Yeah, it’s Mom’s fault. It’s Dad’s fault. It’s the school’s fault. It’s the gun’s fault. It’s the mail carrier’s fault. It’s the dog catcher’s fault. It’s the fault of the girl in 3rd grade who didn’t talk to him and XBox and rappers and Cocoa Puffs and

          5. of course not – all I’m saying is that guns, mental illness, bullying, drug abuse, child abuse, images of violence, etc. have been around for a very long time – there is something different in our culture now. I’m not talking about this tragedy specifically – who knows what went wrong there? I’m just saying that there are a lot more young people who feel disenfranchised, and I’m trying to figure out what is so different now, in general, as opposed to 30-40 years ago when I was growing up. I don’t think there’s any one answer either, and of course, so many single parents do great (and often better) jobs at child rearing than many couples. I can’t help but feeling that our Country, with over a 50% divorce rate now, might be a factor with some of these kids who feel so much isolation and rage, and who act out in horrific ways. People view other people as so disposable now – what has changed so much? What do you think?

          6. A lot to think about and consider. I agree with much of what you wrote here. I also recall very different times growing up. Some things were better, some things not. I don’t think it is ever all black and white. I miss the more personal connections (at least that is how I see it.) I think all this technology is a very mixed bag. People often are more interested in checking their latest messages (from 1 minute ago) than engaging directly with the person present (talking directly to them, with undivided attention, and not checking every minute their latest gadge or device.) I think some of that has been lost. As for violent video games, I never wanted them in my home when my kids were growing up and did not. However, I was undermined in that with another family member and my kids’ friends homes (some of them.) It is not just one thing. I think they did mostly sports ones anyway. It will affect kids differently, of course. Have we become too desensitized to violence in this country?
            I am in favor of tighter restrictions on certain high powered assault weapons. That will not deny a homewoner having guns for his protection and for hunting. I have never fel the need to walk down the street with a gun, here or in Boston ,etc. Never, and I don’t go around thinking about that all the time either. That is no way to live in my opinion.

          7. East, my children were raised in a single parent home for a few years. Not by my choice. They are fine. There are many children out there raised in 2 parent homes who are a mess. It isnt the amount of parents it is the quality of the raising.

          1. You can’t pick a worse time to divorce than when you are raising adolescents. Divorces often take years, especially in affluent communities. The focus is almost always on the parents, thus the toll on adolescents is astronomical from what I’ve seen.

          2. Good point. I responding to the poster who mentioned dead beat dads. He may have read something I haven’t. I haven’t seen anything that mentioned that the father was a dead beat dad.

          3. Many kids come from divorced homes today and do fine. It is not to be recommended but sometimes it is the better answer to a bad marriage, which affects the kids even more. These young men, who isolate and sit in rooms playing violent video games alone…..no , that is not all about single parenting. The Columbine shooters did not come from broken homes, nor did the one from Aurora, VA tech,etc. So, your argument kind of falls apart.

      2. This young man, by every account, was “different” all his life. To me it sounds like some form of autism or worse. Traditional parenting doesn’t always work for these kids. They need more of some things and so much less of others, usually to be determined on a case by case basis. His mother was aware of this and had obviously sought help for this young man. I don’t know what went so terribly wrong, but it would be interesting to know more. I think we need to wait for the police to finish their work before we jump to conclusions as to what kind of parents his were. I am sure his family is as devastated as those of the victims. They have lost two members too. I am so sorry for all concerned, the little kids, the deceased school staff and all of their families, as well as the rest of the community whose sense of security is shattered.

        1. So, what does that show ? Most of us where all nerds in school, I was. And got my a– kick most every day.
          Never once did the thought cross my mind to ‘kill’

          Because I had structure and was not program.

          Your looking for reasoning that dosen’t have any real baring, your digging for straws and possibly a new meal ticket.

          1. My real point was that this young man had some obvious problems. I don’t know what they were, but I don’t believe they were a result of bad parenting. That may have been present too, but I don’t believe it was the real cause of this tragedy.

            I was a nerd too, but girls, in my time, generally were teased but never really bullied in the physical sense. But I would consider myself an essentially average student, i.e. capable of learning in a mainstream classroom, which was all there was in my time.

            I had two brothers who both had physically demonstrable brain damage. Both suffered from oxygen deprivation, one during birth, one due to an accident as an infant, before we adopted him. They both had special parental exceptions that the rest of did not have. Both are wonderful men but one had some problems during his adolescence. I would never anticipate that either would ever kill anyone, but if it happened people might say the same thing about either of them, that they were different growing up. But others might look at the success the rest of the family has achieved and say it was not a parental issue.

            This young shooter has a brother who by all accounts is a successful, law-abiding young man, so why do two kids with the same parents turn out so differently?

          2. Only because he killed, and killed children. It fits your rationalization. Otherwise you can’t comprehend it.

            He has to have ‘metal illness’ in your world. You’ve been programed by the system.

            You could never admit if your degree, you wasted your time and money.

            His brother has a ‘look’ as well. Yes, I’m quite superficial.
            In the end, two people who where no more fit to have children or even own a pet possibly.

          3. You are right that I cannot comprehend it. I can not comprehend how someone could look at innocent little children and let loose a hail of bullets meaning to end their lives. Why does someone do that? Many people have less than ideal childhoods with less than ideal parents. But only a very small percent resort to killing and a much smaller percent to mass murder. So what is different?

            The obvious answer is that these people were some how wired differently at conception. I don’t know if it is mental illness so much as a neurobiologic difference. I know for now that neurobiologic differences or disorders are currently being diagnosed and treated by mental health professionals in combination with various imaging modalities. I believe in the next twenty or so years, we will have better diagnostics and treatments emerge so we can better help children who would otherwise be “different.” I hope that we can better find and treat learning disabilities, a major obstacle for education for so many and be able to understand and develop method for teaching kids who would otherwise have little hope for a real education.

          4. I hear ya. small for my size growing up, heck, I weighed 128 when I graduated from HS. got my arse kicked all the time.

        2. Labeling and pop psychology is your ‘solution’? How do you know what ‘he’ needs? There is very little background information released, so why jump to conclusions?

          I haven’t seen any cable stations, movie producers, or major networks decide to pull episodes of crime shows where children are victims or hostages or change the ending to where they all die…nope, just endless interviews and interviews with children…how exploitative are these greedy bastards anyway?

          1. In my circle we call it fraudulent presentation.. However in a Neoconservative slat one realizes it’s their reality.

          2. I don’t know what he needed. That was kind of my point. Either CNN or CNBC presented that he had a disability where he was unable to feel any physical pain. There was a problem when he was in shop classes to be sure he didn’t get burned as he would not notice it himself. Other descriptions I have heard on the major news networks have suggested he had some form of autism. Autism is no form of pop psychology though as I know personally several affected children and none present exactly the same way. Nor would I anticipate that any of those would commit such a crime. I do believe, however, the “normal” person does not commit such acts. I think a lot of what has been presented by some who do know him suggest he was wired differently than the average person. In any event, I think the police will ultimately come to some conclusion as to why Adam Lanza did what he did although I doubt it will be of any comfort to most of that community.

          3. very. In the name of freedom of the press they are basically animals. All of them, the liberal and conservative media both.

        3. There has also been mention of the fact that this mother put a lot of pressure on her son to excel. “Perfection”,etc. That doesn’t always work and can backfire. Rebellion,etc. I am not saying this was all her fault, but you say she sought help. It was right she did. Apparently it did not work. Not at all.

      3. There is some talk that the mother was “very strict.” I don’t know how taking him to the range to shoot targets was helpful in his social interactions which seemed to have been lacking . Apparently, there was a lot pressure for academic brilliance….everything had to be “perfect.” Rigidity. His bedroom did not look like that of a typical 20 yr old young man. Everything was lined up , in perfect order. It was striking to those who saw it and not in a good and normal way.
        Having said all that…..he was evil. After what he did to those innocent children and adults, may he burn.

        1. She went over board after the divorce I’m sure, What school teacher has 5 guns in their house !?

          I have little doubt she could have ever taught at a higher grade level. Sounds like very poor decision making.
          And quite possibly why the father got the hell away from her.

          1. Semi-Auto’s just don’t jive with a teacher, and a woman teacher at that, and all bought legally I might add. Was she an avid hunter. (cough cough)

            Let’s remember those types of weapons where not design to take out 20 deer in short time , but rather 20 people.

            Plenty of teachers own guns, but this mini arsenal doesn’t fit with the persona. My guess is is her son’s actions where inherent from a less then balance parent.

            We tend to over glorify certain professions. And the professional professions out there will all cover for each other, meaning they’ll throw this kid under a ‘mental illness’ label because they would never admit that their brand of child rearing is producing mass murderous.

            Not one, not two but everyone since Columbine have fit the same profile. Coming from supposed good backgrounds, parents educated and even educated themselves.

            Maybe there’s something in their water. (cough cough)

  3. his eyes in the pic has this crazy deranged looked . the same look the guy had who opened fire on the movie theater in colorado. the bathsalt look

    1. That’s your interpretation of a goofy looking kid…..get some help, now is not the time to start typecasting people and start another Holocaust based on how you think they look.

  4. CHILDREN:
    Charlotte Bacon, 6
    Daniel Barden, 7
    Olivia Engel, 6
    Josephine Gay, 7
    Ana Marquez-Greene, 6
    Dylan Hockley, 6
    Madeleine Hsu, 6
    Catherine Hubbard, 6
    Chase Kowalski, 7
    Jesse Lewis, 6
    James Mattioli, 6
    Grace McDonnell, 7
    Emilie Parker, 6
    Jack Pinto, 6
    Noah Pozner, 6
    Caroline Previdi, 6
    Jessica Rekos, 6
    Avielle Richman, 6
    Benjamin Wheeler, 6
    Allison N. Wyatt, 6

    ADULTS:
    Rachel Davino, 29
    Dawn Hochsprung, 47
    Anne Marie Murphy, 52
    Lauren Russeau, 20
    Mary Sherlach, 56
    Victoria Soto, 27

      1. These are the names of the victims of this mass murderer. They are what matters here. We do not yet know enough about the family circumstances of this shooter. In my humble opinion, even if we did, it would not change the outcome.

        1. I realized that. It’s just that one gets the feeling he’s trying to use them and hide behind it cause he thinks ‘ole Uncle Sam is coming for his guns.

          It’s like asking the fox to guard the hen house. This dude yesterday on another thread turn excuses into an art form.

          And nothing will change as long as we allow easy access to firearms. America is far different from the days of it’s founding. We have over 300 hundred million guns in the hands of some who should not even be allowed to own a pet, or have children much less a gun.

          https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dpNGeyEp5kM

          And those are just the ones that are supposed pillars of the community, we ain’t got to the borderline personality type yet.

      1. or these:
        (As of October 24, 2012)

        Total strikes: 350

        Total reported killed: 2,586 – 3,375

        Civilians reported killed: 472 – 885

        Children reported killed: 176

        Total reported injured: 1,252 – 1,401

        Strikes under the Bush Administration: 52

        Strikes under the Obama Administration: 298

        1. Of course the difference is President Obama is keeping America safe as oppose to the Bush administration who kept America in fear so that the Halliburton’s could steal the wealth out of this country.

          1. We can only thank G*D that the KOCH brothers weren’t involved. I feel so much safer knowing Pakistani children in remote villages are now dead.

          2. Yeah, you gotta love those who call themselves Libertarian but yet have no clue how, and who is behind it all.

            The founders of the modern day Libertarian party, the Koch brothers. Who grow up under their fathers ideology and one they have never shed. While using capitalism to further their fathers empire, that empire that was built as Joseph Stalin’s business partner.

    1. Wondering how Obama can be so callous about the destruction of families and neighborhoods as well as maiming and murdering children and the elderly by authorizing thousands of drone attacks; or distributing WMD to erratic and violent Arab groups while expressing sympathies to the victims in Conn.

      Or is it ‘just a ploy’ to remove weapons and people from society who don’t ‘fit’ in?

  5. Can’t understand why any parent would be holding a news conference, of course I am referring to Robbie Parker(Emilie’s dad). Everyone grieves differently I guess.

  6. If more people with guns is the answer, then why didn’t the mother (who had guns), stop her son from killing her?

  7. Five guns is hardly an arsenal. I really don’t see how the ownership of five firearms is evidence of mental or emotional stability. No, AR-15’s weren’t designed originally (neither were bolt and lever action rifles) for hunting, but many hunters use them. None of that really matters, though, since our founders desire for us to be well armed had very little (actually, nothing) to do with hunting deer.

  8. It’s not evidence of anything other then being ‘odd’ especially for one in her profession. However, if he was like most in his generation and brainwashed through violent video games, well then, where’s that grant money we got us a study.

    I doubt the founders ever intended this, in fact I’d bet on it..

    1. I just don’t think it’s video games. The number of people who play violent video games versus the people who do things like this isn’t even close.

  9. As soon as he left his vehicle after being told not to by the 911 dispatcher, he escalated the situation. I recommend 25 to life and forfeit all the legal defense donations that he hustle from the idiots who can’t make sense of much.

  10. or take out 20 Zombies…. There are some patterns between Columbine and other shootings, if we believe the newspapers. The problem is that the story keeps changing.

    What bother me with your post is how quickly you blame the parents for Autism. Should we blame your parents for your problems?

  11. I’ve been reading a lot of people saying tighter gun control laws! That’s
    what we need. You really think that’s going to work? There will always
    be someone out there willing to illegally sell a firearm. Obviously
    being attacked with gunfire unarmed doesn’t work. So let’s take away
    the right to bare arms to protect us from the monsters that create these
    firestorms. Good idea. But wait, that’s not really the problem is it?
    No one should be worried about the stupid gun control laws. They
    should be worried about this country’s lack of moral and ethical
    compass. I do believe it’s part media but the majority is part
    ENVIRONMENT. How many kids are going to wake up to violent Call of Duty
    type video games this Christmas??? How many parents teach their kids
    manners and to treat others with respect? How many parents lead by
    example, displaying their manners and treating others with respect? Not
    many, just go people watching at Walmart – prepare to be disappointed.
    How many of us have taken the time out of this busy holiday season to do
    something for a stranger? I’m not talking about dropping some coins in
    the Salvation Army pail, I’m talking going out of you way for someone
    elses enjoyment.

    Are we really surprised this is how the
    world is turning out when we have to worry about being politician
    correct over the dumbest things, fear the law will be called if we
    punish our kids “to severely”, let our young children plop down in front
    of violent video games for hours on end or sensationalize this nations
    monsters all over the media????? We the American people need to
    change….not the gun laws.

    1. Exactly. Prior to 1934, any child could order a belt fed machine gun through the mail. Number of mass shootings then versus now?

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *