NEW YORK — Flanked by dozens of shooting survivors and relatives of victims of gunfire around the country, Mayor Michael Bloomberg pressed Congress and President Barack Obama on Monday to toughen gun laws and tighten enforcement after the Connecticut school massacre that left 20 children among the dead.

“If this doesn’t do it,” he asked, “what is going to?”

Such pleas have become near rituals for Bloomberg, a billionaire who has used both his mayoralty and his own money to push the gun-control cause only to see it slide from the national agenda again and again. But Bloomberg is pressing to make this moment a turning point, even as the political calculus around the issue remains hard to solve and he faces questions about a big-city mayor’s sway with often-rural opponents.

During his 11 years in office, Bloomberg’s administration has conducted stings and filed lawsuits to expose what it said were out-of-state dealers flouting gun sale laws. He and Boston Mayor Thomas Menino founded and run a 700-member mayors’ group that lobbies lawmakers on gun measures.

Bloomberg’s multimillion-dollar political pocketbook has backed like-minded candidates and attacked adversaries in races around the nation, and he criticized both Obama and Republican nominee Mitt Romney for not making the issue more of a priority during this year’s presidential campaign. Bloomberg ultimately endorsed Obama.

The mayor has repeatedly stood with victims’ families and spoken out tartly after mass shootings. After 12 people were killed and dozens of others wounded in a shooting this summer in a movie theater in Aurora, Colo., Bloomberg wondered aloud why police officers across the country didn’t threaten to strike until tougher gun laws were passed. He later clarified that he didn’t mean that literally, noting that New York law prevents police from striking.

Bloomberg’s efforts have delighted gun-control advocates, but they’ve engendered pushback — sometimes taunting — from gun manufacturers, sellers and some state officials.

Gun-rights advocates have sometimes portrayed Bloomberg’s initiatives as grandstanding by a politician who wants to build a national profile. And on Sunday, New York Times columnist David Brooks questioned whether the Manhattan-dwelling mayor could be an effective champion for his cause.

“It’s counterproductive to have him as the spokesperson for the gun law movement,” as it’s already “perceived as an attack on the lifestyle of rural people by urban people,” Brooks said on NBC’s “Meet the Press,” where the mayor had just appeared.

Bloomberg said Monday that it was indeed his place to speak: “I’m a human being,” as well as the mayor of the nation’s largest city — one that’s on track this year to logs its lowest murder rate since record-keeping began in the 1960s, he said.

“I’m going to fight, and you should fight, as well. … This is an outrage. We are killing each other,” he said.

Bloomberg and the mayors’ group he leads, Mayors Against Illegal Guns, are calling for reinstituting a version of the federal assault weapons ban that expired in 2004, closing the so-called “gun show loophole” by requiring all gun sellers to conduct criminal background checks on prospective buyers, and stepping up federal prosecutions of people who lie on background checks, among other proposals.

The group — a nonprofit financed by Bloomberg and other donors — released 34 video statements Monday from shooting survivors and victims’ relatives around the country. John Feinblatt, Bloomberg’s top aide on gun issues, said the videos had been scheduled to come out this week, but the group made sure of it by editing the pieces Friday after the shootings in Newtown, Conn. Twenty-year-old Adam Lanza killed his mother at their home, 20 children and six adults at Sandy Hook Elementary School, and then himself.

“A tragedy like this is often what brings the public to pay attention to an issue and brings Capitol Hill’s attention to this issue,” Feinblatt said, but “we never stop paying attention to this issue.”

Proposals to stiffen gun laws have met potent opposition in Washington in recent years. But at least one Republican lawmaker has joined Democrats — including Sen. Joe Manchin, an avid hunter and lifelong member of the National Rifle Association — in saying it’s time to discuss gun regulation again.

In New York, meanwhile, Democratic Gov. Andrew Cuomo said Monday that he would propose state gun laws to close loopholes related to assault weapons, though he didn’t give specifics.

Robyn Thomas, executive director of the San Francisco-based Law Center to Prevent Gun Violence, thinks Bloomberg’s efforts will make a difference.

“I do think he’s ready to put a lot into this in a way that will get attention, finally,” she said.

But Bob Levy, the chairman of the board of the libertarian Cato Institute, said key pieces of Bloomberg’s agenda — the background check and assault weapons ban proposals — could face a difficult legal road. Levy pointed to a federal appeals court decision last week that struck down a ban on carrying concealed weapons in Illinois, saying the state hadn’t done enough to show the law was justified by an increase in public safety.

Chris Foye, for one, gives Bloomberg credit for seizing the moment to speak up about guns.

“Every little bit helps,” said Foye, whose 13-year-old son, Chris Owens, was killed by a stray bullet in Harlem in 2009. “For us to sit back and ignore it, that would be the worst tragedy ever.”

Associated Press writers Eileen AJ Connelly in New York and Michael Virtanen in Albany, N.Y., contributed to this report.

Join the Conversation

31 Comments

    1. Other than humans total annihilation of themselves, probably nothing. Which only proves that as a race we’re not well suited to have weapons that give us the power to take each others lives so easily.

  1. As I have said before:
    You need to realize that the top guns used in crimes are not “assault weapons”.
    According to the U.S. Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms these are the most common guns used to commit crimes:

    1. Smith and Wesson .38 revolver
    2. Ruger 9 mm semiautomatic
    3. Lorcin Engineering .380 semiautomatic
    4. Raven Arms .25 semiautomatic
    5. Mossberg 12 gauge shotgun
    6. Smith and Wesson 9mm semiautomatic
    7. Smith and Wesson .357 revolver
    8. Bryco Arms 9mm semiautomatic
    9. Bryco Arms .380 semiautomatic
    10. Davis Industries .380 semiautomatic

    Few, if any, will be affected by an “assault weapons” ban. I am liberal, but I realize gun control is as silly as alcohol prohibition. I have to agree with the Right on this issue. Shooting, on the Connecticut scale, happens all over the world. Gun control is not the answer to this problem.

    1. Of course it’s not “the answer” but on some level it has to be at least a small “part” of the solution.

      1. it isn’t. it’s just a knee jerk reaction to the horrible acts of one crazy sick twisted individual.

    2. I agree generally…though it still begs the question – what purpose do true autos serve?

      Self defense is covered generally by pistols or shotguns. Most hunting is done with fairly basic rifles. I’ve yet to hear a sound, reasonable explanation as to why a civilian needs military grade weaponry. Though then, I suppose I’ve yet to hear a sound, reasonable explanation as to why someone needs a 95″ TV in their living room either. Meh. :|

      1. In case you havent noticed , friend , this is America.
        Land of opportunity, freedom of choice and etc.
        The very country people from all over
        the world are struggling to come to.
        …..At any cost.

    1. Exactly. Bloomberg’s rhetoric comes from a billionaire elitist who is surrounded by heavily armed police officers to protect him. I’m not saying he shouldn’t be; any high profile political figure would be foolish to not have such protection. But for him to say that everyone else should be banned from having firearms seems to me to ring a bit hollow. Funny that the very wealthy, who can afford, and indeed employ, armed security, are the first ones to call for banning private firearms ownership.

      1. And when the number of murders in NYC drops to ZERO he might have a leg to stand on. As it is now, he’s just pandering to the voters. Sickening really.

    2. This from the guy that is afraid of people drinking too much soft drinks.
      He is working on cutting down on your choice to use salt , as well.
      Yes, his judgment and plans should be carefully scrutinized.

  2. These individuals are terrorists, plain and simple. We need to stop surrendering our liberties to them every time that they attack. Every day, somewhere in the world, innocents including children are killed by some fanatic or radical with a pint of toilet bowl cleaner and a gallon of bleach. The truth is that if you can make a cake, you can make a suicide vest and buy the ingredients at the same supermarket. Appeasing these murderers and thugs is as ineffective as banning their big soft drinks or over the counter nitrates/chlorates. Deal with them for what they are.

  3. INTERESTING? Smarter than they think you are!

    Tim Young

    Managing EditorHilary Clinton – Inglorious Commando-in-Chief

    Diane Alden

    Prior to the death of Ambassador Stevens and the Navy Seals who attempted to protect him from jihadis, Secretary of State Hillary Clinton was a busy little bureaucrat selling the idea of diplomats as shadow warriors to the public at a military-industrial complex gala in Tampa, Florida in May of this year.

    Advertisement

    Is Friday the End of the World?

    Even if it isn’t, people will be reacting like it is since the Mayans predicted it…

    There could be mass hysteria in the streets, and the last thing you want is to get stuck in it.

    Protect you and your family from whatever may come on Friday by clicking here now!

    http://www.absoluterights.com/MayanCalendar

    An article in Wired Magazine titled,”Hillary Goes Commando” describes in some detail her speech and attendance at what amounts to the military wing of the US State Department. Special Operation Command in Tampa, Florida. This outfit has been in the news a lot lately, not only for being involved in various take downs of governments in Egypt and Libya, or for killing bin Laden, but SOC has also taken it’s share of bad publicity in the events surrounding Generals Petraeus and Allen sex and email scandals. But that is a story for another day.

    Wired reports:

    “The Special Operations Forces Industry Conference had a surprise guest on Wednesday — one that had some here scratching their heads. At a black-tie dinner following the day’s panel discussions, product displays and tech demos, Secretary of State Hillary Clinton arrived behind a phalanx of State Department and Special Operations Command security. Clinton’s presence seemed incongruous at the gaudy Tampa Convention Center packed with weary-looking commando staffers, paunchy industry reps and chipper media handlers. Special Operations Forces are a big deal, sure, but it was still just a trade show.[http://www.wired.com/dangerroom/2012/05/clinton-goes-commando/]

    I have followed the Clinton faction in the US State Department for nearly two decades. That faction has promoted what amounts to a takeover of Special Operations by the Clinton cabal. This takeover began in the ‘humanitarian’ Balkans War. As NATO and the people surrounding the Clinton s at the time promoted a war that was anything but humanitarian. It was in fact a war that allowed jihad and drug running and sex trafficking to turn the area into a hell hole. Not to mention the use of US mercenaries by the Clintons to drive 200,000 Christians out of Kosovo. you find Clinton people or US State and the corporate CIA involved, you will find suffering of Christians while jihadis get a pass.

    Hillary’s dreams of power and glory and remaking the world along some crazy geopolitical progressive lines now include use of what was once a branch of the US military. Increasing evidence suggest special forces have more to do with remaking the world according to some elite dream of utopia than US national security interests.

    While the US State Department has always had a military contingent, under the Clinton cabal this has expanded exponentially. For nearly a century, the State Department has had a security force, the Bureau of Diplomatic Security (BDS). The State Department even has about a hundred of their 1,500 BDS personnel trained to carry out commando type missions (the Mobile Security Deployment, or MSD).This was not enough for the Hillary, Burger, Holbrooke, Lake, crowd. Not by a long shot. Since the Balkans the various factions in government, State, the Pentagon, CIA have been fighting it out for turf and for money. Each of them have their own off the books black ops budget and each of them have often been at odds with real US national security interests. Each of them have paid for efforts done in our name that had nothing to do with our best interests that includes the Balkans, Libya and Egypt and now Africa under Africom. To be fair I have to finger the neocons under Bush as well as they fight with the Clinton faction over strategy and money . the results are pretty much the same:an aggressive foreign policy that does not have much to do with fighting terrorism and a lot more over control of assets around the world.Patriot Cartoon of the DayGun Laws
    Eric Allie, Caglecartoons.com

    In any event, the Wired article goes onto say: Clinton first heaped praise on Adm. William McRaven, chief of Special Operations Command and her host at the conference. Then she described a vision in which shadowy U.S. and allied Special Operations Forces, working hand in hand with America’s embassies and foreign governments..

  4. Our Nobel peace winning president has murdered innocent women and children in eight different countries with drones! where are the tears Barak? Nobel peace prize?? Laughable…

    Blame the mainstream corporate media. This is absurd!

    Lets focus on WHY he did this! Or, how does a kid with aspergers pull off such marksmanship? Why no on e rushed to the er? The second shooter in the woods? He had a rifle, he didn’t. Dad was killed, no he wasn’t. It was Adam, no Ryan. Come on…connect the dots
    Way to many inconsistencies….

    Wake up America!

    1. They do use it, the loop hole is in private sales, you are under no obligation to get a background check on someone in a private sale, though you are not allowed to sell if you have reason to believe that the buyer shouldn’t have a gun. But how do you know?

      1. I should have stipulated – “all” sellers. Would prohibiting private sales and only allowing licensed sellers to sell at shows simply push them out to 1 on 1 private sales? Probably. The idea is to make things less convenient and simple.

        No, one can’t expect ordinary people to be psychiatrists. Could civilians somehow tie into the system? Is that too much to ask and expect?

        1. Obviously there is no simple solution to the issue, it is unrealistic to go to either extreme of no regulation or an all out ban. That would just be asinine. There are likely things that can be done with the current system that aren’t unreasonable, but at the same time nothing you do to prevent the bad guys from getting them is going to stop them from getting a firearm if they really want it. Harsher penalties for those that break the law with straw purchases would be a good step, make an example of a lot of them quickly and publicly. Maybe in the private sale get a record of it and a copy of the individuals ID, I don’t really know, just spit-ballin really. Who knows what they can do with it often times we see tragedy occur in places with strict policies in effect all ready.

  5. Okay, since it’s abundantly apparent that there are so many liberal trolls commenting here, I’m calling you out! Since you know so much, and since you feel so strongly that “assault weapons” need to be banned, please explain to us what the difference is between a assault rifle, and any other rifle. Here’s your chance to educate the entire pro gun community. My advice to you would be to start with the difference between a clip and a magazine…Think it through! Before ya share your “intelligence” with the rest of us you SHOULD watch this first!
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yATeti5GmI8

  6. Yes, something must be done. Better screening for those with mental illness and getting them into treatment would be a better start. If you check all the recent mass shootings, all those perpetrators had multiple signs of mental problems & nothing was done about it by family or schools.

    1. “All the focus on the small number of people with mental illness who are violent serves to make us feel safer by displacing and limiting the threat of violence to a small, well-defined group. But the sad and frightening truth is that the vast majority of homicides are carried out by outwardly normal people in the grip of all too ordinary human aggression to whom we provide nearly unfettered access to deadly force. “

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *