It’s the time of year for lists. Bloomberg News penned the 10 “truly worst U.S. domestic policy ideas of 2012,” while CNN posted the worst 25 passwords. Whether the topic is gardening, science fiction movies, stocks or hamburgers, there is a ranking for the past year. So you shouldn’t be surprised to learn there’s also a list of the “20 least- and worst-covered Maine political stories of 2012.”
The rankings were put together by Maine People Before Politics, a group run by allies of Republican Gov. Paul LePage. They were distributed by the communications director for Maine House Republicans. The list had a clear political bent and was designed to bolster Republican policies, but it made a few good points, one of which we will examine here.
The No. 12 “least- and worst-covered” story was that Maine’s unemployment and labor participation rates are stronger than the national economy. “While the Maine media covered Maine’s monthly unemployment rate, it seldom received any in-depth explanation or solid context,” the ranking explained.
Members of the media should, of course, aim to be comprehensive, explain the nuances of different economic measurements and provide background data. What’s more, when possible they should bring to life the human stories behind the numbers.
Context is not hard to come by. About 10 years ago, in November 2002, Maine’s unemployment rate was 4.2 percent, with 31,444 people out of work, according to the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics. During the following six years, the rate fluctuated but didn’t begin to spike until 2008. It then kept increasing and peaked at 8.4 percent in the cold months of December 2009 through March 2010.
Maine’s unemployment rate has since fallen, standing at an estimated 7.2 percent in November, which was lower than the national rate of 7.7 percent.
But Maine typically doesn’t experience the same booms and busts of the nation. And any in-depth explanation about the economy should not just look at the unemployment rate. It should also examine the output of Maine workers and businesses, per capita household income and the rate of young people attaining post-secondary degrees.
These factors present a wider picture and show Maine’s limited economic opportunities. Because even if Maine has an unemployment rate that is less than the nation, it still has far to go to improve its ability to retain the workforce it pays to educate.
For example, measuring economic output per person shows that Maine’s ranking in comparison to other states hasn’t changed much in the past 10 years. Maine’s gross domestic product per capita ranked 42nd in 2011 and 41st in 2001.
And Maine is not keeping up with education targets. Nearly 60 percent of Maine jobs will require some form of postsecondary training in 2018, whether it’s a four-year degree, associate degree or a specialized skills certificate, according to the Georgetown University Center on Education and the Workforce. But in 2010, just 37.2 percent of Maine’s 25- to 34-year-olds had a postsecondary degree, according to the U.S. Census Bureau.
About 51,300 Mainers are currently looking for work, but what about the young Mainers who have left the state, in search of higher earnings potential and career advancement? What about the businesses that have unfilled openings but can’t find workers with the needed skills?
What about someone like Peggy Schaffer, of Vassalboro, a face behind the numbers on the labor department’s spreadsheets? She has been unemployed for nearly two years, she wrote in a recent OpEd, and though she’s had temporary work, she hasn’t found anything permanent. What about the anger and psychological feelings of insecurity that come with being laid off?
The story is indeed complex. Just as the many organizations, businesses, government agencies and schools tackling Maine’s economic problems can improve, so, too, can the media strengthen its reporting of the intricacies of a subject that affects us all.



Part of the problem has been that Maine (East Coast California) has gone totally liberal for too many years. It has chased away the children of this state for locations where business is not considered a bad word
Both my kids returned to Maine after college and have excellent jobs.
government or non-profit?
One is a lawyer with a multinational bank based in the area and one has an excellent and well-paying job at a museum.
Boy, it’s getting deep here! Do you think it was the libs that packed up all the manufacturing jobs in Maine and willingly moved them out of State? If you are looking for someone to blame, you should look at the business owners here that wouldn’t modernize. You see it over and over again along the Midcoast and right through the state. “This is the way we have always done it!” and “I have been in this business for 25 years and this is how I do it.” Out of state companies moved in, bought the failing businesses and stripped them of whatever technology they could. Closed the doors and left the workers scratching their heads. Just how do you justify blaming that on any political group?
Well. Let’s see. We have the unions having a hand in destroying the competitiveness of the paper industry, They aren’t totally responsible but $50 – $60k a year truck drivers in the 80’s certainly played a role. That set the stage for the reduced investment in modern equipment leaving nothing but bones for those “out of state” businesses to pick over..
Then there is that famous Democrat financier Warren Buffet who moved his textile business overseas….
But I don’t think that’s all of the problem. Why is it every time some idea is brought forth to invest and create some economic activity the lefties come out with some reason they believe it shouldn’t be done. Plum Creek The Cargo Ports. The Cross Maine highway… just a few examples.
Cheesy, we all know how you feel about unions. I am sure you can find plenty of arguments so you can blame all your problems on them. In the 80s I was making over $50 k too, but I was working 13 days on and 1 off. How about you? How much were you making then/ You make a big deal out of someone else making a decent living. As far as Plum Creek, the Cargo Ports, and the TransMaine Canadian Highway are concerned, the answer to that is simple. They were all bad ideas!
In the 80’s I was lucky to break $20k.
But thank you for making my points. 100% of them.
While I was making that wage, my supervisor was making 25% more than his top paid man and his supervisor was making 25% over that. I am sure it works the same in Maine. A boss makes $120 k and whines because his employee is bleeding him dry at $20k.
I am having trouble understanding you. Are you saying that a janitor should make the same as a supervisory engineer because they work for the same company? Sort of a waste of all that high priced education don’t you think?
I am saying that I think everyone should be paid a fair wage. if you criticize someone else’s wage, you leave yourself open to scrutiny of your own pay. Personally, I have worked with several engineers who weren’t worth as much as a janitor. I think that a lot of the blame for the downfall of GM that you blame on the UAW should be directed at their engineers.
I am not criticizing anyones wage… just pointing out the link between wage costs & capitalization and the scenario YOU sat up with “out of state” companies taking over the Mills. This was your point remember? You said and I quote “business owners here that wouldn’t modernize” Operating costs including labor and ROI are linked. Always have been.
The Big Three automakers certainly suffered from inept management, but they weren’t being weighed down by a benefits package for a few hundred executives. This is NOT solely the fault of the UAW, but the kinds of life-long benefits their workers received were entirely unsustainable.
According to libs like you there are NO good ideas for economic development in Maine.
“We have the unions having a hand in destroying the competitiveness of the paper industry, ”
Unions get nothing unless management agrees. Any contract takes two signatures, after all.
Normal union cover statement. This time from a guy who doesn’t think the First Ten Amendments are part of the Constitution but are merely “linked”.
Hey Cheesy! Ever consider joining the ASME?
Shame those workers for wanting to earn a decent living. Don’t they know that they shouldn’t aspire to own a house or save to help their child get into college, but instead work for minimum wage?
There is no one saying that people shouldn’t earn a decent living, but should a company pay a truck driver as much as an engineer?
Should the janitorial staff at a hospital get paid as much as the Surgeon?
yes
“Wouldn’t modernize?” So the unions were begging management to modernize, but they wouldn’t?
I am not the one who brought up unions. You have to take that up with Cheesecake. My statement was concerning the “that’s the way we always done it in Maine” attitude. I don’t know about the paper industry, but here on the Midcoast, there have been examples of out of state interests buying up local companies and moving the technology elsewhere.
Got ya. Those companies scooping up these companies and moving them out is a symptom, tho…I’d like to see a real fix to the problem.
Maine is also one of 11 states with more people on welfare than employed…Maine has said NO so many times nobody even asks if they can come here to start a business anymore…Unless it is a mom and pop hobby business like an antique shop or gallery ect. We have the oldest population with a larger than norm amount of seniors over 65…The kids , except those on welfare or work for government , flee in droves to places where there is work and things to do other than look at trees.. We are reaping what we have sown ..It is only gonna get worse as I think we have moved past the point of no return..
No credit given to “free” trade destroying our economy? The only states that are being called “business friendly” are ones that are situated closer to the Mexican border where they have access to cheap illegal labor. All the other jobs have gone to China. A large part of our welfare problems can be laid at the feet of big corporate America. Maine is now full of big box stores that pay “public assistance” wages. When going to work everyday only pays $10 a week more than welfare, what does anyone expect?
“Welfare” is not the correct term. Maine has more people receiving government assistance than people with jobs, due in large part to the high number of people receiving Social Security and subsidized Medicare.
Only if “welfare” is used extremely liberally. When I think of “on welfare”, I think of those completely dependent on the state – what’s your definition?
Maine’s economic problems are far more a structural matter (age and population distribution, among others) than political. Nevertheless, the knee-jerk opposition by some smaller vocal groups to any large industrial projects is troublesome. The state needs meaningful employment generation in the central and northern regions and it has the necessary infrastructure to accommodate it, particularly in the Bangor, Searsport and Eastport regions. The environment and tourism trade are important assets but responsible policy-making must include considerations for strategic economic opportunities. For many Mainers it is a matter of economic survival.
Emphasis on “responsible”.
“responsible” – Translation; not in my back yard…or anywhere in Maine
That’s right. Don’t want to be anywhere near.
Thanks for being honest. No thanks for helping wreck Maine’s economy.
I doubt if reducing subsidies to this particular manufacturer would wreck anything. They seem to be doing just fine.
So in other words, according to the BDN editorial board, any good news in Maine cannot be credited to the LePage Administration’s policies. But any bad news is completely due to LePage’s failure to be an effective governor.
Great point! Wonder if they’d apply the same standard nationally?
What do you expect? Mainers had a hand in the re-election of Oshama, the media in Maine follow Oshama blindly.
Actually Mainer’s clearly saw through Myth Romney’s lies.
Yeah, elections sure are awful, aren’t they? We should totes do away with them!
As the Rs keep trying to do. For obvious reasons.
Let me get this right. The BDN says its not important to report the unemployment rate is going down and is lower than the national average. I’ll bet my b*tt that if it was going up it would be front page news.
No, they’re saying context and details matter. That’s something you disagree with clearly.
Would have been nice to see the “context and details” when the national unemployment rate “dropped” below 8% just before the election. Don’t you agree?
Still trying to pretend Romney lost because he wasn’t a terrible candidate?
Irrelevant. Had nothing to do with the quality of the candidate. Obama won and he’s a terrible President as well as candidate.
That first debate during which Obama looked like a limp noodle apparently was a huge plus to the low/no-information voters, who put him over the top in the election, according to Richard Stengel, Time Magazine editor.
Just looking for some consistency from the media and apparently from you as well…not holding my breath, though.
Why don’t you let me define my opinions and you define yours. OK/
I’m sorry, but I’m going to define your behavior all I want and you can run your spin machine all you want. You completely distorted the message of this opinion piece and you’re going to complain about having your own opinions defined by someone else? What a joke.
Your opinions are never much more than twisting someone else’s words. In my opinion you rarely make a substantive point filled with real data. It is all hate filled attacks.
Well your opinion doesn’t erase reality, so there is that important fact.
I don’t know… but it seems to me that anyone that presumes as much as you do about other posters has some “reality” issues.
Read. They’re saying it is important but that the R biased 20 best/worst report doesn’t discuss it enough.
Wait until you see the number of small businesses cutting employee hours to fall under the minimum threshhold for mandatory health care coverage. 2013 will be another year of economic stagnation.
There is more happening than just the threshold. The so-called tax credit for small business is not all that easy to qualify for. The credit depends alot on your workforce make-up. Hire a part-timer or a Vet on VA insurance or a retiree on medicare and they all reduce the amount of tax credit you qualify for. It deincentivizes hiring folks like them..
Have you seen your w2 yet. Your companies contribution on your behalf is going on it… starting this year for some, next year its mandatory for all.
Happens all the time anyway, might increase slightly.
Its already started.
And the first thing the media can look at is the predatory affect of speculators on Maine’s economy. Speculators have driven the price of a barrel of oil up to $91 + today. It cost about $18 to get it out of the ground and the US has become an oil exporting nation. Can you imagine the effect on our economy if gas slipped below $2 a gallon and heating oil too? Then there is the ignorance of all of our elected local officials, Republican and Democratic. There are almost no medical research or Bio- tech companies in this state. Mass has many more of these companies and no way to absorb more, a new hire will have to drive 2 hrs one way to afford a home near Boston or Cambridge. Don’t you think that Maine could offer these companies a greater quality of life, cheaper housing, and more cultural and recreational experiences than a highly paid worker in these industries can get now in Mass? You betcha!
Are you claiming that the speculators profit by as much as $73 per barrel? I am having trouble with your math. Help me out please.
Depends on how they handle their futures contracts as you should know. They make a profit in differentials at the time of losing or before. Of course not the entire $73 or whatever, but they do adversely affect the spot price of crude.
I understand what the role is for speculators. I understand why they are good boggey man for politicians. I also understand why President Obama can trash talk them and not do anything about them.
They don’t get the full $73 in their own pocket, but they benefit from the higher price.
Hasn’t Maine had a lower unemployment rate than the national average since 2007?
Very seldom do I even bother to read an editorial written by a staff editor of the bdn because they are so liberally slanted to pick out the actual facts from all the spin is painful but to say there are only 51,000 unemployed in Maine is laughable 49% of this state is on the take and 51% are making to take care of the the takers.We have the highest rate of welfare per cap in the country.And no seniors that have worked and paid there dues to society are not the takers the lazy layabouts are who I refer to are those who have it so good on the Maine welfare roles that they will never go get jobs as long as we allow them to get away with it.For a working family to have the same benefits as some one on the dole they would have to make 30$ an hour.As an employer in this state with matching taxes, workers comp, liability ins and unemployment insurance it cost me 1$ for every 1$ in payroll .So in order for me to give my employees the same pay as someone on the take it would cost me 60$ an hour.
Thats why we are worst in the country for business and #1 for welfare.Thats why people are coming from all over the country to take advantage of our system.
A serious discussion would begin with a discussion of the actual agenda of the new Democratic majorities and the criteria for success or failure. There has been, for example, an enormous mass of empirical and theoretical study of the effects of minimum wage legislation since 1947. An analysis would show some awareness of this material. It has not and will not.