BANGOR, Maine — A man serving 30 years for murder has asked U.S. District Court Judge John Woodcock to order officials at the Maine State Prison in Warren to allow him practice Satanism with other inmates.

Current Department of Corrections policy allows Joshua Cookson, 33, of York to practice Satanism in his cell. He is seeking to have Satanism recognized as a religion within the Maine prison system so he and others may worship in a group setting in the activities building, where group practices of other religions take place at the Maine State Prison in Warren. The group practice of Satanism is allowed in federal prisons, according to Cookson.

Cookson was convicted in June 2000 by a York County jury of murdering Robin Rainvill, 21, of Portsmouth, N.H., on Jan. 14, 1999, at Cookson’s tiny mobile home, according to a previously published report. The jury found that Cookson fired 13 shots, stopping once to reload while he and Rainville were playing with a rifle after drinking and taking drugs.

Prison officials have denied Cookson’s repeated requests for group worship since June 2009, when he first filed an internal grievance over the matter. Former DOC Commissioner Martin Magnusson in September 2009 denied Cookson’s request because “Satanism materials and the practice of Satanism are a threat to the safety, security and the orderly management of the facility.”

Cookson sued Magnusson in June 2010 in U.S. District Court in Bangor alleging that by not recognizing Satanism as a religion, the DOC was violating his 1st Amendment right to freedom of religion. Cookson, who is acting as his own attorney, paid the $350 filing fee by check, according to court documents. The complaint was amended last year to substitute the name of Joseph Ponte, the current commissioner, for Magnusson’s name.

U.S. Magistrate Judge Margaret Kravchuk issued her recommended ruling granting the DOC’s motion for summary judgement on Jan. 4. She found that the commissioner’s denial of Cookson’s request, which cited concern security concerns, did not violate Cookson’s constitutional rights.

“If you accept the commissioner’s finding that the practice of Satanism, as commonly understood, poses an institutional danger to the security of the prison, Cookson’s request to convene group rituals based, however loosely, on the religious practice of Satanism could properly be denied,” Kravchuck wrote. “Cookson remains free to practice his individual religion.”

Cookson filed his objection to her ruling on Jan. 20. So far, he has not requested a hearing before Woodcock, who will issue a final decision after he has reviewed all the documents in the case. There is no timeline under which he must issue a decision. If Woodcock rules against him, Cookson could appeal to the 1st U.S. District Court of Appeals in Boston.

Cookson is not the first inmate to sue the DOC over religious practices. In June 2008, Kravchuk recommended a suit filed by American Indians be dismissed after a group of 10 inmates filed a lawsuit seeking access to a sweat lodge, powwows and ceremonial food and music. Although, they lost the lawsuit, the following year Magnusson issued a revised policy concerning religious practices in the state’s prisons.

As of Feb. 19, 2009, the Department of Corrections recognized nine groups who were allowed to have weekly worship services as a group. As listed in the religious services policy for the DOC, They are: Buddhist, Christian, Hindu, Jehovah’s Witness, Judaism, Muslim, Native American, Pagan and Wicca.

Prisoners may have holy books such as Bibles and Qurans and religious publications, including journals and religious calendars, and items such as prayer rugs and shawls in their cells. Attending group worship services, however, is a privilege that must be earned. Prisoners who are in solitary confinement or restricted to their cells due to behavioral issues may not attend.

The items that can be worn and used in worship also are spelled out in the policy. For example, necklaces displaying a cross, crucifix, Star of David or other religious symbol must be on approved “breakaway” material. The same is true for rosaries and prayer beads used by Buddhists, Muslims, Indians, Pagans and Wiccans.

A yarmulke, the skullcap worn by Jews, as well as the kufi and hajib, worn by male and female followers of Islam, respectively, may not obscure a prisoner’s face, the policy states. Prayer rugs used by Muslims and Indians also may be used for individual worship.

The policy also spells out what items may be used in group worship. Cookson argued in his complaint and other court filings that he is seeking to use items such as candles, incense and bells. Those items are allowed to be used in group worship by religions recognized in the policy, Cookson said in court documents.

The Associated Press contributed to the this report.

Join the Conversation

85 Comments

  1. This man will get his wish because somehow there is a law that will be found and cited that shows his rights are being violated. 

    Fair is Fair, Maine State Prison has already apparently admitted that Satanism is a religion and that this inmate has a right to practice it. If Muslims or Christians can gather in public then why cant Satanists? 

    That being said, I dont think this murderer should have to many rights or that anyone should care very much that he may be being discriminated against.

    1. Yes a federal law insures his right to practice his religion, but the prison still has a right to consider matters of security, which may include security of allowing groups together in the prison. Otherwise anything allowed to other religions in prison, must also be allowed to Satanists.
      It is the Religious Land Use and Institutionalized Persons Act of 2000. It was passed unanimously by both the Senate and  House of Representatives and supported by both Republicans and Democrats, supported by the Religious Right, and the ACLU.  It has passed court tests up to and including the Supreme Court.

      1. So in this case the Prison can show that he is allowed to practice his religion in accordance to his rights and yet also say that if he is allowed to practice it around other people he might become a security threat?
        Lets be clear, I think the guy is trying to get special treatment and is practicing a so-called religion. Im just curious about what his rights were in the matter.

        1. Note that the article already says that he is allowed to practice his religion in his cell.

          Now the security issue is about the group he may want to work with, it has little to do with what religion we are talking about. If the prison administration considers that this group of individual prisoners might be a security risk, then they would have good reason to deny them to right to get together. Security is a legitimate concern of the Prison officials, but it would have to be the group as a problem, and not the religion they were following.

          Regardless of whether you consider his religion real or not, religion seems to be helpful as far as helping prisoners, often improving their behavior. Remember also the carrot and the stick is a method of controlling behavior. If  the prisoners behaves he may be allowed some extras, but if he breaks the rule, they have something that they could take away for awhile. If a prisoner has nothing to lose, then you have very little control over him. Control is difficult enough when you consider that the prisoners out number the guards many times and have plenty of time to think up games to play on the staff.

  2. Actually all religions espouse violence, they always have from throughout history to the present day.  I don’t know how Satanism could be more violent on many levels than the religious wars that are taking place around the world today.

    1. Sorry but I do not agree that religions adopt or endorse (espouse) violence but the radical practitioners do who warp religious messages to suit their idealistic needs.  Their zealous actions in name of their religion espouse hate and violence.   

    2. In the Bible, just the idea that you will be cast forever into the fiery pits of Hell if you don’t believe in the imaginary sky wizard sounds pretty violent to me. In the Qu’ran, all non-believers are considered infidels and must be killed…Satanism sounds pretty tame to me.

      1. Who knows, maybe when you die, there is nothing but a hole in the ground waiting for us. I guess that’s why they call it “faith.” The belief in something that you do not have physical proof of. Each one of us has a choice to be a believer in something, and limited time on this planet. So we will all know the truth in the end. There’s no sure things in life other than death and taxes.

      2. Couldn’t agree more Tom!  But you forget…..when people preach the Bible, they only pick and choose the good parts, you know, the one’s that work for them, then ignore that rest, or rationalize the rest! lol

        1. The entire bible was chosen that way. There were dozens of “books” thta were not included in the bible because the catholic church didn’t want them included. Yet other “christian” religions use the bible to say they they are correct and all other religions are wrong…

      3. And if Maine’s next commissioner feels the same way – that Christianity promotes any kind of violence, etc. – he will have the right to ban Christian worship as a result of this judge’s ruling.

  3. I feel the biggest thing wrong with our legal system is that once sentenced to prison you still retain your civil rights.  I can see making accommodation for physical disabilities but you should lose all others.  A cell and basic nutrient is all that should be provided.  If prison wasn’t nicer than home maybe potential criminals would think twice!

    1. I don’t know why he wants to worship the Devil, he will have plenty of opportunity when he gets there!

        1. Oh?  Then what exactly is Satanism about?  You do realize that Satan is the proper name of the devil?

          I’m looking at Webster’s New World College Dictionary:  “Satanism n. worship of Satan: esp., the principles and rites of a cult which travesties Christian ceremonies-Satanist”

          1. Hardly.  If I had used the Bible, you would say something derogatory about that, too.  Since the Webster’s Dictionary is generally considered the standard in word meanings, I quoted it.

          1. Actually, he is right. Satanism worships the self. They invoke the name of satan for power, but they don’t really “worship” satan…

          2. Yeah, Jesus kept saying he was not doing things or actions for himself. Christians should be worshipping others, the creations of a creator to respect the creator, respecting others in general and sharing. Jews should also respect others and share according to Moses’ law, but since most people seem to worship themselves and think greedily, and usurp people, I would think a lot more people are satanists than known or thought of if satanism worships the self.

            However, there is a little self in all to have confidence to accomplish things for the greater good of the community.

    2. Although I understand the frustration that might lead a logical person to say these things, I sure hope you aren’t serious.  

      We should strip people of civil rights? People want to get into jail because its like checking into the Hilton?  Please…

      And, no, I don’t think this guy should get permission o practice satanism publicly.  I already believe that there are laws protecting his civil right to practice his religion peacefully, so he must not be practicing peacefully.

      1. I do believe (and I am a logical person) that a person should be stripped of their civil rights if they are sent to prison.  And for many it is indeed much nicer than  home (or much nicer than being homeless), cooked meals three times a day, cable tv, a gym and laundry service…..hey, it’s not the Hilton by my standards, but you have to look at where some of these people are coming from.

    3.  If prison wasn’t nicer than home maybe potential criminals would think twice!Please.Are you speaking from experience,or just blabbing? Because if your speaking from experience and to you prison really is nicer than home,when are you signing up for a sentence??

    1. If you want to awaken all of humanity, then awaken all of yourself. If you want to eliminate the suffering in the world, then eliminate all that is dark and negative in yourself. Truly, the greatest gift you have to give is that of your own self-transformation.” —Lao Tzu

  4. The time has come to take back our contry from the loonies , This conrty has gone to far with this liberal bull crap, and if left up to the idiots incharge we will not be able to walk out of our homes without being armed to the teeth, it’s good to care and offer help to those who really need  it, but we’ve gone way to far !  

      1. Another liberal heard from, try reading it before  you Jerks messed with it by adding amendments until all the right go to the depraived and the jackels that live off the working class ,it’s pepole like you that have ruined this county.[ there tedjohn are you happy now.]

          1. Um, you obviously can’t tell the difference between the constitution and federal laws… You might want to look up the differences… you also might want to learn how to write and spell correctlyt.

    1. You mean those loonies us Americans call the founding fathers?  I’m sure to someone such as yourself,they were a bunch of liberal loonies too. Lay off the Faux News tea for a bit.

  5. Another reason we should employ the gas chamber or the needle for murder and these crazie’s
    think that its their right, after killing someone. Just amazing

  6. Questionable, but a prison would be the most appropriate place to practice Satanism (if anyplace is).

  7. These Bottom Feeders have nothing else to do but clog our Justice system with trivial slop. He gave up ALL of his “rights” when he denied his victum ALL of theirs. Get it?  Do the right thing and put this thing to death.

    1. i whole heartedly agree. religious beliefs have no place in the courts or in this country… ohh wait what country do we live in?
      gotta love equal enforcement of rights.

      1. So be it! I would give no quarter. Leathal injection is too good for this Ilk, throw his blind arse in a dark cold cell and let him rot to death.

  8. I’ve read the posts here, and the main point is being missed. Part of what the jails are suspposed to do, is maintain safety and security for the inmate population. I know, I know, there is a lot of violence in prisons. However, most of that violence stems from the inmates desire to employ a rank system amongst thmeselves, and the violent enforcement of that rank system by the inmates themselves. The fact that the prison system his handcuffed by regulations that allow so much freedom within the prisions for the inmates, helps that violence to take place. That being said, the problem the state faces is that by giving permission for this “religion” to be practiced means that they are giving permission for a form of violence to take place. It’s a can of worms that they most likely do not want opened.

    1. No I think in this case (murder) the state is handcuffed by the simple fact it no longer has the means to impose the correct sentence ie: Capitol Punishment.  In other words, deprive the murderer of the same rights he deprived his victum of and that was LIFE. The only permission the killer deserves is to hang himself.

  9. If the inmate had an ounce of common sense he would have petitioned the Commissioner of Corrections to create a Democrat or Republican Study group and would have been able to practice his Satanism with the official blessing of the DOC.
    Unfortunately for Maine voters and taxpayers there is a reason Maine prisons have been characterized as electronic cesspools that do nothing more than produce more vicious and competent criminals.
    It cost Maine taxpayers $35,00.00  to warehouse 1 inmate for 1 year.
    90 % of all the inmates in Maine prisons will eventually be released back into Maine communities.
    75 out of 100 of these inmates will return to prison usually within 2 years.
    The Maine Prison Corporation is a bust.
    and Maine voters and taxpayers own this system! Where is your outrage?
    On a lighter note we brought attorney John DeCamp to speak at Bates College in 2001 about his book THE FRANKLIN COVERUP
    The book details politicians and the head of corporations in Nebraska practicing ritual child sex abuse(satanism) that included murdering the children. The book exposed the coverup of this ring by the FBI  and local police.
    google           john decamp the franklin coverup

      1. thanks for your support C

        Thirteen Techniques for Truth Suppression
        by David Martin

        Strong, credible allegations of high-level criminal activity can bring
        down a government. When the government lacks an effective, fact-based
        defense, other techniques must be employed. The success of these
        techniques depends heavily upon a cooperative, compliant press and a
        mere token opposition party.
        13.

        Change the subject. This technique includes creating and/or reporting a distraction.

  10. In his own cell by himself, fine. With other inmates, no! He belongs alone on death row. Key word with other inmates. That would lead to gang violence. After all we already know the quality of individuals we are dealing with. Convicted murderers who admittedly want to worship evil. Not wanting to worship a higher or better way. End of story. Solitary confinement is all a murderer deserves and I suppose food.

  11. LOL, bored inmate with too much time on his hands. If they gave him his way then he would find something else to demand. It’s a never ending process and this guy has a 30 year sentence. A goodly number of these inmates only go to religious meetings only to share info, gossip, and contraband.

  12. I don’t believe inmates should have any rights whatsoever, HOWEVER, we can’t pick and choose, “ok, you can practice these certain religions (because we like them), but we aren’t going to let you practice the ones we don’t like”.   Can’t have it both ways people!

    1. You might want to go back and read the article. The issues isn’t his religion, it is the gathering for the “service” as well as the articles required to perform satanic rituals (blood, knives, fire…)

      1. Well, I did go back and re-read it like you suggested, and there was no mention of blood or knives, I surely would have caught that, if not the first time, surely the second time.  And as for candles, I can’t imagine they would be allowed for anyone.  And yes I realize the issue isn’t the religion it is the gathering to practice it.  So let me word my point a different way…..If he would be allowed (based on his behavior, or his level of privileges) to attend a catholic group worship, then he should be allowed to attend his stupid Satanic gathering.  I don’t think than any inmate should be given the right to go practice any religion with others personally, but my point is we can’t have it both ways, either they have the right to gather or they don’t. 

      2. Let’s see, Catholicism uses candles (fire) and I am guessing that Catholics are allowed to practice their particular brand of religion in prison. And Christians in general practice symbolic cannibalism. Wicca, probably the most peaceful of religions, also uses knives, (symbolizes male energy) and fire, (one of the four universal elements) and they are allowed to practice their ceremonies.

        Just sayin’.

  13. Satan is a fictional character! Worshiping fictional characters is silly. Worshiping anything is silly.

    This story makes me laugh.

  14. If I were him I ask for some sort of pension. The head of the turnpike kept his. It won’t hurt to ask…

  15. This article is basically meaningless because “Satanism” is a culturally loaded term with many different practical/theological meanings.. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Satanism

    It is funny how everyone seems to have an opinion about something most people know almost nothing about.

  16. Cookson is in prison for murder, he will be meeting the devil soon (I hope) and he can fall on his knees there and do as he wishes, for now I think keeping it away from of a large group of prisoners is great with me!

  17. Perhaps an amendment to the constitution needs to be added?  Once a person has killed another person,been fairly tried,convicted and sent to prison,then that person loses all of his human rights.If you arent going to follow the rules,especially the biggie,,{I.E.killing someone thereby depriving THEM  of THEIR right to be alive},than you should not get any benefits or special treatment from said society.You dont get rewarded twice,by doing the wrong thing.Where was his concern about “rights” when he murdered another human being? He should be treated the way he chose to treat another citizen of the world.He made up his own rules,inflicted them on someone else who had no choice and changed their life permanently.No special treatment for murderers!

    1. Very well said but to reiterate, if convicted of a crime against your fellow man, you waiver your own civil and human rights of equal value. Ie: If you deprive someone of “Life, Liberty, and pursuit of Happiness” you are deprived the same and so in this case Life. Therefore, no Amendment is needed, just reestablish the death penalty for Capitol Crimes and appoint Justices who are willing to impose it.

      1. Ok, great. Let’s do it your way. No civil rights (personally I don’t think this is WJWD) but Ok. Now, what about the hundreds of people who have been exhonerated over the past few years because they were wrongly prosecuted. Not only were they deprived of their liberty, but according to you and those who think like you they would also have been deprived of their right to worship, and even lose their lives due to someone else’s crime and the rush to judgment made by very fallible judges and juries. Scary world you guys live in.

        1. First of all where do you get the idea there are Hundreds exonerated over the past few years because they were wrongly prosecuted.  Sounds like the usual exaggerated cry of the bleeding heart religious  zealots.  Secondly you do it again when when you try to make us all believe the judges RUSH to judgment. When was the last time any  one was convicted of a capitol crime then executed within 10 years of their conviction. They have years of appeals and litigation to prove their guilt or innocence.  I also believe that if a convicted person is exonerated that same person’s hands are not 100% clean of the crime.  But you are right in the fact that Judges are fallible that’s because they are human.  The world I live in is not nearly as scary as a world that deprives society of protection from those who would commit a crime such as murder.  This isn’t a    quest of religious right it is a demand for Justice.  Well maybe you are right after all, OK  “Slay him with the Jawbone of an Ass”!

  18. If the judge determines that Satanism can be banned in the prison system due to an arbitrary opinion of one or two individuals, then it will set a precedent that will allow the restriction of any religious practice, including Christianity, based on the opinion of one or two people in Maine’s correctional facilities. That is, if Magnusson is succeeded by someone who feels Christianity is false or a problem, that individual will have the authority to ban Christian worship throughout the Maine correctional system due to judicial precedent.

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *