WASHINGTON — A weak labor market provided energy Sunday for criticism of President Barack Obama, with the campaign of presumptive Republican challenger Mitt Romney contending that the president’s lack of executive leadership experience undermines his policies.
The unemployment rate rose to 8.2 percent in May as the Labor Department reported just 69,000 new jobs, the fewest in nearly a year. In appearances on Sunday’s news shows, Obama campaign officials cast the dismal gains in employment as evidence of growth in jobs for the 27th straight month while acknowledging that it was not at an acceptable pace.
The Obama campaign said Congress had not acted on initiatives that would lead to more hiring of teachers and construction workers. However, Romney campaign adviser Eric Fehrnstrom put the blame on Obama and touted Romney’s experience running the 2002 Winter Olympics and his tenure as Massachusetts governor.
“It’s not that we don’t think that this president is trying. I think he is. It’s just that his policies are not working,” Fehrnstrom said. “We gave the keys to the largest economy in the world to a person who did not have any prior executive leadership experiences.”
Stephanie Cutter, deputy campaign manager for Obama, said an estimated 1 million jobs would result if Congress approved Obama’s job proposals.
“They need to get off their hands and stop rooting for failure,” she said. “That’s really what’s going on right now.”
Massachusetts Gov. Deval Patrick, a Democrat and an Obama supporter, and Obama senior adviser David Axelrod also criticized lawmakers.
“What we have right now is a Congress which has decided that there is a political advantage in stymieing this president, putting ideology ahead of country,” Patrick said.
Axelrod said: “These are the architects of obstruction, and now they’re complaining about the pace of the recovery. They should put down their political hats and join us and help solve these problems.”
Ohio’s Republican governor, John Kasich, said Obama had failed to lead in what he called the dysfunctional environment of Washington and called on the president to stop blaming Congress.
“I can’t blame the legislature for things not getting done. I have to accept responsibility,” Kasich said. “I don’t think they know what they want to do.”
With Republicans controlling the House and Democrats the majority party in the Senate, the cooperation required to send a bill to the president might prove to be elusive in an election year.
The Obama campaign’s criticism of Congress on Sunday and its attacks last week on Romney’s tenure as governor of Massachusetts marked a shift of attention from the Republican’s work at Bain Capital, the private equity firm he co-founded in Boston. Republicans have argued that the anti-Bain strategy shows that Obama is against free enterprise. Some Democrats too have been critical of the Obama campaign’s Bain strategy and its criticism on Romney’s business career.
Former President Bill Clinton said on CNN last Thursday that Romney had had a “sterling business career” but added that Obama and Romney offer dramatically different economic proposals.
“It’s my opinion, anyway, that the Obama proposals and the Obama record would be far better for the American economy and most Americans than those that Gov. Romney has laid out. That’s what the election ought to be about,” Clinton said.
Asked Sunday if the Bain criticism had not worked and that the campaign was stepping back from it, Axelrod said no to both questions and asserted that criticizing Romney’s business record was one part of an overall argument about Romney’s approach to the nation’s economy.
Patrick addressed the same point and said of Romney: “He had a terrific career creating wealth. There is very little evidence that either in the public or in the private sector he’s had the terrific career of creating jobs.”
Axelrod appeared on CBS’ “Face the Nation.” Fehrnstrom and Cutter appeared on ABC’s “This Week” while Patrick and Kasich were on NBC’s “Meet the Press.”
The only leadership that Romney’s shown so far is the leadership neccessary to close plant’s and business’s simply because they are not getting the support from their customer’s and suppliers due to an economy that is being held hostage by the financial service’s and banking sector’s. The economic meltdown, that was caused by these same financial service’s and bank’s in the first place, is being aggravated, and indeed being used as a political weapon, in order for these same sector’s to wring more, if there are any, concessions out of both the House and Senate. Romney’s constant whining and crying about the Dodd-Frank Act, and it’s predecessor, Glass-Stegall of 1934, just makes the need for these same Big Business abuser’s of the public trust to be held more accountable, and their ‘Oh whoa is us if we don’t get our concession’s’ cryer’s held to the same standard. The mere fact that Romney, Boehner, Cantor and McConnell are all crying in unison should tell everybody, as if we can’t figure it out for ourselves anyway, that this constant beating up on the President is nothing more than their trying to bully the public’s opinion into believe that he’s responsible for this mess.
To Obama’s credit, he has admitted responsibility. To being responsible for the economy that was left to him and what he’s doing to fix it, the bailout’s (that saved Detroit as the prime example), the financial service’s reform’s that are now keeping the Bank’s from pushing the American public into even deeper financial debt, to being responsible for investing and expanding the clearly needed investment’s in energy and small business’s that no one can argue that’s needed (even if it means losing the investment like in Solyndra when the idea just didn’t work, which is what the free enterprise system is all about, in case Romney has forgotten) and in being responsible for the ‘not that big surprise’ issue of realizing the our returning veteran’s, like those that came back after WW 2 and Vietnam, and the Cold War, have, and are indeed, the key to our recovery by using those talent’s, idea’s and skill’s that they learned over the last 11 years thru actual use, not some Ivy League prep school bullying gang’s bragging session’s.
No, I’ll admit the Obama may not have done the best possible job. But this much I do know. Given the option’s available at the time, and the foreseeable event’s that happened (that no one wanted to take responsibility for) I think he did as good a job as was possible given the support and resource’s that were available to him at the time. That the House, and the Senate Minority to a large degree, decided to just go and sulk, and refuse to even try to help because they didn’t get their way (and that their campaign contributor’s are now more than clearly visibly responsible for) is also something that he’s responsible for. So is Congress. Obama’s stood up and taken his ‘hit’s’. Now it’s time for Romney and both House’s of Congress to take their’s. And that’s what The Office of The President’s all about, taking the ‘hit’ publicly, responsibly and moving on toward recovery and improvement. So far all I’ve heard from Romney, and the rest of the GOP’rs is ‘Boo hoo ! Obama’s the bad guy’. Mitt, get over it and put your plan and your money where YOUR money where your mouth is, not your Super PAC’s.