WASHINGTON — The State Department said Tuesday it never concluded that the consulate attack in Libya stemmed from protests over an American-made video ridiculing Islam, raising further questions about why the Obama administration used that explanation for more than a week after assailants killed the U.S. ambassador and three other Americans.

The revelation came as new documents suggested internal disagreement over appropriate levels of security before the attack, which occurred on the 11th anniversary of the Sept. 11 terror attacks on the U.S.

Briefing reporters ahead of a hotly anticipated congressional hearing Wednesday, State Department officials provided their most detailed rundown of how a peaceful day in Benghazi devolved into a sustained attack that involved multiple groups of men armed with weapons such as machine guns, rocket-propelled grenades and mortars over an expanse of more than a mile.

But asked about the administration’s initial — and since retracted — explanation linking the violence to protests over an anti-Muslim video circulating on the Internet, one official said, “That was not our conclusion.” He called it a question for “others” to answer, without specifying. The officials spoke on condition of anonymity because they weren’t authorized to speak publicly on the matter, and provided no evidence that might suggest a case of spontaneous violence or angry protests that went too far.

The attack has become a major issue in the presidential campaign, featuring prominently in Republican candidate Mitt Romney’s latest foreign policy address on Monday. He called it an example of President Barack Obama’s weakness in foreign policy matters, noting: “As the administration has finally conceded, these attacks were the deliberate work of terrorists.”

The administration counters that it has provided its best intelligence on the attack, and that it refined its explanation as more information came to light. But five days after the attack, Obama’s ambassador to the United Nations, Susan Rice, gave a series of interviews saying the administration believed the violence was unplanned and that extremists with heavier weapons “hijacked” the protest and turned it into an outright attack.

She has since denied trying to mislead Congress, and a concurrent CIA memo that was obtained by The Associated Press cited intelligence suggesting the demonstrations in Benghazi “were spontaneously inspired by the protests at the U.S. Embassy in Cairo” and “evolved into a direct assault” on the diplomatic posts by “extremists.”

Alongside defining the nature of the Benghazi attack, Congress is looking into whether adequate security was in place.

According to an email obtained Tuesday by the AP, the top State Department security official in Libya told a congressional investigator that he had argued unsuccessfully for more security in the weeks before Ambassador Chris Stevens, a State Department computer specialist and two former Navy SEALs were killed. But department officials instead wanted to “normalize operations and reduce security resources,” he wrote.

Eric Nordstrom, who was the regional security officer in Libya, also referenced a State Department document detailing 230 security incidents in Libya between June 2011 and July 2012 that demonstrated the danger there to Americans.

Nordstrom is among the witnesses set to testify Wednesday before the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee. According to the panel’s chairman, Rep. Darrell Issa, R-Calif., and the head of a subcommittee, Rep. Jason Chaffetz, R-Utah, the State Department refused repeated requests to provide more security for U.S. diplomats in Libya.

“You will note that there were a number of incidents that targeted diplomatic missions and underscored the GoL’s (government of Libya) inability to secure and protect diplomatic missions,” Nordstrom’s email stated.

“This was a significant part of (the diplomatic) post’s and my argument for maintaining continued DS (diplomatic security) and DOD (Department of Defense) security assets into Sept/Oct. 2012; the GoL was overwhelmed and could not guarantee our protection.

“Sadly, that point was reaffirmed on Sept. 11, 2012, in Benghazi,” he added.

Nordstrom said the incidents demonstrated that security in Libya was fragile and could degrade quickly. He added that Libya was “certainly not an environment where (the diplomatic) post would be directed to ‘normalize’ operations and reduce security resources in accordance with an artificial timetable.”

Nordstrom also said diplomats in Libya were told not to request an extension of a 16-member special operations military team that left in August, according to an official of the Oversight panel. The official was not authorized to discuss the matter publicly and thus spoke only on the condition of anonymity.

The State Department has said it never received a request to extend the military team beyond August, and added that its members were replaced with a security team that had the same skills.

Democrats on the Oversight committee were sharply critical of Issa, the chairman, calling his investigation “extremely partisan.”

“The chairman and his staff failed to consult with Democratic members prior to issuing public letters with unverified allegations, concealed witnesses and refused to make one hearing witness available to Democratic staff, withheld documents obtained by the committee during the investigation, and effectively excluded Democratic committee members from joining a poorly planned congressional delegation to Libya,” a Democratic memo said.

It said in the previous two years, House Republicans voted to cut the Obama administration’s requests for embassy security by some $459 million.

The Democratic memo said Nordstrom told committee investigators that he sent two cables to State Department headquarters in March and July 2012 requesting additional diplomatic security agents for Benghazi, but that he received no responses.

He stated that Charlene Lamb, the deputy assistant secretary for international programs, wanted to keep the number of U.S. security personnel in Benghazi artificially low and that Lamb believed the Benghazi facilities did not need any diplomatic security special agents because there was a residential safe haven to fall back to in an emergency.

Issa had a phone conversation Monday with Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton about the committee’s investigation.

The FBI is still investigating the attack. Clinton also has named a State Department review panel to look into the security arrangements in Libya.

Join the Conversation

7 Comments

  1. How about that?  You mean it wasn’t caused by the video after all?  Someone should probably inform Sec of State Clinton, who spent an inordinate amount of time addressing the video, which lent credence to the impression that it was the driving force behind the violence in Egypt and Libya.

    More and more backpedaling by the Most. Corrupt. Administration. Ever.

  2. My hearing must be going bad…..I could have sworn that Ms. Clinton, Ms. Rice & President Obama repeatedly spoke of and apologized for this pitifully done video and the violence and the protests that the VIDEO instigated for several days…..and even in the death of an American Ambassador & 3 other American soldiers/citizens and while the American Flag was burned in the streets they promised that the ones responsible for the VIDEO would be held accountable…..this President & his administration is, well those thoughts are better left unsaid, but this absurd statement from the State Dept. is an absolute example of a poorly run administration with inadequate defense oversight and adds to the dilemma of 4 more years….we cannot, nor can our interests at home or in the Middle East afford another 4 years of this President….Crazy..

    1.  BRAVO!!!!  You hit the nail right on the head!  When the “three stooges” tried to place the blame on the video it literally made me sick to my stomach.  It was plainly obvious the Obama didn’t want to risk losing votes from the anti-war crowd in the election by actually placing the blame ON THE MURDERERS from the very start, and making it clear that the murderers will be caught even if he had to send in troops to start kicking arse and taking down names.

      Any president that cow-tows down to a bunch of maniacal murderers is a weak, ineffectual leader who does not deserve to be the President now, let alone for another 4 years.

  3. Obama didn’t want any distractions getting in the way of his campaign visits and interviews. After all, it was just another “bump in the road”. Can you just imagine if Bush did this? MSNBC would have been running this 24/7 and calling for impeachment. And they are trying to say Romney lies? We are seeing one of the best at it work his sheep and his media.

  4. Just imagine if the Bush administration had tried to conceal a terrorist attack from the American people just a few weeks before the election. The media would have already impeached him and would have run front page headlines from now until the election.

    However, check out MSNBC, the New York Times or the Washington Post and you will find almost nothing about this amazing story. (Note – the Washington Post did a front page story about the claim that Romney had teased a kid in high school some 45 years ago.)

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *