AUGUSTA, Maine — Most Maine schools aren’t meeting goals set by the federal No Child Left Behind Act, according to an annual report released Thursday by the Maine Department of Education.
The low scores came as no surprise but are based on a “flawed federal accountability system,” said Education Commissioner Stephen Bowen.
Lois Kilby-Chesley, president of the Maine Education Association, agreed, and said the test scores don’t give Maine schools enough credit for their above-average achievements.
According to the data released Thursday, just 204 of 584 Maine schools, or 35 percent, are labeled as meeting adequate yearly progress goals under NCLB, an improvement from the 30 percent of schools who met those goals last year. While the number of schools meeting standards increased, more Maine schools were added to a list of Continuous Improvement Priority Schools because they failed to meet goals for two consecutive years, according to the department.
While officials in Maine have long said there is no excuse for schools not making progress, they said Thursday that the standards demanded by NCLB are too steep and within two years will result in virtually no schools making the cut. Because of that, Maine and several other states are awaiting approval of waiver applications that allow increased flexibility under the program.
“Our schools are not doing worse this year than last year, but you wouldn’t know that from the way federal [Adequate Yearly Progress] lists are calculated,” said Bowen in a press release. “This is why we, like most other states, have requested flexibility to do accountability differently.”
The Bush-era NCLB, which is now called the Elementary and Secondary Education Act, includes increasingly rigid standards and requires 100 percent of students to be proficient in reading and math by 2014. This year, NCLB requires 75 percent of third- through eighth-graders to be proficient in reading and 70 percent proficient in Math. At the high school level, 78 percent of students must be proficient in reading this year and 66 percent in math.
“As it stands now, I think we’re still on track to have 100 percent of our schools not making adequate yearly progress by 2013-14,” said Department of Education spokesman David Connerty-Marin. “The expectations are just unrealistic.”
Kilby-Chesley said the NCLB rankings ignore that Maine’s eighth-graders ranked 13th in the country in reading, according to the National Assessment of Education Progress scores from last year. In addition, she said 72 percent of third- through eighth-graders were proficient in reading and 63 percent were proficient in math, according to the New England Common Assessment Program.
“It is clear our students are succeeding in schools across the state and at all grade levels. We have the test scores to prove it,” said Kilby-Chesley in a press release. “We need to be looking at the whole picture. One test score is one puzzle piece. With all the pieces put together then, and only then, can you get a clear picture of how a student is doing in school and how the school is performing as a whole.”
Connerty-Marin said there are signs of improvement evident in the data released Thursday, specifically that 46 schools that were underperforming last year have moved out of that category.
“That’s an indicator of some real progress,” he said.
However, 106 schools in Maine have been newly put in “monitor status,” which means that they aren’t meeting the standards for the first time. Under current law, if their scores don’t improve enough next year, they will enter “continuous improvement priority status,” which means they’ll qualify for interventions and resources from the Department of Education.
“All of these labels aside, the bottom line if you look at this data is that we have schools that are not making tremendous progress here,” said Connerty-Marin. “We have a lot of work to do.”
Connerty-Marin said the state hopes to have its Elementary and Secondary Education Act waiver application approved by the end of this month. Under Maine’s wide-ranging proposal, schools would be required to reduce the percentage of students not proficient in reading and math by 50 percent over six years. Bowen said the new system emphasizes progress rather than strict benchmarks that schools have to attain regardless of several factors such as their numbers of poor or disabled students.
“We have instances where schools are making dramatic improvements but can’t keep up with the ever-rising federal targets,” Bowen said. “With our waiver, we’ll still set ambitious goals for schools, but realistic ones based on where they are starting.”
But Connerty-Marin said the assessment and accountability program proposed by the state won’t automatically increase Maine’s standing. In fact, he said many schools that are scoring well now could find themselves in lower tiers because while most of their students are performing well, they are not making enough progress with disabled or financially disadvantaged students.
“I think people will be surprised next year to see some of our higher-performing schools not meeting the standards,” said Connerty-Marin. “It’s going to be a learning curve for everybody, including us.”
School-by-school adequate yearly progress results for 2012-2013 may be found at www.maine.gov/education/pressreleases/ayp/index.html. More information on Maine’s NCLB flexibility request may be found at www.maine.gov/doe/accountability.



Lol at the title of this article. NCLB standards were meant to be impossible to reach. Most schools nationally aren’t meeting the standards. By next year 100% of all students are expected to be proficient in all areas, as well as a 100% graduation rate. Give me a break.
Thus it is a stupid, flawed system. Impossible to attain, so ridiculous. Don’t complain about an accurate headline, complain about a stupid standard.
Pretty tough to meet those standards when it’s doubtful that 100% of the teachers could qualify as proficient in all areas.
So nice of you to throw your uninformed opinion into the fray. Yes, you are entitled to an opinion, and yes the First Amendment gives you the right to voice that opinion no matter how ignorant it makes you look considering you that you have no data, facts, or figures to support your statement.
I do have the announcements full of grammatical errors sent home by those teachers and my discussions with teachers who couldn’t do simple math without referring to the answer key. Fortunately for my children they had me to make sure they learned what they needed to know and learned it correctly. Unfortunately, many kids don’t have parents who care or if they do care the parents aren’t capable of teaching and instead they must rely on the unqualified teachers.
A good percentage of us believe that “No Child left behind” is flawed. However- we have kids in our schools who don’t value education because their parents and grandparent don’t or didn’t. They watch TV and play video games all night. If some kids don’t value education and learn very little while they are in school…how we test them isn’t the biggest problem we have is it?
…and some work on the family farm, and some don’t make it to school very often because their drunk/stoned parents kept them up all night while they yelled at eachother.
Good points. How do you teach a hungry, tired, scared, smelly child who would rather be anywhere but in school?
The other night-one of the national news shows featured a sch00l in the south that provided 3 meals a day for their students who needed the help. The kids were even given food to take home for younger siblings as well meals for the weekend. I taught for a few years out of college years ago. I found most teachers care a lot. There are easier jobs out there for the listless.
I would agree 100 percent with that. Also, not all students are on the same page intellectually, nor are they going to be. Give students the tools that can help to make them successful, whatever that may be. Not everyone is going off to college & a good percentage of those who start, do not finish…
The Regional Technology Centers are the best thing that ever happened for many Maine students. Unfortunately our Community Colleges have drifted away from their original mission. There are good well paying jobs in Maine that go unfilled due to a lack of highly skilled machinists and other technology based tradesmen. There are tons of people out there who can’t write a complete sentence, but could machine the guts of a jet engine given the chance.How do we measure that potential in the 7th grade? Isn’t it fun to watch a wealthy doctor admire an 8th grade grad operating an excavator as if it were a concert piano on his property? We all have a gift.
also children learn differently
You’ve hit the nail on the head. Yes, there are some bad teachers but there are ways to deal with them, remediate them or remove them. The biggest problem with both NCLB and Race to the Top is that neither one contains any accountability for the students or parents. The teachers’ job is to teach; the STUDENTS’ job is to LEARN. If the student isn’t in school, makes no effort in school and the school is not supported by the parent, then the chances are pretty good that the student is not going to succeed and, of course, the parents and the student will blame the school. Just like when a student looks at a report card and says “the teacher GAVE me an F.” Did you do your work? No. Did you show up for class? No. Then YOU EARNED that “F.” Motivated students will learn despite having bad teachers. The trick is to find a way to motivate the parents and students and hold THEM accountable for their OWN educational outcomes. They are the ones who have 100% control over those outcomes.
Teacher Priorities:
1: How much money can I make
2. How can I get the best Healthcare Coverage
3. How can I get more time off
4. How can I have a shorter school day
5. How can I be held less accountable
6. Once I get all of these then I’ll teach your kid
Parent Priorities:
1. How much money can I make
2. How can I get the best Healthcare coverage
3. How can I get more time off
4. How can I get the schools to provide a longer school day so I don’t have to provide child care for my children
5. How can I be held less accountable for my children’s behavior.
6. Unless I get all of these, I will blame the school for my kids’ behaviors.
“stand up for the union label…”
Nope, simply pointing out that the primary determinant of whether children succeed or not has not much to do with schools and EVERYTHING to do with parental decisions and actions.
Yet we measure commitment to education by how much we pay our teachers. There are no good teachers and there are no bad teachers. All teachers are identical, or at least that’s how the union demands that we pay them; and we pay them more for doing the same job as long as they can fog a mirror for another year. No wonder 20% of best and brightest need remedial classes just to be able to keep up in college. Imagine what level of understanding the students who don’t go to college have.
Judging by the teacher-bashing posts in this thread, I’d say that many of them are commenting on this article.
Some have more depends more on social class than SAT scores . Having graduate HS. In the top 10 of my class I was not encouraged to go to college . But less ranking kids from upper middle class were. Not talk much about in education do to the bias in society against the poor.
Your analogy falls flat on its face. Paying teachers based on student success is like paying the doctor based on whether or not you lose weight or stop smoking-you’re the only one who can control that. It’s as dumb as paying police based on the amount of crime or paying firemen based on the number of fires they stop before they start. When parents stop making excuses for and enabling their kids to blow of school and not do their work, when parents and students are held accountable for their educational outcomes, then maybe we can talk. Until then, all you’re doing is blowing a bunch of smoke.
All teachers have to do is hold the kids accountable for actually learning instead of continuing to promote them so the teacher won’t look bad. Have they no professional ethics? They put their professional stamp of approval (a high school diploma) on kids who can barely read. But hey, they get summers off, so it’s all good.
The Union label? What a laugh. Maine teachers get fewer dolalrs than teachers in flinty, super-cheap New Hampshire… AND New Hampshire continually kicks Maine’s butt on test scores.
In most civilized states tyeachers can collect Social Security AND teacher’s retirement. here in Maine they must pick one or the other.
Susan Collins had to suggest a law allowing teachers who use their own money for school supplies to be able to deduct that expense from their taxes.
Yeah I know teachers have it so good. Jeeze
Teachers have it so tough, and they’re so underpaid. Yet you never hear of a teacher shortage. Things that make you go hmmm.
But there is a good teacher shortage.
The solution to a lack of good teachers is not to pay the bad teachers more.
So the more you pay them; the better the results. I guess this is why New Jersey schools are so good and Iowa’s so bad
Exactly. When I moved to Maine for New Hampshire, after being HEAVILY RECRUITED BY FOUR SCHOOLS, I ended up taking a $4000 per year pay cut with a 20% per cost of living/tax increase. As for retirement, it isn’t an option-teachers MUST pay into the retirement system PLUS their Social Security earned in other jobs, whether in Maine or other states, will be offset (reduced) by the amount they receive in retirement. Actual retirement pay is approximately 30% of an average of the final three years’ salary. Some golden parachute for those making about $55,000 per year (times 30%) that works out to about $16,500.
Most teachers DO use their own money to purchase supplies, but there is a limit to how much they can deduct ($200); and that deduction is not off the top, it is lumped in with all deductions and only a small percentage is actually deducted.
Anyone who thinks teaching is easy , that teachers are over paid and under worked, I CHALLENGE YOU to put your money where your mouth is and become a teacher.
If that’s the case- why do students who sit right next to each other end up with such varied results? Teachers can’t care more than the parents do…can they?
Sorry about that, my comment was obviously for Noleman2. That was very clever…
You really should do research on the bias of social class in education. Teacher are only human.
I feel you don’t understand what the doctrine of IN LOCO PARENTIS is all about.
“in loco parentis, Latin for “in the place of a parent””[1] refers to the legal responsibility of a person or organization to take on some of the functions and responsibilities of a parent. Originally derived from English common law, it is applied in two separate areas of the law.
First, it allows institutions such as colleges and schools to act in the best interests of the students as they see fit, although not allowing what would be considered violations of the students’ civil liberties
That’s the ticket; be insulting and stereotype all teachers with ideas from Fox and company.
As a property taxpayer WITHOUT children in the local school, I find that the school is very cost effective.. and somehow DOES meet NCLB standards.
NCLB is and always has been a joke. Especially in Maine.
Using the SAT test to see what high school students know was a big mistake. This test was not designed for ALL Juniors to take, it was designed for students intending to go to college. The reality is that not all students are going to college, so not all students should be taking the SATs.
The reason that Maine scores are lower than other states on the SATs is because in other states, not all students take them. In Maine, ALL students take them- including those in Special Education- and all scores are used to generate a school average.
If you think the SAT is irrelevant; how about the many tests required of applicants to trade and technical schools?
Tests are tests, no more b.s.!
There’s comes a point when some kids should have been left behind until they get it right, I’m sick of having to tie shoes for 18 year olds.
So stop! As long as you tie shoes for 18-year-olds, they will not have to learn how to tie their own.
Yeah I tried to quit but I keep tripping over their shoes laces when I have to hold their hands and pencil to help them write their names.
I thought that was the job of the ED TECH’s!!!
I’m happy to say that my child’s school does meet the standards.
That’s good news for children attending schools in communities like yours.I’m sure that you and many other parents had a role in those good scores. However -meeting these standards does not necessarily mean that all of students are having their individual needs met.There is a difference.In addition-many kids attending schools that are deemed “failing” may in fact be receiving an excellent education. We should all be careful not to condemn schools that don’t come out on or near the top.
This includes immigrants from non-english speaking countries, special education students, and Students with disabilities like blindnedss, deafness, and brain damage.
NCLB is a STUPID law, and only stupid people would even attempt to comply with it.
A legacy of our last Republican president.
If you happen to have a child that does have two brain cells to rub together, they are so held up by kids who are on so many meds they couldn’t keep up if they wanted to! This no child left behind means dumbing down so many others. And do they have a “gifted” or “talented” class so the bored ones aren’t so bored..no. So now my “smart” child is acting up in class BECAUSE she is bored, now she has behavioral problems, now they want her tested, now they want her on meds…..b/s. Welcome to the dumbing down of America.
Want to know whats wrong with the “No Child Left Behind” law? Its leaving kids behind…and punishing the very students the law was created to help. How about giving the teachers less paperwork to prove they are not leaving children behind, and free up more time for teachers to PREVENT students from falling behind. Also, there are great teachers out there, and NOT SO GREAT teachers. A teacher has the capacity to either help a child succeed or cause them to fail. Good teachers who care about their students create an environment where kids want to learn. Bad teachers can make kids want to quit school. Less electronic distractions for students is a great idea. Parents, as busy as you are, squeeze a little more family time into your day. Its easy to get caught up in day to day chores. The chores will always be there. Your kid will only be a kid once. And kids, make the most of your education…its awfully hard to live in this society making minimum wage.
Let’s hope that schools, parents, and students will just not cooperate with those foolish tests…
Tests don’t solve any of education’s problems. Issues such as school funding, creative curriculum development, and student participation in their own learning are taking a back seat to testing. Creativity, conceptual thinking, and curiosity can’t be measure by standardized tests. Tests can measure isolated skills, specific facts, and trivia. As Albert Einstein said, ”Not everything that counts can be counted, and not everything that can be counted counts.”If testing were the answer to solving our schools’ problems, these problems would have been solved years ago.
Tests stop real learning. Test companies are inaccurate and lax in their security. Tests are a waste of money and valuable time. In the year 2001 the states collectively spent more than $400 million to test students. At 17 hours long, the Massachusetts Comprehensive Assessment test is longer than the Massachusetts bar exam. Tests place too much emphasis on a single examination. Tests turn schools into stock markets where students are only numbers, teacher are merely technicians, and schools are factories. Tests prepare students for the dull lock-step jobs offered in a global economy.
I take you were a teacher or somehow and educator? I major issue I have is it is not so much how much they learn . Some smart kids do poorly that come from troubled families . The system dose not seem to take into account a child home life. If it dose it is only in a negative way. I was one of those “Stupid” kids . Some times I would get the highest grad on a test . Sometimes I was so far behind. It is more about numbers than preparing kids for the real world . The system is gamed . When I did get an A and most the kids got a D or an F on the test it was scaled . Funny when I got an F it was not scaled. We can not make the upper class kids look bad now can we? . Teachers care but in a failed system.
Is this a surprise? The first few years of required improvements were attainable; not so now.
Teach kids how to learn not what to learn for a test. the system id designed to make a social class system . Strongest correlation between SAT scores is parents income. Schools play games weather they realize it or not it is more about compliance to authority than what they learn . Example kid forget homework in locker but it is done. He is not allowed to bring it in latter. gets a 0 . Another kids fail the test mommy is involved in school helps kid get organized and either helps or dose the homework for the kid. Kid pull off a B+ homework counts as more then the test scores in some classes . Ya think a kid who has a hard homelike has much of a chance to be focused on homework. 3 rd grade science far daddy makes a project for the kid he gets an A . Other kids parents have issues . Has no project and fails. Kids see this and no fault of thier won are treated unfair from the start it destroy thier attitude towards learning. NCLB is more about test scores than dropouts let the poor kid drop out and test scores will go up. Reality is subjective . Many more teacher grew up upper middle class than poor. Just saying it all in perspective. No real incentive for teachers to care much about the ones that might not make it. Just my opinion .
I am a teacher who grew up POOR, and in addition to having compassion for these children, I have something called EMPATHY. A little bit goes a long way. Yes, perception is reality, but please don’t assume someone grew up “upper middle class” simply because they became an educator.
Yes you are probably one or the teachers who would not stand for a science fair that gives an A to a kid who’s parents did it and let another kid cry because he has no project (Knowing full well the kids background.) Not ALL teacher have that empathy . Again I said many more grew up upper middle class than poor. If you have a percentage that differs from what I said please tel me . I see that . You can tell by the way the Blame parents. Most teachers care a great deal . I had a few teachers alone the way that were great also others than made me feel stupid. We have a society that is biased (the welfare mom is a looser) . Teachers are not much different they are just people. One or Two good teachers can make all the difference . Also one or two bad ones can destroy a kids self efficacy esteem and make them feel stupid. Another Myth taught in PSY101 when I took it some 20 years ago was about IQ and it not changing much . Well it can change by as much as 30 points in the real world. The SAT math dose not go beyond Algebra 11 . Most people with average math ability could ace it with as little as 1000 hours study (Thier goes the SAT IQ correlation out the window). A kid would have to have the right encouragement and tools to do that. Yes parenting is a struggle for teachers but is in know way the kids fault just do your best some will surprize you giving the right chance. Myth is kids who come to school slow will not catch up. (some will) most Low income kids come to school having herd about 5 million less works than well to do on average so they are way behind from the start. I do not thin teachers can save the world. Some have no understanding of the struggles of the at risk kids. It s not a perfect world By any means . I never went past algebra 1 my GF had a 4.0 in calculus . She picks on my spelling and wrighting. I think she is a 3rd grader at math compared to me lol. We think it is funny .She might know some formulas but would never understand how numbers fit together Like I do. I am not trying to bash teachers I had some good ones or I would have dropped out of school myself. I also had some bad ones that made me feel stupid. It is very clear to me Betsy Webb did not grow up poor . Just do your best I would .
Reality is subjective based on perspective almost all teachers care. Some do not understand . Even most poor parents care about thier kids. Lower class kids are taught not to make waves middle class are taught to advocate for themselves. Well the kid did not ask for help. Teachers need classes on poverty 101 . Some get it some do not.
ON ONE SIDE OF GOV. WE HAVE NO CHILD LEFT BEHIND…A PROGRAM TO JUDGE AND ANALIZE OUR SCHOOL SYSTEM…THEN WE HAVE GOV. MANDATING THESE CHANGES…AT THE VERY SAME TIME REMOVING THE FUNDING TO SUPPORT THE CHANGES…ARE YA AWAKE YET ?????
According to the Department of Education one the one hand, the NCLB standards are so flawed so Maine that needs a waiver. On the other hand, those same standards prove that Maine’s schools are not doing what they’re supposed to. What a bizarre analysis.
I feel that most Mainers have a negative opinion of NCLB because both the union and the school establishment have convinced them it is ‘flawed’ and even that it is somehow a Republican artifact, even though it was crafted and championed by Sen. Ted Kennedy(D), chair of the Senate Education Committee to hold states responsible and accountable for implementing the long standing Elementary and Secondary Education Act designed to improve the education of POOR children.
Maine doesn’t do a good job; in fact 1/4th to 1/3rd of students fail to achieve learning standards by the time they graduate; most are poor.
The loophole for states like Maine is to somehow opt out of the Federal system; which under OBAMA has become increasingly difficult. Nor have Democrats come up with a replacement for the basic policy shift initiated by Kennedy and other Democrats; and most distressing is that Republicans have fully bought into the NCLB suite of policies.
As long as Maine takes the Federal money, it must abide by both the spirit and letter of the law; or go it alone…..I feel that the results wouldn’t be much different and perhaps even better if we consider Federal subsidies similar to depending on imported oil.