The value of the Land for Maine’s Future program is obvious this time of year.
Hundreds of shoppers flock Saturday mornings to Crystal Spring Farm in Brunswick to buy local produce, meats, baked goods and prepared foods at a farmers market on intown land that remains a working farm in part because of support from the Land for Maine’s Future program. In addition to putting money in the pockets of Maine farmers, the Saturday market draws potential customers to merchants in a town trying to adjust economically from the loss of 5,000 jobs that departed with the closure of Brunswick Naval Air Station in 2011.
Meanwhile in Manchester, Maine families and visitors comb the trees at Lakeside Orchards in search of the perfect apple. The 13,000 to 18,000 bushels that don’t go home with those pickers find their way to supermarkets, school cafeterias, colleges and hospitals. A conservation easement funded by the Land for Maine’s Future program helped keep alive Lakeside’s 140-year tradition of growing Maine apples, provides healthy local fruit to students and hospital patients, and allowed eight full-time and 20 seasonal workers to stay on the job.
On the coast, at Holbrook’s Wharf in Harpswell and at the Port Clyde Fishermen’s Cooperative in St. George, men and women who make their living from the sea now know that they and their children will retain access to the wharves where generations have loaded and unloaded their catch. Maine’s maritime heritage endures in those waterfront communities because the Land for Maine’s Future program buoyed local conservation efforts with funding designed to ensure that fishing harbors remain a place where Mainers can earn a living.
Inland, leaf peepers visiting from out of state park at vistas such as Height of Land above the Rangeley Lake system or hike trails on Bald Mountain before spending their money at inns and shops in Maine’s rural hamlets. Grants from the Land for Maine’s Trust helped the Rangeley Lakes Heritage Trust buy Bald Mountain and maintain an extensive trail system that attracts snowmobile enthusiasts during the winter.
Maine’s natural resources are priceless, but preserving them requires an occasional investment, which is why the Land for Maine’s Future program has existed for 25 years.
Question 3 on the Nov. 6 state ballot asks voters to borrow $5 million to restock the Land for Maine’s Future coffers. The program’s diverse portfolio of almost 200 proven successes — which includes preserving family farms, working waterfronts and sportsmen’s paradises — offers ample evidence that voting yes represents a sound investment.
A February 2012 study by The Trust for Public Land calculates that “every dollar invested in land conservation through LMF returned $11 in natural goods and services to the Maine economy.”
Question 3 offers more than feel-good euphoria for those who might be inclined to hug a tree. Past Land for Maine’s Future projects have kept more than 500,000 acres open to hunters, anglers and other outdoors enthusiasts. Expanding the Land for Maine’s Future focus, passage of Question 3 will, for the first time, dedicate funding to “make strategic investments in conserving habitat for deer to help restore healthy deer numbers and also benefit countless other wildlife species in the northern half of Maine,” according to the Sportsman’s Alliance of Maine, which endorses the bond.
In many cases, Land for Maine’s Future grants augment private fundraising or pay for easements that allow financially strained property owners to hold onto their land and continue to use it for farming, fishing, hunting and other activities that define the Maine way of life. A yes vote on Question 3 will continue this Maine-based success story.



The folks that benefit most from the LMF bonds are developers and out of staters. The developers get to benefit from higher land prices as a result and the only people that can afford to live there are from out-of state summer rich. It spells the end of the traditional Mainer.
Crystal Spring Farm in Brunswick; Lakeside Orchard in Manchester; Holbrook’s Wharf in Harpswell; Port Clyde Fisherman’s coop; Rangeley Lakes Heritage Trust; more than 500,000 acres open to hunters, anglers and other outdoors enthusiasts; yep – them folks from away are the only ones who benefit from LMF.
Yep and every square foot purchased by the State drives up the price of all remaining land out of the reach of working Mainers and into the hands of wealthy people from away. It also drives up taxes on landowners some to the point that they can no longer afford to keep land that has been in families for generations.
Also the developers love this bond issue and vote for it every time.
Can you back up your claim with facts?
That is hard to do of course. You can look for BDN stories about property taxes and long time Mainers having to sell to meet the obligation. There have been several on the topic over the last few years. The other comment about developers is a little harder as my evidence is anecdotal in the sense that I do business with these guys and we chat over their projects. They tell me that when a purchase of land is made for LMF the price of their nearby lots jumps. The same with realtors is again the same sort of evidence. They would tell your their best clients for rural/vacation waterfront real estate are people from out of state because the locals really can’t afford the price.
I see. So you have no particulars – such as parcel A was sold to someone from away for X dollars and parcel B next door went from X dollars to Y dollars. OK. Then I guess we just take your word for that and dismiss out of hand the good works LMF does for residents, which I’m sure, after reading your comments, amounts to what – maybe 5% of the total – with 95% or more of the help going to people from away?
Like all things the LMF is a double edged sword. People from southern Maine get to visit scenic state run vistas for the day and Realtors and developers make money. The one thing I do know is they smile when the bond issue comes up and they aren’t making any more land.
lets pay for the bonds we have now. Bonds just raise taxes
Why would we want to wade into those waters so we can attach ourselves financially to the leech?
All of you already under the water by virtue of having swallowed the worm should not take a deep breath when I suggest that there are always other undiscovered means to ends whenever solutions are needed.
Regardless of how many times we approve a bond to address a specific cause they keep coming back every election cycle. They are always made to appear more appealing by noting the amount in matching federal funds, as though we didn’t pay federal taxes too.
Here is the list:
roads & transportation
land purchase
UMaine
education in general
wastewater/sewage/and home heating
Grants to towns & business development
Isn’t it time we stop approving these “temporary” budget oversights?
Shouldn’t Maine pay off the more than $1 billion of debt it already owes before taking on more?
http://www.maine.gov/treasurer/debts_bonds/debt_summary.html
I totally agree. I don’t know what the state pays for interest but one billion dollars at 2% interest is 20 million dollars a year the state has to raise just for interest.
I agree. Vote yes on 3.
Good or bad , it doesn’t really matter…WE CAN’T AFFORD IT…Time to start living within our means and stop putting stuff we want , not need on a credit card…
Must be we can. LePage plans on re4moving Corporate income tax. If the State can afford that, we must be sitting pretty! Don’t hear any Repubs whining about that.