Daria Dugina was killed Saturday in a car bombing.
In this handout photo taken from video released by Investigative Committee of Russia on Sunday, investigators work on the site of explosion of a car driven by Daria Dugina outside Moscow. Credit: Courtesy of the Investigative Committee of Russia via AP

The BDN Opinion section operates independently and does not set newsroom policies or contribute to reporting or editing articles elsewhere in the newspaper or on bangordailynews.com.

“I am a political observer of the International Eurasianist Movement and an expert in international relations. … In this capacity, I appear on Russian, Pakistani, Turkish, Chinese and Indian television channels. … The situation in Ukraine is really an example of a clash of civilizations; it can be seen as a clash between globalist and Eurasian civilization.”

That’s how Daria Dugina, who was killed on Saturday evening outside Moscow by a car bomb, described herself last May in an interview with an obscure far-right Breton website, Breizh-info.com. (“Globalist” in far-right Russian circles means the United States, NATO or “the West”; “Eurasian” is just a more expansive way of saying “Russian.”)

The car bomb that killed the 29-year-old philosopher and journalist was probably intended for her father Alexander Dugin, also a philosopher and sometimes called “Putin’s Brain” by the foreign media because of his alleged influence on the Russian president. They had driven together to an event supporting the Russian invasion of Ukraine where Dugin spoke. He took another car home and so escaped the bomb, but they were very close.

The “path of truth” they were both on was Neoplatonism, a style of early Christian mysticism so abstruse and absurd that I will not try to explain it here beyond saying it’s big on ideal forms and not so keen on matter. It remained fashionable in parts of the Orthodox church, and has recently found favor with Russian ultranationalists.

But Daria Neoplatonova (Dugina’s pseudonym as a writer) was not murdered for saying “The main line of thought in late Neoplatonist political philosophy is the development of the idea of a homology of the soul and the state and the existence of a similar threefold order in both.” Her father was not targeted for his dangerous ideas either.

I never met Dugina, but I interviewed her father about a dozen years ago, when he was still believed to be close to Vladimir Putin. (He certainly isn’t now, and has even lost his job at Moscow State University.) My Russian was pretty rusty by then, so I took an interpreter along to the interview in his modest flat.

Dugin proceeded to expand in great detail on the wrongs inflicted on the Russian soul by wicked foreigners and the need for an “existential politics” to counter them, but there were few concrete policy ideas among the shower of abstract nouns.

I also noticed that the translator was leaving out quite a lot of what he was saying. I thought he was just going too fast for her, but when I asked her afterward, she said she had been too embarrassed by some of what he said. He wasn’t ranting, exactly, but the nationalist paranoia was unrelenting and overwhelming.

The point is that neither father nor daughter was an important target in terms of their influence on Russian policy, which pretty much rules out any Russian motive for killing either of them. Dugina was an enthusiastic supporter of the attack on Ukraine — she even visited the conquered city of Mariupol — but she was just another cheerleader.

So who planted the bomb? Almost certainly somebody Ukrainian who was part of that country’s extensive intelligence network in Russia or some Russian underworld figure paid by the Ukrainians. (There are about 2 million Ukrainians living in Russia.)

Was it terrorism? Yes, in the very specific sense that its motive must have been to show that Ukraine could strike anywhere in Russia with impunity, and thereby terrorize Russians into abandoning their invasion of Ukraine. (It probably won’t have that effect, but that’s the only plausible motive.)

Will it harm the Ukrainian cause in terms of public opinion elsewhere? A little bit, maybe, because blowing up young women is never a good look, but probably only for a short time. It’s a war, and on the same day Russian shelling wounded 12 civilians, including four children, in the Ukrainian town of Vosnesensk.

What’s the difference, apart from the fact that the Russian gunners didn’t know the names of their victims, and the Ukrainian who planted the bomb that killed Dugina didn’t wear a uniform?

Avatar photo

Gwynne Dyer, Opinion columnist

Gwynne Dyer is a London-based independent journalist whose commentary is published in 45 countries.