The LePage Administration’s proposed $221 million in cuts to the Department of Health and Human Services budget threaten the health and well-being of 65,000 Maine seniors, children, families and disabled persons. At recent hearings, legislators heard testimony that put a human face on these numbers.

Kelley Cash, CEO of Maine Veterans Homes, told legislators his organization “would have to close permanently all six of its assisted living facilities for Maine veterans.”

“Today, the typical private non-medical institutions for the elderly [PNMI] resident is an 81-year old woman (70 percent) who has been widowed (89 percent),” Richard Erb, president and CEO of Maine Health Care Association told legislators. “What is especially troubling to me, after participating in good faith, is that DHHS has somehow made the leap from examining and changing PNMIs to their outright elimination.”

“My wife and [I] are on MaineCare and we are 75 and 76 years old,” Bernard Corbin of Waterville testified. “The only income we have is our Social Security. We go to [the] food bank every week. We have very little savings in the bank. I don’t know how we are going to buy medicine.”

Legislators were told that contrary to LePage administration’ assertions, Maine faces a health care crisis, not a Medicaid funding crisis.

They also heard that these cuts would further damage Maine’s fragile economic recovery.

The health care industry is a major economic engine and source of jobs in Maine, accounting for approximately one in four private sector jobs across the state. In Penobscot and Washington counties, approximately one out of every three private sector jobs is in the health care industry. State and federal Medicaid payments of $2.3 billion to 3,500 health care providers statewide in fiscal year 2011 directly and indirectly supported 40,526 jobs.

A Maine Center for Economic Policy analysis found that these cuts will result in the loss of nearly 4,500 jobs across all counties statewide, including more than 1,000 in Cumberland County alone. In addition to the devastating human costs, these cuts will have a chilling effect on Maine’s economy as we continue to dig our way out of the worst recession in 70 years.

Maine has lost more than 4,500 jobs since January 2011, according to the most recent Maine Department of Labor data. The job losses resulting from the proposed budget cuts to Medicaid will further worsen Maine’s employment picture and the prospects for future growth.

The cuts will also cause Maine to lose federal matching funds, costing the state’s economy hundreds of millions more. Under the new federal Affordable Care Act, cuts made now will likely mean Maine must spend more, not less, on Medicaid down the road. This is penny-wise and pound-foolish because people who lose their health insurance now will forgo treatment and cost more to cover when they reenter the program in 2014.

The LePage administration argues its proposal will merely bring Maine in line with national Medicaid enrollment numbers. In fact, because of the ACA, other states are actually moving toward the Maine standard. The new federal law will also provide subsidies to those who lose coverage and cannot afford private options.

Currently, there is no such alternative for the 65,000 people slated to lose coverage under the LePage administration’s proposal.

The loss of health care for 65,000 Mainers and the loss of nearly 4,500 Maine jobs are only the tip of the iceberg. The proposed cuts will also result in tremendous cost shifts as those who lose health care coverage show up at emergency rooms for more expensive treatment with the costs passed on to health care providers, insurers and premium holders.

The last time Maine faced a fiscal challenge of this magnitude was during the McKernan administration in the early 1990s. Policymakers averted crisis then with a bipartisan, balanced approach, one that considered both spending cuts and increased revenues. We need our leaders to adopt a similar mindset toward our current dilemma.

As the recent Bangor Daily News editorial said about the LePage administration’s proposal, “a lot more work needs to be done before any decisions about budget cuts can be made.” It will have devastating effects on real Mainers — working families, children, seniors and disabled individuals who will be denied critically important services. The proposed cuts will undermine programs for those hardest hit by the recession, cost thousands of jobs, shift costs and put our economic future at risk.

Slashing services and critical investments just when we need them most is not the remedy for our current problems. Working together with all options, including additional revenues, on the table is the cure Maine needs our leaders to prescribe in the New Year.

Garrett Martin is executive director of the Maine Center for Economic Policy.

Join the Conversation

15 Comments

  1. I admire Mr. Martin’s altruistic zeal and earnestly hope that all those who truly want to help the needy will assess their net worth and give the greater part of their wealth to ease the suffering of their brothers and sisters.

      1. The IRS has no legal authority to tax wealth at this time other than the inheritance tax.  But that appears to be where progressives are headed next.  To tax not just income, but to tax actual wealth, also known as  assets.  That would be the end of our country as a republic and make us no better than dictatorships and communist countries.  Then again, progressives have always hated the fact that the US is a republic and the freedoms it grants individuals.

        What progressives fail to understand is where this will lead.  At current rates of spending you could spend the entire wealth of not just the top 1%, but of the top 10% in only a few years.  At that point in order to continue the spending it will be necessary to tax the wealth of people with fewer assets.  The process will continue until almost everyone’s wealth is taxed at some level.  Just look at the history of the income tax, originally it only applied to the top few percent of earners.

        1. well  “wealthy are the problem”  Just how much do you think the ones at the top should have?

          In 1981 average salaries for the securities industry in New York City were $85,000 verses $43,000 for all other sectors in New York City In 2010 that number had changed Average salary for Wall St. $361,000 verses $66,000 for all other sectors. So the ratio has grown from about 2-1 to 6 -1 The 400 richest families in America have more wealth than the bottom 150 million people. The bottom 80% of us now have 7% of the wealth. The top 10% control two thirds of the nations wealth Almost all the growth in wealth since Reaganomics began went to the top 10% 2007-2009 Wall Street profits up 720% Unemployment rate up 102% American’s home equity down 35% In 1979 average CEO made 25-40 times what average worker made. They now make 250-400 times as much. Since 1950, federal payroll tax revenue went from 10% of the total, to over 40% Corporate effective tax rate went from about 25% to about 8% of total federal tax revenue Average loss/gain in income per household from 1979 to 2005 top 1% + $597,241 more next 4% + $29,8985 more next4% + $4,912 more next 10% – $3,733 less next 20% – $8,598 less next 20% – $10,100 less next 20% – $8,582 less bottom 20% – $5,623 less Normalized to 1979, the top 1% have seen their share of America’s income more than double. The bottom 90% have seen their portion shrink Since 1990: US corporate profits: +200% corporate employee compensation: +20% median family income: +2% Since 2000: US corporate profits: +80% corporate employee compensation: +8% median family income: -5% (All figures are inflation-adjusted.) Source: Sacramento Bee

          1. The 6 Walton heirs now have $93 billion, or 93,000 million. That is more than the entire wealth of the bottom 30% of Americans, or 96 million people. And they still can’t afford to pay a living wage. Everyone should think long and hard about that before they give those greedy brats another nickel.

          2. Watch “Hardcore Pawn” on TruTV  and you will get a glimpse of WHY many of those in the bottom 30% are where they are economically.

            And it isn’t the fault of the rich or the Waltons in particular.

          3. The statistics are great.  But they show no understanding of the reasons WHY.  Or of any realistic or practical solutions to the problem.

        2. Taxes are a necessary evil and should be shouldered by everyone according to their ability. The problem is not our tax rates, it is the lack of jobs that pay a living wage and therefore pay taxes. The dim wits in Washington forgot to consider the consequences when they held the door open for companies to pack up and move to China by enacting “free” trade. The wages are stuck right where they were when the factories left. Guess what? They don’t pay any taxes because inflation has eaten up their paychecks and they are now poverty level. HALF of America is now at poverty level or below. Anyone who tries to pin that on too many taxes is a fool. Anyone who tries to pin that on welfare abuse is a fool. Anyone who tries to blame that on the 7% of private union members that are left is beyond a fool. We have been going head to head with the Chinese for the last 20 years. How has that been working for our economy? lol. Our standard of living has been sliding straight into the toilet for the last 20 years. We are the first generation of Americans to have a lower standard of living than our parents did. We are running a $350 billion trade DEFICIT with a communist regime. We owe that same pack of commies over $1 trillion and climbing. We keep sending our jobs and our money to China and then wonder why we don’t have any decent jobs or any money. The Republicans and the Democrats do not have any solutions, even though they created the problem. They were simply trying to pander to the ultra wealthy by giving them unlimited access to cheap Chinese labor and no environmental or worker safety laws. They were all for getting everyone over heerre working part time for $7.50 an hour. They just forgot to realize that people who only make $7.50 an hour do not pay any taxes and are eligible for every government block of cheese there is. 

          1. Yes, starting at 30 k or so. Below that is poverty level and the poor should be cared for, not taxed. I do not have all the answers, but I know we are sailing in the wrong direction. I may be a snipe, but I can read a chart and use a compass.

            ——————————

          2. Should the government then increase the marginal income tax rates on those making above $250k/yr? Would that solve our financial problems and bring about social justice?

          3. I agree with most of your points completely, especially about free trade.  The basic problem with our economy is the long term negative balance of trade.  In effect we have been exporting our wealth to other countries and most of that wealth has come from the middle class.  (There are logical economic reasons why that wealth has come from the middle class and it is a disaster for the US.)  We have exchanged good paying manufacturing jobs for lower paying service sector jobs and the unintended consequences are finally coming due.

            There are a couple of points I do disagree with. 

            When you say that “Taxes are a necessary evil and should be shouldered by everyone according to their ability.” I get the impression that you believe the poor should pay nothing and the rich pay even more.  Basic Progressive thought, but this is exactly one of the reasons we are where we are.  When the poor no longer pay any income taxes they are insulated from the direct economic consequences of increased government programs while they are getting hammered by the hidden unintended consequences of those programs.

            Blaming the rich for what has happened is not productive and isn’t even accurate.  Almost every law, rule, and regulation that has led us to this place can be traced back to politicians.  Politicians that suffer from the sins of greed and ego are part of it.  But much of the blame can also be traced to politicians who push laws and programs with the best of intentions without understanding either long term or unintended consequenses of those laws and programs.

  2. I urge everyone to search up a BDN article from September 29th, 2010 entitled Hospitals Face Challenges This Year. At that point, the state of Maine owed hospitals at least $300 million for Maine Care services. Hospitals around the state were laying off staff, not hiring to fill positions, and cutting wages. I wonder if the MCEP could do an analysis of how many jobs the lack of paying its bills costs the state of Maine. Maine has not been able to afford its MaineCare for over 10 years. The last year of the Baldacci administration saw some effort to repay some of the debt through the use of federal stimulus funds–funds no longer available to the state. How many jobs have been lost in Maine due to the state not paying its bills? How much cost shift has been going on over the years because the state is promising services to people that it cannot pay for?
    I support LePage’s efforts to make Maine Care a system that the state can afford to pay for. Not paying for it has been costing the state and its people more money than fixing it now will cost.

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *